Effect of colesevelam on liver fat quantified by magnetic resonance in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a randomized controlled trial

Thuy-Anh Le, Joshua Chen, Christopher Changchien, Michael R Peterson, Yuko Kono, Heather Patton, Benjamin L Cohen, David Brenner, Claude Sirlin, Rohit Loomba, San Diego Integrated NAFLD Research Consortium (SINC), Rohit Loomba, Ottar Lunde, Robert Gish, Yuko Kono, Alexander Kuo, Heather Patton, Lisa Richards, Joanie Salotti, Archana Bhatt, Thu Nguyen, Michael Bennett, Tommy Yen, John Person, Cynthia Behling, Lisa Nyberg, Anders Nyberg, Mamie Dong, Thuy-Anh Le, Joshua Chen, Christopher Changchien, Michael R Peterson, Yuko Kono, Heather Patton, Benjamin L Cohen, David Brenner, Claude Sirlin, Rohit Loomba, San Diego Integrated NAFLD Research Consortium (SINC), Rohit Loomba, Ottar Lunde, Robert Gish, Yuko Kono, Alexander Kuo, Heather Patton, Lisa Richards, Joanie Salotti, Archana Bhatt, Thu Nguyen, Michael Bennett, Tommy Yen, John Person, Cynthia Behling, Lisa Nyberg, Anders Nyberg, Mamie Dong

Abstract

Bile acid sequestrants (BAS) lower plasma low density lipoprotein levels and improve glycemic control. Colestimide, a BAS, has been claimed by computed tomography to reduce liver fat. Therefore, we examined the efficacy of colesevelam, a potent BAS, to decrease liver fat in patients with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Liver fat was measured by a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique, the proton-density-fat-fraction (PDFF), as well as by conventional MR spectroscopy (MRS). Fifty patients with biopsy-proven NASH were randomly assigned to either colesevelam 3.75 g/day orally or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was change in liver fat as measured by MRI-PDFF in colocalized regions of interest within each of the nine liver segments. Compared with placebo, colesevelam increased liver fat by MRI-PDFF in all nine segments of the liver with a mean difference of 5.6% (P = 0.002). We cross-validated the MRI-PDFF-determined fat content with that assessed by colocalized MRS; the latter showed a mean difference of 4.9% (P = 0.014) in liver fat between the colesevelam and the placebo arms. MRI-PDFF correlated strongly with MRS-determined hepatic fat content (r(2) = 0.96, P < 0.0001). Liver biopsy assessment of steatosis, cellular injury, and lobular inflammation did not detect any effect of treatment.

Conclusion: Colesevelam increases liver fat in patients with NASH as assessed by MRI as well as MRS without significant changes seen on histology. Thus, MRI and MRS may be better than histology to detect longitudinal changes in hepatic fat in NASH. Underlying mechanisms and whether the small MR-detected increase in liver fat has clinical consequences is not known.

Copyright © 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Chart of study enrollment and study flow. In all, 77 subjects were screened and 50 subjects were eligible for randomization. Twenty-five subjects were randomized to either colesevelam or placebo. There were two dropouts in the colesevelam and three dropouts in the placebo groups.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effect of colesevelam on hepatic fat content assessed by MRI in patients with NASH. The longitudinal trend of liver fat fraction as measured by MRI-PDFF for each subject is shown in the placebo (right) and colesevelam (left) groups. Each small circle represents an individual patient at weeks 0 and 24. The average MRI-PDFF increased by 2.8% in the colesevelam group (P = 0.011) as shown by red lines and decreased by 2.7% in the placebo group (P = 0.065) as shown by black lines with a mean difference between the two groups of 5.6% (P = 0.002).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(A) Whole liver fat mapping with MRI-PDFF for a single patient. MRI-PDFF measurements of liver segments 1, 2, 4a, 7, and 8 in the superior plane (upper panel), and of liver segments 3, 4b, 5, and 6 in the inferior plane (lower panel) are shown at week 0 (left column) and 24 (right column) for a patient in the placebo group. The fat fraction in a single liver segment is calculated by averaging three MRI-PDFF ROIs. Using 27 ROIs, the calculated total liver fat fraction average at week 0 is 29% and this decreased to 18% at week 24. MRI-PDFF data from all nine liver segments gives a fat map for the entire liver where longitudinal within-segment changes of liver fat can be appreciated. (B) MRS measured fat fraction in the same patient. MRS measurements from a 2 × 2 × 2 cm3 cube (voxel) within the right liver lobe of the same patient in which MRI-PDFF were performed in (A) are shown at week 0 (left column) and week 24 (right column). The corresponding MRS fat fraction at week 0 is 28% and this decreased to 20% at week 24.

References

    1. Brunt EM, Janney CG, Di Bisceglie AM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Bacon BR. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a proposal for grading and staging the histological lesions. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:2467–2474.
    1. Bhala N, Angulo P, van der Poorten D, Lee E, Hui JM, Saracco G, et al. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis: an international collaborative study. HEPATOLOGY. 2011;54:1208–1216.
    1. Hofmann AF. Bile acid sequestrants improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a proposed mechanism implicating glucagon-like peptide 1 release. HEPATOLOGY. 2011;53:1784.
    1. Rosenson RS, Abby SL, Jones MR. Colesevelam HCl effects on atherogenic lipoprotein subclasses in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Atherosclerosis. 2009;204:342–344.
    1. Goldberg RB, Fonseca VA, Truitt KE, Jones MR. Efficacy and safety of colesevelam in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycemic control receiving insulin-based therapy. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1531–1540.
    1. Sonnett TE, Levien TL, Neumiller JJ, Gates BJ, Setter SM. Colesevelam hydrochloride for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther. 2009;31:245–259.
    1. Taniai M, Hashimoto E, Tobari M, Yatsuji S, Haruta I, Tokushige K, et al. Treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with colestimide. Hepatol Res. 2009;39:685–693.
    1. Fishbein M, Castro F, Cheruku S, Jain S, Webb B, Gleason T, et al. Hepatic MRI for fat quantitation: its relationship to fat morphology, diagnosis, and ultrasound. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;39:619–625.
    1. Lee SS, Park SH, Kim HJ, Kim SY, Kim MY, Kim DY, et al. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic steatosis: prospective comparison of the accuracy of imaging examinations. J Hepatol. 2010;52:579–585.
    1. Dufour JF, Oneta CM, Gonvers JJ, Bihl F, Cerny A, Cereda JM, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of ursodeoxycholic acid with vitamin e in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1537–1543.
    1. McPherson S, Jonsson JR, Cowin GJ, O'Rourke P, Clouston AD, Volp A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy accurately estimate the severity of steatosis provided the stage of fibrosis is considered. J Hepatol. 2009;51:389–397.
    1. Pacifico L, Martino MD, Catalano C, Panebianco V, Bezzi M, Anania C, et al. T1-weighted dual-echo MRI for fat quantification in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:3012–3019.
    1. Hines CD, Frydrychowicz A, Hamilton G, Tudorascu DL, Vigen KK, Yu H, et al. T(1) independent, T(2) (*) corrected chemical shift based fat-water separation with multi-peak fat spectral modeling is an accurate and precise measure of hepatic steatosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;33:873–881.
    1. Kang GH, Cruite I, Shiehmorteza M, Wolfson T, Gamst AC, Hamilton G, et al. Reproducibility of MRI-determined proton density fat fraction across two different MR scanner platforms. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;34:928–934.
    1. Meisamy S, Hines CD, Hamilton G, Sirlin CB, McKenzie CA, Yu H, et al. Quantification of hepatic steatosis with T1-independent, T2-corrected MR imaging with spectral modeling of fat: blinded comparison with MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2011;258:767–775.
    1. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, Behling C, Contos MJ, Cummings OW, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. HEPATOLOGY. 2005;41:1313–1321.
    1. Davidson MH, Dillon MA, Gordon B, Jones P, Samuels J, Weiss S, et al. Colesevelam hydrochloride (cholestagel): a new, potent bile acid sequestrant associated with a low incidence of gastrointestinal side effects. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1893–1900.
    1. Brufau G, Stellaard F, Prado K, Bloks VW, Jonkers E, Boverhof R, et al. Improved glycemic control with colesevelam treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes is not directly associated with changes in bile acid metabolism. HEPATOLOGY. 2010;52:1455–1464.
    1. Herrema H, Meissner M, van Dijk TH, Brufau G, Boverhof R, Oosterveer MH, et al. Bile salt sequestration induces hepatic de novo lipogenesis through farnesoid X receptor- and liver X receptor alpha-controlled metabolic pathways in mice. HEPATOLOGY. 2010;51:806–816.
    1. Robinson DM, Keating GM. Colesevelam: a review of its use in hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2007;7:453–465.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe