Disrupted topological organization of structural brain networks in childhood absence epilepsy

Wenchao Qiu, Chuanyong Yu, Yuan Gao, Ailiang Miao, Lu Tang, Shuyang Huang, Wenwen Jiang, Jintao Sun, Jing Xiang, Xiaoshan Wang, Wenchao Qiu, Chuanyong Yu, Yuan Gao, Ailiang Miao, Lu Tang, Shuyang Huang, Wenwen Jiang, Jintao Sun, Jing Xiang, Xiaoshan Wang

Abstract

Childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) is the most common paediatric epilepsy syndrome and is characterized by frequent and transient impairment of consciousness. In this study, we explored structural brain network alterations in CAE and their association with clinical characteristics. A whole-brain structural network was constructed for each participant based on diffusion-weighted MRI and probabilistic tractography. The topological metrics were then evaluated. For the first time, we uncovered modular topology in CAE patients that was similar to healthy controls. However, the strength, efficiency and small-world properties of the structural network in CAE were seriously damaged. At the whole brain level, decreased strength, global efficiency, local efficiency, clustering coefficient, normalized clustering coefficient and small-worldness values of the network were detected in CAE, while the values of characteristic path length and normalized characteristic path length were abnormally increased. At the regional level, especially the prominent regions of the bilateral precuneus showed reduced nodal efficiency, and the reduction of efficiency was significantly correlated with disease duration. The current results demonstrate significant alterations of structural networks in CAE patients, and the impairments tend to grow worse over time. Our findings may provide a new way to understand the pathophysiological mechanism of CAE.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Differences of network metrics between CAE patients and healthy controls (CON). (A) Shows the group differences under different thresholds; significant between-group differences are indicated by an asterisk above the corresponding threshold at p < 0.05 with Bonferroni correction. (B) Displays the group differences at integrated level (**p < 0.05). The error bar indicates standard deviation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Modular topology of the structural network of CAE patients and healthy controls (CON). (A) Number of modules and brain network modularity in CAE and CON under different thresholds. No significant difference is detected between the two groups. The error bar indicates standard deviation. (B) 3D representations of modular topology are visualized on the average structural network of each group. The nodes are colour-coded by modules.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Distribution of hubs in CAE and healthy controls (CON). For abbreviations of the regions, please see Supplementary Table S1. (B) Significant group difference in integrated Enodal of bilateral precuneus (left and right, respectively) (**p < 0.05). (C) Relationship between disease duration and integrated Enodal of bilateral precuneus in the patient group. Significantly negative correlations are revealed for both sides.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Flowchart for brain network construction. Data from a typical healthy control is used to demonstrate the process of construction. (A) Raw high-resolution T1-weighted MRI and DTI images in native space and automated anatomical labelling (AAL) atlas in MNI space. (B) The connectivity matrix is built up according to the probabilistic tractography algorithm after the process of parcellation and normalization. (C) 3D visualization of the weighted network is rendered using BrainNet Viewer (BrainNet Viewer 1.53, Beijing Normal University, http://www.nitrc.org/projects/bnv/). The edges are encoded with their connection weights at the threshold of 0.01.

References

    1. Berg AT, Shinnar S, Levy SR, Testa FM. Newly diagnosed epilepsy in children: presentation at diagnosis. Epilepsia. 1999;40:445–452. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb00739.x.
    1. ILAE. Proposal for revised classification of epilepsies and epileptic syndromes. Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy. Epilepsia30, 389-399 (1989).
    1. Caplan R, et al. Childhood absence epilepsy: behavioral, cognitive, and linguistic comorbidities. Epilepsia. 2008;49:1838–1846. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01680.x.
    1. Vega C, et al. Symptoms of anxiety and depression in childhood absence epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2011;52:e70–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03119.x.
    1. Verrotti A, Matricardi S, Rinaldi VE, Prezioso G, Coppola G. Neuropsychological impairment in childhood absence epilepsy: Review of the literature. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2015;359:59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.10.035.
    1. Arya R, et al. Obesity and overweight as CAE comorbidities and differential drug response modifiers. Neurology. 2016;86:1613–1621. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002611.
    1. van den Heuvel MP, Hulshoff Pol HE. Exploring the brain network: a review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. European neuropsychopharmacology: the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;20:519–534. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.03.008.
    1. He Y, Evans A. Graph theoretical modeling of brain connectivity. Current opinion in neurology. 2010;23:341–350.
    1. Yang T, et al. Altered resting-state connectivity during interictal generalized spike-wave discharges in drug-naive childhood absence epilepsy. Human brain mapping. 2013;34:1761–1767. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22025.
    1. Liao W, et al. Dynamical intrinsic functional architecture of the brain during absence seizures. Brain structure & function. 2014;219:2001–2015. doi: 10.1007/s00429-013-0619-2.
    1. Ponten SC, Douw L, Bartolomei F, Reijneveld JC, Stam CJ. Indications for network regularization during absence seizures: weighted and unweighted graph theoretical analyses. Experimental neurology. 2009;217:197–204. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.02.001.
    1. Killory BD, et al. Impaired attention and network connectivity in childhood absence epilepsy. NeuroImage. 2011;56:2209–2217. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.036.
    1. Berman R, et al. Simultaneous EEG, fMRI, and behavior in typical childhood absence seizures. Epilepsia. 2010;51:2011–2022. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02652.x.
    1. Luo C, et al. Altered intrinsic functional connectivity of the salience network in childhood absence epilepsy. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2014;339:189–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.02.016.
    1. Bullmore E, Sporns O. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature reviews. Neuroscience. 2009;10:186–198. doi: 10.1038/nrn2575.
    1. Fornito A, Zalesky A, Breakspear M. The connectomics of brain disorders. Nature reviews. Neuroscience. 2015;16:159–172. doi: 10.1038/nrn3901.
    1. Hagmann P, et al. Mapping human whole-brain structural networks with diffusion MRI. PLoS One. 2007;2:e597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000597.
    1. Xue K, et al. Diffusion tensor tractography reveals disrupted structural connectivity in childhood absence epilepsy. Epilepsy research. 2014;108:125–138. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2013.10.002.
    1. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage. 2002;15:273–289. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978.
    1. Lemkaddem A, et al. Connectivity and tissue microstructural alterations in right and left temporal lobe epilepsy revealed by diffusion spectrum imaging. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2014;5:349–358. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.07.013.
    1. Vaessen MJ, et al. Functional and structural network impairment in childhood frontal lobe epilepsy. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090068.
    1. Liang JS, et al. Microstructural Changes in Absence Seizure Children: A Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Pediatrics and neonatology. 2016;57:318–325. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2015.10.003.
    1. Behrens TE, Berg HJ, Jbabdi S, Rushworth MF, Woolrich MW. Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? NeuroImage. 2007;34:144–155. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.018.
    1. Honey CJ, Thivierge JP, Sporns O. Can structure predict function in the human brain? NeuroImage. 2010;52:766–776. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.071.
    1. Greicius MD, Supekar K, Menon V, Dougherty RF. Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. Cerebral cortex. 2009;19:72–78. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn059.
    1. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature. 1998;393:440–442. doi: 10.1038/30918.
    1. Bassett DS, Bullmore E. Small-world brain networks. The Neuroscientist: a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry. 2006;12:512–523. doi: 10.1177/1073858406293182.
    1. Humphries MD, Gurney K. Network ‘small-world-ness’: a quantitative method for determining canonical network equivalence. PLoS One. 2008;3:e0002051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002051.
    1. Newman ME. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103:8577–8582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601602103.
    1. Meunier D, Lambiotte R, Bullmore ET. Modular and hierarchically modular organization of brain networks. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2010;4:200. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2010.00200.
    1. Bertolero MA, Yeo BT, D’Esposito M. The modular and integrative functional architecture of the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2015;112:E6798–6807. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510619112.
    1. van den Heuvel MP, Sporns O. Network hubs in the human brain. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2013;17:683–696. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.012.
    1. Achard S, Bullmore E. Efficiency and cost of economical brain functional networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2007;3:e17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030017.
    1. Cavanna AE, Trimble MR. The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain: a journal of neurology. 2006;129:564–583. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl004.
    1. Alkire MT, Hudetz AG, Tononi G. Consciousness and anesthesia. Science. 2008;322:876–880. doi: 10.1126/science.1149213.
    1. Moeller F, et al. Simultaneous EEG-fMRI in drug-naive children with newly diagnosed absence epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2008;49:1510–1519. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01626.x.
    1. Yang T, et al. Altered spontaneous activity in treatment-naive childhood absence epilepsy revealed by Regional Homogeneity. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2014;340:58–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.02.025.
    1. Miao A, et al. Using ictal high-frequency oscillations (80-500 Hz) to localize seizure onset zones in childhood absence epilepsy: a MEG study. Neuroscience letters. 2014;566:21–26. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.02.038.
    1. Crossley NA, et al. The hubs of the human connectome are generally implicated in the anatomy of brain disorders. Brain: a journal of neurology. 2014;137:2382–2395. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu132.
    1. Raichle ME, et al. A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;98:676–682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.676.
    1. Chhatwal JP, et al. Impaired default network functional connectivity in autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2013;81:736–744. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a1aafe.
    1. Sandrone S, Catani M. Journal Club. Default-mode network connectivity in cognitively unimpaired patients with Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2013;81:e172–175. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000436943.62904.09.
    1. Gong G, et al. Age- and gender-related differences in the cortical anatomical network. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2009;29:15684–15693. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2308-09.2009.
    1. Bassett DS, Brown JA, Deshpande V, Carlson JM, Grafton ST. Conserved and variable architecture of human white matter connectivity. NeuroImage. 2011;54:1262–1279. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.006.
    1. Shimono M, Niki K. Global mapping of the whole-brain network underlining binocular rivalry. Brain connectivity. 2013;3:212–221. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0129.
    1. Kim DJ, et al. Disrupted modular architecture of cerebellum in schizophrenia: a graph theoretic analysis. Schizophrenia bulletin. 2014;40:1216–1226. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu059.
    1. Fleisher AS, et al. Chronic divalproex sodium use and brain atrophy in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2011;77:1263–1271. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318230a16c.
    1. Pardoe HR, Berg AT, Jackson GD. Sodium valproate use is associated with reduced parietal lobe thickness and brain volume. Neurology. 2013;80:1895–1900. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318292a2e5.
    1. Yendiki A, Koldewyn K, Kakunoori S, Kanwisher N, Fischl B. Spurious group differences due to head motion in a diffusion MRI study. NeuroImage. 2014;88:79–90. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.027.
    1. Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Human brain mapping. 2002;17:143–155. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10062.
    1. Muthuraman M, et al. Structural Brain Network Characteristics Can Differentiate CIS from Early RRMS. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2016;10:14. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00014.
    1. Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. NeuroImage. 2010;52:1059–1069. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003.
    1. He Y, et al. Impaired small-world efficiency in structural cortical networks in multiple sclerosis associated with white matter lesion load. Brain: a journal of neurology. 2009;132:3366–3379. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp089.
    1. Lei D, et al. Disrupted Functional Brain Connectome in Patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Radiology. 2015;276:818–827. doi: 10.1148/radiol.15141700.
    1. Xia M, Wang J, He Y. BrainNet Viewer: a network visualization tool for human brain connectomics. PLoS One. 2013;8:e68910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068910.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe