Effect of lactic acid suppositories compared with oral metronidazole and placebo in bacterial vaginosis: a randomised clinical trial

A J Boeke, J H Dekker, J T van Eijk, P J Kostense, P D Bezemer, A J Boeke, J H Dekker, J T van Eijk, P J Kostense, P D Bezemer

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of lactic acid locally, metronidazole orally and placebo in women with bacterial vaginosis.

Design: Randomised clinical trial.

Setting: 30 general practices in the Netherlands.

Patients: 125 women consulting the general practitioner for symptomatic bacterial vaginosis.

Main outcome measures: Duration of subjective symptoms, recurrence of symptoms, clinically diagnosed cure, adverse events.

Results: Survival analysis showed a significantly faster disappearance of symptoms in the metronidazole category compared with both lactic acid and placebo (p = 0.0005 metronidazole v placebo, p = 0.0002 metronidazole v lactic acid p = 0.6521 lactic acid v placebo [The stratified Mantel Cox test]). The median duration until absence of symptoms was 21 days for metronidazole and 80 days for placebo. Disappearance of symptoms did not occur in 50% of the lactic acid group in 90 days. Recurrence rates of symptoms were similar over the treatment categories (p = 0.13 metronidazole v placebo and p = 0.12 lactic acid v placebo). After 2 weeks cure rates (cure defined as less than three of four clinical criteria present) were 83%, 49% and 47% for metronidazole, lactic acid and placebo category respectively. At that time cure rates (cure defined as none of three clinical criteria present) were 10%, 0% and 3%. After four weeks and three months these figures were: 55%, 20%, 20% and 64%, 28%, 28%. No differences in adverse events were found between the three interventions.

Conclusions: Lactic acid suppositories are ineffective, metronidazole capsules are effective on signs and symptoms in bacterial vaginosis. A considerable proportion of the patients recover without active medication.

References

    1. Lancet. 1980 Mar 8;1(8167):501-3
    1. Am J Med. 1983 Jan;74(1):14-22
    1. Lancet. 1983 Dec 17;2(8364):1379-82
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Dec 15;150(8):917-24
    1. JAMA. 1986 Oct 10;256(14):1899-903
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jan;71(1):89-95
    1. Scand J Infect Dis. 1990;22(5):625-6
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jun;27(6):1266-71
    1. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1989;28(3):156-60
    1. Scand J Infect Dis. 1989;21(5):585-6
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jan;162(1):155-60
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Mar;75(3 Pt 1):402-6
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Nov;163(5 Pt 1):1465-73
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Jan;73(1):52-60

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe