Can microcredit help improve the health of poor women? Some findings from a cross-sectional study in Kerala, India

Ks Mohindra, Slim Haddad, D Narayana, Ks Mohindra, Slim Haddad, D Narayana

Abstract

Background: This study examines associations between female participation in a microcredit program in India, known as self help groups (SHGs), and women's health in the south Indian state of Kerala. Because SHGs do not have a formal health program, this provides a unique opportunity to assess whether SHG participation influences women's health via the social determinants of health.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used special survey data collected in 2003 from one Panchayat (territorial decentralized unit). Information was collected on women's characteristics, health determinants (exclusion to health care, exposure to health risks, decision-making agency), and health achievements (self assessed health, markers of mental health). The study sample included 928 non elderly poor women.

Results: The primary finding is that compared to non-participants living in a household without a SHG member, the odds of facing exclusion is significantly lower among early joiners, women who were members for more than 2 years (OR = 0.58, CI = 0.41-0.80), late joiners, members for 2 years and less (OR = 0.60, CI = 0.39-0.94), and non-participants who live in a household with a SHG member (OR = 0.53, CI = 0.32-0.90). We also found that after controlling for key women's characteristics, early joiners of a SHG are less likely to report emotional stress and poor life satisfaction compared to non-members (OR = 0.52, CI = 0.30-0.93; OR = 0.32, CI = 0.14-0.71). No associations were found between SHG participation and self assessed health or exposure to health risks. The relationship between SHG participation and decision-making agency is unclear.

Conclusion: Microcredit is not a panacea, but could help to improve the health of poor women by addressing certain issues relevant to the context. In Kerala, SHG participation can help protect poor women against exclusion to health care and possibly aid in promoting their mental health.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Determinants of SHG participation (S1) and associations (A1, A2) between SHG participation, women's characteristics, health determinants, and health achievements, and variables used in the study.

References

    1. Commission on Macroeconomics and Health . Macroeconomics and Health: Investing in Health for Economic Development. Geneva, World Health Organization; 2001.
    1. Wagstaff A. CMH Working Paper Series, WG1 5. Geneva, World Health Organization; 2001. Poverty and health.
    1. Microcredit Summit Declaration and Plan of Action Washington. 1997.
    1. Mushtaque A, Chowdhury R, Bhuiya A. Do poverty alleviation programmes reduce inequities in health? The Bangladesh experience. In: Leon D, Walt G, editor. Poverty, Inequality and Health An International Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford; 2001.
    1. Nanda P. Women's participation in rural credit programmes in Bangladesh and their demand for formal health care: is there a positive impact? Health Economics. 1999;8:415–428. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199908)8:5<415::AID-HEC450>;2-L.
    1. Bhuiya A, Chowdhury M. Beneficial effects of a woman-focused development programme on child survival: evidence from rural Bangladesh. Social Science & Medicine. 2002;55:1553–1560. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00287-8.
    1. Nayar KR, Kyobutungi C, Razum O. Self-help: what future role in health care for low and middle-income countries? International Journal for Equity in Health. 2004;3:1. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-3-1.
    1. Panikar PGK, Soman CR. Health status of Kerala: the paradox of economic backwardness and health development. Trivandrum, Kerala: Centre for Development Studies; 1984.
    1. Government of India . National human development report, 2001. New Delhi, Planning Commission; 2002.
    1. Drèze J, Sen A. India: Development and participation. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2002.
    1. Mohindra KS, Haddad S, Narayana D. Women's health in a rural community in Kerala, India: do caste and socioeconomic position matter? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2006;60:1020–1026. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.047647.
    1. Levesque JF, Haddad S, Narayana D, Fournier P. Uneven options for accessing health care in developing world cities: a multilevel analysis of outpatient care utilisation in urban Kerala, India. Health Policy & Planning. 2006;21:289–301. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czl013.
    1. Panda P, Agarwal B. Marital violence, human development and women's property status in India. World Development. 2005;33:823–850. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.01.009.
    1. Eapen M, Kodoth P. Family structure, women's education and work: re-examining the 'high status' of women in Kerala. In: Mukhopadyay S, Surdarshan, R, editor. Tracking gender equity under the economic reforms. New Delhi: Kali for Women; 2003. pp. 227–267.
    1. Sivramkrishna S, Panigrahi R. An economic model of self-help groups: policy implications for banks and NGO initiatives. Journal of International Development. 2001;13:1119–1130. doi: 10.1002/jid.780.
    1. Mohindra KS, Haddad S. Women's interlaced freedoms: A framework linking microcredit participation and health. Journal of Human Development. 2005;6:353–374. doi: 10.1080/14649880500287662.
    1. Narayana D. The Mixed Health Care System in Kerala: Quality or Price Competition? Trivandrum, Kerala, Centre for Development Studies; 2001.
    1. Sen A. Health: perception versus observation. British Medical Journal. 2002;324:860–861. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7342.860.
    1. Ahmed SM, Chowdhury M, Bhuiya A. Micro-credit and emotional well-being: experience of poor rural women from Matlab, Bangladesh. World Development. 2001;29:1957–1966. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00069-9.
    1. SPSS . SPSS for Windows, release 140 (5 Sept 2005) Chicago: SPSS Inc; 2005.
    1. Davies P. Sociological approaches to outcomes. In: Macbeth H, editor. Health Outcomes: Biological, Social, and Economic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996.
    1. Patel V. Cultural factors and international epidemiology. British Medical Bulletin. 2001;57:33–45. doi: 10.1093/bmb/57.1.33.
    1. Gertler P, Levine DI, Moretti E. Do Microfinance Programs Help Families Insure Consumption against Illness? California Center for Population Research On-Line Working Paper Series Paper CCPR-011-02. 2002.
    1. Holvoet N. The impact of microfinance on decision-making agency: evidence from South India. Development and Change. 2005;36:75–102. doi: 10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00403.x.
    1. Rodriguez R, Mackindo J, Waters W. Microenterprise development for better health outcomes. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press; 2001.
    1. Montgomery R. Disciplining or protecting the poor? Avoiding the social costs of peer pressures in micro-credit schemes. Journal of International Development. 1996;8:289–305. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199603)8:2<289::AID-JID368>;2-2.
    1. Mosley P, Hulme D. Microenterprise finance: is there a conflict between growth and poverty alleviation? World Development. 1998;26:783–790. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00021-7.
    1. Mariam D. Indigenous social insurance as an alternative financing mechanism for health care in Ethiopia (the case of eders) Social Science & Medicine. 2003;56:1719–1726. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00166-1.
    1. Ranson MK, Sinha T, Chatterjee M, Acharya A, Bhavsar A, Morris S, Mills A. Making health insurance work for the poor: learning from the Self-Employed Women's Association's (SEWA) community-based health insurance scheme in India. Social Science and Medicine. 2006;62:707–720. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.037.
    1. Microcredit Summit Campaign Summit Purpose and Background. 2006.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe