Autonomous exoskeleton reduces metabolic cost of human walking during load carriage

Luke M Mooney, Elliott J Rouse, Hugh M Herr, Luke M Mooney, Elliott J Rouse, Hugh M Herr

Abstract

Background: Many soldiers are expected to carry heavy loads over extended distances, often resulting in physical and mental fatigue. In this study, the design and testing of an autonomous leg exoskeleton is presented. The aim of the device is to reduce the energetic cost of loaded walking. In addition, we present the Augmentation Factor, a general framework of exoskeletal performance that unifies our results with the varying abilities of previously developed exoskeletons.

Methods: We developed an autonomous battery powered exoskeleton that is capable of providing substantial levels of positive mechanical power to the ankle during the push-off region of stance phase. We measured the metabolic energy consumption of seven subjects walking on a level treadmill at 1.5 m/s, while wearing a 23 kg vest.

Results: During the push-off portion of the stance phase, the exoskeleton applied positive mechanical power with an average across the gait cycle equal to 23 ± 2 W (11.5 W per ankle). Use of the autonomous leg exoskeleton significantly reduced the metabolic cost of walking by 36 ± 12 W, which was an improvement of 8 ± 3% (p = 0.025) relative to the control condition of not wearing the exoskeleton.

Conclusions: In the design of leg exoskeletons, the results of this study highlight the importance of minimizing exoskeletal power dissipation and added limb mass, while providing substantial positive power during the walking gait cycle.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Autonomous leg exoskeleton. (A) The autonomous exoskeleton applies torque about the human ankle joint during walking, adding positive mechanical power to the wearer during the push-off portion of stance phase. During the swing phase, the device applies negligible forces on the wearer by allowing small amounts of slack into the cord. The mechanism consists of a winch actuator and fiberglass struts that directly apply a resultant torque about the ankle. (B) The winch actuator provides a torque on the ankle by winding the cord around the spool. As the cord is tightened, a force is applied to the struts on either side of the leg. The winch actuator’s brushless motor applies the torque to the ankle joint through a transmission that consists of the belt transmission stage in series with the geometric transmission stage comprising spool, idler roller and strut.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Calculation of negative net-power dissipation term, pdis. Various power profiles are shown with the corresponding positive and dissipative powers. Note that when mean positive power is greater than the mean negative power, the dissipative term is zero.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mechanical and metabolic results of wearing the autonomous exoskeleton. (A) Inter-subject mean exoskeletal ankle power provided by only the exoskeleton is shown (blue) throughout a single gait cycle, while carrying load. Power is normalized by body mass with standard deviation shown in translucent. For comparison, the mechanical power provided by only the biological ankle joint is shown (dashed red) in the case of fast walking without a load or exoskeleton, acquired from a reference dataset [33]. The normalized maximum mechanical power produced by the ankle while walking with a 20 kg load has been shown to increase to over 6 W/kg [23]. (B) Inter-subject mean change in mechanical and metabolic power is shown when using the exoskeleton is compared to not using the exoskeleton, with error bars denoting standard error. The increase in exoskeletal mechanical power demonstrates how much positive mechanical power is provided to the wearer by the exoskeleton. The decrease in metabolic power demonstrates the reduction in the rate of metabolic energy consumed while wearing the exoskeleton.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Augmentation Factor (AF). The AF was calculated for six devices and compared to the measured metabolic impact for each device [9,10,12,20,22]. Triangle markers are previously published autonomous devices, square markers are previously published tethered devices, and the circle marker is the presented autonomous exoskeleton of this study. The equation estimated by linear regression is y = 1.1x – 4 with an R2 equal to 0.98. In the AF equation, the p+ term is calculated by taking the positive work done by an exoskeleton during the gait cycle and dividing by the gait cycle duration. If the net-work done by the exoskeleton is negative, then pdis is equal to this negative net-work divided by the gait cycle duration, otherwise, pdis is zero.

References

    1. Royal marines fitness test. [ ]
    1. Patterson MJ, Roberts WS, Lau W, Prigg SK. Gender and Physical Training Effects on Soldier Physical Competencies and Physiological Strain. Victoria, Australia: Human Protection and Performance Division, Defence Science and Technology Organisation; 2005. [Technical Report]
    1. Yagn N. Apparatus for facilitating walking, running, and jumping. 1890. US Patent No. 420 179 and 438 830.
    1. Kazerooni H, Steger R. The Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 2006;128(March):14–25.
    1. Makinson BJ. Research and Development Prototype for Machine Augmentation of Human Strength and Endurance: Hardiman I Project. Schenectady, New York: General Electric Company; 1971. Tech Rep S-71-1056; [Technical Report]
    1. Rosheim E. Man-amplifying exoskeleton. Proc SPIE Mob Robot IV. 1989;1195:402–411.
    1. Dollar AM, Herr H. Lower extremity exoskeletons and active orthoses: challenges and state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans Robot. 2008;24:144–158.
    1. Ferris DP, Sawicki GS, Daley MA. A physiologist’s perspective on robotic exoskeletons for human locomotion. Int J HR. 2007;4:507–528.
    1. Walsh CJ, Endo K, Herr H. A quasi-passive leg exoskeleton for load-carrying augmentation. Int J HR. 2007;04:487–506.
    1. Donelan JM, Li Q, Naing V, Hoffer JA, Weber DJ, Kuo AD. Biomechanical energy harvesting: generating electricity during walking with minimal user effort. Science. 2008;319:807–810. doi: 10.1126/science.1149860.
    1. Li Q, Naing V, Donelan JM. Development of a biomechanical energy harvester. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6:22. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-22.
    1. Van Dijk W, van der Kooij H, Hekman E. A Passive Exoskeleton with Artificial Tendons. Proc IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011.
    1. Grabowski A, Herr H. Leg exoskeleton reduces the metabolic cost of human hopping. J Appl Physiol. 2009;107:670–678. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.91609.2008.
    1. Farris DJ, Sawicki GS. Linking the mechanics and energetics of hopping with elastic ankle exoskeletons. J Appl Physiol. 2012;113:1862–1872. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00802.2012.
    1. Zoss A, Kazerooni H. Design of an electrically actuated lower extremity exoskeleton. Adv Robot. 2006;20:967–988. doi: 10.1163/156855306778394030.
    1. Zoss A, Kazerooni H, Chu A. Biomechanical design of the Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX) Mechatronics, IEEE/ASME. 2006;11:128–138.
    1. Browning RC, Modica JR, Kram R, Goswami A. The effects of adding mass to the legs on the energetics and biomechanics of walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:515–525. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31802b3562.
    1. Ferris DP, Czerniecki JM, Hannaford B. An ankle-foot orthosis powered by artificial pneumatic muscles. J Appl Biomech. 2005;21:189–197.
    1. Sawicki GS, Ferris DP. Mechanics and energetics of level walking with powered ankle exoskeletons. J Exp Biol. 2008;211(Pt 9):1402–1413.
    1. Sawicki GS, Ferris DP. Powered ankle exoskeletons reveal the metabolic cost of plantar flexor mechanical work during walking with longer steps at constant step frequency. J Exp Biol. 2009;212(Pt 1):21–31.
    1. Ferris DP, Gordon KE, Sawicki GS, Peethambaran A. An improved powered ankle-foot orthosis using proportional myoelectric control. Gait Posture. 2006;23:425–428. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.05.004.
    1. Malcolm P, Derave W, Galle S, De Clercq D. A simple exoskeleton that assists plantarflexion can reduce the metabolic cost of human walking. PLoS One. 2013;8:e56137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056137.
    1. Huang T-WP, Kuo AD. Mechanics and energetics of load carriage during human walking. J Exp Biol. 2014;217(Pt 4):605–613.
    1. Galle S, Malcolm P, Derave W, De Clercq D. Adaptation to walking with an exoskeleton that assists ankle extension. Gait Posture. 2013;38:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.10.007.
    1. Brockway JM. Derivation of formulae used to calculate energy expenditure in man. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1987;41:463–471.
    1. Geyer H, Seyfarth A, Blickhan R. Compliant leg behaviour explains basic dynamics of walking and running. Proc Biol Sci. 2006;273:2861–2867. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3637.
    1. Endo K, Herr H. A model of muscle-tendon function in human walking at self-selected speed. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013;22:352–362.
    1. Whipp BJ, Wasserman K. Efficiency of muscular work. J Appl Physiol. 1969;26:644–648.
    1. Gaesser G, Brooks G. Muscular efficiency during steady-rate exercise: effects of speed and work rate. J Appl Physiol. 1975;38:1132–1139.
    1. Ryschon TW, Fowler MD, Wysong RE, Anthony A, Balaban RS. Efficiency of human skeletal muscle in vivo: comparison of isometric, concentric, and eccentric muscle action. J Appl Physiol. 1997;83:867–874.
    1. Pierrynowski MR, Winter DA, Norman RW. Metabolic measures to ascertain the optimal load to be carried by man. Ergonomics. 1981;24:393–399. doi: 10.1080/00140138108924861.
    1. Bastien GJ, Willems PA, Schepens B, Heglund NC. Effect of load and speed on the energetic cost of human walking. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005;94:76–83. doi: 10.1007/s00421-004-1286-z.
    1. Winter D. Biomechanical motor patterns in normal walking. J Mot Behav. 1983;15:303–330.
    1. Sawicki GS, Ferris DP. Mechanics and energetics of incline walking with robotic ankle exoskeletons. J Exp Biol. 2009;212(Pt 1):32–41.
    1. Valiente A. Design of a Quasi-Passive Parallel Leg Exoskeleton to Augment Load Carrying for Walking: Maters’ thesis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Mechanical Engineering Department; 2006.
    1. Collins SH, Jackson RW. Inducing self-selected human engagement in robotic locomotion training. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2013;2013:6650488.
    1. Kao P, Ferris D. Motor adaptation during dorsiflexion-assisted walking with a powered orthosis. Gait Posture. 2009;29:230–236. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.08.014.
    1. Wehner M, Quinlivan B, Aubin PM, Martinez-villalpando E, Bauman M, Holt K, Wood R, Walsh C. Design and Evaluation of a Lightweight Soft Exosuit for Gait Assistance. 2013.
    1. Sawicki GS, Lewis CL, Ferris DP. It pays to have a spring in your step. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2009;37:130–138. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e31819c2df6.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe