Personalizing physical exercise in a computational model of fuel homeostasis

Maria Concetta Palumbo, Micaela Morettini, Paolo Tieri, Fasma Diele, Massimo Sacchetti, Filippo Castiglione, Maria Concetta Palumbo, Micaela Morettini, Paolo Tieri, Fasma Diele, Massimo Sacchetti, Filippo Castiglione

Abstract

The beneficial effects of physical activity for the prevention and management of several chronic diseases are widely recognized. Mathematical modeling of the effects of physical exercise in body metabolism and in particular its influence on the control of glucose homeostasis is of primary importance in the development of eHealth monitoring devices for a personalized medicine. Nonetheless, to date only a few mathematical models have been aiming at this specific purpose. We have developed a whole-body computational model of the effects on metabolic homeostasis of a bout of physical exercise. Built upon an existing model, it allows to detail better both subjects' characteristics and physical exercise, thus determining to a greater extent the dynamics of the hormones and the metabolites considered.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Whole body system diagram.
Fig 1. Whole body system diagram.
Exercise stimulates epinephrine release which influences the pancreatic secretion of insulin and glucagon and acts as a neuroendocrine signal for the heart and skeletal muscle (gray lines). Consequently, modifications in the glucagon and insulin production modulate in a coordinated way the metabolic flux rates of the different organs. Each organ is connected via the arterial/venous circulation (red/blue lines). Arterial glucose concentration (dotted line) signals the pancreas to set the levels of insulin and glucagon, whose ratio is used by the liver, GI tract and the adipose tissue. Two more ODEs are added to the KSC to model the exercise-induced effect of epinephrine, for a total of 136 ODEs consisting in the multi-scale computational model.
Fig 2. Dynamics of insulin and glucagon…
Fig 2. Dynamics of insulin and glucagon in response to exercise.
Model fit (solid line) vs experimental data (circles), expressed as mean ± SEM from study 3 [28]. Parameter estimation is performed using data obtained during an exercise session of 60 min. The gray zone refers to the exercise period. The inset plots refer to the weighted residuals. A: Plasma insulin concentration. B: Plasma glucagon concentration.
Fig 3. Dynamics of suprabasal plasma insulin…
Fig 3. Dynamics of suprabasal plasma insulin concentration in response to exercise.
Model fit (red areas) vs experimental data (circles) expressed as mean ± SEM from the study 1. The red areas show the range of the dynamic responses of the model to the variability of the subjects’ characteristics as reported in Table 2; individual response curves related to each simulation are available. The gray zone refers to the exercise period. The dark gray zone refers to the exercise performed above the LT until minute 32. A: Trained individuals. B: Untrained individuals.
Fig 4. Dynamics of suprabasal plasma glucagon…
Fig 4. Dynamics of suprabasal plasma glucagon concentration in response to exercise.
Model fit (red areas) vs experimental data (circles), expressed as mean ± SEM. The red areas show the range of the dynamic responses of the model to the variability of the subjects’ characteristics as reported in Table 2; individual response curves related to each simulation are available. The gray zone refers to the exercise period. The dark gray zone refers to the exercise performed above the LT until minute 32. A: Trained individuals from the study 1. B: Untrained individuals from the study 1. C: Individuals from the study 2.
Fig 5. Dynamics of suprabasal plasma epinephrine…
Fig 5. Dynamics of suprabasal plasma epinephrine concentration in response to exercise.
Model fit (colored areas) vs experimental data (circles and squares) expressed as mean ± SE. The colored areas show the range of the dynamic responses of the model to the variability of the subjects’ characteristics as reported in Table 2 (black circles and red area: males; open squares and blue area: females); individual response curves related to each simulation are available. The gray zone refers to the exercise period. The dark gray zone refers to the exercise performed above the LT until minute 32. A: Trained individuals from the study 1. B: Untrained individuals from the study 1. C: Individuals from the study 3. D: Individuals from the study 5 (black circles and red area: males; open squares and blue area: females).
Fig 6. Dynamics of suprabasal plasma glucose…
Fig 6. Dynamics of suprabasal plasma glucose concentration in response to exercise.
Model fit (red areas) vs experimental data (circles) expressed as mean ± SE. The red areas show the range of the dynamic responses of the model to the variability of the subjects’ characteristics as reported in Table 2; individual response curves related to each simulation are available. The gray zone refers to the exercise period. The dark gray zone refers to the exercise performed above the LT until minute 32. A: Trained individuals from the study 1. B: Untrained individuals from the study 1. C: Individuals from the study 2.
Fig 7. Dynamics of suprabasal plasma glycerol…
Fig 7. Dynamics of suprabasal plasma glycerol concentration in response to exercise.
Model fit (colored areas) vs experimental data (circles and squares) expressed as mean ± SE. The colored areas show the range of the dynamic responses of the model to the variability of the subjects’ characteristics as reported in Table 2 (black circles and red area: males; open squares and blue area: females); individual response curves related to each simulation are available. The gray zone refers to the exercise period. The dark gray zone refers to the exercise performed above the LT until minute 32. A: Trained individuals from the study 1. B: Untrained individuals from the study 1. C: Individuals from the study 2. D: Individuals from the study 5.
Fig 8. Dynamics of suprabasal plasma alanine…
Fig 8. Dynamics of suprabasal plasma alanine concentration in response to exercise.
Model fit (red areas) vs experimental data (circles) expressed as mean ± SE from the study 1. The red areas show the range of the dynamic responses of the model to the variability of the subjects’ characteristics as reported in Table 2; individual response curves related to each simulation are available. The gray zone refers to the exercise period. The dark gray zone refers to the exercise performed above the LT until minute 32. A: Trained individuals. B: Untrained individuals.
Fig 9. Dynamics of suprabasal plasma lactate…
Fig 9. Dynamics of suprabasal plasma lactate concentration in response to exercise.
Model fit (colored areas) vs experimental data (circles) expressed as mean ± SE. The colored areas show the range of the dynamic responses of the model to the variability of the subjects’ characteristics as reported in Table 2 (blue: females; red: males); individual response curves related to each simulation are available. The gray zone refers to the exercise period. The dark gray zone refers to the exercise performed above the LT until minute 32. The colored area shows the dynamic responses of the model to the variability of the subjects’ characteristics as reported in Table 2. A: Trained individuals from the study 1. B: Untrained individuals from the study 1. C: Trained individuals from the study 4. D: Untrained individuals from the study 4. E: Individuals from the study 5.
Fig 10. Dynamics of suprabasal plasma FFA…
Fig 10. Dynamics of suprabasal plasma FFA concentration in response to exercise.
Model fit (colored areas) vs experimental data (circles) expressed as mean ± SE. The colored areas show the range of the dynamic responses of the model to the variability of the subjects’ characteristics as reported in Table 2 (black circles and red area: males; open squares and blue area: females); individual response curves related to each simulation are available. The gray zone refers to the exercise period. The dark gray zone refers to the exercise performed above the LT until minute 32. A: Trained individuals from the study 1. B: Untrained individuals from the study 1. C: Individuals from the study 2. D: Individuals from the study 3. E: Individuals from the study 5.
Fig 11. Reactions in liver.
Fig 11. Reactions in liver.
Simulations of net hepatic glycogen breakdown (solid line) and net hepatic gluconeogenesis (dotted line) in response to the exercise performed in the study 3. The gray zone refers to the exercise period.
Fig 12. Dynamics of suprabasal concentration of…
Fig 12. Dynamics of suprabasal concentration of glycogen in muscle in response to exercise.
Model fit (red areas) vs experimental data (circles) expressed as mean ± SE in the study 6. The gray zone refers to the exercise period. The red areas show the range of the dynamic responses of the model to the variability of the subjects’ characteristics as reported in Table 2; individual response curves related to each simulation are available.
Fig 13. Dynamics of suprabasal plasma glycerol…
Fig 13. Dynamics of suprabasal plasma glycerol concentration in response to exercise.
Model fit (colored lines) vs experimental data (circles) expressed as mean ± SE. The colored lines show the different simulated dynamic responses of the eight subjects from the study 2 [32]. The gray zone refers to the exercise period.

References

    1. Borer KT. Advanced Exercise Endocrinology. Champain, IL: Human Kinetics; 2013.
    1. Felig P, Wahren J. Fuel homeostasis in exercise. N Engl J Med. 1975;21(293):1078–1082.
    1. Breton MD.javascript:void(0); Physical activity-the major unaccounted impediment to closed loop control. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(1):169–174. doi:
    1. Derouich M, Boutayeb A. The effect of physical exercise on the dynamics of glucose and insulin. J Biomech. 2002;35(7):911–917. doi:
    1. Dalla Man C, Breton MD, Cobelli C. Physical activity into the meal glucose-insulin model of type 1 diabetes: in silico studies. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(1):56–67. doi:
    1. Bergman RN, Phillips LS, Cobelli C. Physiologic evaluation of factors controlling glucose tolerance in man: measurement of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell glucose sensitivity from the response to intravenous glucose. J Clin Invest. 1981;68(6):1456–1467. doi:
    1. Bergman RN, Cobelli C. Minimal modeling, partition analysis, and the estimation of insulin sensitivity. Fed Proc. 1980;39(1):110–115.
    1. Adamu II, Garba EJD, Haruna Y. Mathematical model for the dynamics of glucose regulatory system under the combined use of dieting and physical exercise. Ozean Journal of Applied Sciences. 2012;5(3):229–241.
    1. Topp B, Promislow K, deVries G, Miura RM, Finegood DT. A model of beta-cell mass, insulin, and glucose kinetics: pathways to diabetes. J Theor Biol. 2000;206(4):605–619. doi:
    1. Singh K, Kumar D. A mathematical model on glucose-insulin regulatory system with the impact of physical activities. Computational and Mathematical Biology. 2016;5(1):5–8.
    1. Svitra D, Basov I, Vilkyté R. Modelling of glycaemia dynamics: impact of physical exercises. Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control. 2010;15(2):213–232.
    1. Roy A, Parker RS. Dynamic modeling of exercise effects on plasma glucose and insulin levels. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007;1(3):338–347. doi:
    1. Kim J, Saidel GM, Cabrera ME. Multi-scale computational model of fuel homeostasis during exercise: effect of hormonal control. Ann Biomed Eng. 2007;35(1):69–90. doi:
    1. Kildegaard J, Christensen TF, Johansen MD, Randløv J, Hejlesen OK. Modeling the effect of blood glucose and physical exercise on plasma adrenaline in people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007;9(6):501–507. doi:
    1. Robergs RA, Roberts SO. Exercise Physiology: Exercise, Performance, and Clinical Applications. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1997.
    1. Brooks GA. Intra- and extra-cellular lactate shuttles. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2000;32:790–799. doi:
    1. Katz A, Sahlin K. Regulation of lactic acid production during exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1988;65:509–518. doi:
    1. Hindmarsh AC, Brown PN, Grant KE, Lee SL, Serban R, Shumaker DE, et al. SUNDIALS: Suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solvers. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS). 2005;31(3):363–396. doi:
    1. Cohen SD, Hindmarsh AC. CVODE, a stiff/nonstiff ODE solver in C. Computers in physics. 1996;10(2):138–143.
    1. Hill AV, Lupton H. Muscular exercise, lactic acid, and the supply and utilization of oxygen. Q J Med. 1923;16:135–171. doi:
    1. Hawkins MN, Raven PB, Snell PG, Stray-Gundersen J, Levine BD. Maximal oxygen uptake as a parametric measure of cardiorespiratory capacity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(1):103–7. doi:
    1. Heyward VH, Gibson AL. Advance fitness assessment and exercise prescription. Champain, IL: Human Kinetics; 2014.
    1. American College of Sports Medicine and others. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
    1. McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Essentials of exercise physiology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
    1. Kohlstadt I. Scientific evidence for musculoskeletal, bariatric, and sports nutrition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2006.
    1. Morettini M, Palumbo MC, Sacchetti M, Castiglione F, Mazzá C. A system model of the effects of exercise on plasma Interleukin-6 dynamics in healthy individuals: Role of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0181224 doi:
    1. Saunders PT, Koeslag JH, Wessels JA. Integral rein control in physiology. J Theor Biol. 1998;194(2):163–173. doi:
    1. Hirsch IB, Marker JC, Smith LJ, Spina RJ, Parvin CA, Holloszy JO, et al. Insulin and glucagon in prevention of hypoglycemia during exercise in humans. Am J Physiol. 1991;260(5 Pt 1):E695–E704.
    1. Carson ER, Finkelstein L, Cobelli C. Mathematical modeling of metabolic and endocrine systems: Model formulation, identification, and validation. JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., 605 THIRD AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10158, USA, 394; 1983.
    1. Bloom SR, Johnson RH, Park DM, Rennie MJ, Sulaiman WR. Differences in the metabolic and hormonal response to exercise between racing cyclist and untrained individuals. J Physiol. 1976;258:1–18. doi:
    1. Arts F, Kuipers H. The relation between power output, oxygen uptake and heart rate in male athletes. International journal of sports medicine. 1994;15(05):228–231. doi:
    1. Wahren J, Hagenfeldt L, Felig P. Splanchnic and leg exchange of glucose, amino acids, and free fatty acids during exercise in diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 1975;55(6):1303–1314. doi:
    1. Bergman BC, Brooks GA. Respiratory gas-exchange ratios during graded exercise in fed and fasted trained and untrained men. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999;86(2):479–487. doi:
    1. Carter S, Rennie C, Tarnopolsky M. Substrate utilization during endurance exercise in men and women after endurance training. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology And Metabolism. 2001;280(6):E898–E907. doi:
    1. Gollnick P, Piehl K, Saltin B. Selective glycogen depletion pattern in human muscle fibres after exercise of varying intensity and at varying pedalling rates. The Journal of physiology. 1974;241(1):45–57. doi:
    1. Katch V, Weltman A, Sady S, Freedson P. Validity of the relative percent concept for equating training intensity. European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology. 1978;39(4):219–227. doi:
    1. Meyer T, Gabriel HH, Kindermann W. Is determination of exercise intensities as percentages of VO2max or HRmax adequate? Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 1999;31(9):1342–1345. doi:
    1. Hopker JG, Jobson SA, Pandit J. Controversies in the physiological basis of the ‘anaerobic threshold’and their implications for clinical cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Anaesthesia. 2011;66(2):111–123. doi:
    1. Paterson DH, Whipp B. Asymmetries of oxygen uptake transients at the on- and offset of heavy exercise in humans. Journal of Physiology. 1991;443:575–586. doi:
    1. Bell C, Paterson DH, Kowalchuk JM, Padilla J, Cunningham DA. A comparison of modelling techniques used to characterise oxygen uptake kinetics during the on-transient of exercise. Experimental Physiology. 2001;86:667–676. doi:
    1. Friedlander AL, Casazza GA, Horning MA, Buddinger TF, Brooks GA. Effects of exercise intensity and training on lipid metabolism in young women. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology And Metabolism. 1998;275(5):E853–E863. doi:
    1. Galbo H, Holst J, Christensen N. Glucagon and plasma catecholamine responses to graded and prolonged exercise in man. Journal of applied physiology. 1975;38(1):70–76. doi:
    1. Hotamisligil GS, Shargill NS, Spiegelman BM. Adipose expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha: direct role in obesity-linked insulin resistance. Science. 1993;259(5091):87–91. doi:
    1. Gregor MF, Hotamisligil GS. Inflammatory mechanisms in obesity. Annual review of immunology. 2011;29:415–445. doi:
    1. Castiglione F, Celada F. Immune System Modelling and Simulation. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015.
    1. Castiglione F, Tieri P, De Graaf A, Franceschi C, Liò P, Van Ommen B, et al. The onset of type 2 diabetes: proposal for a multi-scale model. JMIR research protocols. 2013;2(2). doi:
    1. Price ND, Magis AT, Earls JC, Glusman G, Levy R, Lausted C, et al. A wellness study of 108 individuals using personal, dense, dynamic data clouds. Nature biotechnology. 2017;35(8):747 doi:

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe