Whole brain radiotherapy after local treatment of brain metastases in melanoma patients--a randomised phase III trial

Gerald Fogarty, Rachael L Morton, Janette Vardy, Anna K Nowak, Catherine Mandel, Peta M Forder, Angela Hong, George Hruby, Bryan Burmeister, Brindha Shivalingam, Haryana Dhillon, John F Thompson, Gerald Fogarty, Rachael L Morton, Janette Vardy, Anna K Nowak, Catherine Mandel, Peta M Forder, Angela Hong, George Hruby, Bryan Burmeister, Brindha Shivalingam, Haryana Dhillon, John F Thompson

Abstract

Background: Cerebral metastases are a common cause of death in patients with melanoma. Systemic drug treatment of these metastases is rarely effective, and where possible surgical resection and/or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are the preferred treatment options. Treatment with adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) following neurosurgery and/or SRS is controversial. Proponents of WBRT report prolongation of intracranial control with reduced neurological events and better palliation. Opponents state melanoma is radioresistant; that WBRT yields no survival benefit and may impair neurocognitive function. These opinions are based largely on studies in other tumour types in which assessment of neurocognitive function has been incomplete.

Methods/design: This trial is an international, prospective multi-centre, open-label, phase III randomised controlled trial comparing WBRT to observation following local treatment of intracranial melanoma metastases with surgery and/or SRS. Patients aged 18 years or older with 1-3 brain metastases excised and/or stereotactically irradiated and an ECOG status of 0-2 are eligible. Patients with leptomeningeal disease, or who have had previous WBRT or localised treatment for brain metastases are ineligible. WBRT prescription is at least 30 Gy in 10 fractions commenced within 8 weeks of surgery and/or SRS. Randomisation is stratified by the number of cerebral metastases, presence or absence of extracranial disease, treatment centre, sex, radiotherapy dose and patient age. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with distant intracranial failure as determined by MRI assessment at 12 months. Secondary end points include: survival, quality of life, performance status and neurocognitive function.

Discussion: Accrual to previous trials for patients with brain metastases has been difficult, mainly due to referral bias for or against WBRT. This trial should provide the evidence that is currently lacking in treatment decision-making for patients with melanoma brain metastases. The trial is conducted by the Australia and New Zealand Melanoma Trials Group (ANZMTG-study 01-07), and the Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) but international participation is encouraged. Twelve sites are open to date with 43 patients randomised as of the 31st March 2011. The target accrual is 200 patients.

Trial registration: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR): ACTRN12607000512426.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial schema.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plain simulation film showing isocentre on the caudal edge of the field to ensure that there is no divergence through the contralateral eye. WBRT Quality Assurance. Simulation & Planning. The patient must be simulated supine, arms by the side, head resting on neck-shape as per department protocol. A personalised immobilisation mask can be used. Treatment Volume. The fields must cover the whole brain and include the cerebrum and cerebellum. The superior border of the field must be overshooting the skull by 2 cm to ensure adequate coverage. There must be adequate coverage of the intracranial contents by a margin of 1-2 cm. The caudal border needs to be angled to accomplish this and also avoid the eyes. The pituitary is usually included in the field by default. No effort should be made to cover it if it is not in field.

References

    1. Bafaloukos D, Gogas H. The treatment of brain metastases in melanoma patients. Cancer Treat Rev. 2004;30(6):515–520. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2004.05.001.
    1. Posner JB. Management of brain metastases. Revue Neurologique. 1992;148(6-7):477–487.
    1. Sampson JH, Carter JH Jr, Friedman AH, Seigler HF. Demographics, prognosis, and therapy in 702 patients with brain metastases from malignant melanoma. J Neurosurg. 1998;88(1):11–20. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.88.1.0011.
    1. Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF, Dempsey RJ, Mohiuddin M, Kryscio RJ, Markesbery WR, Foon KA, Young B. Postoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of single metastases to the brain: a randomized trial. JAMA. 1998;280(17):1485–1489. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.17.1485.
    1. Fisher B, Seiferheld W, Schultz C, DeAngelis L, Nelson D, Schold SC, Curran W, Mehta M. Secondary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study (RTOG) 9310: an intergroup phase II combined modality treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma. J Neurooncol. 2005;74(2):201–205. doi: 10.1007/s11060-004-6596-9.
    1. Aoyama H, Shirato H, Tago M, Nakagawa K, Toyoda T, Hatano K, Kenjyo M, Oya N, Hirota S, Shioura H. et al.Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole brain radiation therapy vs stereotactic radiosurgery alone for treatment of brain metastases. JAMA. 2006;295:2483–2491. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.21.2483.
    1. Broadbent AM, Hruby G, Tin MM, Jackson M, Firth I. Survival following whole brain radiation treatment for cerebral metastases: an audit of 474 patients. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2004;71(3):259–265. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.02.019.
    1. Kocher M, Soffietti R, Abacioglu U, Villa S, Fauchon F, Baumert BG, Fariselli L, Tzuk-Shina T, Kortmann R-D, Carrie C. et al.Adjuvant Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Versus Observation After Radiosurgery or Surgical Resection of One to Three Cerebral Metastases: Results of the EORTC 22952-26001 Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2011;29(2):134–141. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.1655.
    1. Chang EL, Wefel JS, Hess KR, Allen PK, Lang FF, Kornguth DG, Arbuckle RB, Swint JM, Shiu AS, Maor MH. et al.Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncology. 2009;10(11):1037–1044. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70263-3.
    1. Mahmood U, Kwok Y, Regine WF, Patchell RA. Whole-brain irradiation for patients with brain metastases: still the standard of care. Lancet Oncology. 2010;11(3):221–223. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70389-4.
    1. Meyers CA, Wefel JS. The use of the mini-mental state examination to assess cognitive functioning in cancer trials: no ifs, ands, buts, or sensitivity. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3557–3558. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.07.080.
    1. Meyers CA, Geara F, Wong PF, Morrison WH. Neurocognitive effects of therapeutic irradiation for base of skull tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;46(1):51–55. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00376-4.
    1. Meyers CA, Hess KR, Yung WK, Levin VA. Cognitive function and progression in patients with brain metastases treated with whole-brain radiation and motexafin gadolinium: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;1(22):157–165.
    1. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC. et al.The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365–376. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
    1. Osoba D, Aaronson NK, Muller M, Sneeuw K, Hsu MA, Yung WK, Brada M, Newlands E. The development and psychometric validation of a brain cancer quality-of-life questionnaire for use in combination with general cancer-specific questionnaires. Qual Life Res. 1996;5:139–150. doi: 10.1007/BF00435979.
    1. Pocock SJ. Clinical trials: a practical approach. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1983.
    1. Roos DE, Wirth A, Burmeister BH, Spry NA, Drummond KJ, Beresford JA, McClure BE. Whole brain irradiation following surgery or radiosurgery for solitary brain metastases: Mature results of a prematurely closed randomized Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group trial (TROG 98.05) Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2006;80(3):318–322. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.08.004.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe