Psychological and behavioral differences between low back pain populations: a comparative analysis of chiropractic, primary and secondary care patients

Andreas Eklund, Gunnar Bergström, Lennart Bodin, Iben Axén, Andreas Eklund, Gunnar Bergström, Lennart Bodin, Iben Axén

Abstract

Background: Psychological, behavioral and social factors have long been considered important in the development of persistent pain. Little is known about how chiropractic low back pain (LBP) patients compare to other LBP patients in terms of psychological/behavioral characteristics.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the aim was to investigate patients with LBP as regards to psychosocial/behavioral characteristics by describing a chiropractic primary care population and comparing this sample to three other populations using the MPI-S instrument. Thus, four different samples were compared. A: Four hundred eighty subjects from chiropractic primary care clinics. B: One hundred twenty-eight subjects from a gainfully employed population (sick listed with high risk of developing chronicity). C: Two hundred seventy-three subjects from a secondary care rehabilitation clinic. D: Two hundred thirty-five subjects from secondary care clinics. The Swedish version of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI-S) was used to collect data. Subjects were classified using a cluster analytic strategy into three pre-defined subgroups (named adaptive copers, dysfunctional and interpersonally distressed).

Results: The data show statistically significant overall differences across samples for the subgroups based on psychological and behavioral characteristics. The cluster classifications placed (in terms of the proportions of the adaptive copers and dysfunctional subgroups) sample A between B and the two secondary care samples C and D.

Conclusions: The chiropractic primary care sample was more affected by pain and worse off with regards to psychological and behavioral characteristics compared to the other primary care sample. Based on our findings from the MPI-S instrument the 4 samples may be considered statistically and clinically different.

Trial registration: Sample A comes from an ongoing trial registered at clinical trials.gov; NCT01539863 , February 22, 2012.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart describing workflow and formation of clusters. Legend: MPI-S = The Multi-dimensional Pain Inventory - Swedish version, AC = adaptive coper, ID = interpersonally distressed, DYS = dysfunctional
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
MPI-S subgroups across study samples. Legend: A = study sample A, B = study sample B, C = study sample C, D; study sample D, AC = adaptive coper, ID = interpersonally distressed, DYS = dysfunctional, MP = The Multi-dimensional Pain Inventory

References

    1. Ihlebaek C, Hansson TH, Laerum E, Brage S, Eriksen HR, Holm SH, et al. Prevalence of low back pain and sickness absence: a "borderline" study in Norway and Sweden. Scand J Public Health. 2006;34(5):555–558. doi: 10.1080/14034940600552051.
    1. Itz CJ, Geurts JW, van Kleef M, Nelemans P. Clinical course of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies set in primary care. Eur J Pain. 2013;17(1):5–15. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00170.x.
    1. Gatchel RJ. TD: Psychosocial factors in pain: critical perspectives. New York: Guilford Press; 1999.
    1. Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129–136. doi: 10.1126/science.847460.
    1. Engel GL. The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. A J Psychiatry. 1980;137(5):535–544. doi: 10.1176/ajp.137.5.535.
    1. Weiner BK. Spine update: the biopsychosocial model and spine care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33(2):219–223. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181604572.
    1. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965;150(3699):971–979. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3699.971.
    1. Hall AM, Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira ML, Nicholas MK. Symptoms of depression and stress mediate the effect of pain on disability. Pain. 2011;152(5):1044–1051. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.01.014.
    1. Fordyce W. Behavior Methods for Cronic Pain and Illness. Saint Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company; 1976.
    1. Hoogendoorn WE, van Poppel MN, Bongers PM, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25(16):2114–2125. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200008150-00017.
    1. Macfarlane GJ, Thomas E, Croft PR, Papageorgiou AC, Jayson MI, Silman AJ. Predictors of early improvement in low back pain amongst consulters to general practice: the influence of pre-morbid and episode-related factors. Pain. 1999;80(1–2):113–119. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00209-7.
    1. Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Main CJ, Hollis S. Psychosocial predictors of outcome in acute and subchronic low back trouble. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20(6):722–728. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199503150-00014.
    1. Linton SJ, Hallden K. Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. Clin J Pain. 1998;14(3):209–215. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199809000-00007.
    1. Hill JC, Dunn KM, Lewis M, Mullis R, Main CJ, Foster NE, et al. A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(5):632–641. doi: 10.1002/art.23563.
    1. Celestin J, Edwards RR, Jamison RN. Pretreatment psychosocial variables as predictors of outcomes following lumbar surgery and spinal cord stimulation: a systematic review and literature synthesis. Pain Med. 2009;10(4):639–653. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00632.x.
    1. Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Hancock MJ, Koes BW, Croft PR, Hay E. Treatment-based subgroups of low back pain: a guide to appraisal of research studies and a summary of current evidence. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24(2):181–191. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.11.003.
    1. Grotle M, Foster NE, Dunn KM, Croft P. Are prognostic indicators for poor outcome different for acute and chronic low back pain consulters in primary care? Pain. 2010;151(3):790–797. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.014.
    1. Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9802):1560–1571. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60937-9.
    1. Carmody TP. Psychosocial subgroups, coping, and chronic low-back pain. J Clin Psychol Med S. 2001;8(3):137–148. doi: 10.1023/A:1011309401598.
    1. Newell DF. J: Who will get better? Predicting clinical outcomes in a chiropractic practice. Clin Chiropr. 2008;13(1):108.
    1. Langworthy JM, Breen AC. Psychosocial factors and their predictive value in chiropractic patients with low back pain: a prospective inception cohort study. Chiropr Osteopat. 2007;15:5. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-15-5.
    1. Malmqvist S, Leboeuf-Yde C. The Nordic maintenance care program: case management of chiropractic patients with low back pain--defining the patients suitable for various management strategies. Chiropr Osteopat. 2009;17:7. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-17-7.
    1. Field JR, Newell D, McCarthy PW. Preliminary study into the components of the fear-avoidance model of LBP: change after an initial chiropractic visit and influence on outcome. Chiropr Osteopat. 2010;18:21.
    1. Field J, Newell D. Relationship between STart Back Screening Tool and prognosis for low back pain patients receiving spinal manipulative therapy. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies. 2012;20(1):17. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-20-17.
    1. Kongsted A, Andersen CH, Hansen MM, Hestbaek L. Prediction of outcome in patients with low back pain - A prospective cohort study comparing clinicians' predictions with those of the Start Back Tool. Man Ther. 2015.
    1. Leboeuf-Yde C, Rosenbaum A, Axen I, Lovgren PW, Jorgensen K, Halasz L, et al. The Nordic Subpopulation Research Programme: prediction of treatment outcome in patients with low back pain treated by chiropractors-does the psychological profile matter? Chiropr Osteopat. 2009;17:14. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-17-14.
    1. Weigel P, Hockenberry JM, Bentler SE, Obrizan M, Kaskie B, Jones MP, et al. A longitudinal study of chiropractic use among older adults in the United States. Chiropr Osteopat. 2010;18:34. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-18-34.
    1. French SD, Densley K, Charity MJ, Gunn J. Who uses Australian chiropractic services? Chiropr Man Therap. 2013;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-21-31.
    1. Kerns RD, Turk DC, Rudy TE. The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI) Pain. 1985;23(4):345–356. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90004-1.
    1. Turk DC, Kerns RD. Conceptual issues in the assessment of clinical pain. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1983;13(1):57–68. doi: 10.2190/RQAR-UT6W-G4A0-TYHY.
    1. Turk DC. The potential of treatment matching for subgroups of patients with chronic pain: lumping versus splitting. Clin J Pain. 2005;21(1):44–55. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200501000-00006.
    1. Eklund A, Axen I, Kongsted A, Lohela-Karlsson M, Leboeuf-Yde C, Jensen I. Prevention of low back pain: effect, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility of maintenance care - study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2014;15(1):102. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-102.
    1. Bergstrom G, Bjorklund C, Fried I, Lisspers J, Nathell L, Hermansson U, et al. A comprehensive workplace intervention and its outcome with regard to lifestyle, health and sick leave: the AHA study. Work. 2008;31(2):167–180.
    1. Bergstrom C, Hagberg J, Bodin L, Jensen I, Bergstrom G. Using a psychosocial subgroup assignment to predict sickness absence in a working population with neck and back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-81.
    1. Ljungquist T, Jensen IB, Nygren Å. G. Rehabilitation of patients suffering from spinal pain (Rehabillitering av patienter med smärttillstånd i ryggkotpelaren). In Section for Personal Injury Prevention. Stockholm: Karolinska Institute; 1999.
    1. Bergstrom G, Bergstrom C, Hagberg J, Bodin L, Jensen I. A 7-year follow-up of multidisciplinary rehabilitation among chronic neck and back pain patients. Is sick leave outcome dependent on psychologically derived patient groups? Eur J Pain. 2010;14(4):426–433. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.06.008.
    1. Jensen IB, Busch H, Bodin L, Hagberg J, Nygren A, Bergstrom G. Cost effectiveness of two rehabilitation programmes for neck and back pain patients: A seven year follow-up. Pain. 2009;142(3):202–208. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.12.015.
    1. Jensen IB, Bergstrom G, Ljungquist T, Bodin L, Nygren AL. A randomized controlled component analysis of a behavioral medicine rehabilitation program for chronic spinal pain: are the effects dependent on gender? Pain. 2001;91(1–2):65–78. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00420-6.
    1. Busch H, Bodin L, Bergstrom G, Jensen IB. Patterns of sickness absence a decade after pain-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Pain. 2011;152(8):1727–1733. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.02.004.
    1. Turk DC, Rudy TE. The robustness of an empirically derived taxonomy of chronic pain patients. Pain. 1990;43(1):27–35. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90047-H.
    1. Turk DC. Strategies for classifying chronic orofacial pain patients. Anesth Prog. 1990;37(2–3):155–160.
    1. Walter L, Brannon L. A cluster analysis of the multidimensional pain inventory. Headache. 1991;31(7):476–479. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1991.hed3107476.x.
    1. Turk DC, Okifuji A, Sinclair JD, Starz TW. Pain, disability, and physical functioning in subgroups of patients with fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol. 1996;23(7):1255–1262.
    1. Turk DC, Sist TC, Okifuji A, Miner MF, Florio G, Harrison P, et al. Adaptation to metastatic cancer pain, regional/local cancer pain and non-cancer pain: role of psychological and behavioral factors. Pain. 1998;74(2–3):247–256. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00187-5.
    1. Talo S, Forssell H, Heikkonen S, Puukka P. Integrative group therapy outcome related to psychosocial characteristics in patients with chronic pain. Int J Rehabil Res. 2001;24(1):25–33. doi: 10.1097/00004356-200103000-00004.
    1. Lousberg R, Schmidt AJ, Groenman NH, Vendrig L, Dijkman-Caes CI. Validating the MPI-DLV using experience sampling data. J Behav Med. 1997;20(2):195–206. doi: 10.1023/A:1025534812341.
    1. Flor H, Rudy TE, Birbaumer N, Streit B, Schugens MM. The applicability of the West Haven-Yale multidimensional pain inventory in German-speaking countries. Data on the reliability and validity of the MPI-D. Schmerz. 1990;4(2):82–87. doi: 10.1007/BF02527839.
    1. Bergstrom G, Jensen IB, Bodin L, Linton SJ, Nygren AL, Carlsson SG. Reliability and factor structure of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory - Swedish Language Version (MPI-S) Pain. 1998;75(1):101–110. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00210-8.
    1. Bergstrom KG, Jensen IB, Linton SJ, Nygren AL. A psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI-S): a gender differentiated evaluation. Eur J Pain. 1999;3(3):261–273. doi: 10.1016/S1090-3801(99)90053-8.
    1. Bergstrom G, Bodin L, Jensen IB, Linton SJ, Nygren AL. Long-term, non-specific spinal pain: reliable and valid subgroups of patients. Behav Res Ther. 2001;39(1):75–87. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00175-8.
    1. Turk DC, Rudy TE. Toward an empirically derived taxonomy of chronic pain patients: integration of psychological assessment data. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56(2):233–238. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.56.2.233.
    1. Everitt B. Cluster Analysis. London: Arnold; 1993.
    1. Strategier LD, Chwalisz K, Altmaier EM, Russell DW, Lehmann TR. Multidimensional assessment of chronic low back pain: Predicting treatment outcomes. J Clin Psychol Med S. 1997;4(1):91–110. doi: 10.1023/A:1026288205401.
    1. Bergstrom C, Jensen I, Hagberg J, Busch H, Bergstrom G. Effectiveness of different interventions using a psychosocial subgroup assignment in chronic neck and back pain patients: a 10-year follow-up. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(2):110–118. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.607218.
    1. Bergstrom G, Jensen IB, Bodin L, Linton SJ, Nygren AL. The impact of psychologically different patient groups on outcome after a vocational rehabilitation program for long-term spinal pain patients. Pain. 2001;93(3):229–237. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00320-7.
    1. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, et al. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008;9(2):105–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005.
    1. Becker A, Held H, Redaelli M, Chenot JF, Leonhardt C, Keller S, et al. Implementation of a Guideline for Low Back Pain Management in Primary Care. Spine. 2012;37(8):701–710. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822b01bd.
    1. Banerjee M. Beyond kappa: A review of interrater agreement measures. Can J Stat. 1999;27(1):3–23. doi: 10.2307/3315487.
    1. Cohen J. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20(1):37–46. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104.
    1. Verra ML, Angst F, Staal JB, Brioschi R, Lehmann S, Aeschlimann A, et al. Differences in pain, function and coping in Multidimensional Pain Inventory subgroups of chronic back pain: a one-group pretest-posttest study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:145. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-145.
    1. Hartvigsen J, Natvig B, Ferreira M. Is it all about a pain in the back? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013;27(5):613–623. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2013.09.008.
    1. Leboeuf-Yde C, Fejer R, Nielsen J, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J. Pain in the three spinal regions: the same disorder? Data from a population-based sample of 34,902 Danish adults. Chiropr Man Therap. 2012;20:11. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-20-11.
    1. Koes BW, van Tulder M, Lin CW, Macedo LG, McAuley J, Maher C. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(12):2075–2094. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1502-y.
    1. Hestbaek L, Munck A, Hartvigsen L, Jarbol DE, Sondergaard J, Kongsted A. Low back pain in primary care: a description of 1250 patients with low back pain in danish general and chiropractic practice. Int J Family Med. 2014;2014:106102. doi: 10.1155/2014/106102.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe