Randomised clinical trial: vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, vs. lansoprazole for the healing of erosive oesophagitis

K Ashida, Y Sakurai, T Hori, K Kudou, A Nishimura, N Hiramatsu, E Umegaki, K Iwakiri, K Ashida, Y Sakurai, T Hori, K Kudou, A Nishimura, N Hiramatsu, E Umegaki, K Iwakiri

Abstract

Background: Vonoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker which may provide clinical benefit in acid-related disorders.

Aim: To verify the non-inferiority of vonoprazan vs. lansoprazole in patients with erosive oesophagitis (EE), and to establish its long-term safety and efficacy as maintenance therapy.

Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group comparison study, patients with endoscopically confirmed EE (LA Classification Grades A-D) were randomly allocated to receive vonoprazan 20 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg once daily after breakfast. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with healed EE confirmed by endoscopy up to week 8. In addition, subjects who achieved healed EE in the comparison study were re-randomised into a long-term study to investigate the safety and efficacy of vonoprazan 10 or 20 mg as maintenance therapy for 52 weeks.

Results: Of the 409 eligible subjects randomised, 401 completed the comparison study, and 305 entered the long-term maintenance study. The proportion of patients with healed EE up to week 8 was 99.0% for vonoprazan (203/205) and 95.5% for lansoprazole (190/199), thus verifying the non-inferiority of vonoprazan (P < 0.0001). Vonoprazan was also effective in patients with more severe EE (LA Classification Grades C/D) and CYP2C19 extensive metabolisers. In the long-term maintenance study, there were few recurrences (<10%) of EE in patients treated with vonoprazan 10 or 20 mg. Overall, vonoprazan was well-tolerated.

Conclusions: The non-inferiority of vonoprazan to lansoprazole in EE was verified in the comparison study, and vonoprazan was well-tolerated and effective during the long-term maintenance study.

© 2015 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition during a short‐term (8‐week) double‐blind comparison of vonoprazan (VPZ) and lansoprazole (LPZ) and long‐term (52‐week) single‐blind maintenance study with VPZ 10 or 20 mg in patients with erosive oesophagitis (EE)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Arithmetic mean serum gastrin, pepsinogen I and pepsinogen II levels at baseline and after 2, 4 and 8 weeks' treatment with vonoprazan (VPZ) 20 mg or lansoprazole (LPZ) 30 mg once daily in patients with erosive oesophagitis (EE). Each bar shows the standard deviation. Difference between vonoprazan and lansoprazole groups: ***P < 0.0001; *P < 0.05.

References

    1. Maradey‐Romero C, Fass R. New and future drug development for gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 20: 6–16.
    1. Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J, et al Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 1179–87.
    1. Locke GR 3rd, Talley NJ, Fett SL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population‐based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1448–56.
    1. Chiba N, De Gara CJ, Wilkinson JM, Hunt RH. Speed of healing and symptom relief in grade II to IV gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta‐analysis. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1798–810.
    1. Dent J, El‐Serag HB, Wallander MA, Johansson S. Epidemiology of gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut 2005; 54: 710–7.
    1. El‐Serag HB, Sweet S, Winchester CC, Dent J. Update on the epidemiology of gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut 2014; 63: 871–80.
    1. Altomare A, Guarino MPL, Cocca S, Emerenziani S, Cicala M. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: update on inflammation and symptom perception. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 6523–8.
    1. van Pinxteren B, Numans ME, Lau J, et al Short‐term treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 755–63.
    1. Fass R. Alternative therapeutic approaches to chronic proton pump inhibitor treatment. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 338–45.
    1. Shin JM, Inatomi N, Munson K, et al Characterization of a novel potassium‐competitive acid blocker of the gastric H,K‐ATPase, 1‐[5‐(2‐fluorophenyl)‐1‐(pyridin‐3‐ylsulfonyl)‐1H‐pyrrol‐3‐yl]‐N‐methylmethanamine monofumarate (TAK‐438). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2011; 339: 412–20.
    1. Hori Y, Imanishi A, Matsukawa J, et al 1‐[5‐(2‐fluorophenyl)‐1‐(pyridin‐3‐ylsulfonyl)‐1H‐pyrrol‐3‐yl]‐N‐methylmethanamine monofumarate (TAK‐438), a novel and potent potassium‐competitive acid blocker for the treatment of acid‐related diseases. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2010; 335: 231–8.
    1. Matsukawa J, Hori Y, Nishida H, et al A comparative study on the modes of action of TAK‐438, a novel potassium‐competitive acid blocker, and lansoprazole in primary cultured rabbit gastric glands. Biochem Pharmacol 2011; 81: 1145–51.
    1. Hori Y, Matsukawa J, Takeuchi T, et al A study comparing the antisecretory effect of TAK‐438, a novel potassium‐competitive acid blocker, with lansoprazole in animals. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2011; 337: 797–804.
    1. Sakurai Y, Nishimura A, Kennedy G, et al Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single rising TAK‐438 (Vonoprazan) doses in healthy male Japanese/non‐Japanese subjects. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2015; 6: e94. doi:
    1. Jenkins H, Sakurai Y, Nishimura A, et al Randomised clinical trial: safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of repeated doses of TAK‐438 (vonoprazan), a novel potassium‐competitive acid blocker, in healthy male subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015; 41: 636–48.
    1. Ashida K, Sakurai Y, Nishimura A, et al Randomised clinical trial: a dose‐ranging study of vonoprazan, a novel potassium‐competitive acid blocker, vs. lansoprazole for the treatment of erosive oesophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015; 42: 685–95.
    1. Kahrilas PJ, Dent J, Lauritsen K, et al A randomized, comparative study of three doses of AZD0865 and esomeprazole for healing of reflux esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 1385–91.
    1. Farrington CP, Manning G. Test statistics and sample size formulae for comparative binomial trials with null hypothesis of non‐zero risk difference or non‐unity relative risk. Stat Med 1990; 9: 1447–54.
    1. Andersson K, Carlsson E. Potassium‐competitive acid blockade: a new therapeutic strategy in acid‐related diseases. Pharmacol Ther 2005; 108: 294–307.
    1. Kinoshita Y, Miwa H, Kasugai K. Efficacy and safety of esomeprazole, compared with omeprazole, in maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis – a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double‐blind trial. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 2013; 110: 1428–38.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe