Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled study of galcanezumab in patients with chronic cluster headache: Results from 3-month double-blind treatment

David W Dodick, Peter J Goadsby, Christian Lucas, Rigmor Jensen, Jennifer N Bardos, James M Martinez, Chunmei Zhou, Sheena K Aurora, Jyun Yan Yang, Robert R Conley, Tina Oakes, David W Dodick, Peter J Goadsby, Christian Lucas, Rigmor Jensen, Jennifer N Bardos, James M Martinez, Chunmei Zhou, Sheena K Aurora, Jyun Yan Yang, Robert R Conley, Tina Oakes

Abstract

Objective: To report efficacy and safety of galcanezumab in adults with chronic cluster headache.

Background: Galcanezumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to calcitonin gene-related peptide and inhibits its biological activity.

Methods: This study comprised a prospective baseline period, a 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period, and a 52-week open-label period. Up to six protocol-specified concomitant preventive medications were allowed if patients were on a stable dose for 2 months prior to the prospective baseline period. Patients were randomized 1:1 to monthly subcutaneous galcanezumab (300 mg) or placebo. The primary endpoint was overall mean change from baseline in weekly attack frequency with galcanezumab compared to placebo. Key secondary endpoints were ≥50% response rate and percentage of patients meeting sustained response. Results from the double-blind treatment period are reported.

Results: A total of 237 patients were randomized and treated (120 placebo; 117 galcanezumab). At baseline, the mean age was 45 years and 63% were using ≥1 preventive drug. The primary endpoint was not met; mean change in weekly attack frequency was -4.6 placebo versus -5.4 galcanezumab (p = 0.334). Key secondary endpoints also were not met. Injection site-related treatment-emergent adverse events were more common in the galcanezumab than the placebo group, with significantly more injection site erythema.

Conclusion: Treatment with galcanezumab 300 mg did not achieve its primary and key secondary endpoints. This study underscores the potential distinct biology of cCH as well as the significant unmet need for safe, effective, and well-tolerated preventive treatment. The safety profile of galcanezumab in cCH is consistent with that observed in trials of episodic CH and migraine.

Trial registration: NCT02438826; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02438826.

Keywords: CGRP; Galcanezumab; LY2951742; chronic cluster headache; humanized monoclonal antibody.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: DWD reports the following conflicts: Personal fees: Amgen, AEON, Association of Translational Medicine, University Health Network, Daniel Edelman Inc., Autonomic Technologies, Axsome, Aural Analytics, Allergan, Alder BioPharmaceuticals, Biohaven, Charleston Laboratories, Clexio, Dr Reddy’s Laboratories/Promius, Electrocore LLC, Eli Lilly, eNeura, Neurolief, Novartis, Ipsen, Impel, Satsuma, Supernus, Sun Pharma (India), Theranica, Teva, Vedanta, WL Gore, Nocira, PSL Group Services, University of British Columbia, XoC, Zosano, ZP Opco, Foresite Capital, Oppenheimer; Upjohn (Division of Pfizer), Pieris, Revance, Equinox, Salvia, Amzak Health. CME fees or royalty payments: HealthLogix, Medicom Worldwide, MedLogix Communications, Mednet, Miller Medical, PeerView, WebMD Health/Medscape, Chameleon, Academy for Continued Healthcare Learning, Universal Meeting Management, Haymarket, Global Scientific Communications, Global Life Sciences, Global Access Meetings, UpToDate (Elsevier), Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press, Wolters Kluwer Health; Stock options: Precon Health, Aural Analytics, Healint, Theranica, Second Opinion/Mobile Health, Epien, GBS/Nocira, Matterhorn/Ontologics, King-Devick Technologies; Consulting without fee: Aural Analytics, Healint, Second Opinion/Mobile Health, Epien; Board of Directors: Epien, Matterhorn/Ontologics, King-Devick Technologies. Patent: 17189376.1-1466:vTitle: Botulinum Toxin Dosage Regimen for Chronic Migraine Prophylaxis without fee; Research funding: American Migraine Foundation, US Department of Defense, PCORI, Henry Jackson Foundation; Professional society fees or reimbursement for travel: American Academy of Neurology, American Brain Foundation, American Headache Society, American Migraine Foundation, International Headache Society, Canadian Headache Society. PJG reports grants and personal fees from Amgen and Eli-Lilly and Company, and personal fees from Alder Biopharmaceuticals, Allergan, Autonomic Technologies Inc., Biohaven Pharmaceuticals Inc., Electrocore LLC, eNeura, Impel Neuropharma, MundiPharma, Novartis, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Trigemina Inc., WL Gore, and personal fees from MedicoLegal work, Massachusetts Medical Society, Up-to-Date, Oxford University Press, and Wolters Kluwer; and a patent magnetic stimulation for headache assigned to eNeura without fee. CL reports consulting fee/honoraria for advisory board membership or speaking from Novartis, TEVA, Sanofi, Grunenthal, Eli Lilly and Company, Biogen, and Ethypharm. He served as an investigator on clinical trials for Novartis and Eli Lilly and Company. RJ reports speaker’s fees from Novartis, ATI, and Allergan and institutional payments for clinical trials with Eli Lilly and Company and ATI. JB, JM, CZ, SKA, JYY, RC, and TO are employees and minor stock holders of Eli Lilly and Company.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study diagram. ePRO: electronic patient reported outcome. *injection of blinded investigational drug; X, injection of open-label galcanezumab 300 mg. aePRO diary reporting was completed daily during period 2, period 3, and the first month of period 4.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Patient disposition during the double-blind period. N: population size; n: number in group. aThe most common reasons for screen failure were not meeting cluster headache attack frequency criteria during the prospective baseline period or having a cardiovascular or a drug- or alcohol-related exclusion criterion. bThree patients who were randomized to placebo did not receive treatment.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Primary endpoint and key secondary endpoints. a) Least squares mean change from baseline in weekly cluster headache attack frequency. The primary endpoint is overall mean change from baseline in weekly cluster headache attack frequency across weeks 1–12. b) Mean percentage of patients achieving a response of ≥ 50% reduction in weekly cluster headache frequency across weeks 1–12 (first key secondary endpoint). c) Percentage of patients achieving a sustained response through week 12. A sustained response was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in the weekly cluster attack frequency from baseline to weeks 3/4 and maintained at weeks 5/6, 7/8, 9/10, and 11/12 (second key secondary endpoint). CHW adjusted p-values are shown. BL: baseline; CHW: Cui, Hung, and Wang; GMB: galcanezumab; LS: least squares; N: population size; PBO: placebo; SE: standard error.

References

    1. Hoffmann J, May A. Diagnosis, pathophysiology, and management of cluster headache. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17: 75–83.
    1. Nesbitt AD, Goadsby PJ. Cluster headache. BMJ 2012; 344: e2407.
    1. Van Vliet JA, Eekers PJ, Haan J, et al. Features involved in the diagnostic delay of cluster headache. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74: 1123–1125.
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 2018; 38: 1–211.
    1. Jensen RM, Lyngberg A, Jensen RH. Burden of cluster headache. Cephalalgia 2007; 27: 535–541.
    1. Robbins MS, Starling AJ, Pringsheim TM, et al. Treatment of cluster headache: The American Headache Society evidence-based guidelines. Headache 2016; 56: 1093–1106.
    1. May A, Leone M, Afra J, et al. EFNS guidelines on the treatment of cluster headache and other trigeminal-autonomic cephalalgias. Europ J Neurol 2006; 13: 1066–1077.
    1. Ho TW, Edvinsson L, Goadsby PJ. CGRP and its receptors provide new insights into migraine pathophysiology. Nat Rev Neurol 2010; 6: 573–582.
    1. Eftekhari S, Salvatore CA, Calamari A, et al. Differential distribution of calcitonin gene-related peptide and its receptor components in the human trigeminal ganglion. Neuroscience 2010; 169: 683–696.
    1. Rice FL, Xie JY, Albrecht PJ, et al. Anatomy and immunochemical characterization of the non-arterial peptidergic diffuse dural innervation of the rat and Rhesus monkey: Implications for functional regulation and treatment in migraine. Cephalalgia 2017; 37: 1350–1372.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L. The trigeminovascular system and migraine: Studies characterizing cerebrovascular and neuropeptide changes seen in humans and cats. Ann Neurol 1993; 33: 48–56.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L, Ekman R. Vasoactive peptide release in the extracerebral circulation of humans during migraine headache. Ann Neurol 1990; 28: 183–187.
    1. Fanciullacci M, Alessandri M, Figini M, et al. Increase in plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide from the extracerebral circulation during nitroglycerin-induced cluster headache attack. Pain 1995; 60: 119–123.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L. Human in vivo evidence for trigeminovascular activation in cluster headache. Neuropeptide changes and effects of acute attacks therapies. Brain 1994; 117: 427–434.
    1. Vollesen ALH, Snoer A, Beske RP, et al. Effect of infusion of calcitonin gene-related peptide on cluster headache attacks: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 2018; 75: 1187–1197.
    1. Benschop RJ, Collins EC, Darling RJ, et al. Development of a novel antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide for the treatment of osteoarthritis-related pain. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; 22: 578–585.
    1. Skljarevski V, Matharu M, Millen BA, et al. Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: Results of the EVOLVE-2 Phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia 2018; 39: 1442–1454.
    1. Stauffer VL, Dodick DW, Zhang Q, et al. Evaluation of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: The EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 2018; 75: 1080–1088.
    1. Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, Wang S, et al. Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology 2018; 91: e2211–e2221.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Dodick DW, Leone M, et al. Trial of galcanezumab in prevention of episodic cluster headache. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 132–141.
    1. Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ, Lucas C, et al. Phase 3 randomized trial of galcanezumab in chronic cluster headache: Double-blind treatment. 19th Congress of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 2019; 39: 46–47.
    1. Oakes TM, Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ, et al. Phase 3 placebo-controlled study of galcanezumab in patients with chronic cluster headache: Results from 3-month double-blind treatment. 61st Annual Scientific Meeting American Headache Society. Headache 2019; 59: 19–20.
    1. Pocock S, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in controlled clinical trials. Biometrics 1975; 31: 103–115.
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013; 33: 629–808.
    1. Lipton RB, Micieli G, Russell D, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in cluster headache. Cephalalgia 1995; 15: 452–462.
    1. Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, et al. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: Initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry 2011; 168: 1266–1277.
    1. Bourdage JS, Cook CA, Farrington DL, et al. An Affinity Capture Elution (ACE) assay for detection of anti-drug antibody to monoclonal antibody therapeutics in the presence of high levels of drug. J Immunol Methods 2007; 327: 10–17.
    1. Butterfield AM, Chain JS, Ackermann BL, et al. Comparison of assay formats for drug-tolerant immunogenicity testing. Bioanalysis 2010; 2: 1961–1969.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Assay development and validation for immunogenicity testing of therapeutic protein products. Guidance for industry. Draft guidance. Pharmaceutical quality/CMC. Revision 1, (2016, accessed 4 June 2019).
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Immunogenicity testing of therapeutic protein products – developing and validating assays for anti-drug antibody detection. Guidance for industry. Pharmaceutical quality/CMC, (2019, accessed 4 June 2019).
    1. Koch GG, Tangen CM, Jung JW, et al. Issues for covariance analysis of dichotomous and ordered categorical data from randomized clinical trials and non-parametric strategies for addressing them. Stat Med 1998; 17: 1863–1892.
    1. Cui L, Hung HM, Wang SJ. Modification of sample size in group sequential clinical trials. Biometrics 1999; 55: 853–857.
    1. The Sumatriptan Cluster Headache Study Group. Treatment of acute cluster headache with sumatriptan. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 322–326.
    1. Bussone G, Leone M, Peccarisi C, et al. Double blind comparison of lithium and verapamil in cluster headache prophylaxis. Headache 1990; 30: 411–417.
    1. Steiner TJ, Hering R, Couturier EG, et al. Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of lithium in episodic cluster headache. Cephalalgia 1997; 17: 673–675.
    1. Goadsby PJ, de Coo IF, Silver N, et al. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for the ACute Treatment of episodic and chronic cluster headache: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled ACT2 study. Cephalalgia 2018; 38: 959–969.
    1. Silberstein SD, Mechtler LL, Kudrow DB, et al. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for the ACute Treatment of cluster headache: Findings from the randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled ACT1 study. Headache 2016; 56: 1317–1332.
    1. Naegel S, Holle D, Desmarattes N, et al. Cortical plasticity in episodic and chronic cluster headache. Neuroimage Clin 2014; 6: 415–423.
    1. Barloese M, Haddock B, Lund NT, et al. Chronorisk in cluster headache: A tool for individualised therapy?. Cephalalgia 2018; 38: 2058–2067.
    1. Mitsikostas DD, Edvinsson L, Jensen RH, et al. Refractory chronic cluster headache: A consensus statement on clinical definition from the European Headache Federation. J Headache Pain 2014; 15: 79.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe