Comparison of the safety and pharmacokinetics of ST-246® after i.v. infusion or oral administration in mice, rabbits and monkeys

Yali Chen, Adams Amantana, Shanthakumar R Tyavanagimatt, Daniela Zima, X Steven Yan, Gopi Kasi, Morgan Weeks, Melialani A Stone, William C Weimers, Peter Samuel, Ying Tan, Kevin F Jones, Daniel R Lee, Shirley S Kickner, Bradley M Saville, Martin Lauzon, Alan McIntyre, Kady M Honeychurch, Robert Jordan, Dennis E Hruby, Janet M Leeds, Yali Chen, Adams Amantana, Shanthakumar R Tyavanagimatt, Daniela Zima, X Steven Yan, Gopi Kasi, Morgan Weeks, Melialani A Stone, William C Weimers, Peter Samuel, Ying Tan, Kevin F Jones, Daniel R Lee, Shirley S Kickner, Bradley M Saville, Martin Lauzon, Alan McIntyre, Kady M Honeychurch, Robert Jordan, Dennis E Hruby, Janet M Leeds

Abstract

Background: ST-246® is an antiviral, orally bioavailable small molecule in clinical development for treatment of orthopoxvirus infections. An intravenous (i.v.) formulation may be required for some hospitalized patients who are unable to take oral medication. An i.v. formulation has been evaluated in three species previously used in evaluation of both efficacy and toxicology of the oral formulation.

Methodology/principal findings: The pharmacokinetics of ST-246 after i.v. infusions in mice, rabbits and nonhuman primates (NHP) were compared to those obtained after oral administration. Ten minute i.v. infusions of ST-246 at doses of 3, 10, 30, and 75 mg/kg in mice produced peak plasma concentrations ranging from 16.9 to 238 µg/mL. Elimination appeared predominately first-order and exposure dose-proportional up to 30 mg/kg. Short i.v. infusions (5 to 15 minutes) in rabbits resulted in rapid distribution followed by slower elimination. Intravenous infusions in NHP were conducted at doses of 1 to 30 mg/kg. The length of single infusions in NHP ranged from 4 to 6 hours. The pharmacokinetics and tolerability for the two highest doses were evaluated when administered as two equivalent 4 hour infusions initiated 12 hours apart. Terminal elimination half-lives in all species for oral and i.v. infusions were similar. Dose-limiting central nervous system effects were identified in all three species and appeared related to high C(max) plasma concentrations. These effects were eliminated using slower i.v. infusions.

Conclusions/significance: Pharmacokinetic profiles after i.v. infusion compared to those observed after oral administration demonstrated the necessity of longer i.v. infusions to (1) mimic the plasma exposure observed after oral administration and (2) avoid C(max) associated toxicity. Shorter infusions at higher doses in NHP resulted in decreased clearance, suggesting saturated distribution or elimination. Elimination half-lives in all species were similar between oral and i.v. administration. The administration of ST-246 was well tolerated as a slow i.v. infusion.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Yali Chen, Adams Amantana, Shanthakumar R. Tyavanagimatt, Daniela Zima , X. Steven Yan, Gopi Kasi, Morgan Weeks, Melialani A. Stone, William C. Weimers, Peter Samuel, Ying Tan, Kevin F. Jones, Daniel R. Lee, Shirley S. Kickner, Kady M. Honeychurch, Robert Jordan, Dennis E. Hruby and Janet M. Leeds are employees of SIGA Technologies. Bradley M. Saville, Martin Lauzon and Alan McIntyre are employees of Charles River Laboratories. ST-246 is patented (US Patent No. for ST-246 is 7,737,168 issued on June 15, 2010) and currently being evaluated in clinical development. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.

Figures

Figure 1. Plasma concentration time curves for…
Figure 1. Plasma concentration time curves for oral and IV administration of ST-246 in mice.
The means and standard deviations of the plasma concentrations over time are shown after oral administration of ST-246 to female BALB/c mice at doses of 30 (chartreuse hexagons) and 1000 mg/kg (purple squares). The means and standard deviations of the plasma concentrations over time after 10 minute IV infusions to female CD-1 mice at 3 (red circles), 10 (blue triangles), 30 (black triangles), and 75 mg/kg (green diamonds). Each time point is the mean value from three individual mice.
Figure 2. Plasma concentrations over time after…
Figure 2. Plasma concentrations over time after IV and oral administration in New Zealand White Rabbits.
Plasma concentrations of ST-246 over time are shown after oral administration of 100 mg/kg (purple squares); bolus IV administration of 1 mg/kg (red circles); or a 5- minute IV slow push of 3 (blue triangles), 30 (black triangles), or 60 mg/kg (green diamonds). A 15-minute IV infusion of 3 mg/kg (blue hexagons) is also shown. Each curve is the mean with standard deviations from two male and two female rabbits.
Figure 3. ST-246 plasma concentrations over time…
Figure 3. ST-246 plasma concentrations over time after oral or 4 hours IV infusions in cynomolgus monkeys.
Plasma concentration of ST-246 after a single oral dose of 3 (chartreuse hexagons), 10 (purple squares), or 30 mg/kg (white circles) compared to the plasma concentration time curves after 4 hour IV infusion of 1 (red circles), 3 (blue triangles), 10 (black triangles), or 30 mg/kg (green diamonds) in cynomolgus monkeys. Each curve shows the means and standard deviations. For oral administration there were 3 males and 3 females in each dose group while for the IV infusion there were 2 males and 2 females in each dose group.
Figure 4. Exposure after different dosing regimens…
Figure 4. Exposure after different dosing regimens of either 20 or 30 mg/kg ST-246 to cynomolgus monkeys.
The mean and standard deviation values for the plasma concentrations over time are shown for different dosing regimens of (A) 20 mg/kg or (B) 30 mg/kg. The dosing regimens included oral administration (3 males and 3 females in each dose group, green diamonds), 4 hour IV infusion (2 males and 2 females in each dose group, red circles), 6 hour IV infusion (2 males and 2 females in each dose group, blue diamonds), and BID two 4 hour IV infusions initiated 12 hours apart (4 males and 4 females in each dose group, black diamonds).

References

    1. Nafziger SD. Smallpox. Crit Care Clin. 2005;21(4):739–46.
    1. Duclos P, Okwo-Bele J-M, Gacic-Dobo M, Cherian T. Global immunization: status, progress, challenges and future. BMC International Health and Human Rights. 2009;9(Suppl 1):S2.
    1. Bolken TC, Hruby DE. Tecovirimat for smallpox infections. Drugs Today (Barc) 2010;46(2):109–17.
    1. Parker S, Nuara A, Buller RM, Schultz DA. Human monkeypox: an emerging zoonotic disease.”. Future Microbiol. 2007;2:17–34.
    1. Kaiser J. A Tame Virus Runs Amok. Science. 2007;316(5830):1418–9.
    1. Nitsche A, Kurth A, Pauli G. Viremia in human Cowpox virus infection. J Clin Virol. 2007;40(2):160–2.
    1. Learned LA, Reynolds MG, Wassa DW, Li Y, Olson VA, et al. Extended interhuman transmission of monkeypox in a hospital community in the Republic of the Congo, 2003. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73(2):428–434.
    1. Hutin YJ, Williams RJ, Malfait P, Pebody R, Loparev VN, et al. Outbreak of human monkeypox, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1996 to 1997. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(3):434–8.
    1. Eriksson U, Peterson LW, Kashemirov BA, Hilfinger JM, Drach JC, et al. Serine peptide phosphoester prodrugs of cyclic cidofovir: synthesis, transport, and antiviral activity. Mol Pharm. 2008;5(4):598–609.
    1. Quenelle DC, Collins DJ, Kern ER. Efficacy of multiple- or single-dose cidofovir against vaccinia and cowpox virus infections in mice.”. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(10):3275–80.
    1. Smee DF. Progress in the discovery of compounds inhibiting orthopoxviruses in animal models. Antivir Chem Chemother. 2008;19 (3) Review:115–24.
    1. Goff A, Twenhafel N, Garrison A, Mucker E, Lawler J, et al. In vivo imaging of cidofovir treatment of cowpox virus infection.”. Virus Res. 2007;128(1–2):88–98.
    1. Geerinck K, Lukito G, Snoeck R, De Vos R, De Clercq E. A case of human orf in an immunocompromised patient treated successfully with cidofovir cream. J Med Virol. 2001;64(4):543–9.
    1. McCabe D, Weston B, Storch G. Treatment of orf poxvirus lesion with cidofovir cream.”. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003;22(11):1027–8.
    1. Baker RO, Bray M, Huggins JW. Potential antiviral therapeutics for smallpox, monkeypox and other orthopoxvirus infections.”. Antiviral Res. 2003;57(1–2):13–23.
    1. Neyts J, De Clercq E. Therapy and short-term prophylaxis of poxvirus infections: historical background and perspectives.”. Antiviral Res. 2003;57(1–2):25–33.
    1. Lalezari JP, Holland GN, Kramer F, McKinley GF, Kemper CA, et al. Randomized, controlled study of the safety and efficacy of intravenous cidofovir for the treatment of relapsing cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with AIDS.”. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998;17(4):339–44.
    1. Papastamopoulos V, Botsis C, Paparizos VA, Kyriakis KP, Zagoraios Y, et al. Stavrianeas NG. “Lack of reactivation of cytomegalovirus retinitis in an AIDS patient, during and after stopping long-term cidofovir treatment: case report.”. J Chemother. 2000;12(3):258–60.
    1. Lalezari JP, Stagg RJ, Kuppermann BD, Holland GN, Kramer F, Ives DV, Youle M, Robinson MR, Drew WL, Jaffe HS. Intravenous cidofovir for peripheral cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with AIDS. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126(4):257–63.
    1. Ciesla SL, Trahan J, Wan WB, Beadle JR, Aldern KA, et al. Esterification of cidofovir with alkoxyalkanols increases oral bioavailability and diminishes drug accumulation in kidney.”. Antiviral Res Aug; 2003;59(3):163–71.
    1. Cono J, Casey CG, Bell DM. Smallpox Vaccination and Adverse Reactions.”. MMWR. 2003;52(RR04):1–28.
    1. Rosenthal SR, Merchlinsky M, Kleppinger C, Goldenthal KL. Developing New Smallpox Vaccines.”. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2001;7(6):920–6.
    1. Massoudi MS, Barker L, Schwartz B. Effectiveness of postexposure vaccination for the prevention of smallpox: results of a delphi analysis.”. J Infect Dis. 2003;188(7):973–6.
    1. Yang G, Pevear DC, Davies MH, Collett MS, Bailey T, et al. An orally bioavailable antipoxvirus compound (ST-246) inhibits extracellular virus formation and protects mice from lethal orthopoxvirus Challenge. J Virol. 2005;79(20):13139–49.
    1. Bailey TR, Rippin SR, Opsitnick E, Burns CJ, Pevear DC, et al. N-(3,3a,4,4a,5,5a,6,6a-Octahydro-1,3-dioxo-4,6- ethenocycloprop[f]isoindol-2-(1H)-yl)carboxamides: Identification of novel orthopoxvirus egress inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2007;50(7):1442–4.
    1. Chen Y, Honeychurch KM, Yang G, Byrd CM, Harver C, et al. Vaccinia virus p37 interacts with host proteins associated with LE-derived transport vesicle biogenesis.”. Virol J. 2009;6(44):1–12.
    1. Duraffour S, Snoeck R, deVos R, van Den Oord JJ, Crance J-M, et al. Activity of the anti-orthopoxvirus compound ST-246 against vaccinia, cowpox and camelpox viruses in cell monolayers and organotypic raft cultures. Antiviral Therapy. 2007;12:1205–1216.
    1. Quenelle DC, Buller RM, Parker S, Keith KA, Hruby DE, et al. Efficacy of delayed treatment with ST-246 given orally against systemic orthopoxvirus infections in mice.”. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(2):689–95.
    1. Sbrana E, Jordan R, Hruby DE, Mateo RI, Xiao SY, et al. Efficacy of the antipoxvirus compound ST-246 for treatment of severe orthopoxvirus infection.”. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76(4):768–773.
    1. Nalca A, Hatkin JM, Garza NL, Nichols DK, Norris SW, et al. Evaluation of orally delivered ST-246 as postexposure prophylactic and antiviral therapeutic in an aerosolized rabbitpox rabbit model.”. Antiviral Res. 2008;79(2):121–7.
    1. Huggins J, Goff A, Hensley L, Mucker E, Shamblin J, et al. Nonhuman primates are protected from smallpox virus or monkeypox virus challenges by the antiviral drug ST-246. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(6):2620–5.
    1. Jordan R, Goff A, Frimm A, Corrado ML, Hensley LE, et al. ST-246 antiviral efficacy in a nonhuman primate monkeypox model: determination of the minimal effective dose and human dose justification. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(5):1817–22.
    1. Jordan R, Tien D, Bolken TC, Jones KF, Tyavanagimatt SR, et al. Single-dose safety and pharmacokinetics of ST-246, a novel orthopoxvirus egress inhibitor. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52(5):1721–7.
    1. Jordan R, Leeds JM, Tyavanagimatt S, Hruby DE. Development of ST-246® for Treatment of Poxvirus Infections. Viruses. 2010;2:2409–2435.
    1. Jordan R, Chinsangaram J, Bolken TC, Tyavanagimatt SR, Tien D, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of the antiorthopoxvirus compound ST-246 following repeat oral dosing in healthy adult subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(6):2560–6.
    1. Vora S, Damon I, Fulginiti V, Weber SG, Kahana M, et al. Severe Eczema Vaccinatum in a Household Contact of a Smallpox Vaccinee. CID. 2008;46(10):1555–1561.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Progressive Vaccinia in a Military Smallpox Vaccinee — United States, 2009. MMWR. 2009;58(19):532–536.
    1. Guidance for Industry, Bioanalytical Method Validation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, May 2001.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe