Spinal anaesthesia with Chloroprocaine HCl 1% for elective lower limb procedures of short duration: a prospective, randomised, observer-blind study in adult patients

Daniela Ghisi, Giorgia Boschetto, Alessandra Maria Spinelli, Sandra Giannone, Jacopo Frugiuele, Marcello Ciccarello, Stefano Bonarelli, Daniela Ghisi, Giorgia Boschetto, Alessandra Maria Spinelli, Sandra Giannone, Jacopo Frugiuele, Marcello Ciccarello, Stefano Bonarelli

Abstract

Background: This prospective, randomised, observer-blinded study has been conducted in patients undergoing procedures of the lower extremities to evaluate the time to complete block resolution of 2-chloroprocaine 1% at three intrathecal doses (30, 40 and 50 mg).

Methods: After informed consent, we enrolled 45 male and female patients, aged 18-65 years, ASA score I-II, BMI 18-32 kg/m2, undergoing elective lower limb procedures lasting ≤40 min and with a requested dermatomeric level of sensory block ≥ T12. The patients were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive Chloroprocaine HCl 1% at one of the three different intrathecal doses (Group 30 = 30 mg, Group 40 = 40 mg or Group 50 = 50 mg). The progression and regression of both sensory and motor blocks were evaluated blindly. Urine and venous blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis.

Results: Times to regression of spinal blocks were 1.76 ± 0.35 h, 2.13 ± 0.46 h and 2.23 ± 0.38 h, in Group 30, 40 and 50 respectively: the 30 mg dose showed a significantly faster resolution of spinal block than the 40 mg (p = 0.034) and the 50 mg (p = 0.006). Time to readiness for surgery was significantly reduced with the dose of 50 mg when compared to dose of 30 mg (p = 0.0259).

Conclusions: The doses of 50 mg and 40 mg yielded a longer resolution of spinal block than the dose of 30 mg. Nevertheless, the dose of 30 mg resulted in a higher secondary failure rate.

Trial registration: Registration of clinical trial: clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02481505 ).

Keywords: Ambulatory, subspecialties; Anaesthetics, local; Chloroprocaine; Neuraxial blocks: spinal, regional anaesthesia; Transient neurologic symptoms, complications.

Conflict of interest statement

Daniela Ghisi has participated as a medical consultant to a scientific advice with Sintetica S.A. The other authors have no competing interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The investigator included 46 subjects in the study. One subject (S030/029) discontinued the study before receiving the assigned anaesthesia due to non-compliance. Among the remaining 45 patients, 15 enrolled subjects received chloroprocaine 30 mg, other 15 received chloroprocaine 40 mg, and other 15 received chloroprocaine 50 mg. Forty-five subjects completed the study as planned
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CABA increased in plasma after the spinal injection of the parent compound and reached a peak 30 min post-dose. Plasma CABA concentrations increased with the increase in chloroprocaine dose

References

    1. Kouri ME, Kopacz DJ. Spinal 2-chloroprocaine: a comparison with lidocaine in volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:75–80. doi: 10.1213/.
    1. Smith KN, Kopacz DJ, McDonald S. Spinal 2-chloroprocaine: a dose-ranging study and the effect of added epinephrine. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:81–88. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000093361.48458.6E.
    1. Gebhardt V, Zawierucha V, Schöffski O, et al. Spinal anaesthesia with chloroprocaine 1% versus total intravenous anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018;35:774–781. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000794.
    1. Teunkens A, Vermeulen K, Van Gerven E, et al. Comparison of 2-Chloroprocaine, bupivacaine, and Lidocaine for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy in an outpatient setting: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:576–583. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000420.
    1. Camponovo C, Wulf H, Ghisi D, et al. Intrathecal 1% 2-chloroprocaine vs. 0.5% bupivacaine in ambulatory surgery: A prospective, observer-blinded, randomised, controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58:560–566. doi: 10.1111/aas.12291.
    1. Casati A, Danelli G, Berti M, et al. Intrathecal 2-chloroprocaine for lower limb outpatient surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, clinical evaluation. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:234–238. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000221441.44387.82.
    1. Goldblum E, Atchabahian A. The use of 2-chloroprocaine for spinal anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57:545–552. doi: 10.1111/aas.12071.
    1. Yoos JR, Kopacz DJ. Spinal 2-chloroprocaine for surgery: an initial 10-month experience. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:553–558. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130397.38849.4A.
    1. Casati A, Fanelli G, Danelli G, et al. Spinal anesthesia with lidocaine or preservative free 2-chlorprocaine for outpatient knee arthroscopy: a prospective, randomized, double blind comparison. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:959–964. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000258766.73612.d8.
    1. Hejtmanek MR, Pollock JE. Chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia: a retrospective analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55:267–272. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02371.x.
    1. Weiss RR, Halevy S, Almonte RO, Gundersen K, Hinsvark ON, O'Brien JE. Comparison of lidocaine and 2-chloroprocaine in paracervical block: clinical effects and drug concentrations in mother and child. Anesth Analg. 1983;62:168–173. doi: 10.1213/00000539-198302000-00009.
    1. Sum DC, Chung PC. Plasma lidocaine level during spinal or epidural anesthesia in geriatric patients. Ma Zui Xue Za Zhi. 1993;31:59–63.
    1. Ledan C, Collet D, Vincelot A, Debord J, Lachatre G, Feiss P. Pharmacokinetics of epidural or intrathecal bupivacaine in elective cesarean section. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1993;12:552–559. doi: 10.1016/S0750-7658(05)80621-5.
    1. Kuhnert BR, Kuhnert PM, Prochaska AL, Gross TL. Plasma levels of 2-chloroprocaine in obstetric patients and their neonates after epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1980;53:21–25. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198007000-00005.
    1. Abboud TK, Afrasiabi A, Sarkis F, et al. Continuous infusion epidural analgesia in parturients receiving bupivacaine, 2-chloroprocaine or lidocaine: maternal, fetal and neonatal effects. Anesth Analg. 1984;63:421–428.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe