Romosozumab in Postmenopausal Korean Women with Osteoporosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study

Ki-Hyun Baek, Yoon-Sok Chung, Jung-Min Koh, In Joo Kim, Kyoung Min Kim, Yong-Ki Min, Ki Deok Park, Rajani Dinavahi, Judy Maddox, Wenjing Yang, Sooa Kim, Sang Jin Lee, Hyungjin Cho, Sung-Kil Lim, Ki-Hyun Baek, Yoon-Sok Chung, Jung-Min Koh, In Joo Kim, Kyoung Min Kim, Yong-Ki Min, Ki Deok Park, Rajani Dinavahi, Judy Maddox, Wenjing Yang, Sooa Kim, Sang Jin Lee, Hyungjin Cho, Sung-Kil Lim

Abstract

Background: This phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of 6-month treatment with romosozumab in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Methods: Sixty-seven postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (bone mineral density [BMD] T-scores ≤-2.5 at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck) were randomized (1:1) to receive monthly subcutaneous injections of romosozumab (210 mg; n=34) or placebo (n=33) for 6 months.

Results: At month 6, the difference in the least square (LS) mean percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD (primary efficacy endpoint) between the romosozumab (9.5%) and placebo (-0.1%) groups was significant (9.6%; 95% confidence interval, 7.6 to 11.5; P<0.001). The difference in the LS mean percent change from baseline was also significant for total hip and femoral neck BMD (secondary efficacy endpoints). After treatment with romosozumab, the percent change from baseline in procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide transiently increased at months 1 and 3, while that in C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen showed a sustained decrease. No events of cancer, hypocalcemia, injection site reaction, positively adjudicated atypical femoral fracture or osteonecrosis of the jaw, or positively adjudicated serious cardiovascular adverse events were observed. At month 9, 17.6% and 2.9% of patients in the romosozumab group developed binding and neutralizing antibodies, respectively.

Conclusion: Treatment with romosozumab for 6 months was well tolerated and significantly increased lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck BMD compared with placebo in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02791516).

Keywords: Bone density; Bone turnover markers; Korea; Randomized controlled trial; Romosozumab.

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Yoon-Sok Chung reports consultancy fee from Amgen, Eli Lilly, MSD, and Yuyu. Rajani Dinavahi, Judy Maddox, and Wenjing Yang are employees and stockholders of Amgen Inc. Sooa Kim, Sang Jin Lee, and Hyungjin Cho are employees of Amgen Korea Limited.

Ki-Hyun Baek, Jung-Min Koh, In Joo Kim, Kyoung Min Kim, Yong-Ki Min, Ki Deok Park, and Sung-Kil Lim do not have any conflicts of interest to declare. This study was sponsored by Amgen Inc. Editorial support, in the form of medical writing, assembling tables and creating high-resolution images based on authors’ detailed directions, collating author comments, copyediting, fact checking, and referencing, was provided by Annirudha Chillar, MD, PhD, and Mami Hirano, MS, of Cactus Life Sciences (part of Cactus Communications) and funded by Amgen Korea.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design. IP, investigational product; D, day; M, month; SC, subcutaneous; QM, once monthly.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient disposition. BMD, bone mineral density; BTM, bone turnover marker.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percent change (least square mean and 95% confidence interval) from baseline in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck at month 6.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Median (interquartile range) percent change from baseline in (A) procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) and (B) serum C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX) by visit. SC, subcutaneous; QM, once monthly.

References

    1. Ji MX, Yu Q. Primary osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2015;1:9–13.
    1. Park EJ, Joo IW, Jang MJ, Kim YT, Oh K, Oh HJ. Prevalence of osteoporosis in the Korean population based on Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), 2008–2011. Yonsei Med J. 2014;55:1049–57.
    1. Park C, Ha YC, Jang S, Jang S, Yoon HK, Lee YK. The incidence and residual lifetime risk of osteoporosis-related fractures in Korea. J Bone Miner Metab. 2011;29:744–51.
    1. Papapoulos S, Makras P. Selection of antiresorptive or anabolic treatments for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2008;4:514–23.
    1. Compston JE, McClung MR, Leslie WD. Osteoporosis. Lancet. 2019;393:364–76.
    1. Lim SY, Bolster MB. Profile of romosozumab and its potential in the management of osteoporosis. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017;11:1221–31.
    1. Ke HZ, Richards WG, Li X, Ominsky MS. Sclerostin and Dickkopf-1 as therapeutic targets in bone diseases. Endocr Rev. 2012;33:747–83.
    1. Ominsky MS, Niu QT, Li C, Li X, Ke HZ. Tissue-level mechanisms responsible for the increase in bone formation and bone volume by sclerostin antibody. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29:1424–30.
    1. Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Adachi JD, Binkley N, Czerwinski E, Ferrari S, et al. Romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1532–43.
    1. Saag KG, Petersen J, Brandi ML, Karaplis AC, Lorentzon M, Thomas T, et al. Romosozumab or alendronate for fracture prevention in women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1417–27.
    1. Langdahl BL, Libanati C, Crittenden DB, Bolognese MA, Brown JP, Daizadeh NS, et al. Romosozumab (sclerostin monoclonal antibody) versus teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis transitioning from oral bisphosphonate therapy: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;390:1585–94.
    1. Lewiecki EM, Blicharski T, Goemaere S, Lippuner K, Meisner PD, Miller PD, et al. A phase III randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of romosozumab in men with osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103:3183–93.
    1. Amgen Korea Limited. Evenity™ Inj. Pre-filled Syringe prescribing information [Internet] Seoul: Amgen; 2019. [cited 2020 Nov 26]. Available from:
    1. McClung MR, Grauer A, Boonen S, Bolognese MA, Brown JP, Diez-Perez A, et al. Romosozumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:412–20.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry drug-induced liver injury: premarketing clinical evaluation July 2009 [Internet] White Oak: FDA; 2009. [cited 2020 Nov 26]. Available from: .
    1. Park SY, Ahn SH, Yoo JI, Chung YJ, Jeon YK, Yoon BH, et al. Position statement on the use of bone turnover markers for osteoporosis treatment. J Bone Metab. 2019;26:213–24.
    1. Amgen Inc. EVENITY™ (romosozumab-aqqg) injection, for subcutaneous use prescribing information [Internet] White Oak: FDA; 2019. [cited 2020 Nov 26]. Available from: .
    1. Miyauchi A, Dinavahi RV, Crittenden DB, Yang W, Maddox JC, Hamaya E, et al. Increased bone mineral density for 1 year of romosozumab, vs placebo, followed by 2 years of denosumab in the Japanese subgroup of the pivotal FRAME trial and extension. Arch Osteoporos. 2019;14:59.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe