Supervised and non-supervised Nordic walking in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a single blind randomized clinical trial

Jan Hartvigsen, Lars Morsø, Tom Bendix, Claus Manniche, Jan Hartvigsen, Lars Morsø, Tom Bendix, Claus Manniche

Abstract

Background: Active approaches including both specific and unspecific exercise are probably the most widely recommended treatment for patients with chronic low back pain but it is not known exactly which types of exercise provide the most benefit. Nordic Walking - power walking using ski poles - is a popular and fast growing type of exercise in Northern Europe that has been shown to improve cardiovascular metabolism. Until now, no studies have been performed to investigate whether Nordic Walking has beneficial effects in relation to back pain.

Methods: A total of 151 patients with low back and/or leg pain of greater than eight weeks duration were recruited from a hospital based outpatient back pain clinic. Patients continuing to have pain greater than three on the 11-point numeric rating scale after a multidisciplinary intervention were included. Fifteen patients were unable to complete the baseline evaluation and 136 patients were randomized to receive A) Nordic walking supervised by a specially trained instructor twice a week for eight weeks B) One-hour instruction in Nordic walking by a specially trained instructor followed by advice to perform Nordic walking at home as much as they liked for eight weeks or C) Individual oral information consisting of advice to remain active and about maintaining the daily function level that they had achieved during their stay at the backcenter. Primary outcome measures were pain and disability using the Low Back Pain Rating Scale, and functional limitation further assessed using the Patient Specific Function Scale. Furthermore, information on time off work, use of medication, and concurrent treatment for their low back pain was collected. Objective measurements of physical activity levels for the supervised and unsupervised Nordic walking groups were performed using accelerometers. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Results: No mean differences were found between the three groups in relation to any of the outcomes at baseline. For pain, disability, and patient specific function the supervised Nordic walking group generally faired best however no statistically significant differences were found. Regarding the secondary outcome measures, patients in the supervised group tended to use less pain medication, to seek less concurrent care for their back pain, at the eight-week follow-up. There was no difference between physical activity levels for the supervised and unsupervised Nordic walking groups. No negative side effects were reported.

Conclusion: We did not find statistically significant differences between eight weeks of supervised or unsupervised Nordic walking and advice to remain active in a group of chronic low back pain patients. Nevertheless, the greatest average improvement tended to favor the supervised Nordic walking group and - taking into account other health related benefits of Nordic walking - this form of exercise may potentially be of benefit to selected groups of chronic back pain patients.

Trial registration: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT00209820.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change over 12 months on the Low Back Pain Rating Scale (LBPRS) pain subscale for chronic low back pain patients randomized to either supervised Nordic walking, unsupervised Nordic walking or advice to remain active.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change over 12 months on the Low Back Pain Rating Scale (LBPRS) function subscale for chronic low back pain patients randomized to either supervised Nordic walking, unsupervised Nordic walking or advice to remain active.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Change over 12 months on the Patient Specific Function Scale for chronic low back pain patients randomized to either supervised Nordic walking, unsupervised Nordic walking or advice to remain active.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Range of average intensity measured in counts per minute using Actigraph GT 256 accelerometers over a day for the most and least active individuals in the supervised and unsupervised Nordic walking groups.

References

    1. International Nordic Walking Federation (INWA) accessed January 10th 2010.
    1. Church TS, Earnest CP, Morss GM. Field testing of physiological responses associated with Nordic Walking. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2002;11:296–300.
    1. Porcari JP, Hendrickson TL, Walter PR, Terry L, Walsko G. The physiological responses to walking with and without Power Poles on treadmill exercise. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1997;11:161–6.
    1. Schiffer T, Knicker A, Hoffman U, Harwig B, Hollmann W, Strüder HK. Physiological responses to nordic walking, walking and jogging. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;11:56–61. doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0242-5.
    1. Oakley C, Zwierska I, Tew G, Beard JD, Saxton JM. Nordic poles immediately improve walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication. Eur J Endovasc Surg. 2008;11:689–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.06.036.
    1. Reuter I, Leone P, Schwed M, Oechsner M. Effect of Nordic Walking in Parkinson's Disease. Mov Disord. 2006;11:S567. doi: 10.1002/mds.20754.
    1. Van Eijkern FJM, Reijmers RSJ, Kleinveld MJ, Minten RN, ter Bruggen JP, Bloem BR. Nordic walking improves mobility in Parkinson's Disease. Mov Disord. 2008;11:2239–43. doi: 10.1002/mds.22293.
    1. Suija KA, Pechter UAB, Kalda RA, Tahepold HE, Maaroos JB, Jaak B. Physical activity of depressed patients and their motivation to exercise: Nordic walking in family practice. Int J Rehabil Res. 2009;11:132–8. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32831e44ef.
    1. Knobloch K, Schreibmueller L, Jagodzinski M, Zeichen J, Krettek C. Rapid rehabilitation programme following sacral stress fracture in a long-distance running female athlete. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;11:809–13. doi: 10.1007/s00402-006-0201-y.
    1. Kukkonen-Harjula K, Hiilloskorpi H, Mäntäri A, Pasanen M, Parkkari J, Suni J. Self-guided brisk walking training with or without poles: a randomized controlled trial in middle-aged women. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007;11:316–23.
    1. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;11:646–56.
    1. Kjøller M, Kamper-Jørgensen, edt. Public Health Report, Denmark 2007. National Institute of Public Health, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2007. [In Danish]
    1. Hestbæk L, Leboeuf-Yde C, Engberg M, Lauritzen T, Bruun NH, Manniche C. The course of low back pain in a general population. Results from a 5-year prospective study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003;11:213–9. doi: 10.1016/S0161-4754(03)00006-X.
    1. Deyo R. Treatments for back pain. Can we get past trivial effects? Ann Int Med. 2004;11:957–8.
    1. Andersen LB. Physical activity and health. BMJ. 2007;11:1173. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39225.414537.80.
    1. Wedderkopp N, Kjaer P, Hestbaek L, Korsholm L, Leboeuf-Yde C. High-level physical activity in childhood seems to protect against low back pain in early adolescence. Spine J. 2009;11:131–44. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.02.003.
    1. Henchoz Y, So KK. Exercise and non-specific low back pain: A literature review. Joint Bone Spine. 2008;11:533–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2008.03.003.
    1. Hartvigsen J, Christensen K. Active lifestyle protects against incident low back pain in seniors: a population-based 2-year prospective study of 1387 Danish twins aged 70-100 years. Spine. 2007;11:76–81. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000250292.18121.ce.
    1. Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Chiao C. Effects of recreational physical activity and back exercises on low back pain and psychological distress: findings from the UCLA Low Back Pain Study. Am J Public Health. 2005;11:1817–24. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.052993.
    1. Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara AV, Koes BW. Meta-analysis: exercise therapy for nonspecific low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005;11:765–75.
    1. Härkäpää K, Jarvikoski A, Mallin G, Hurri H. A controlled study of the outcome of inpatient and outpatient treatment of low back pain. Part 1. Pain, disability, compliance, and reported treatment benefits three months after treatment. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1989;11:81–9.
    1. Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Tomlinson G. Systematic review: strategies for using exercise therapy to improve outcomes in chronic low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005;11:776–85.
    1. Morsø L, Hartvigsen J, Puggaard L, Manniche C. Nordic Walking and chronic low back pain: design of a randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Dis. 2006;11:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-77.
    1. Manniche C, Asmussen K, Lauritsen B, Vinterberg, Kreiner S, Jordan A. Low back pain rating scale: Validation of a tool for assessment of low back pain. Pain. 1994;11:317–26. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90007-8.
    1. Stratford P, Gill C, Westaway M, Binkley J. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: A report of a patient specific measure. Physiotherapy Canada. 1995;11:258–63. doi: 10.3138/ptc.47.4.258.
    1. Wolfe F, Hawley DJ. Measurement of the quality of life in rheumatic disorders using the EuroQuol. Br J Rheumatol. 1997;11:786–93. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/36.7.786.
    1. Brage S, Wedderkopp N, Franks PW, Andersen LB, Froberg K. Reexamination of validity and reliability of the CSA monitor in walking and running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;11:1447–54. doi: 10.1249/.
    1. Welk GJ, Schaben JA, Morrow JR. Reliability of accelerometry-based activity monitors: a generalizability study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;11:1637–45.
    1. Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C, Korsholm L, Grunnet-Nilsson N. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2006;11:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-82.
    1. Stata Statistical Software: release 10. Version 7.0. StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA; 2007.
    1. Kuomantakis GA, Watson PJ, Oldham JA. Trunk muscle stabilization training plus general exercise versus general exercise only: randomized controlled trial of patients with recurrent low back pain. Phys Ther. 2005;11:209–25.
    1. Ferreira ML, Ferreira PH, Latimer J, Herbert RD, Hodges PW, Jennings MD. Comparison of general exercise, motor control exercise, and spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized trial. Pain. 2007;11:31–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.008.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe