Internet-based support for informal caregivers to individuals with head and neck cancer (Carer eSupport): a study protocol for the development and feasibility testing of a complex online intervention

Ulrica Langegård, Åsa Cajander, Maria Carlsson, Louise von Essen, Awais Ahmad, Göran Laurell, Ylva Tiblom Ehrsson, Birgitta Johansson, Ulrica Langegård, Åsa Cajander, Maria Carlsson, Louise von Essen, Awais Ahmad, Göran Laurell, Ylva Tiblom Ehrsson, Birgitta Johansson

Abstract

Introduction: It is strongly recommended that randomised controlled trials are preceded with an exploration of the needs of the target population and feasibility testing of the intervention. The present study protocol is set out to describe these steps in the development of a complex intervention.The past decades' transition of care from inpatient to outpatient settings has increased the complexity of caregivers' responsibilities, which they may not be prepared for. There is a need to support informal caregivers (ICs) to prepare them for caregiving and decrease the caregiver burden. The main aim of this study is to describe the development of an internet-based intervention (Carer eSupport) to improve ICs' ability to support individuals with head and neck cancer and to describe the testing of the feasibility and acceptability of Carer eSupport.

Methods and analysis: This is a multicentre study involving the ear, nose and throat clinics and the oncology and radiotherapy clinics at three university hospitals. The study protocol comprises two phases, development and feasibility testing, using the Medical Research Council framework for developing a complex intervention. Carer eSupport will be based on the results from focus group discussions with ICs and healthcare professionals (planned for n=6-8 in respective groups) and scientific evidence, the Social Cognitive Theory and the Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. The feasibility testing will include 30 ICs who will have access to Carer eSupport for 1 month. The feasibility testing will be evaluated with a mixed-method design.

Ethics and dissemination: All procedures have been approved by the Ethics Committee at Uppsala University (Dnr: 2020-04650). Informed consent will be obtained before enrolment of patients, their ICs and healthcare staff. The feasibility testing is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05028452). Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journal publications.

Trial registration number: Clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05028452).

Keywords: complex intervention; development; feasibility testing; head and neck cancer; informal caregiver; study protocol.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the development phase and the feasibility testing phase of the intervention, Carer eSupport, according to Medical research councils guidelines for complex intervention.

References

    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655. 10.1136/bmj.a1655
    1. Hudson P, Payne S. The future of family caregiving: research, social policy and clinical practice. Family Carers in Palliative Care: A guide for health and social care professionals, 2009: p. 2009.
    1. Adashek JJ, Subbiah IM. Caring for the caregiver: a systematic review characterising the experience of caregivers of older adults with advanced cancers. ESMO Open 2020;5:e000862. 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000862
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655. 10.1136/bmj.a1655
    1. Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. . A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2021;374:n2061. 10.1136/bmj.n2061
    1. O'Cathain A, Croot L, Duncan E, et al. . Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare. BMJ Open 2019;9:e029954. 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029954
    1. Pandi-Perumal SR, Akhter S, Zizi F, et al. . Project Stakeholder management in the clinical research environment: how to do it right. Front Psychiatry 2015;6:71. 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00071
    1. Crosby R, Noar SM. What is a planning model? an introduction to PRECEDE-PROCEED. J Public Health Dent 2011;71:S7–15. 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00235.x
    1. DeLone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst 2003;19:9–30.
    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394–424. 10.3322/caac.21492
    1. Ehrsson YT, Fransson P, Einarsson S. Mapping health-related quality of life, anxiety, and depression in patients with head and neck cancer diagnosed with malnutrition defined by GLIM. Nutrients 2021;13:1167. 10.3390/nu13041167
    1. Einarsson S, Laurell G, Tiblom Ehrsson Y. Experiences and coping strategies related to food and eating up to two years after the termination of treatment in patients with head and neck cancer. Eur J Cancer Care 2019;28:e12964. 10.1111/ecc.12964
    1. Wells M, Cunningham M, Lang H, et al. . Distress, concerns and unmet needs in survivors of head and neck cancer: a cross-sectional survey. Eur J Cancer Care 2015;24:748–60. 10.1111/ecc.12370
    1. Ringash J, Bernstein LJ, Devins G, et al. . Head and neck cancer survivorship: learning the needs, meeting the needs. Semin Radiat Oncol 2018;28:64–74. 10.1016/j.semradonc.2017.08.008
    1. Nund RL, Ward EC, Scarinci NA, et al. . Carers' experiences of dysphagia in people treated for head and neck cancer: a qualitative study. Dysphagia 2014;29:450–8. 10.1007/s00455-014-9527-8
    1. Patterson JM, Rapley T, Carding PN, et al. . Head and neck cancer and dysphagia; caring for carers. Psychooncology 2013;22:1815–20. 10.1002/pon.3226
    1. Wang T, Mazanec SR, Voss JG. Needs of informal caregivers of patients with head and neck cancer: A systematic review. Oncology Nursing Society.
    1. Castellanos EH, Dietrich MS, Bond SM, et al. . Impact of patient symptoms and caregiving tasks on psychological distress in caregivers for head and neck cancer (HNC). Psychooncology 2019;28:511–7. 10.1002/pon.4968
    1. Lee C-Y, Lee Y, Wang L-J, et al. . Depression, anxiety, quality of life, and predictors of depressive disorders in caregivers of patients with head and neck cancer: a six-month follow-up study. J Psychosom Res 2017;100: :29–34. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.07.002
    1. Schumacher KL, Stewart BJ, Archbold PG. Conceptualization and measurement of doing family caregiving well. Image J Nurs Sch 1998;30:63–70. 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01238.x
    1. Given B. Caregiver role strain. nursing care of older adults diagnosis: outcomes and interventions. Mosby, 2001: 679–95.
    1. Goldstein NE, Concato J, Fried TR, et al. . Factors associated with caregiver burden among caregivers of terminally ill patients with cancer. J Palliat Care 2004;20): :38–43.
    1. Carter PA. Caregivers' descriptions of sleep changes and depressive symptoms. Oncol Nurs Forum 2002;29:1277–83. 10.1188/02.ONF.1277-1283
    1. Carrera PM, Kantarjian HM, Blinder VS. The financial burden and distress of patients with cancer: understanding and stepping-up action on the financial toxicity of cancer treatment. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:153–65. 10.3322/caac.21443
    1. Ugalde A, Krishnasamy M, Schofield P. Role recognition and changes to self-identity in family caregivers of people with advanced cancer: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 2012;20:1175–81. 10.1007/s00520-011-1194-9
    1. Mason N, Hodgkin S. Preparedness for caregiving: a phenomenological study of the experiences of rural Australian family palliative carers. Health Soc Care Community 2019;27:926–35. 10.1111/hsc.12710
    1. Northouse LL, Katapodi MC, Song L, et al. . Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:n/a–39. 10.3322/caac.20081
    1. Applebaum AJ, Breitbart W. Care for the cancer caregiver: a systematic review. Palliat Support Care 2013;11:231–52. 10.1017/S1478951512000594
    1. Ferrell B, Wittenberg E. A review of family caregiving intervention trials in oncology. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:318–25. 10.3322/caac.21396
    1. Aung SHH, White K, Bloomfield J. The experiences and the needs of caregivers of patients with head and neck cancer: an integrative review. Cancer Nurs 2021;44:E361–73. 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000833
    1. D'Souza V, Blouin E, Zeitouni A, et al. . Multimedia information intervention and its benefits in partners of the head and neck cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care 2017;26:e12440. 10.1111/ecc.12440
    1. Luo X, Gao L, Li J, et al. . A critical literature review of dyadic web-based interventions to support cancer patients and their caregivers, and directions for future research. Psychooncology 2020;29:38–48. 10.1002/pon.5278
    1. Kaltenbaugh DJ, Klem ML, Hu L, et al. . Using web-based interventions to support caregivers of patients with cancer: a systematic review. Oncol Nurs Forum 2015;42:156–64. 10.1188/15.ONF.156-164
    1. Ahmad A, Mozelius P, Ahlin K. Testbed requirements for technology enhanced stroke rehabilitation to support independent living. in ICT4AWE 2019.
    1. Freund M, Carey M, Dilworth S, et al. . Effectiveness of information and communications technology interventions for stroke survivors and their support people: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2021:1–16. 10.1080/09638288.2021.1913245
    1. Faruque M. Feasibility of digital health services for educating the community people regarding lifestyle modification combating noncommunicable diseases. In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 2019.
    1. Ugalde A, Gaskin CJ, Rankin NM, et al. . A systematic review of cancer caregiver interventions: appraising the potential for implementation of evidence into practice. Psychooncology 2019;28:687–701. 10.1002/pon.5018
    1. Firouzi F, et al. . Ai-driven data monetization: the other face of data in iot-based smart and connected health. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2020.
    1. Cabestany J. Artificial intelligence contribution to eHealth application. In: 2018 25th International Conference" Mixed Design of Integrated Circuits and System"(MIXDES, 2018.
    1. Schunk DH. Social cognitive theory, 2012.
    1. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977;84:191–215. 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
    1. Venkatesh V, et al. . User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 2003;27:425–78. 10.2307/30036540
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. . Spirit 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586. 10.1136/bmj.e7586
    1. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications, 2017.
    1. Krueger RA, Casey MA. A practical guide for applied research. A practical guide for applied research, 2000.
    1. Lobe B, Morgan D, Hoffman KA. Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. Int J Qual Methods 2020;19:160940692093787. 10.1177/1609406920937875
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    1. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New directions for program evaluation, 1986 1986;30): :73–84.
    1. Sjöström J, von Essen L, Grönqvist H. The origin and impact of ideals in eHealth research: experiences from the U-CARE research environment. JMIR Res Protoc 2014;3): :e28. 10.2196/resprot.3202
    1. The U-Care group . Uppsala University Psychosocial Care Programme: U-CARE. 2010 [cited 2016 Juni 15]. Available:
    1. Still B, Crane K. Fundamentals of user-centered design: a practical approach. CRC press, 2017.
    1. Cocks K, Torgerson DJ. Sample size calculations for pilot randomized trials: a confidence interval approach. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:197–201. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.002
    1. Henriksson A, Andershed B, Benzein E, et al. . Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the preparedness for caregiving scale, caregiver competence scale and rewards of caregiving scale in a sample of Swedish family members of patients with life-threatening illness. Palliat Med 2012;26:930–8. 10.1177/0269216311419987
    1. Archbold PG, Stewart BJ, Greenlick MR, et al. . Mutuality and preparedness as predictors of caregiver role strain. Res Nurs Health 1990;13:375–84. 10.1002/nur.4770130605
    1. Elmståhl S, Malmberg B, Annerstedt L. Caregiver's burden of patients 3 years after stroke assessed by a novel caregiver burden scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:177–82. 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90164-1
    1. Taft C, Karlsson J, Sullivan M. Performance of the Swedish SF-36 version 2.0. Qual Life Res 2004;13): :251–6. 10.1023/B:QURE.0000015290.76254.a5
    1. Alfonsson S, Wallin E, Maathz P. Factor structure and validity of the depression, anxiety and stress Scale-21 in Swedish translation. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2017;24:154–62. 10.1111/jpm.12363
    1. Chiang VCL, Lee RLP, Ho MF, et al. . Fulfilling the psychological and information need of the family members of critically ill patients using interactive mobile technology: a randomised controlled trial. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2017;41: :77–83. 10.1016/j.iccn.2017.03.006
    1. Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, et al. . The multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res 1995;39): :315–25. 10.1016/0022-3999(94)00125-o
    1. Hagelin CL, Wengström Y, Runesdotter S, et al. . The psychometric properties of the Swedish multidimensional fatigue inventory MFI-20 in four different populations. Acta Oncol 2007;46:97–104. 10.1080/02841860601009430
    1. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:105–12. 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
    1. Cernvall M, Carlbring P, Wikman A, et al. . Twelve-Month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of Internet-based guided self-help for parents of children on cancer treatment. J Med Internet Res 2017;19:e273. 10.2196/jmir.6852
    1. Wikman A, Kukkola L, Börjesson H, et al. . Development of an Internet-Administered cognitive behavior therapy program (engage) for parents of children previously treated for cancer: participatory action research approach. J Med Internet Res 2018;20:e133. 10.2196/jmir.9457
    1. Woodford J, Farrand P, Hagström J, et al. . Internet-administered cognitive behavioral therapy for common mental health difficulties in parents of children treated for cancer: intervention development and description study. JMIR Form Res 2021;5:e22709. 10.2196/22709
    1. Hauffman A, Alfonsson S, Bill‐Axelson A, et al. . Cocreated internet‐based stepped care for individuals with cancer and concurrent symptoms of anxiety and depression: Results from the U‐CARE AdultCan randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology 2020;29:2012–8. 10.1002/pon.5489
    1. Gulliksen J, Göransson B, Boivie I, et al. . Key principles for user-centred systems design. Behav Inf Technol 2003;22:397–409. 10.1080/01449290310001624329
    1. Rexhepi H, Åhlfeldt R-M, Cajander Åsa, et al. . Cancer patients' attitudes and experiences of online access to their electronic medical records: a qualitative study. Health Informatics J 2018;24:115–24. 10.1177/1460458216658778
    1. Witkowski Å, Carlsson ME. Support group programme for relatives of terminally ill cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2004;12:168–75. 10.1007/s00520-003-0518-9
    1. Stenhammar C, Isaksson J, Granström B, et al. . Changes in intimate relationships following treatment for head and neck cancer-a qualitative study. J Psychosoc Oncol 2017;35:614–30. 10.1080/07347332.2017.1339224
    1. Slev VN, Mistiaen P, Pasman HRW, et al. . Effects of eHealth for patients and informal caregivers confronted with cancer: a meta-review. Int J Med Inform 2016;87: :54–67. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.013
    1. Badr H, Herbert K, Reckson B, et al. . Unmet needs and relationship challenges of head and neck cancer patients and their spouses. J Psychosoc Oncol 2016;34:336–46. 10.1080/07347332.2016.1195901

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe