Retinitis Pigmentosa: Burden of Disease and Current Unmet Needs

Nancy Cross, Cécile van Steen, Yasmina Zegaoui, Andrew Satherley, Luigi Angelillo, Nancy Cross, Cécile van Steen, Yasmina Zegaoui, Andrew Satherley, Luigi Angelillo

Abstract

Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP), a group of inherited retinal dystrophies characterised by progressive vision loss, is the leading cause of visual disability and blindness in subjects less than 60 years old. Currently incurable, therapy is aimed at restricting degeneration of vision, treating complications, and helping patients to cope with the psychosocial impact of their disease. Hence, RP is associated with a high burden of disease. This paper describes the current therapeutic landscape for RP and the disease burden for patients, caregivers, and society. A review of available data was conducted in three stages: (1) a literature search of publicly available information on all domains of RP; (2) a systematic literature review using Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and grey literature (GlobalData) on epidemiology and cost of RP; and (3) qualitative research with senior physicians treating RP patients in the EU4 and the UK to validate research findings from secondary sources. RP severely impacts the daily lives of over a million people worldwide. Progressive vision loss significantly affects the ability to perform basic daily tasks, to maintain employment, and maintain independence. Consequently, most patients will experience reduced quality of life, with a greater emotional and psychological impact than other conditions related to vision loss such as diabetic retinopathy or age-related macular degeneration. RP is also associated with a high level of carer burden, arising from psychological and financial stress. The therapeutic landscape for RP is limited, with few treatment options and minimal guidance for the diagnosis, treatment, and care of patients. A curative intervention, voretigene neparvovec (Luxturna®), only exists for 1-6% of patients. Although disease management can be successful in developing coping strategies, most patients live with this chronic, progressive condition without interventions to change the disease course. Innovative new therapies can transform the therapeutic landscape, provided appropriate clinical guidance is forthcoming.

Keywords: burden of disease; retinal dystrophy; retinitis pigmentosa; treatment; visual impairment.

Conflict of interest statement

Cécile van Steen and Luigi Angelillo are employees of Santen. The views expressed in this article are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the company. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

© 2022 Cross et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Identification of studies on the epidemiology of RP. Created using the official PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Identification of studies on the cost of RP. Created using the official PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Classification of inheritance type of RP from a cohort of Spanish patients. Data from Perea- Romero et al.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Suggested mechanisms contributing to the death of cone photoreceptors in RP. Data from Narayan et al.
Figure 5
Figure 5
RP diagnosis age based on the onset of symptoms, split by genotype. Data from these studies.,
Figure 6
Figure 6
Progression of disease in patient with autosomal dominant RP. Top: representation of visual field; bottom: images from fundus photography; from left to right: progressing from normal visual field in a patient in teenage years (first column) to severely constricted visual field in a patient over 50 years (sixth column). Fundus images show the progression of vessel attenuation and retinal pigment epithelium atrophy, as well as sharp demarcation lines (arrow) between the healthy and affected retina.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Referral pathway for patients with RP.  Data from Lightning Health. European ophthalmologist research; 2021.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Employment rates across groups with different levels of visual impairment France. Data from Chaumet-Riffaud et al.

References

    1. Chaumet-Riffaud AE, Chaumet Riffaud P, Cariou A, et al. Impact of retinitis pigmentosa on quality of life, mental health, and employment among young adults. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;177:169–174. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.02.016
    1. Hamel C. Retinitis pigmentosa. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006;1(1):40. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-1-40
    1. O’Neal TB, Luther EE. Retinitis Pigmentosa. StatPearls Publishing; 2021.
    1. Verbakel SK, van Huet RAC, Boon CJF, et al. Non-syndromic retinitis pigmentosa. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018;66:157–186. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.03.005
    1. Frick KD, Roebuck MC, Feldstein JI, McCarty CA, Grover LL. Health services utilization and cost of retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(5):629–634. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.2820
    1. Jangra D, Ganesh A, Thackray R, et al. Psychosocial adjustment to visual loss in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmic Genet. 2007;28(1):25–30. doi:10.1080/13816810701201930
    1. Garip G, Kamal A. Systematic review and meta-synthesis of coping with retinitis pigmentosa: implications for improving quality of life. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):181. doi:10.1186/s12886-019-1169-z
    1. Perea-Romero I, Gordo G, Iancu IF, et al. Genetic landscape of 6089 inherited retinal dystrophies affected cases in Spain and their therapeutic and extended epidemiological implications. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1526. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-81093-y
    1. Churchill JD, Bowne SJ, Sullivan LS, et al. Mutations in the X-linked retinitis pigmentosa genes RPGR and RP2 found in 8.5% of families with a provisional diagnosis of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(2):1411–1416. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-11541
    1. Ferrari S, Iorio ED, Barbaro V, et al. Retinitis pigmentosa: genes and disease mechanisms. Curr Genomics. 2011;12(4):238–249. doi:10.2174/138920211795860107
    1. RetNet. Summaries of genes and loci causing retinal diseases. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. Narayan DS, Wood JPM, Chidlow G, Casson RJ. A review of the mechanisms of cone degeneration in retinitis pigmentosa. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(8):748–754. doi:10.1111/aos.13141
    1. Nakagawa S, Oishi A, Ogino K, Majiyama Y, Kurimoto M, Yoshimura N. Association of retinal vessel attenuation with visual function in eyes with retinitis pigmentosa. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:1487–1493. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S66326
    1. Hartong DT, Berson EL, Dryja TP. Retinitis pigmentosa. Lancet. 2006;368(9549):1795–1809. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69740-7
    1. Orphanet. Prevalence and incidence of rare diseases: bibliographic data. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. GlobalData. Epidemiology and market size retinitis pigmentosa. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. Kozma P, Hughbanks-Wheaton DK, Locke KG, et al. Phenotypic characterization of a large family with RP10 autosomal-dominant retinitis pigmentosa: an Asp226Asn mutation in the IMPDH1 gene. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(5):858–867. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.05.027
    1. West SK, Rubin GS, Broman AT, Muñoz B, Bandeen-Roche K, Turano K. How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life? The SEE Project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation . Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(6):774–780.
    1. Kliegman RM, Lye PS, Bordini BJ, Toth H, Basel D. Paediatric Symptom-Based Diagnosis. 1st ed. Elsevier; 2018.
    1. International Council of Ophthalmology. Visual standards: aspects and ranges of vision loss with emphasis on population surveys. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. Chivers M, Li N, Pan F, Wieffer H, Slowik R, Leartsakulpanitch J. The burden of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa on patients and society: a narrative literature review. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021;13:565–572. doi:10.2147/CEOR.S297287
    1. Herse P. Retinitis pigmentosa: visual function and multidisciplinary management. Clin Exp Optom. 2005;88(5):335–350. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2005.tb06717.x
    1. European Physician Research. Lightning health European ophthalmologist research; 2021.
    1. RNIB. Understanding retinitis pigmentosa and other inherited retinal dystrophies. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. BVA. Erbliche Netzhaut-, Aderhaut- und Sehbahnerkrankungen. [Hereditary Diseases of theRetina, Choroid and Visual Tract]. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. Ministero de Sanidad, Servicos Sociales, e Igualidad. Guía de Práctica Clínica para las Distrofias Hereditarias de Retina. [Clinical Practice Guideline for Hereditary Retinal Dystrophies]. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. NHS. Referral guideline ophthalmology overview. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. Deloitte. The socioeconomic impact of inherited retinal dystrophies. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. Ronco V, Dilecce M, Lanati E, Canonico PL, Jommi C. Price and reimbursement of advanced therapeutic medicinal products in Europe: are assessment and appraisal diverging from expert recommendations? J Pharm Policy Pract. 2021;14(1):30. doi:10.1186/s40545-021-00311-0
    1. AEMPS. Informe de Posicionamiento Terapéutico de voretigén neparvovec (Luxturna®) para distrofia retiniana asociada a la mutación RPE65 bialélica [Report on the therapeutic positioning of voretigene neparvovec (Luxturna®) for retinal dystrophyassociated with the biallelic RPE65 mutation]; 2021. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco. Riclassificazione del medicinale per uso umano Luxturna ai sensi dell’art. 8, comma 10, della legge 24 dicembre 1993, n. 537. [Reclassification of the medicinal product for humanuse «Luxturna» pursuant to art. 8, paragraph 10, of the law of 24 December 1993, n. 537]. (Determina DG/1344/2020). (20A07274); 2020. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. Alliance for regenerative medicine [homepage on the Internet]. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. EURORDIS. About EURORDIS. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. European reference networks. Eye diseases (ERN-EYE). Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. Genetic Testing Registry. Retinitis pigmentosa. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. EMC. Luxturna concentrate and solvent for solution for injection. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. Knott L. Retinitis Pigmentosa. Patient. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. NICE. Voretigene neparvovec for treating inherited retinal dystrophies caused by RPE65 gene mutations; 2019. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Recommendations on clinical assessment of patients with inherited retinal degenerations; 2016. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. Garrett JR, Lantos JD, Biesecker LG, et al. Rethinking the “open future” argument against predictive genetic testing of children. Genet Med. 2019;21(10):2190–2198. doi:10.1038/s41436-019-0483-4
    1. G-BA. Supporting reasons to not include the diagnostics and care of patients with hereditary retinal degenerations in the catalog according to §116b Abs. 3 and 4 SGB V. s.l. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. Kang C, Scott LJ. Voretigene neparvovec: a review in RPE65 mutation-associated inherited retinal dystrophy. Mol Diagn Ther. 2020;24(4):487–495. doi:10.1007/s40291-020-00475-6
    1. Patterson G, Howard C, Hepworth L, Rowe F. The impact of visual field loss on driving skills: a systematic narrative review. Br Ir Orthopt J. 2019;15(1):53. doi:10.22599/bioj.129
    1. Wong EYH, Chou S-L, Lamoureux EL, Keeffe JE. Personal costs of visual impairment by different eye diseases and severity of visual loss. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2008;15(5):339–344. doi:10.1080/09286580802227394
    1. . Personal Independence Payment (PIP). Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. Bundesministerium fer Justiz. Einkommensteuergesetz (EStG) §33b Pauschbeträge für Menschen mit Behinderungen, Hinterbliebene und Pflegepersonen. [IncomeTax Act (EStG) § 33b lump sums for people with disabilities, surviving dependents and carers]. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. République Française. Vivre à domicile avec un handicap visual. [Living at home with a visual impairment 48 - Recognition of visual impairment and financial aid]. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. ORCAM. Reconnaissance du handicap visual et aides financières. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. INPS. Risultati per tabelle. [Results by tables]. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. PWC. Spain – individual deductions. Worldwide tax summaries. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. SeguridadSocial. Minimum Amounts. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. McDaid D, Park A-L. Counting all the costs: the economic impact of comorbidity. Karger. 2015;179:23–32.
    1. O’Hare F, Bentley SA, Wu Z, Guymer RH, Luu CD, Ayton LN. Charles Bonnet syndrome in advanced retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(9):1951–1953. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.006
    1. Mojon-Azzi SM, Sourza-Poza A, Mojon DS. Impact of low vision on well-being in 10 European countries. Ophthalmologica. 2008;222(3):205–212. doi:10.1159/000126085
    1. The World Bank. Population estimates and projections. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. Tsujikawa M, Wada Y, Sukegawa M. Age at onset curves of retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(3):337–340. doi:10.1001/archopht.126.3.337
    1. RNIB. Benefits rates and payments. Available from: . Accessed July, 2021.
    1. Toms M, Pagarkar W, Moosajee M. Usher syndrome: clinical features, molecular genetics and advancing therapeutics. Therapeut Adv Ophthalmol. 2020;12:2515841420952194.
    1. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe