A novel visual facial anxiety scale for assessing preoperative anxiety
Xuezhao Cao, Roya Yumul, Ofelia Loani Elvir Lazo, Jeremy Friedman, Omar Durra, Xiao Zhang, Paul F White, Xuezhao Cao, Roya Yumul, Ofelia Loani Elvir Lazo, Jeremy Friedman, Omar Durra, Xiao Zhang, Paul F White
Abstract
Background: There is currently no widely accepted instrument for measuring preoperative anxiety. The objective of this study was to develop a simple visual facial anxiety scale (VFAS) for assessing acute preoperative anxiety.
Methods: The initial VFAS was comprised of 11 similarly styled stick-figure reflecting different types of facial expressions (Fig 1). After obtaining IRB approval, a total of 265 participant-healthcare providers (e.g., anesthesiologists, anesthesiology residents, and perioperative nurses) were recruited to participate in this study. The participants were asked to: (1) rank the 11 faces from 0-10 (0 = no anxiety, while 10 = highest anxiety) and then to (2) match one of the 11 facial expression with a numeric verbal rating scale (NVRS) (0 = no anxiety and 10 = highest level of anxiety) and a specific categorical level of anxiety, namely no anxiety, mild, mild-moderate, moderate, moderate-high or highest anxiety. Based on these data, the Spearman correlation and frequencies of the 11 faces in relation to the 11-point numerical anxiety scale and 6 categorical anxiety levels were calculated. The highest frequency of a face assigned to a level of the numerical anxiety scale resulted in a finalized order of faces corresponding to the 11-point numeric rating scale.
Results: The highest frequency for each of the NVRS anxiety scores were as follow: A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A7, A6, A8, A9 and A10 (Fig 2). For the six categorical anxiety levels, a total of 260 (98.1%) participants chose the face A0 as representing 'no' anxiety, 250 (94.3%) participants chose the face A10 as representing 'highest' anxiety and 147 (55.5%) participants chose the face A8 as representing 'moderate-high' anxiety. Spearman analysis showed a significant correlation between the faces A3 and A5 assigned to the mild-moderate anxiety category (r = 0.58), but A5 was ultimately chosen due to its higher frequency compared to the frequency of A3 (30.6% vs 24.9%)(Fig 3). Similarly, the correlation of the faces A7 and A6 was significantly correlated with moderate anxiety (r = 0.87), but A7 remained because of its higher frequency (35.9% vs 22.6%). Using frequency and Spearman correlations, the final order of the faces assigned to the categories none, mild, mild-moderate, moderate, moderate-high and highest anxiety levels was A0, A1, A5, A7, A8 and A10, respectively (Fig 4).
Conclusion: The proposed VFAS was a valid tool for assessing the severity of acute [state] anxiety, and could be easy to administer in routine clinical practice.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
- Hashimoto Y, Baba S, Koh H, Takagi H, Ishihara H, Matsuki A. Anxiolytic effect of pre-operative showing of anesthesia video for surgical patients. Masui 1993; 42: 611–616.
- Matthias AT, Samarasekera DN. Preoperative anxiety in surgical patients—experience of a single unit. ActaAnaesthesiologicaTaiwanica 2012; 50: 3–6.
- Julian LJ. Measures of anxiety: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A). Arthritis Care Res 2011; 63: 467–472.
- Derogatis IR,Melisaratos N. The brief symptominventory: an introductory report. Psychological Medicine 1983; 13: 595–605.
- Millar K, Jelicic M, Bonke B, Asbury AJ. Assessment of preoperative anxiety: comparison of measures in patients awaiting surgery for breast cancer. Br J Anaesth 1995; 74: 180–183.
- Chlan LL. Relationship between two anxiety instruments in patients receiving mechanical ventilatory support. J AdvNurs 2004; 48: 493–499.
- Ekman P,Oster H. Facial expressions of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology 1979; 30: 527–554.
- McGrath PA, Seifert CE, Speechley KN, Booth JC, Stitt L, Gibson MC. A new analogue scale for assessing children's pain: an initial validation study. Pain 1996;64(3):435–443.
- Abend R, Dan O, Maoz K, Raz S, Bar-Haim Y. Reliability, validity and sensitivity of a computerized visual analog scale measuring state anxiety. J BehavTherExp Psychiatry 2014;45(4):447–453.
- Bulloch B, Garcia-Filion P, Notricia D, Bryson M, McConahay T. Reliability of the color analog scale: repeatability of scores in traumatic and nontraumatic injuries. Acad Emerg Med 2009; 16(5): 465–469. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00404.x
- Van Giang N, Chiu HY, Thai DH, Kuo SY, Tsai PS. Validity, Sensitivity, and Responsiveness of the 11-Face Faces Pain Scale to Postoperative Pain in Adult Orthopedic Surgery Patients. Pain Manag Nurs. 2015; 16(5): 678–684. 10.1016/j.pmn.2015.02.002
- Garra G, Singer AJ, Taira BR, Chohan J, Cardoz H, Chisena E, Thode HC Jr. Validation of the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale in pediatric emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2010; 17(1): 50–54. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00620.x
- Tomlinson D, von Baeyer CL, Stinson JN, Sung L. A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children. Pediatrics 2010; 126(5): 1168–1198.
- Ekman P, Oster H. Facial expressions of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology 1979; 30: 527–554.
- Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales-a practical guide to their development and use (3th edition). New York: Oxford University Press Inc. 2003.
- Yumul R, Ahdout J, Goodman A, Elvir-Lazo OL, Conte AH, Cook-Wiens G, Cao XZ, White PF. Assessment of preoperative anxiety using visual facial anxiety scale: an alternative to the verbal rating scale? Medical Research Archives 2015; 4: 1–14.
Source: PubMed