Selection and optimisation of biventricular pacing: the role of echocardiography

R E Lane, A W C Chow, D Chin, J Mayet, R E Lane, A W C Chow, D Chin, J Mayet

Abstract

The quantification of ventricular dyssynchrony is a key factor in identifying patients with severe heart failure who may benefit from cardiac resynchronisation with biventricular pacing (BVP). Echocardiographic techniques appear to offer superior sensitivity and specificity than the ECG in selecting these patients. This paper reviews the scope of current echocardiographic techniques for guiding both patient selection and optimisation of device programming following implantation.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
M mode echocardiogram showing paradoxical left ventricular septal wall contraction and late systolic/early diastolic thickening of the posterior wall.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reduction in regional ejection fraction (septal regions 2 and 3) on MUGA scan in the patient in fig 1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Optimisation of atrioventricular delay. Left ventricular (LV) inflow pulsed wave Doppler at the level of mitral valve leaflets. (A) Atrioventricular (AV) delay 160 ms: uniphasic transmitral flow (fused E and A wave) with reduced left ventricular filling time (t)

Figure 4

Presystolic mitral regurgitation in the…

Figure 4

Presystolic mitral regurgitation in the patient from fig 1. The arrow indicates the…

Figure 4
Presystolic mitral regurgitation in the patient from fig 1. The arrow indicates the frame is acquired before onset of the QRS complex.

Figure 5

Aortic pre-ejection time (Ao) is…

Figure 5

Aortic pre-ejection time (Ao) is measured as the time from QRS onset to…

Figure 5
Aortic pre-ejection time (Ao) is measured as the time from QRS onset to blood flow. The time from the aortic valve opening to closure represents the ejection period (EP).

Figure 6

Pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging…

Figure 6

Pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging of the basal interventricular septum acquired from an…

Figure 6
Pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging of the basal interventricular septum acquired from an apical four chamber view. A broad complex QRS is seen. The upward deflection following QRS complex represents longitudinal shortening toward the transducer during ventricular systole (S wave). The two main deflections below the baseline represent E and A waves occurring during ventricular filling as the sampled region moves away from the transducer at the cardiac apex. The heights of S, E, and A waves (cm/s) measure the velocities of motion of the sampled region during systole and diastole respectively. Regional electromechanical delay (EMD) may be calculated from the start of QRS to the onset or peak of the S wave.

Figure 7

Three dimensional reconstruction of the…

Figure 7

Three dimensional reconstruction of the left ventricle, which is divided into different regions.…

Figure 7
Three dimensional reconstruction of the left ventricle, which is divided into different regions. The timing of contraction and relaxation is assessed for each of these regions.

Figure 8

Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular…

Figure 8

Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony. Each line represents movement of one of…

Figure 8
Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony. Each line represents movement of one of the left ventricular segments shown in fig 7. This ventricle contracts synchronously.

Figure 9

Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular…

Figure 9

Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony. This shows an abnormal, dyssynchronous ventricle.

Figure 9
Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony. This shows an abnormal, dyssynchronous ventricle.

Figure 10

(A) LV velocity time integral…

Figure 10

(A) LV velocity time integral (VTI) of 10.3 cm with an optimised AV…

Figure 10
(A) LV velocity time integral (VTI) of 10.3 cm with an optimised AV delay at an interventricular pacing interval (IVPI) of 0 ms. (B) The same patient with an LV VTI of 12.9 cm at an IVPI delay of 20 ms (LV ahead of RV).
All figures (10)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Presystolic mitral regurgitation in the patient from fig 1. The arrow indicates the frame is acquired before onset of the QRS complex.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Aortic pre-ejection time (Ao) is measured as the time from QRS onset to blood flow. The time from the aortic valve opening to closure represents the ejection period (EP).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging of the basal interventricular septum acquired from an apical four chamber view. A broad complex QRS is seen. The upward deflection following QRS complex represents longitudinal shortening toward the transducer during ventricular systole (S wave). The two main deflections below the baseline represent E and A waves occurring during ventricular filling as the sampled region moves away from the transducer at the cardiac apex. The heights of S, E, and A waves (cm/s) measure the velocities of motion of the sampled region during systole and diastole respectively. Regional electromechanical delay (EMD) may be calculated from the start of QRS to the onset or peak of the S wave.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Three dimensional reconstruction of the left ventricle, which is divided into different regions. The timing of contraction and relaxation is assessed for each of these regions.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony. Each line represents movement of one of the left ventricular segments shown in fig 7. This ventricle contracts synchronously.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony. This shows an abnormal, dyssynchronous ventricle.
Figure 10
Figure 10
(A) LV velocity time integral (VTI) of 10.3 cm with an optimised AV delay at an interventricular pacing interval (IVPI) of 0 ms. (B) The same patient with an LV VTI of 12.9 cm at an IVPI delay of 20 ms (LV ahead of RV).

References

    1. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;26(1 Pt 2):169-74
    1. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;26(1 Pt 2):137-43
    1. Eur J Heart Fail. 2003 Jun;5(3):305-13
    1. Circulation. 2004 Mar 2;109(8):978-83
    1. N Engl J Med. 2004 May 20;350(21):2140-50
    1. Am Heart J. 1977 May;93(5):596-602
    1. Circulation. 1989 Apr;79(4):845-53
    1. Br Heart J. 1991 Dec;66(6):443-7
    1. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993 Oct;16(10):2034-43
    1. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994 Nov;17(11 Pt 2):1980-3
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Feb;27(2):421-30
    1. G Ital Cardiol. 1997 Jun;27(6):593-9
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Oct;32(4):865-75
    1. Jpn Circ J. 2000 Aug;64(8):579-82
    1. Heart. 2000 Sep;84(3):272-6
    1. Circulation. 2000 Dec 19;102(25):3053-9
    1. N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 22;344(12):873-80
    1. Z Kardiol. 2001;90 Suppl 1:10-5
    1. Heart. 2001 May;85(5):514-20
    1. Eur J Heart Fail. 2001 Aug;3(4):441-7
    1. Cardiology. 2001;95(4):173-82
    1. Am J Cardiol. 2001 Oct 15;88(8):858-62
    1. Am Heart J. 2002 Jan;143(1):34-44
    1. Am J Cardiol. 2002 Feb 1;89(3):346-50
    1. Eur J Heart Fail. 2002 Jan;4(1):83-90
    1. Circulation. 2002 Jan 29;105(4):438-45
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Feb 6;39(3):489-99
    1. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 13;346(24):1845-53
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Aug 21;40(4):723-30
    1. Circulation. 2002 Oct 1;106(14):1760-3
    1. Circulation. 2002 Oct 15;106(16):2078-84
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Nov 6;40(9):1615-22
    1. Heart. 2003 Jan;89(1):54-60
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Mar 5;41(5):765-70
    1. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Feb;26(2 Pt 1):562-70

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe