Family Connections in different settings and intensities for underserved and geographically isolated families: a non-randomised comparison study

Sophie I Liljedahl, Nikolaus Kleindienst, Margit Wångby-Lundh, Lars-Gunnar Lundh, Daiva Daukantaitė, Alan E Fruzzetti, Sofie Westling, Sophie I Liljedahl, Nikolaus Kleindienst, Margit Wångby-Lundh, Lars-Gunnar Lundh, Daiva Daukantaitė, Alan E Fruzzetti, Sofie Westling

Abstract

Background: Family Connections (FC) is a multi-family skills training program for relatives of individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and related difficulties, typically offered once per week for 12-14 weeks. Families with loved ones receiving residential Dialectical Behaviour Therapy DBT (DBT-R) in a different community, or those with multiple caregiving demands may have difficulty participating in weekly standard FC (FC-S). The aims of this paper are to: 1) Evaluate the results of the FC-S approach compared with an intensified weekend FC model developed for family members whose relatives are in DBT-R (FC-R); 2) Evaluate outcomes of FC-R for families with loved ones returning home from DBT-R, as little is known about how this population fares.

Methods: Data were collected at pre-treatment (T1), post-treatment (T2), and at six-to-seven-month follow-up (T3) in this non-randomized comparison study. A total of 82 family members participated, 34 of whom completed the FC-S program and 48 of whom completed the FC-R program. The evaluation was based upon outcomes derived from a standard battery used in FC research, analyzed by time and treatment setting. A composite score to evaluate family distress was generated. Two-way mixed multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA) were employed to evaluate time (pre-versus-post versus follow-up) and group (FC-S versus FC-R).

Results: Scores on measures of mental health difficulties (General Severity Index), sense of burden (Burden Assessment Scale), and Global Family Functioning showed improvement over time. Having a loved one return home from DBT-R was associated with worsening on the GSI and the BAS at post-test. Notably, this deterioration was not found at follow-up.

Conclusions: Little is known about families with loved ones receiving DBT-R other than the fact that their loved ones had not responded to previous services, which suggests greater complexity and chronicity. Because the family members receiving the weekend intensive FC-R version of FC demonstrated improvement, preliminary support exists for service providers to use the weekend intensive FC-R model as a time-and-cost efficient option whenever barriers exist to participating in weekly FC-S. Our findings also suggest that booster sessions may be indicated for families receiving loved ones home from DBT-R programs.

Keywords: Borderline personality disorder (BPD); Dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT); Enhanced service delivery; Families; Family Connections; Relatives; Residential treatment.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
GSI, BAS, and Family Distress scores for pre (time 1), post (time 2), and follow-up (time 3) assessments

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM 5) 5. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
    1. Grant BF, Chou SP, Goldstein RB, Huang B, Stinson FS, Saha TD, Smith SM, Dawson DA, Pulay AJ, Pickering RP, Ruan WJ. Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV borderline personality disorder: results from the wave 2 national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69:553–545.
    1. Philipsen A, Limberger MF, Lieb K, Feige B, Kleindienst N, Ebner-Priemer U, Barth J, Schmahl C, Bohus M. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder as a potentially aggravating factor in borderline personality disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;192:118–123. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.035782.
    1. Björkenstam E, Björkenstam C, Holm H, Gerdin B, Ekselius L. Excess cause-specific mortality in in-patient-treated individuals with personality disorder: 25-year nationwide population-based study. Br J Psychiatry. 2015;207:339–345. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.149583.
    1. Lieb K, Zanarini MC, Schmahl C, Linehan MM, Bohus M. Borderline personality disorder. Lancet. 2004;364:453–461. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16770-6.
    1. Bateman A, Fonagy P. A randomized controlled trial of a mentalization-based intervention (MBT-FACTS) for families of people with borderline personality disorder. Personal Disord. 2019;10:70–79. doi: 10.1037/per0000298.
    1. Fruzzetti AE, Shenk C, Hoffpam PD. Family interaction and the development of borderline personality disorder: a transactional model. Dev Psychopathol. 2005;17:1007–1030. doi: 10.1017/S0954579405050479.
    1. Linehan MM. Validation and psychotherapy. In: Bohart AC, Greenberg LS, editors. Empathy reconsidered: new directions in psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1997. pp. 353–392.
    1. Fruzzetti AE. The high conflict couple: a dialectical behavior therapy guide to finding peace, intimacy, and validation. Oakland: New Harbinger Press; 2006.
    1. Terkelsen KG. Schizophrenia and the family: II. Adverse effects of family therapy. Fam Process. 1983;22:191–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1983.00191.x.
    1. Fitzpatrick Skye, Wagner Anne C., Monson Candice M. Optimizing borderline personality disorder treatment by incorporating significant others: A review and synthesis. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. 2019;10(4):297–308. doi: 10.1037/per0000328.
    1. Linehan MM. Cognitive behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press; 1993.
    1. Hoffman PD, Fruzzetti AE, Buteau E, Neiditch ER, Penney D, Bruce ML, Hellman F, Struening E. Family Connections: a program for relatives of persons with borderline personality disorder. Fam Process. 2005;44:217–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2005.00055.x.
    1. Fruzzetti AE, Hoffman PD. Family Connections workbook and training manual: National Education Alliance for Borderline Personality Disorder; 2004. . Accessed 3 June 2019
    1. Lundh LG, Wångby M. Programmet Familijeband som anhörigstöd inom psykiatrin. En svensk utvärdering: Lund Univeristy; 2007. . Accessed 3 June 2019
    1. Rajalin M, Wockholm-Pethrus L, Hursti T, Jokinen J. Dialectical behaviour therapy-based skills training for family members of suicide attempters. Arch Suicide Res. 2009;13:257–263. doi: 10.1080/13811110903044401.
    1. Flynn D, Kells M, Joyce M, Corcoran P, Herley S, Suarez C, Cotter P, Hurley J, Weihrauch M, Groeger J. Family Connections versus optimized treatment-as-usual for family members of individuals with borderline personality disorder: non-randomised controlled study. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2017;4:18. doi: 10.1186/s40479-017-0069-1.
    1. Linehan MM. DBT skills training manual. 2. New York: Guilford Press; 2015.
    1. Ekdahl Susanne, Idvall Ewa, Perseius Kent-Inge. Family Skills Training in Dialectical Behaviour Therapy: The Experience of the Significant Others. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 2014;28(4):235–241. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2014.03.002.
    1. Lundh L-G. Behandlingseffekter på självskadebeteende:Vad visar forskningen? 2013.
    1. Hoffman PD, Fruzzeti AE, Buteau E. Understanding and engaging families: an education, skills and support program for relatives impacted by borderline personality disorder. J Ment Health. 2007;16:69–82. doi: 10.1080/09638230601182052.
    1. Derogatis LR. Symptom Checklist-90-R. administration, scoring and procedure manual for the revised version of the SCL-90. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems; 1994.
    1. Reinhard S, Gubman G, Horwitz A, Minsky S. Burden assessment scale for families of the seriously mentally ill. Eval Program Plann. 1994;17:261–269. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(94)90004-3.
    1. Ivarsson AB, Sidenvall B, Carlsson M. The factor structure of the burden assessment scale and the perceived burden of caregivers for individuals with severe mental disorders. Scand J Caring Sci. 2004;18:396–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00298.x.
    1. Frisch MB, Cornell J, Villanueva M, Retzlaff PJ. Clinical validation of the quality of life inventory: a measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcome assessment. Psychol Assess. 1992;4:92–101. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.92.
    1. Lundh LG, Simonsson-Sarnecki M. Alexithymia, emotion, and somatic complaints. J Pers. 2001;69:483–510. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00153.
    1. Baer RA, Smith GT, Allen KB. Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment. 2004;11:191–206. doi: 10.1177/1073191104268029.
    1. Hansen E, Lundh LG, Homman A, Wångby-Lundh M. Measuring mindfulness. Pilot studies with the Swedish versions of the mindful attention awareness scale (MAAS) and the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills (KIMS) Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38:2–15. doi: 10.1080/16506070802383230.
    1. Hansson K, Jarbin H. A new self-rating questionnaire in Swedish for measuring expressed emotion. Nord J Psychiatry. 1997;51:287–297. doi: 10.3109/08039489709090721.
    1. Hansson K. Familjeklimat. En adjektivlista för familjediagnostik. Family climate. A list of adjectives for diagnosing families. Lund: Psykologi i tillämpning, nr 1, Lund University; 1989.
    1. Lundblad AM, Hansson K. Relational problems and psychiatric symptoms in couple therapy. Int J Soc Welf. 2015;14:256–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-6866.2005.00368.x.
    1. Fralicx Rodney D., Raju Nambury S. A Comparison of Five Methods for Combining Multiple Criteria into a Single Composite. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1982;42(3):823–827. doi: 10.1177/001316448204200315.
    1. Paunonen SV, Gardner RC. Biases resulting from the use of aggregate variables in psychology. Psychol Bull. 1991;109:520–523. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.3.520.
    1. Drossel C, Fisher JE, Mercer A. DBT skills training group for family caregivers of persons with dementia. Behav Ther. 2011;42:109–119. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.06.001.
    1. Lieb K, Völlm B, Rücker G, Timmer A, Stoffers JM. Pharmacotherapy for borderline personality disorder: Cochrane systematic review of randomized trials. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;196:4–12. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.062984.
    1. Choi-Kain LW, Finch EF, Masland SR, Jenkins JA, Unruh BT. What works in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2017;4:21–30. doi: 10.1007/s40473-017-0103-z.
    1. Zeitler ML, Bohus M, Kleindienst N, Knies R, Ostermann M, Schmahl C, Lyssenko L. How to assess recovery in borderline personality disorder: psychosocial functioning and satisfaction with life in a sample of former DBT study patients. J Personal Disord. 2018;4:1–19. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2018_32_394.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe