Assessing the efficacy, safety and utility of closed-loop insulin delivery compared with sensor-augmented pump therapy in very young children with type 1 diabetes (KidsAP02 study): an open-label, multicentre, multinational, randomised cross-over study protocol

Julia Fuchs, Janet M Allen, Charlotte K Boughton, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Ajay Thankamony, Carine de Beaufort, Fiona Campbell, James Yong, Elke Froehlich-Reiterer, Julia K Mader, Sabine E Hofer, Thomas M Kapellen, Birgit Rami-Merhar, Martin Tauschmann, Korey Hood, Barbara Kimbell, Julia Lawton, Stephane Roze, Judy Sibayan, Nathan Cohen, Roman Hovorka, KidsAP Consortium, Roman Hovorka, Carlo L Acerini, Ajay Thankamony, Charlotte K Boughton, Klemen Dovc, Julia Fuchs, Gianluca Musolino, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Janet M Allen, Nicole Ashcroft, Matthew Haydock, Carine de Beaufort, Ulrike Schierloh, Muriel Fichelle, Dominique Schaeffer, Fiona Campbell, James Yong, Emily Metcalfe, Saima Waheed, Joseph Tulip, Elke Froehlich-Reiterer, Maria Fritsch, Hildegard Jasser-Nitsche, Julia K Mader, Kerstin Faninger, Sabine E Hofer, Daniela Abt, Anita Malik, Barbara Lanthaler, Matthias Wenzel, Thomas M Kapellen, Heike Bartelt, Alena Thiele, Birgit Rami-Merhar, Gabriele Berger, Nicole Blauensteiner, Renata Gellai, Katrin Nagl, Martin Tauschmann, Sarah Cvach, Sonja Katzenbeisser-Pawlik, Korey K Hood, Barbara Kimbell, Julia Lawton, Stephane Roze, Nathan Cohen, Craig Kollman, Judy Sibayan, Julia Fuchs, Janet M Allen, Charlotte K Boughton, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Ajay Thankamony, Carine de Beaufort, Fiona Campbell, James Yong, Elke Froehlich-Reiterer, Julia K Mader, Sabine E Hofer, Thomas M Kapellen, Birgit Rami-Merhar, Martin Tauschmann, Korey Hood, Barbara Kimbell, Julia Lawton, Stephane Roze, Judy Sibayan, Nathan Cohen, Roman Hovorka, KidsAP Consortium, Roman Hovorka, Carlo L Acerini, Ajay Thankamony, Charlotte K Boughton, Klemen Dovc, Julia Fuchs, Gianluca Musolino, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Janet M Allen, Nicole Ashcroft, Matthew Haydock, Carine de Beaufort, Ulrike Schierloh, Muriel Fichelle, Dominique Schaeffer, Fiona Campbell, James Yong, Emily Metcalfe, Saima Waheed, Joseph Tulip, Elke Froehlich-Reiterer, Maria Fritsch, Hildegard Jasser-Nitsche, Julia K Mader, Kerstin Faninger, Sabine E Hofer, Daniela Abt, Anita Malik, Barbara Lanthaler, Matthias Wenzel, Thomas M Kapellen, Heike Bartelt, Alena Thiele, Birgit Rami-Merhar, Gabriele Berger, Nicole Blauensteiner, Renata Gellai, Katrin Nagl, Martin Tauschmann, Sarah Cvach, Sonja Katzenbeisser-Pawlik, Korey K Hood, Barbara Kimbell, Julia Lawton, Stephane Roze, Nathan Cohen, Craig Kollman, Judy Sibayan

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes management in very young children remains challenging. Glycaemic targets are achieved at the expense of high parental diabetes management burden and frequent hypoglycaemia, impacting quality of life for the whole family. Our objective is to assess whether automated insulin delivery can improve glycaemic control and alleviate the burden of diabetes management in this particular age group.

Methods and analysis: The study adopts an open-label, multinational, multicentre, randomised, crossover design and aims to randomise 72 children aged 1-7 years with type 1 diabetes on insulin pump therapy. Following screening, participants will receive training on study insulin pump and study continuous glucose monitoring devices. Participants will be randomised to 16-week use of the hybrid closed-loop system (intervention period) or to 16-week use of sensor-augmented pump therapy (control period) with 1-4 weeks washout period before crossing over to the other arm. The order of the two study periods will be random. The primary endpoint is the between-group difference in time spent in the target glucose range from 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/L based on sensor glucose readings during the 16-week study periods. Analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Key secondary endpoints are between group differences in time spent above and below target glucose range, glycated haemoglobin and average sensor glucose. Participants' and caregivers' experiences will be evaluated using questionnaires and qualitative interviews, and sleep quality will be assessed. A health economic analysis will be performed.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval has been obtained from Cambridge East Research Ethics Committee (UK), Ethics Committees of the University of Innsbruck, the University of Vienna and the University of Graz (Austria), Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig (Germany) and Comité National d'Ethique de Recherche (Luxembourg). The results will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

Trial registration number: NCT03784027.

Keywords: diabetes & endocrinology; general diabetes; paediatric endocrinology; paediatrics.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: SEH declares speaker honoraria from Eli Lilly, Pfizer and Sanofi. EF-R reports having received speaker honoraria from Minimed Medtronic and Eli Lilly, serving on advisory boards for Eli Lilly. TMK has received speaker honoraria from Minimed Medtronic, Roche and Eli Lilly and consulted Sanofi-Aventis. CdB has received speaker honoraria from Minimed Medtronic, and is member of their European Psychology Advisory Board. BR-M reports having received speaker honoraria from Abbott, Minimed Medtronic, Eli Lilly, Roche, Menarini and Novo Nordisk, serving on advisory boards for Eli Lilly. FC has received speaking fees from Abbott, Medtronic and Eli Lilly. RH reports having received speaker honoraria from Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, serving on advisory panel for Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk; receiving license fees from BBraun and Medtronic; having served as a consultant to BBraun, patents and patent applications related to closed-loop insulin delivery, and director at CamDiab. JKM is shareholder of Decide Clinical Software, a member in the advisory board of Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Prediktor A/S, Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi-Aventis and received speaker honoraria from Abbott Diabetes Care, Astra Zeneca, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, NovoNordisk A/S, Roche Diabetes Care, Servier and Takeda.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CamAPS FX app with Dexcom G6 sensor (Dexcom, San Diego, California, USA), Dana Diabecare RS insulin pump (Sooil Development, Seoul, Korea), and automatic upload capabilities to diabetes management system Diasend (Glooko/Diasend, Göteborg, Sweden) (reproduced with permission from CamDiab, Cambridge, UK).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study flowchart. CGM, continuous glucose monitoring; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin.

References

    1. Todd JA Etiology of type 1 diabetes. Immunity 2010;32:457–67. 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.04.001
    1. Gale EAM The rise of childhood type 1 diabetes in the 20th century. Diabetes 2002;51:3353–61. 10.2337/diabetes.51.12.3353
    1. Patterson CC, Harjutsalo V, Rosenbauer J, et al. . Trends and cyclical variation in the incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes in 26 European centres in the 25 year period 1989-2013: a multicentre prospective registration study. Diabetologia 2019;62:408–17. 10.1007/s00125-018-4763-3
    1. Williams RM, Dunger DB. Insulin treatment in children and adolescents. Acta Paediatr 2004;93:440–6. 10.1080/08035250410024934
    1. Dovc K, Boughton C, Tauschmann M, et al. . Young children have higher variability of insulin requirements: observations during hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery. Diabetes Care 2019;42:1344–7. 10.2337/dc18-2625
    1. Deiss D, Kordonouri O, Meyer K, et al. . Long hypoglycaemic periods detected by subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring in toddlers and pre-school children with diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 2001;18:337–8. 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2001.00429-3.x
    1. Kaufman FR, Austin J, Neinstein A, et al. . Nocturnal hypoglycemia detected with the continuous glucose monitoring system in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr 2002;141:625–30. 10.1067/mpd.2002.129175
    1. Wiltshire EJ, Newton K, McTavish L. Unrecognised hypoglycaemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes using the continuous glucose monitoring system: prevalence and contributors. J Paediatr Child Health 2006;42:758–63. 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2006.00973.x
    1. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group Prolonged nocturnal hypoglycemia is common during 12 months of continuous glucose monitoring in children and adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1004–8. 10.2337/dc09-2081
    1. Musolino G, Dovc K, Boughton CK, et al. . Reduced burden of diabetes and improved quality of life: experiences from unrestricted day-and-night hybrid closed-loop use in very young children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2019;20:794–9. 10.1111/pedi.12872
    1. Mair C, Wulaningsih W, Jeyam A, et al. . Glycaemic control trends in people with type 1 diabetes in Scotland 2004-2016. Diabetologia 2019;62:1375–84. 10.1007/s00125-019-4900-7
    1. Foster NC, Beck RW, Miller KM, et al. . State of type 1 diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D exchange in 2016-2018. Diabetes Technol Ther 2019;21:66–72. 10.1089/dia.2018.0384
    1. Wood JR, Miller KM, Maahs DM, et al. . Most youth with type 1 diabetes in the T1D exchange clinic registry do not meet American diabetes association or International Society for pediatric and adolescent diabetes clinical guidelines. Diabetes Care 2013;36:2035–7. 10.2337/dc12-1959
    1. DiMeglio LA, Acerini CL, Codner E, et al. . ISPAD clinical practice consensus guidelines 2018: glycemic control targets and glucose monitoring for children, adolescents, and young adults with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2018;19 Suppl 27:105–14. 10.1111/pedi.12737
    1. Anderzén J, Hermann JM, Samuelsson U, et al. . International benchmarking in type 1 diabetes: large difference in childhood HbA1c between eight high-income countries but similar rise during adolescence-A quality registry study. Pediatr Diabetes 2020;21:621–7. 10.1111/pedi.13014
    1. Harrington KR, Boyle CT, Miller KM, et al. . Management and Family Burdens Endorsed by Parents of Youth <7 Years Old With Type 1 Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2017;11:980–7. 10.1177/1932296817721938
    1. Mazaika PK, Weinzimer SA, Mauras N, et al. . Variations in brain volume and growth in young children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2016;65:476–85. 10.2337/db15-1242
    1. Barnea-Goraly N, Raman M, Mazaika P, et al. . Alterations in white matter structure in young children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2014;37:332–40. 10.2337/dc13-1388
    1. Weber C, Schnell O. The assessment of glycemic variability and its impact on diabetes-related complications: an overview. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009;11:623–33. 10.1089/dia.2009.0043
    1. Maahs DM, Hermann JM, DuBose SN, et al. . Contrasting the clinical care and outcomes of 2,622 children with type 1 diabetes less than 6 years of age in the United States T1D Exchange and German/Austrian DPV registries. Diabetologia 2014;57:1578–85. 10.1007/s00125-014-3272-2
    1. van den Boom L, Karges B, Auzanneau M, et al. . Temporal trends and contemporary use of insulin pump therapy and glucose monitoring among children, adolescents, and adults with type 1 diabetes between 1995 and 2017. Diabetes Care 2019;42:2050–6. 10.2337/dc19-0345
    1. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group, Tamborlane WV, Beck RW, et al. . Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1464–76. 10.1056/NEJMoa0805017
    1. Tauschmann M, Hermann JM, Freiberg C, et al. . Reduction in diabetic ketoacidosis and severe hypoglycemia in pediatric type 1 diabetes during the first year of continuous glucose monitoring: a multicenter analysis of 3,553 subjects from the DPV registry. Diabetes Care 2020;43:e40–2. 10.2337/dc19-1358
    1. Tsalikian E, Fox L, Weinzimer S, et al. . Feasibility of prolonged continuous glucose monitoring in toddlers with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2012;13:301–7. 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00837.x
    1. Bekiari E, Kitsios K, Thabit H, et al. . Artificial pancreas treatment for outpatients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2018;361:k1310. 10.1136/bmj.k1310
    1. Weisman A, Bai J-W, Cardinez M, et al. . Effect of artificial pancreas systems on glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outpatient randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017;5:501–12. 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30167-5
    1. Boughton C, Allen JM, Tauschmann M, et al. . Assessing the effect of closed-loop insulin delivery from onset of type 1 diabetes in youth on residual beta-cell function compared to standard insulin therapy (cloud study): a randomised parallel study protocol. BMJ Open 2020;10:e033500. 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033500
    1. Garg SK, Weinzimer SA, Tamborlane WV, et al. . Glucose outcomes with the in-home use of a hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system in adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2017;19:155–63. 10.1089/dia.2016.0421
    1. Forlenza GP, Pinhas-Hamiel O, Liljenquist DR, et al. . Safety evaluation of the MiniMed 670G system in children 7-13 years of age with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2019;21:11–19. 10.1089/dia.2018.0264
    1. Brown SA, Kovatchev BP, Raghinaru D, et al. . Six-Month randomized, multicenter trial of closed-loop control in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1707–17. 10.1056/NEJMoa1907863
    1. Kovatchev BP, Kollar L, Anderson SM, et al. . Evening and overnight closed-loop control versus 24/7 continuous closed-loop control for type 1 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial. Lancet Digit Health 2020;2:E64–73. 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30218-3
    1. Tauschmann M, Thabit H, Bally L, et al. . Closed-Loop insulin delivery in suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, 12-week randomised trial. Lancet 2018;392:1321–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31947-0
    1. Tauschmann M, Allen JM, Wilinska ME, et al. . Home use of day-and-night hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery in suboptimally controlled adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a 3-week, free-living, randomized crossover trial. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2019–25. 10.2337/dc16-1094
    1. Tauschmann M, Allen JM, Nagl K, et al. . Home use of Day-and-Night hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery in very young children: a multicenter, 3-week, randomized trial. Diabetes Care 2019;42:594–600. 10.2337/dc18-1881
    1. Sherr JL, Buckingham BA, Forlenza GP, et al. . Safety and performance of the omnipod hybrid closed-loop system in adults, adolescents, and children with type 1 diabetes over 5 days under free-living conditions. Diabetes Technol Ther 2020;22:174–84. 10.1089/dia.2019.0286

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe