Analgesic effectiveness of rectus sheath block during open gastrectomy: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial

Seongwook Hong, Hyunjeong Kim, Junmo Park, Seongwook Hong, Hyunjeong Kim, Junmo Park

Abstract

Background: Despite recent advances in gastric cancer surgery, open gastrectomy is often needed to treat gastric cancer. Due to the large incision in the abdomen, the amount of opioid required during surgery increases and postoperative pain becomes worse. It is well known that postoperative pain has a negative impact on the patient's immune system. Herein, we performed an ultrasound-guided bilateral rectus sheath block (RSB) in patients undergoing open gastrectomy under general anesthesia and analyzed the analgesic effectiveness of RSB in open gastrectomy.

Methods: A total of 46 patients scheduled for open gastrectomy were randomly divided into 2 groups: Group A (n = 21) consisted of patients who received an RSB using 40 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine under ultrasound guidance and Group B (n = 20) consisted of patients who received an RSB using 40 mL of normal saline. An electronic injection pump was connected to each patient for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) immediately after the skin closure. The amount of remifentanil required during the surgery was analyzed. After using PCA, data on the use of PCA bolus dose were extracted and analyzed using Excel.

Results: Group A used significantly less remifentanil (1021.4 ± 172.0 μg) than group B (1415.0 ± 330.6 μg; P = .03). The number of PCA bolus dose provided to the patients after surgery was significantly lower in group A (1 h: 1.14 ± 0.9, 2 h: 0.85 ± 0.7) than in group B (1 h: 1.85 ± 0.7, 2 h: 1.45 ± 1.0) until 2 hours after the surgery (1 h, P = .008; 2 h, P = .03), but after 3 hours, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: If ultrasound-guided bilateral RSB with 40 mL of 0.35% ropivacaine is performed precisely in patients undergoing open gastrectomy, the requirement for remifentanil during surgery can be reduced. In addition, it significantly reduces the use of PCA bolus dose for acute postoperative pain within 2 hours after surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flowchart showing the patients included in enrollment, group allocation, follow-up, and analysis phases of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Requirement of remifentanil. Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The amount of remifentanil required during surgery was significantly lower in group A (1021.4 ± 172.0 ug) than in group B (1415.0 ± 330.6 ug). (P = .003). ∗ P < .05 significant difference between groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The number of bolus doses administered to a patient. The numbers of the bolus dose of PCA administered to the patient after surgery was significantly lower in group A (1 hour = 1.14 ± 0.9, 2 hours = 0.85 ± 0.7) than in group B (1 hour = 1.85 ± 0.7, 2 hours = 1.45 ± 1.0) from immediately after the operation until 2 hours after the operation (1 hour, P = .008; 2 hours, P = .03), but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups after 3 hours. ∗ P < .05 significant difference between groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Frequency of rescue analgesic drug administered to patients in each group. Group A had significantly lower rescue analgesic drug use in the anesthesia recovery room than group B (P = .01), but at 6 and 12 hours after the surgery, group A was higher than group B (6 h, P = .048; 12 h, P = .02). At other times, however, there was no difference between the 2 groups. ∗ P < .05 significant difference between groups.

References

    1. Van Cutsem E, Sagaert X, Topal B, et al. Gastric cancer. Lancet 2016;388:2654–64.
    1. Waddell T, Verheij M, Allum W, et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014;40:584–91.
    1. Juneja R. Opioids and cancer recurrence. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2014;8:91–101.
    1. Cruz FF, Rocco PR, Pelosi P. Anti-inflammatory properties of anesthetic agents. Crit Care 2017;21:67.
    1. Snyder GL, Greenberg S. Effect of anaesthetic technique and other perioperative factors on cancer recurrence. Br J Anaesth 2010;105:106–15.
    1. Jin F, Chung F. Minimizing perioperative adverse events in the elderly. Br J Anaesth 2001;87:608–24.
    1. Abdelsalam K, Mohamdin OW. Ultrasound-guided rectus sheath and transversus abdominis plane blocks for perioperative analgesia in upper abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled study. Saudi J Anaesth 2016;10:25–8.
    1. Jin F, Li Z, Tan WF, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block for improving pain, sleep quality and cytokine levels in patients with open midline incisions undergoing transabdominal gynecological surgery: a randomized-controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2018;18:19.
    1. Karaarslan E, Topal A, Avci O, et al. Research on the efficacy of the rectus sheath block method. Agri 2018;30:183–8.
    1. Cho S, Kim YJ, Jeong K, et al. Ultrasound-guided bilateral rectus sheath block reduces early postoperative pain after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a randomized study. J Anesth 2018;32:189–97.
    1. Marhofer P, Greher M, Kapral S. Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2005;94:7–17.
    1. Sites BD, Brull R. Ultrasound guidance in peripheral regional anesthesia: philosophy, evidence-based medicine, and techniques. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2006;19:630–9.
    1. Finnerty O, Carney J, McDonnell JG. Trunk blocks for abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 2010;65suppl 1:76–83.
    1. Yassin HM, Abd Elmoneim AT, El Moutaz H. The analgesic efficiency of ultrasound-guided rectus sheath analgesia compared with low thoracic epidural analgesia after elective abdominal surgery with a midline incision: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Pain Med 2017;7:e14244.
    1. Osaka Y, Kashiwagi M, Nagatsuka Y, et al. Ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block for upper abdominal surgery. Masui 2010;59:1039–41.
    1. Sandeman DJ, Dilley AV. Ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block and catheter placement. ANZ J Surg 2008;78:621–3.
    1. Rozen WM, Tran TM, Ashton MW, et al. Refining the course of the thoracolumbar nerves: a new understanding of the innervation of the anterior abdominal wall. Clin Anat 2008;21:325–33.
    1. Crosbie EJ, Massiah NS, Achiampong JY, et al. The surgical rectus sheath block for post-operative analgesia: a modern approach to an established technique. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012;160:196–200.
    1. Smith BE, MacPhearson GH, Jonge M, et al. Rectus sheath and mesosalpinx block for laparoscopic sterilization. Anesthesia 1991;46:875–7.
    1. Smith BE, Suchak M, Siggins D, et al. Rectus sheath block for diagnostic laparoscopy. Anesthesia 1988;43:947–8.
    1. Yentis SM, Hills-Wright P, Potparic O. Development and evaluation of combined rectus sheath and ilioinguinal blocks for abdominal gynaecological surgery. Anaesthesia 1999;54:475–9.
    1. Al-Hashimi M, Scott SW, Thompson JP, et al. Opioids and immune modulation: more questions than answers. Br J Anaesth 2013;111:80–8.
    1. Sun Y, Li T, Gan TJ. The effects of perioperative regional anesthesia and analgesia on cancer recurrence and survival after oncology surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2015;40:589–98.
    1. Grandhi RK, Lee S, Abd-Elsayed A. The relationship between regional anesthesia and cancer: a metaanalysis. Ochsner J 2017;17:345–61.
    1. Tedore T. Regional anaesthesia and analgesia: relationship to cancer recurrence and survival. Br J Anaesth 2015;115suppl 2:ii34–45.
    1. Dutton TJ, McGrath JS, Daugherty MO. Use of rectus sheath catheters for pain relief in patients undergoing major pelvic urologicalsurgery. BJU Int 2014;113:246–53.
    1. Bakshi SG, Mapari A, Shylasree TS. REctus Sheath block for postoperative analgesia in gynecological ONcology Surgery (RESONS): a randomized-controlled trial. Can J Anaesth 2016;63:1335–44.
    1. Purdy M, Kinnunen M, Kokki M, et al. A prospective, randomized, open label, controlled study investigating the efficiency and safety of 3 different methods of rectus sheath block analgesia following midline laparotomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e9968.
    1. Webster K. Ultrasound guided rectus sheath block: analgesia for abdominal surgery. Update Anaesth 2010;26:12–7.
    1. Wilkinson KM, Krige A, Brearley SG, et al. Thoracic Epidural analgesia versus Rectus Sheath Catheters for open midline incisions in major abdominal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme (TERSC): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2014;15:400.
    1. Grass JA. Patient-controlled analgesia. Anesth Analg 2005;101(5 suppl):S44–61.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe