Recent advances in understanding and managing phantom limb pain

Andrea Aternali, Joel Katz, Andrea Aternali, Joel Katz

Abstract

Post-amputation phantom limb pain (PLP) is highly prevalent and very difficult to treat. The high-prevalence, high-pain intensity levels, and decreased quality of life associated with PLP compel us to explore novel avenues to prevent, manage, and reverse this chronic pain condition. This narrative review focuses on recent advances in the treatment of PLP and reviews evidence of mechanism-based treatments from randomized controlled trials published over the past 5 years. We review recent evidence for the efficacy of targeted muscle reinnervation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, imaginal phantom limb exercises, mirror therapy, virtual and augmented reality, and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy. The results indicate that not one of the above treatments is consistently better than a control condition. The challenge remains that there is little level 1 evidence of efficacy for PLP treatments and most treatment trials are underpowered (small sample sizes). The lack of efficacy likely speaks to the multiple mechanisms that contribute to PLP both between and within individuals who have sustained an amputation. Research approaches are called for to classify patients according to shared factors and evaluate treatment efficacy within classes. Subgroup analyses examining sex effects are recommended given the clear differences between males and females in pain mechanisms and outcomes. Use of novel data analytical approaches such as growth mixture modeling for multivariate latent classes may help to identify sub-clusters of patients with common outcome trajectories over time.

Keywords: assessment; central sensitization; cortical reorganization; neuropathic pain; phantom limb pain; referred pain; treatment.

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.

Figures

Figure 1.. Risk-of-bias assessments for studies presented…
Figure 1.. Risk-of-bias assessments for studies presented in the review of recent randomized controlled trials exploring treatment of phantom limb pain.
Randomization: randomization sequence generation; Blinding – P & P: blinding of participants and personnel; Blinding – Outcome: blinding of outcome assessment; Outcome data: incomplete outcome data.

References

    1. Ephraim PL, Wegener ST, MacKenzie EJ, et al. : Phantom pain, residual limb pain, and back pain in amputees: results of a national survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(10):1910–9. 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.031
    1. Richardson C, Glenn S, Nurmikko T, et al. : Incidence of phantom phenomena including phantom limb pain 6 months after major lower limb amputation in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Clin J Pain. 2006;22(4):353–8. 10.1097/
    1. Kooijman CM, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, et al. : Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: an epidemiological study. Pain. 2000;87(1):33–41. 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00264-5
    1. Bosmans JC, Geertzen JH, Post WJ, et al. : Factors associated with phantom limb pain: a 31/2-year prospective study. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(5):444–53. 10.1177/0269215509360645
    1. Horne CE, Paul J: Pain Support for Adults with a Diabetes-Related Lower Limb Amputation: an Empirical Phenomenology Study. Pain Manag Nurs. 2019;20(3):270–5. 10.1016/j.pmn.2018.09.007

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Flor H: Phantom-limb pain: characteristics, causes, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2002;1(3):182–9. 10.1016/S1474-4422(02)00074-1
    1. Subedi B, Grossberg GT: Phantom limb pain: mechanisms and treatment approaches. Pain Res Treat. 2011;2011: 864605. 10.1155/2011/864605
    1. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. : The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. 10.1136/bmj.d5928
    1. Dumanian GA, Potter BK, Mioton LM, et al. : Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Treats Neuroma and Phantom Pain in Major Limb Amputees: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2019;270(2):238–246. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003088

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Bowen JB, Wee CE, Kalik J, et al. : Targeted Muscle Reinnervation to Improve Pain, Prosthetic Tolerance, and Bioprosthetic Outcomes in the Amputee. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2017;6(8):261–7. 10.1089/wound.2016.0717

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Souza JM, Cheesborough JE, Ko JH, et al. : Targeted muscle reinnervation: a novel approach to postamputation neuroma pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(10):2984–90. 10.1007/s11999-014-3528-7
    1. Valerio IL, Dumanian GA, Jordan SW, et al. : Preemptive Treatment of Phantom and Residual Limb Pain with Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Major Limb Amputation. J Am Coll Surg. 2019;228(3):217–26. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.015

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Bowen JB, Ruter D, Wee C, et al. : Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Technique in Below-Knee Amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(1):309–12. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005133

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Kikkert S, Mezue M, O'Shea J, et al. : Neural basis of induced phantom limb pain relief. Ann Neurol. 2019;85(1):59–73. 10.1002/ana.25371

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Katz J: Psychophysiological contributions to phantom limbs. Can J Psychiatry. 1992;37(5):282–98. 10.1177/070674379203700502
    1. Malavera A, Silva FA, Fregni F, et al. : Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Phantom Limb Pain in Land Mine Victims: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial. J Pain. 2016;17(8):911–8. 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.05.003

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Lefaucheur JP: Pain. In Handbook of Clinical Neurology M.H. A. M. Lozano, Editor.2013;116:423–440. 10.1016/B978-0-444-53497-2.00035-8
    1. Lefaucheur JP, Drouot X, Ménard-Lefaucheur I, et al. : Motor cortex rTMS restores defective intracortical inhibition in chronic neuropathic pain. Neurology. 2006;67(9):1568–74. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000242731.10074.3c
    1. Brunelli S, Morone G, Iosa M, et al. : Efficacy of progressive muscle relaxation, mental imagery, and phantom exercise training on phantom limb: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(2):181–7. 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.035
    1. Finn SB, Perry BN, Clasing JE, et al. : A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Mirror Therapy for Upper Extremity Phantom Limb Pain in Male Amputees. Front Neurol. 2017;8:267. 10.3389/fneur.2017.00267

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Anaforoğlu Külünkoğlu B, Erbahçeci F, Alkan A: A comparison of the effects of mirror therapy and phantom exercises on phantom limb pain. Turk J Med Sci. 2019;49(1):101–9. 10.3906/sag-1712-166

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Ol HS, Van Heng Y, Danielsson L, et al. : Mirror therapy for phantom limb and stump pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial in landmine amputees in Cambodia. Scand J Pain. 2018;18(4):603–10. 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0042

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Ramadugu S, Nagabushnam SC, Katuwal N, et al. : Intervention for phantom limb pain: A randomized single crossover study of mirror therapy. Indian J Psychiatry. 2017;59(4):457–64.

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Tilak M, Isaac SA, Fletcher J, et al. : Mirror Therapy and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Management of Phantom Limb Pain in Amputees - A Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Physiother Res Int. 2016;21(2):109–15. 10.1002/pri.1626

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Rothgangel A, Braun S, Winkens B, et al. : Traditional and augmented reality mirror therapy for patients with chronic phantom limb pain (PACT study): Results of a three-group, multicentre single-blind randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32(12):1591–608. 10.1177/0269215518785948

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Rostaminejad A, Behnammoghadam M, Rostaminejad M, et al. : Efficacy of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing on the phantom limb pain of patients with amputations within a 24-month follow-up. Int J Rehabil Res. 2017;40(3):209–14. 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000227

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Moseley GL: Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2006;67(12):2129–34. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000249112.56935.32
    1. Beaumont G, Mercier C, Michon PE, et al. : Decreasing phantom limb pain through observation of action and imagery: a case series. Pain Med. 2011;12(2):289–99. 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.01048.x
    1. Kikkert S, Mezue M, Henderson Slater D, et al. : Motor correlates of phantom limb pain. Cortex. 2017;95:29–36. 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.015

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Katz J: The reality of phantom limbs. Motiv Emot. 1993;17(3):147–79. 10.1007/BF00992218
    1. Kammers MP, de Vignemont F, Haggard P: Cooling the thermal grill illusion through self-touch. Curr Biol. 2010;20(20):1819–22. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.038
    1. Longo MR, Betti V, Aglioti SM, et al. : Visually Induced Analgesia: Seeing the Body Reduces Pain. J Neurosci. 2009;29(39):12125–30. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3072-09.2009

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D, Cobb S: Touching the phantom limb. Nature. 1995;377(6549):489–90. 10.1038/377489a0
    1. Chan AW, Bilger E, Griffin S, et al. : Visual responsiveness in sensorimotor cortex is increased following amputation and reduced after mirror therapy. Neuroimage Clin. 2019;23:101882. 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101882

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Carabelli RA, Kellerman WC: Phantom limb pain: Relief by application of TENS to contralateral extremity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66(7):466–7.
    1. Giuffrida O, Simpson L, Halligan PW: Contralateral Stimulation, Using TENS, of Phantom Limb Pain: Two Confirmatory Cases. Pain Med. 2010;11(1):133–41. 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00705.x
    1. Katz J, France C, Melzack R: An association between phantom limb sensations and stump skin conductance during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) applied to the contralateral leg: A case study. Pain. 1989;36(3):367–77. 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90098-5
    1. Giummarra M: Augmented reality for treatment of phantom limb pain-are we there yet? Lancet. 2016;388(10062):2844–5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32416-3

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Ortiz-Catalan M, Guðmundsdóttir RA, Kristoffersen MB, et al. : Phantom motor execution facilitated by machine learning and augmented reality as treatment for phantom limb pain: A single group, clinical trial in patients with chronic intractable phantom limb pain. Lancet. 2016;388(10062):2885–94. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31598-7

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Dunn J, Yeo E, Moghaddampour P, et al. : Virtual and augmented reality in the treatment of phantom limb pain: A literature review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40(4):595–601. 10.3233/NRE-171447

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Sherman RA: Phantom limb pain. Mechanism-based management. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1994;11(1):85–106.
    1. Sherman RA, Jones DC, Marbach JJ: Mechanism-based assessment and management. Phantom pain. 1997;149–166. 10.1007/978-1-4757-6169-6_9
    1. Rosen S, Ham B, Mogil JS: Sex differences in neuroimmunity and pain. J Neurosci Res. 2017;95(1–2):500–8. 10.1002/jnr.23831

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Dance A: Why the sexes don’t feel pain the same way. Nature. 2019;567(7749):448–50. 10.1038/d41586-019-00895-3

    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Pagé MG, Romero Escobar EM, Ware MA, et al. : Predicting treatment outcomes of pain patients attending tertiary multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: A pain trajectory approach. Can J Pain. 2017;1(1):61–74. 10.1080/24740527.2017.1325715

    2. F1000 Recommendation

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe