Evaluation of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a clinical decision support system in managing hypertension in resource constrained primary health care settings: results from a cluster randomized trial

Raghupathy Anchala, Stephen Kaptoge, Hira Pant, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Oscar H Franco, D Prabhakaran, Raghupathy Anchala, Stephen Kaptoge, Hira Pant, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Oscar H Franco, D Prabhakaran

Abstract

Background: Randomized control trials from the developed world report that clinical decision support systems (DSS) could provide an effective means to improve the management of hypertension (HTN). However, evidence from developing countries in this regard is rather limited, and there is a need to assess the impact of a clinical DSS on managing HTN in primary health care center (PHC) settings.

Methods and results: We performed a cluster randomized trial to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a clinical DSS among Indian adult hypertensive patients (between 35 and 64 years of age), wherein 16 PHC clusters from a district of Telangana state, India, were randomized to receive either a DSS or a chart-based support (CBS) system. Each intervention arm had 8 PHC clusters, with a mean of 102 hypertensive patients per cluster (n=845 in DSS and 783 in CBS groups). Mean change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline to 12 months was the primary endpoint. The mean difference in SBP change from baseline between the DSS and CBS at the 12th month of follow-up, adjusted for age, sex, height, waist, body mass index, alcohol consumption, vegetable intake, pickle intake, and baseline differences in blood pressure, was -6.59 mm Hg (95% confidence interval: -12.18 to -1.42; P=0.021). The cost-effective ratio for CBS and DSS groups was $96.01 and $36.57 per mm of SBP reduction, respectively.

Conclusion: Clinical DSS are effective and cost-effective in the management of HTN in resource-constrained PHC settings.

Clinical trial registration url: http://www.ctri.nic.in. Unique identifier: CTRI/2012/03/002476.

Keywords: cluster randomized trials; computers; cost‐effectiveness; effectiveness; hypertension.

© 2015 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Consort flow chart. CBS indicates chart‐based support; DSS, decision support systems; MITT, modified intention to treat; PHC, primary health care center.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Randomization procedure followed during the study. CBS indicates chart‐based support; CHC, community health center; DSS, decision support systems; PHC, primary health care center.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mean blood pressure in randomized groups by month and differences versus baseline. CBS indicates chart‐based support; CI, confidence interval; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DSS, decision support systems; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Comparison of CBS and DSS groups: BP under control (SBP

References

    1. Anderson JA, Willson P, Peterson NJ, Murphy C, Kent TA. Prototype to practice: developing and testing a clinical decision support system for secondary stroke prevention in a veterans healthcare facility. Comput Inform Nurs. 2010; 28:353-363.
    1. Montgomery AA, Fahey T, Peters TJ, MacIntosh C, Sharp DJ. Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2000; 320:686-690.
    1. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas‐Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, Sam J, Haynes RB. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005; 293:1223-1238.
    1. Shojania KG, Jennings A, Mayhew A, Ramsay CR, Eccles MP, Grimshaw J. The effects of on‐screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; 3:CD001096.
    1. Bosworth HB, Olsen MK, McCant F, Harrelson M, Gentry P, Rose C, Goldstein MK, Hoffman BB, Powers B, Oddone EZ. Hypertension Intervention Nurse Telemedicine Study (HINTS): testing a multifactorial tailored behavioral/educational and a medication management intervention for blood pressure control. Am Heart J. 2007; 153:918-924.
    1. Persson M, Mjorndal T, Carlberg B, Bohlin J, Lindholm LH. Evaluation of a computer‐based decision support system for treatment of hypertension with drugs: retrospective, nonintervention testing of cost and guideline adherence. J Intern Med. 2000; 247:87-93.
    1. Roumie CL, Elasy TA, Greevy R, Griffin MR, Liu X, Stone WJ, Wallston KA, Dittus RS, Alvarez V, Cobb J, Speroff T. Improving blood pressure control through provider education, provider alerts, and patient education. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 145:165-175.
    1. Hicks LS, Sequist TD, Ayanian JZ, Shaykevich S, Fairchild DG, Orav EJ, Bates DW. Impact of computerized decision support on blood pressure management and control: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23:429-441.
    1. Rinfret S, Lussier MT, Peirce A, Duhamel F, Cossette S, Lalonde L, Tremblay C, Guertin MC, LeLorier J, Turgeon J, Hamet PLOYAL Study Investigators. The impact of a multidsicplinary information technology supported program on blood pressure control in primary care. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009; 2:170-177.
    1. Nair M, Ali MK, Ajay VS, Shivashankar R, Mohan V, Pradeepa R, Deepa M, Khan HM, Kadir MM, Fatmi ZA, Reddy KS, Tandon N, Narayan KM, Prabhakaran D. CARRS surveillance study: design and methods to assess burdens from multiple perspectives. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:701.
    1. Shah S, Singh K, Ali MK, Mohan V, Kadir MM, Unnikrishnan AG, Sahay RK, Varthakavi P, Dharmalingam M, Viswanathan V, Masood Q, Bantwal G, Khadgawat R, Desai A, Sethi BK, Shivashankar R, Ajay VS, Reddy KS, Narayan KM, Prabhakaran D, Tandon N. Improving diabetes care: multi‐component cardiovascular disease risk reduction strategies for people with diabetes in South Asia—the CARRS multi‐center translation trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012; 98:285-294.
    1. Roy SK, Roy SK, Bagchi S, Bajpayee A, Pal R, Biswas R. Study of KAP of the private medical practitioners about national disease control programmes. Indian J Public Health. 2005; 49:256-257.
    1. Roshanov PS, Misra S, Gerstein HC, Garg AX, Sebaldt RJ, Mackay JA, Weise‐Kelly L, Navarro T, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision‐maker‐researcher partnership systematic review. Implement Sci. 2011; 6:92.
    1. Anchala R, Pant H, Prabhakaran D, Franco OH. ‘Decision support system (DSS) for prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among hypertensive (HTN) patients in Andhra Pradesh, India'—a cluster randomised community intervention trial. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:393.
    1. Weijer C, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, McRae AD, White A, Brehaut JC, Taljaard M. The Ottawa statement on the ethical design and conduct of cluster randomized trials. PLoS Med. 2012; 9:e1001346.
    1. Edwards SJ, Braunholtz DA, Lilford RJ, Stevens AJ. Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 1999; 318:1407-1409.
    1. Anchala R, Di Angelantonio E, Prabhakaran D, Franco OH. Development and validation of a clinical and computerised decision support system for management of hypertension (DSS‐HTN) at a primary health care (PHC) setting. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e79638.
    1. Association of Physicians of India. Indian Hypertension Guidelines; 2007. Available at: . Accessed June 05, 2013.
    1. Official website of Mahabubnagar district. National Informatics center (NIC), Mahabubnagar Available at: . Accessed June 05, 2013.
    1. Ministry of Panchayat Raj India. Backward Regions Grant Fund, Programme Guidelines Available at:. Accessed June 05, 2013.
    1. Prabhakaran D, Jeemon P, Goenka S, Lakshmy R, Thankappan KR, Ahmed F, Joshi PP, Mohan BV, Meera R, Das MS, Ahuja RC, Saran RK, Chaturvedi V, Reddy KS. Impact of a worksite intervention program on cardiovascular risk factors: a demonstration project in an Indian industrial population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53:1718-1728.
    1. Kinra S, Bowen LJ, Lyngdoh T, Prabhakaran D, Reddy KS, Ramakrishnan L, Gupta R, Bharathi AV, Vaz M, Kurpad AV, Smith GD, Ben‐Shlomo Y, Ebrahim S. Sociodemographic patterning of non‐communicable disease risk factors in rural India: a cross sectional study. BMJ. 2010; 341:c4974.
    1. Drummond MF, Jefferson TO. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party. BMJ. 1996; 313:275-283.
    1. Mathur N, Kedia G, Trivedi A. A comparative study to analyze the cost of curative care at primary health center in Ahmedabad. Indian J Community Med. 2010; 35:153-158.
    1. Borah PK, Hazarika NC, Biswas D, Kalita HC, Mahanta J. Population‐specific left ventricular hypertrophy in three groups from the northeastern region of India. Natl Med J India. 2010; 23:336-339.
    1. Mohan V, Deepa M, Farooq S, Datta M, Deepa R. Prevalence, awareness and control of hypertension in Chennai—the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES‐52). J Assoc Physicians India. 2007; 55:326-332.
    1. Manimunda SP, Sugunan AP, Benegal V, Balakrishna N, Rao MV, Pesala KS. Association of hypertension with risk factors & hypertension related behaviour among the aboriginal Nicobarese tribe living in Car Nicobar Island, India. Indian J Med Res. 2011; 133:287-293.
    1. Dutta A, Ray MR. Prevalence of hypertension and pre‐hypertension in rural women: a report from the villages of West Bengal, a state in the eastern part of India. Aust J Rural Health. 2012; 20:219-225.
    1. Hazarika NC, Biswas D, Narain K, Kalita HC, Mahanta J. Hypertension and its risk factors in tea garden workers of Assam. Natl Med J India. 2002; 15:63-68.
    1. Sathish T, Kannan S, Sarma PS, Razum O, Thankappan KR. Incidence of hypertension and its risk factors in rural Kerala, India: a community‐based cohort study. Public Health. 2012; 126:25-32.
    1. Meshram II, Arlappa N, Balkrishna N, Rao KM, Laxmaiah A, Brahmam GN. Prevalence of hypertension, its correlates and awareness among adult tribal population of Kerala state, India. J Postgrad Med. 2012; 58:255-261.
    1. Ganguli D, Das N, Saha I, Chaudhuri D, Ghosh S, Dey S. Risk factors for hypertension in a population‐based sample of postmenopausal women in Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2013; 25:388-397.
    1. Thankappan KR, Sivasankaran S, Sarma PS, Mini G, Khader SA, Padmanabhan P, Vasan R. Prevalence‐correlates‐awareness‐treatment and control of hypertension in Kumarakom, Kerala: baseline results of a community‐based intervention program. Indian Heart J. 2006; 58:28-33.
    1. Shanthirani CS, Pradeepa R, Deepa R, Premalatha G, Saroja R, Mohan V. Prevalence and risk factors of hypertension in a selected South Indian population—the Chennai Urban Population Study. J Assoc Physicians India. 2003; 51:20-27.
    1. Gupta R, Deedwania PC, Achari V, Bhansali A, Gupta BK, Gupta A, Mahanta TG, Asirvatham AJ, Gupta S, Maheshwari A, Saboo B, Jali MV, Singh J, Guptha S, Sharma KK. Normotension, prehypertension, and hypertension in urban middle‐class subjects in India: prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control. Am J Hypertens. 2013; 26:83-94.
    1. Anchala R, Kannuri NK, Pant H, Khan H, Franco OH, Di Angelantonio E, Prabhakaran D. Hypertension in india: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prevalence, awareness, and control of hypertension. J Hypertens. 2014; 32:1170-1177.
    1. He FJ, MacGregor GA. Effect of modest salt reduction on blood pressure: a meta‐analysis of randomized trials. Implications for public health. J Hum Hypertens. 2002; 16:761-770.
    1. Whelton PK, Appel LJ, Espeland MA, Applegate WB, Ettinger WH, Jr, Kostis JB, Kumanyika S, Lacy CR, Johnson KC, Folmar S, Cutler JA. Sodium reduction and weight loss in the treatment of hypertension in older persons: a randomized controlled trial of nonpharmacologic interventions in the elderly (TONE). Tone collaborative research group. JAMA. 1998; 279:839-846.
    1. Basile JN. Systolic blood pressure. BMJ. 2002; 325:917-918.
    1. Miller ER, III, Erlinger TP, Young DR, Jehn M, Charleston J, Rhodes D, Wasan SK, Appel LJ. Results of the Diet, Exercise, and Weight loss Intervention Trial (DEW‐IT). Hypertension. 2002; 40:612-618.
    1. Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, Appel LJ, Bray GA, Harsha D, Obarzanek E, Conlin PR, Miller ER, III, Simons‐Morton DG, Karanja N, Lin PH. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH‐Sodium Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344:3-10.
    1. Xin X, He J, Frontini MG, Ogden LG, Motsamai OI, Whelton PK. Effects of alcohol reduction on blood pressure: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hypertension. 2001; 38:1112-1117.
    1. Appel LJ, Brands MW, Daniels SR, Karanja N, Elmer PJ, Sacks FM. Dietary approaches to prevent and treat hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2006; 47:296-308.
    1. Tu SW, Campbell JR, Glasgow J, Nyman MA, McClure R, McClay J, Parker C, Hrabak KM, Berg D, Weida T, Mansfield JG, Musen MA, Abarbanel RM. The SAGE guideline model: achievements and overview. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007; 14:589-598.
    1. Pearson SA, Moxey A, Robertson J, Hains I, Williamson M, Reeve J, Newby D. Do computerised clinical decision support systems for prescribing change practice? A systematic review of the literature (1990–2007). BMC Health Serv Res. 2009; 9:154.
    1. Roshanov PS, Fernandes N, Wilczynski JM, Hemens BJ, You JJ, Handler SM, Nieuwlaat R, Souza NM, Beyene J, Spall HG, Garg AX, Haynes RB. Features of effective computerised clinical decision support systems: meta‐regression of 162 randomised trials. BMJ. 2013; 346:f657.
    1. World Health Organisation. Choosing Interventions that are Cost Effective (WHO‐CHOICE) Available at: . Accessed April 24, 2013.
    1. Kawamoto K, Jacobs J, Welch BM, Huser V, Paterno MD, Del Fiol G, Shields D, Strasberg HR, Haug PJ, Liu Z, Jenders RA, Rowed DW, Chertcoff D, Fehre K, Adlassnig KP, Curtis AC. Clinical information system services and capabilities desired for scalable, standards‐based, service‐oriented decision support: consensus assessment of the Health Level 7 clinical decision support Work Group. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012; 2012:446-455.
    1. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ. 2005; 330:76510.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F
    1. Union Primary Census Data Highlights ‐ India, 2011. Available at: . Accessed April 24, 2013.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe