Comparative in vivo efficacies of epithelial lining fluid exposures of tedizolid, linezolid, and vancomycin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a mouse pneumonia model

Pamela R Tessier, Rebecca A Keel, Mao Hagihara, Jared L Crandon, David P Nicolau, Pamela R Tessier, Rebecca A Keel, Mao Hagihara, Jared L Crandon, David P Nicolau

Abstract

The antibacterial efficacies of tedizolid phosphate (TZD), linezolid, and vancomycin regimens simulating human exposures at the infection site against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were compared in an in vivo mouse pneumonia model. Immunocompetent BALB/c mice were orally inoculated with one of three strains of MRSA and subsequently administered 20 mg/kg TZD every 24 hours (q24h), 120 mg/kg linezolid q12h, or 25 mg/kg vancomycin q12h over 24 h. These regimens produced epithelial lining fluid exposures comparable to human exposures observed following intravenous regimens of 200 mg TZD q24h, 600 mg linezolid q12h, and 1 g vancomycin q12h. The differences in CFU after 24 h of treatment were compared between control and treatment groups. Vehicle-dosed control groups increased in bacterial density an average of 1.1 logs. All treatments reduced the bacterial density at 24 h with an average of 1.2, 1.6, and 0.1 logs for TZD, linezolid, and vancomycin, respectively. The efficacy of TZD versus linezolid regimens against the three MRSA isolates was not statistically different (P > 0.05), although both treatments were significantly different from controls. In contrast, the vancomycin regimen was significantly different from TZD against one MRSA isolate and from linezolid against all isolates. The vancomycin regimen was less protective than either the TZD or linezolid regimens, with overall survival of 61.1% versus 94.7% or 89.5%, respectively. At human simulated exposures to epithelial lining fluid, vancomycin resulted in minimal reductions in bacterial counts and higher mortality compared to those of either TZD or linezolid. TZD and linezolid showed similar efficacies in this MRSA pneumonia model.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
ELF concentration time course of 20 mg/kg tedizolid q24h (circle), 120 mg/kg LZD q12h (square), and 25 mg/kg VAN q12h (triangle) over 24 h in mice.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Changes in bacterial density after 24 h for tedizolid (black bar)-, LZD (light-gray bar)-, and VAN (dark-gray bar)-treated groups (bar level represents average change in log10 CFU of group from initial density; error bars, ±1 SD). †, significantly different from tedizolid and LZD, P ≤ 0.016; ‡, significantly different from LZD, P ≤ 0.026.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe