Referral-based transition to subsequent rehabilitation at home after stroke: one-year outcomes and use of healthcare services

Sebastian Lindblom, Malin Tistad, Maria Flink, Ann Charlotte Laska, Lena von Koch, Charlotte Ytterberg, Sebastian Lindblom, Malin Tistad, Maria Flink, Ann Charlotte Laska, Lena von Koch, Charlotte Ytterberg

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of knowledge about patients' journeys across the stroke care continuum, especially regarding the transition from inpatient to outpatient care and rehabilitation. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to explore and describe patterns of healthcare use over a one-year period, health outcomes at 3 and 12 months for patients following a referral-based transition to subsequent rehabilitation in the home, and the caregiver burden on their significant others. A further aim was to explore factors associated with the use of rehabilitation and healthcare after the referral-based transition to continued rehabilitation in the home for people recovering from a stroke.

Methods: Data regarding healthcare use during the first 12 months post-stroke was collected from the Region Stockholm computerized register. Data on patient characteristics, disease-related data, and functioning were retrieved drawn from medical records and questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to present healthcare use, participants' characteristics, disease-related data, and patient functioning. Multivariable regression models were created to explore associations between the total number of outpatient contacts, total visits with the neurorehabilitation team, and the independent variables.

Results: The mean age for the 190 participants was 73 years for men and 78 years for women. Twenty-one participants (11%) had an acute rehospitalization within 30 days after discharge, and 41 participants (21%) were re-hospitalized within 90 days. Twenty-two (12%) of the participants had no visits with the neurorehabilitation team, 73 (39%) participants had 1-3 visits, 57 (30%) had 4-16 visits, and 38 (20%) had ≥17 visits. Female sex and length of hospital stay were associated with a higher number of visits with the neurorehabilitation team. Living alone, higher self-rated recovery, and being able to walk independently were associated with a lower number of visits with the neurorehabilitation team. Female sex, having home help services before the stroke, longer length of hospital stay, and more comorbidities were associated with a higher number of outpatient contacts.

Conclusions: The findings indicate that there is no generic pattern of healthcare use during the first-year post-stroke in patients receiving referral-based transition to continued rehabilitation in the home. The different patterns of healthcare use seemed to mirror the participants' level of functioning. However, there is a need to further investigate how follow-up and rehabilitation correspond to the needs of patients and their significant others in the short- and long-term perspective.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , registration number: NCT02925871 . Date of registration: October 6, 2016.

Keywords: Care transition; Healthcare use; Home environment; Hospitalization; Patient discharge; Readmission primary care; Rehabilitation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the inclusion and retention of people with stroke and significant others
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Total use of outpatient care, including visits with the neurorehabilitation team, during the first-year post-stroke

References

    1. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet (London, England). 2016, 2017;390(10100):1151–210. 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32152-9 Epub 2017/09/19. PubMed PMID: 28919116; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5605883.
    1. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE), 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet (London, England). 2016;388(10053):1603–58. 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31460-x Epub 2016/10/14. PubMed PMID: 27733283; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5388857.
    1. Feigin VL, Norrving B, Mensah GA. Global burden of stroke. Circ Res. 2017;120(3):439–448. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.116.308413.
    1. Donkor ES. Stroke in the 21(st) century: a snapshot of the burden, epidemiology, and quality of life. Stroke research and treatment. 2018;2018:3238165. doi: 10.1155/2018/3238165.
    1. Lindsay M, Norrving B, Furie K, Donnan G, Langhorne P, Davis S. Global stroke guidelines and action plan: a road map for quality stroke care. 2016.
    1. Lindblom S, Flink M, Sjöstrand C, Laska AC, von Koch L, Ytterberg C. Perceived quality of care transitions between hospital and the home in people with stroke. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020. 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.06.042 Epub 2020/08/03. PubMed PMID: 32739283.
    1. Lindblom S, Ytterberg C, Elf M, Flink M. Perceptive dialogue for linking stakeholders and units during care transitions - a qualitative study of people with stroke, significant others and healthcare professionals in Sweden. Int J Integr Care. 2020;20(1):11. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4689.
    1. Nordin A, Sunnerhagen KS, Axelsson AB. Patients' expectations of coming home with Very Early Supported Discharge and home rehabilitation after stroke - an interview study. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:235. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0492-0.
    1. Broderick JP, Abir M. Transitions of Care for Stroke Patients: opportunities to improve outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015;8(6 Suppl 3):S190–S192. doi: 10.1161/circoutcomes.115.002288.
    1. Wottrich AW, Astrom K, Lofgren M. On parallel tracks: newly home from hospital--people with stroke describe their expectations. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(14):1218–1224. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.640381.
    1. Chen L, Xiao LD, Chamberlain D. An integrative review: challenges and opportunities for stroke survivors and caregivers in hospital to home transition care. J Adv Nurs. 2020;76(9):2253–2265. doi: 10.1111/jan.14446.
    1. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(9):Cd000197. 10.1002/14651858.CD000197.pub3 Epub 2013/09/13. PubMed PMID: 24026639.
    1. Riks-Stroke. Riks-Stroke: årsrapport 2018 Umeå: Riks-Stroke; 2019 [cited 2020 September 8]. Available from: .
    1. Tistad M, Ytterberg C, Sjostrand C, Holmqvist LW, von Koch L. Shorter length of stay in the stroke unit: comparison between the 1990s and 2000s. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19(2):172–181. doi: 10.1310/tsr1902-172.
    1. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet (London, England) 2011;377(9778):1693–1702. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60325-5.
    1. Janzen S, Mirkowski M, McIntyre A, Mehta S, Iruthayarajah J, Teasell R. Referral patterns of stroke rehabilitation inpatients to a model system of outpatient services in Ontario, Canada: a 7-year retrospective analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4236-5.
    1. Langhorne P, Baylan S. Early supported discharge services for people with acute stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7:Cd000443. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000443.pub4.
    1. Fisher RJ, Gaynor C, Kerr M, Langhorne P, Anderson C, Bautz-Holter E, et al. A consensus on stroke: early supported discharge. Stroke. 2011;42(5):1392–1397. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.110.606285.
    1. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional EVALUATION: the BARTHEL index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.
    1. Quinn TJ, Langhorne P, Stott DJ. Barthel index for stroke trials: development, properties, and application. Stroke. 2011;42(4):1146–1151. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.110.598540.
    1. Govan L, Langhorne P, Weir CJ. Categorizing stroke prognosis using different stroke scales. Stroke. 2009;40(10):3396–3399. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.109.557645.
    1. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
    1. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2131–2140. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.30.10.2131.
    1. Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, Perera S. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the stroke impact scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(7):950–963. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00035-2.
    1. Sonn U. Longitudinal studies of dependence in daily life activities among elderly persons. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1996;34:1–35.
    1. Sonn U, Asberg KH. Assessment of activities of daily living in the elderly. A study of a population of 76-year-olds in Gothenburg, Sweden. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1991;23(4):193–202.
    1. Elmståhl S, Malmberg B, Annerstedt L. Caregiver's burden of patients 3 years after stroke assessed by a novel caregiver burden scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(2):177–182. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90164-1.
    1. Williams H, Edwards A, Hibbert P, Rees P, Prosser Evans H, Panesar S, et al. Harms from discharge to primary care: mixed methods analysis of incident reports. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(641):e829–e837. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X687877.
    1. Poldervaart JM, van Melle MA, Reijnders LJ, de Wit NJ, Zwart DL. Transitional safety incidents as reported by patients and healthcare professionals in the Netherlands: A descriptive study. Eur J Gen Pract. 2019;25(2):77–84. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2018.1543396.
    1. Hodson T, Gustafsson L, Cornwell P. The lived experience of supporting people with mild stroke. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(3):184–193. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2019.1633401.
    1. Bertilsson AS, Eriksson G, Ekstam L, Tham K, Andersson M, von Koch L, et al. A cluster randomized controlled trial of a client-centred, activities of daily living intervention for people with stroke: one year follow-up of caregivers. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(8):765–775. doi: 10.1177/0269215515603780.
    1. Vluggen T, van Haastregt JCM, Tan FE, Verbunt JA, van Heugten CM, Schols J. Effectiveness of an integrated multidisciplinary geriatric rehabilitation programme for older persons with stroke: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02082-4.
    1. Pindus DM, Mullis R, Lim L, Wellwood I, Rundell AV, Abd Aziz NA, et al. Stroke survivors' and informal caregivers' experiences of primary care and community healthcare services - A systematic review and meta-ethnography. PloS One. 2018;13(2):e0192533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192533.
    1. Tyagi S, Koh GC-H, Nan L, Tan KB, Hoenig H, Matchar DB, et al. Healthcare utilization and cost trajectories post-stroke: role of caregiver and stroke factors. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):881. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3696-3.
    1. Tistad M, Tham K, von Koch L, Ytterberg C. Unfulfilled rehabilitation needs and dissatisfaction with care 12 months after a stroke: an explorative observational study. BMC Neurol. 2012;12(1):40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-40.
    1. Tistad M, von Koch L. Usual Clinical Practice for Early Supported Discharge after Stroke with Continued Rehabilitation at Home: An Observational Comparative Study. PloS One. 2015;10(7):e0133536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133536.
    1. Minet LR, Peterson E, von Koch L, Ytterberg C. Healthcare utilization after stroke: a 1-year prospective study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020. 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.04.036.
    1. Døhl Ø, Halsteinli V, Askim T, Gunnes M, Ihle-Hansen H, Indredavik B, et al. Factors contributing to post-stroke health care utilization and costs, secondary results from the life after stroke (LAST) study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05158-w.
    1. Di Carlo A, Lamassa M, Baldereschi M, Pracucci G, Basile Anna M, Wolfe Charles DA, et al. Sex differences in the clinical presentation, resource use, and 3-month outcome of acute stroke in Europe. Stroke. 2003;34(5):1114–1119. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000068410.07397.D7.
    1. Bertakis KD, Azari R, Helms LJ, Callahan EJ, Robbins JA. Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. J Fam Pract. 2000;49(2):147–152.
    1. Roth DL, Sheehan OC, Huang J, Rhodes JD, Judd SE, Kilgore M, et al. Medicare claims indicators of healthcare utilization differences after hospitalization for ischemic stroke: race, gender, and caregiving effects. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(8):928–934. doi: 10.1177/1747493016660095.
    1. Gargano Julia W, Reeves MJ. Sex differences in stroke recovery and stroke-specific quality of life. Stroke. 2007;38(9):2541–2548. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.485482.
    1. Glader E-L, Stegmayr B, Norrving B, Terént A, Hulter-Åsberg K, Wester P-O, et al. Sex differences in management and outcome after stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(8):1970–1975. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000083534.81284.C5.
    1. Weiss Z, Snir D, Zohar R, Klein B, Eyal P, Dynia A, et al. Allocation and preference of patients for domiciliary or institutional rehabilitation after a stroke. Int J Rehabil Res. 2004;27(2):155–8.
    1. Charlson M, Wells MT, Ullman R, King F, Shmukler C. The Charlson comorbidity index can be used prospectively to identify patients who will incur high future costs. PloS One. 2014;9(12):e112479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112479.
    1. Gruneir A, Griffith LE, Fisher K, Panjwani D, Gandhi S, Sheng L, et al. Increasing comorbidity and health services utilization in older adults with prior stroke. Neurology. 2016;87(20):2091–2098. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003329.
    1. Hall RE, Sondergaard D, Wodchis WP, Fang J, Mondal P, Bayley MT. Trajectories of stroke Care in Ontario: which path to best care? Can J Neurol Sci. 2017;44(3):261–266. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2016.440.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe