Evaluating the likelihood to be helped or harmed after treatment with viloxazine extended-release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Azmi Nasser, Alisa R Kosheleff, Joseph T Hull, Tesfaye Liranso, Peibing Qin, Gregory D Busse, Maurizio Fava, Vladimir Maletic, Jonathan Rubin, Frank Lopez, Azmi Nasser, Alisa R Kosheleff, Joseph T Hull, Tesfaye Liranso, Peibing Qin, Gregory D Busse, Maurizio Fava, Vladimir Maletic, Jonathan Rubin, Frank Lopez

Abstract

Aims: When clinicians evaluate potential medications for their patients, they must weigh the probability of a treatment's benefits against the possible risks. To this end, the present analyses evaluate the novel nonstimulant viloxazine extended-release (viloxazine ER) using measures of effect size to describe the potential benefits of its treatment in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as well as the risk of discontinuation because of intolerable adverse events.

Methods: These post hoc analyses use pooled data from four pivotal Phase 3 trials in paediatric patients treated with viloxazine ER. The Likelihood to be Helped or Harmed (LHH) effect size measure was calculated to describe the probability of patients benefiting from treatment vs discontinuing. The Number Needed to Treat (NNT) was calculated from frequently used thresholds of response. The Number Needed to Harm (NNH) was calculated using discontinuations because of adverse events.

Results: LHH values for viloxazine ER ranged from 5 to 13, suggesting that subjects were 5-13 times more likely to benefit from, rather than discontinue, viloxazine ER treatment. Specifically, NNT values for viloxazine ER treatment ranged from 6 to 7. NNH values for viloxazine ER treatment ranged from 31 to 74. By convention, single-digit NNTs (<10) suggest the intervention is potentially useful, while NNH values ≥10 for adverse events suggest it is potentially safe or tolerable.

Conclusions: These results indicate that patients with ADHD are likely to benefit from treatment with viloxazine ER, and are unlikely to discontinue, as viloxazine ER treatment was associated with favourable LHH, NNT, and NNH values. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03247530, NCT03247543, NCT03247517, NCT03247556.

Conflict of interest statement

A Nasser, AR Kosheleff, T Liranso, P Qin, JT Hull, GD Busse, and J Rubin are employees of Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc For a list of M Fava's lifetime disclosures, please see this link. V Maletic is an employee of the University of South Carolina School of Medicine. He is a consultant for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc; Alfasigma USA, Inc; Alkermes, Inc; Allergan; Eisai‐Purdue; Intra‐Cellular Therapies; Janssen; H. Lundbeck A/S; Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc; Sage Pharmaceuticals; Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc; Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc; and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. He serves on the speakers’ bureau of ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc; Alkermes, Inc; Allergan; Ironshore; Intra‐Cellular; Janssen; H. Lundbeck A/S; Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc; Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc; and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; and his spouse serves on the speakers’ bureau of Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc F Lopez has served as a consultant to and received speaker fees and/or research support from Eli Lilly, GSK, Ironshore, Neos, Novartis, Noven, Pfizer, Shire, Sunovion, Supernus, and Tris.

© 2021 Supernus Pharmaceuticals Inc. International Journal of Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Likelihood to be helped or harmed. Likelihood to be Helped or Harmed (LHH) based on the rate of discontinuations because of adverse events and (A) ADHD‐RS‐5 criteria only or (B) either ADHD‐RS‐5 criteria or CGI‐I criteria. LHH values under each symbol represent the likelihood of responding to treatment vs discontinuing treatment because of adverse events. ADHD‐RS‐5, Attention‐Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, Fifth Edition; CGI‐I, Clinical Global Impressions – Improvement
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Number needed to treat. Number Needed to Treat (NNT; ± 95% confidence intervals) based on (A) ADHD‐RS‐5 criteria only or (B) either ADHD‐RS‐5 criteria or CGI‐I criteria. NNT values under each symbol represent the number of patients who need to be treated before one patient responds. ADHD‐RS‐5, Attention‐Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, Fifth Edition; CGI‐I, Clinical Global Impressions – Improvement
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Number needed to harm. Number Needed to Harm (NNH; ± 95% confidence intervals) based on the rate of discontinuations because of adverse events. NHH values represent the number of patients who need to be treated before one patient discontinues treatment because of adverse events. Confidence intervals for NNH values that are not statistically significant (ie, Children, blue square) contain two ranges of numbers: negative infinity to a negative value (ie, −infinity to −110), and a positive value to positive infinity (ie, +27 to +infinity), and suggest that there exists no difference in event rates between patients treated with viloxazine ER and placebo. NNH values are to the left of each symbol, 95% upper‐ and lower‐bound confidence intervals are to the right

References

    1. Singh A, Yeh CJ, Verma N, et al. Overview of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in young children. Health Psychol Res. 2015;3:23‐35.
    1. Adesman AR. The diagnosis and management of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder in pediatric patients. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;3:66‐77.
    1. Danielson ML, Bitsko RH, Ghandour RM, et al. Prevalence of parent‐reported ADHD diagnosis and associated treatment Among U.S. children and adolescents, 2016. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018;47(2):199–212.
    1. Simon V, Czobor P, Balint S, et al. Prevalence and correlates of adult attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder: meta‐analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;194:204‐211.
    1. Kessler RC, Adler LA, Barkley R, et al. The prevalence and correlates of adult ADHD in the United States: results from the national comorbidity survey replication. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:716‐723.
    1. Polanczyk GV, de Lima MS, Horta BL, et al. The Worldwide Prevalence of ADHD: a systematic review and metaregression analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:942‐948.
    1. Turgay A, Goodman DW, Asherson P, et al. Lifespan persistence of ADHD: the life transition model and its application. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73:192‐201.
    1. Wilens T, Biederman J, Spencer T. Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder across the lifespan. Annu Rev Med. 2002;53:113‐131.
    1. Cortese S. Pharmacologic treatment of attention deficit‐hyperactivity disorder. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1050‐1056.
    1. Adler LA, Reingold LS, Morrill MS, et al. Combination pharmacotherapy for adult ADHD. Current Psychiatry Reports. 2006;8:409‐415.
    1. Molife C, Bernauer MJ, Farr AM, et al. Combination therapy patterns and predictors of ADHD in commercially insured and Medicaid populations. Postgrad Med. 2012;124:7‐22.
    1. Wilens T, Spencer T, Biederman J, et al. Combined pharmacotherapy: an emerging trend in pediatric psychopharmacology. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995;34:110‐112.
    1. Concerta (Methylphenidate HCL) Extended Release [package insert]. Titusville, NJ: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2017.
    1. Biederman J, Wilens T, Mick E, et al. Psychoactive substance use disorders in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): effects of ADHD and psychiatric comorbidity. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152:1652‐1658.
    1. Wilens T. Impact of ADHD and its treatment on substance abuse in adults. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65:38‐45.
    1. Vyvanse (Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate) [package insert]. Lexington, MA: Shire US Inc.; 2017.
    1. Nafees B, Setyawan J, Lloyd A, et al. Parent preferences regarding stimulant therapies for ADHD: a comparison across six European countries. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;23:1189‐1200.
    1. Efron D, Jarman F, Barker M. Side effects of methylphenidate and dexamfetamine in children with attention defict hyperactivity disorder: a double‐blind, crossover trial. Pediatrics. 1997;100:662‐666.
    1. Clemow DB, Walker DJ. The potential for misuse and abuse of medications in ADHD: a review. Postgrad Med. 2014;126:64‐81.
    1. Clemow DB. Misuse of methylphenidate. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2017;34:99‐124.
    1. Wilens TE, Adler LA, Adams J, et al. Misuse and diversion of stimulants prescribed for ADHD: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47:21‐31.
    1. Spencer T, Biederman J, Wilens T, et al. Pharmacotherapy of attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder across the life cycle. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996;35:409‐432.
    1. Faraone SV, Glatt SJ. A comparison of the efficacy of medications for adult attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder using meta‐analysis of effect sizes. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71:754‐763.
    1. Strattera (Atomoxetine) [prescribing information]. Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly and Company, LLC; 2017.
    1. Intuniv (Guanfacine Extended‐Release) [prescribing information]. Lexington, MA: Shire US Inc.; 2016.
    1. Busner J, Targum SD. The Clinical Global Impressions Scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007;4:28‐37.
    1. Kay SR. Positive‐negative symptom assessment in schizophrenia: psychometric issues and scale comparison. Psychiatr Q. 1990;61:163‐178.
    1. Weiss M, Tannock R, Kratochvil C, et al. A randomized, placebo‐controlled study of once‐daily atomoxetine in the school setting in children with ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005;44:647‐655.
    1. Kemner JE, Starr HL, Ciccone PE, et al. Outcomes of OROS methylphenidate compared with atomoxetine in children with ADHD: a multicenter, randomized prospective study. Adv Ther. Sep‐Oct. 2005;22:498‐512.
    1. Huss M, Sikirica V, Hervas A, et al. Guanfacine extended release for children and adolescents with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder: efficacy following prior methylphenidate treatment. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016;112:1085‐1101.
    1. Stein MA, Sikirica V, Weiss MD, et al. Does guanfacine extended release impact functional impairment in children with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder? Results from a randomized controlled trial. CNS Drugs. 2015;29:953‐962.
    1. Biederman J, Krishnan S, Zhang Y, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (NRP‐104) in children with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, forced‐dose, parallel‐group study. Clin Ther. 2007;29:450‐463.
    1. Gao K, Kemp DE, Fein E, et al. Number needed to treat to harm for discontinuation due to adverse events in the treatment of bipolar depression, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder with atypical antipsychotics. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72:1063‐1071.
    1. Yu C, Garcia‐Olivares J, Candler S, et al. New insights into the mechanism of action of viloxazine: Serotonin and norepinephrine modulating properties. J Exp Pharmacol. 2020;12:285‐300.
    1. Nasser A, Liranso T, Adewole T, et al. A phase 3, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of once‐daily SPN‐812 (viloxazine extended release) in the treatment of ADHD in school‐age children. Clin Ther. 2020;42:1452‐1466.
    1. Nasser A, Liranso T, Adewole T, et al. Once‐daily SPN‐812 200 and 400 mg in the treatment of ADHD in school‐aged children: a phase III randomized, controlled trial. Clin Ther. 2021. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Nasser A, Liranso T, Adewole T, et al. A Phase 3, placebo‐controlled trial of once‐daily viloxazine extended‐release in adolescents with ADHD. J Clin Psychopharmacol. In press. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Nasser A, Liranso T, Adewole T, et al. A phase 3 placebo‐controlled trial of once‐daily 400‐mg and 600‐mg SPN‐812 (Viloxazine Extended‐Release) in Adolescents with ADHD. Psychopharm Bul. 2021;51:43‐64.
    1. Faries DE, Yalcin I, Harder D, et al. Validation of the ADHD Rating Scale as a clinician administered and scored instrument. J Attention Disorders. 2001;5:107‐115.
    1. DuPaul GJ, Power TJ, Anastopoulos AD, et al. ADHD Rating Scale‐5 for Children and Adolescents: Checklists, Norms, and Clinical Interpretation. Guilford Publications, 2016.
    1. Guy W. ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, National Institute of Mental Health, Psychopharmacology Research Branch, Division of Extramural Research Programs. 1976.
    1. Hoffman JIE. Odds Ratio, Relative Risk, Attributable Risk, and Number Needed to Treat. Biostatistics for Medical and Biomedical Practitioners, 2nd edn. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science; 2015.
    1. Citrome L, Ketter TA. When does a difference make a difference? Interpretation of number needed to treat, number needed to harm, and likelihood to be helped or harmed. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67:407‐411.
    1. Citrome L. Compelling or irrelevant? Using number needed to treat can help decide. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008;117:412‐419.
    1. Altman DG. Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat. BMJ. 1998;317:1309‐1312.
    1. Michelson D, Allen AJ, Busner J, et al. Once‐daily atomoxetine treatment for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, placebo‐controlled study. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1896‐1901.
    1. Kelsey D, Sumner CR, Casat CD, et al. Once‐daily atomoxetine treatment for children with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder, including an assessment of evening and morning behavior: a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2004;113:e1‐e8.
    1. Spencer T, Biederman J, Wilens T, et al. Efficacy of mixed amphetamine salts compound in adults with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:775‐782.
    1. Steele M, Jensen PS, Quinn DMP. Remission versus response as the goal of therapy in ADHD: a new standard for the field? Clin Ther. 2006;28:1892‐1908.
    1. Nasser A, Kosheleff AR, Hull JT, et al. Translating attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder rating scale‐5 and weiss functional impairment rating scale‐parent effectiveness scores into clinical global impressions clinical significance levels in four randomized clinical trials of SPN‐812 (Viloxazine Extended‐Release) in children and adolescents with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2021;31:214–226.
    1. Goodman DW, Faraone SV, Adler LA, et al. Interpreting ADHD rating scale scores: linking ADHD rating scale scores and cgi levels in two randomized controlled trials of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in ADHD. Primary Psychiatry. 2010;17:44‐52.
    1. Citrome L. Can you interpret confidence intervals? It’s not that difficult. Curr Psychiatry. 2007;6:77‐82.
    1. Bender R. Calculating confidence intervals for the number needed to treat. Control Clin Trials. 2001;22:102‐110.
    1. Ghirardi L, Larsson H, Chang Z, et al. Attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder medication and unintentional injuries in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020;59:944‐951.
    1. Zetterqvist J, Asherson P, Halldner L, et al. Stimulant and non‐stimulant attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder drug use: total population study of trends and discontinuation patterns 2006–2009. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2013;128:70‐77.
    1. McCarthy S, Asherson P, Coghill D, et al. Attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder: treatment discontinuation in adolescents and young adults. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;194:273‐277.
    1. Wong I, Asherson P, Bilbow A, et al. Cessation of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder drugs in the young (CADDY)‐pharmacoepidemiological and qualitative study. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13:1‐144.
    1. Gajria K, Lu M, Sikirica V, et al. Adherence, persistence, and medication discontinuation in patients with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder ‐ a systematic literature review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014;10:1543‐1569.
    1. Miller AR, Lalonde CE, McGrail KM. Children's persistence with methylphenidate therapy: a population‐based study. Can J Psychiatry. 2004;49:761‐768.
    1. Faraone SV, Buitelaar J. Comparing the efficacy of stimulants for ADHD in children and adolescents using meta‐analysis. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;19:353‐364.
    1. Schwartz S, Correll CU. Efficacy and safety of atomoxetine in children and adolescents with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results from a comprehensive meta‐analysis and metaregression. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53:174‐187.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe