From trial to population: a study of a family-based community intervention for childhood overweight implemented at scale

J Fagg, P Chadwick, T J Cole, S Cummins, H Goldstein, H Lewis, S Morris, D Radley, P Sacher, C Law, J Fagg, P Chadwick, T J Cole, S Cummins, H Goldstein, H Lewis, S Morris, D Radley, P Sacher, C Law

Abstract

Objectives: To assess how outcomes associated with participation in a family-based weight management intervention (MEND 7-13, Mind, Exercise, Nutrition..Do it!) for childhood overweight or obesity implemented at scale in the community vary by child, family, neighbourhood and MEND programme characteristics.

Methods/subjects: Intervention evaluation using prospective service level data. Families (N=21,132) with overweight children are referred, or self-refer, to MEND. Families (participating child and one parent/carer) attend two sessions/week for 10 weeks (N=13,998; N=9563 with complete data from 1788 programmes across England). Sessions address diet and physical activity through education, skills training and motivational enhancement. MEND was shown to be effective in obese children in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Outcomes were mean change in body mass index (BMI), age- and sex-standardised BMI (zBMI), self-esteem (Rosenberg scale) and psychological distress (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire) after the 10-week programme. Relationships between the outcome and covariates were tested in multilevel models adjusted for the outcome at baseline.

Results: After adjustment for covariates, BMI reduced by mean 0.76 kg m(-2) (s.e.=0.021, P<0.0001), zBMI reduced by mean 0.18 (s.e.=0.0038, P<0.0001), self-esteem score increased by 3.53 U (s.e.=0.13, P<0.0001) and psychological distress score decreased by 2.65 U (s.e.=0.31, P<0.0001). Change in outcomes varied by participant, family, neighbourhood and programme factors. Generally, outcomes improved less among children from less advantaged backgrounds and in Asian compared with white children. BMI reduction under service conditions was slightly but not statistically significantly less than in the earlier RCT.

Conclusions: The MEND intervention, when delivered at scale, is associated with improved BMI and psychosocial outcomes on average, but may work less well for some groups of children, and so has the potential to widen inequalities in these outcomes. Such public health interventions should be implemented to achieve sustained impact for all groups.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of referral to MEND 7–13 and data management.

References

    1. Han JC, Lawlor DA, Kimm SYS. Childhood obesity. Lancet. 2010;375:1737–1748.
    1. Butland B, Jebb S, Kopelman P, McPherson K, Thomas S, Mardell J.Foresight. Tackling Obesities: Future Choices. Project Report. Government Office for Science, UK, 2007
    1. Reilly JJ, Kelly J. Long-term impact of overweight and obesity in childhood and adolescence on morbidity and premature mortality in adulthood: systematic review. Int J Obes. 2011;35:891–898.
    1. Health Survey for England 2004 Health of Ethnic Minorities. Full Report. The Information Centre NHS, Leeds, UK, 2006
    1. Shrewsbury V, Wardle J. Socioeconomic status and adiposity in childhood: a systematic review of cross-sectional studies 1990-2005. Obesity. 2008;16:275–284.
    1. Oude Luttikhuis H, Baur L, Jansen H, Shrewsbury VA, O'Malley C, Stolk RP, et al. Interventions for treating obesity in children Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; ((1)):CD001872.
    1. Lorenc T, Petticrew M, Welch V, Tugwell P. What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67:190–193.
    1. Aicken C, Roberts H, Arai L. Mapping service activity: the example of childhood obesity schemes in England. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:310.
    1. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1322–1327.
    1. McPherson K, Marsh T, Brown M.Foresight. Tackling Obesities: Future Choices - Modelling Future Trends in Obesity and the Impact on Health Government Office for Science, UK, 2007
    1. Kerr J, Norman GJ, Adams MA, Ryan S, Frank L, Sallis JF, et al. Do neighborhood environments moderate the effect of physical activity lifestyle interventions in adults. Health Place. 2010;16:903–908.
    1. Sacher PM, Kolotourou M, Chadwick PM, Cole TJ, Lawson MS, Lucas A, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the MEND program: a family-based community intervention for childhood obesity. Obesity. 2010;18:S62–S68.
    1. Rosenberg M.Society and the Adolescent Self-image Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1965
    1. Goodman R. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997;38:581–586.
    1. Cole TJ, Freeman JV, Preece MA. Body mass index reference curves for the UK, 1990. Arch Dis Child. 1995;73:259.
    1. Cole TJ, Green PJ. Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med. 1992;11:1305–1319.
    1. Noble M, McLennan D, Wilkinson K, Whitworth A, Dibben C, Barnes H.English Indices of Deprivation 2007 Communities and Local Government, UK, 2008
    1. Bibby P, Shephard J.Developing a New Classification of Urban and Rural Areas for Policy Purposes – the Methodology DEFRA, London, UK, 2005
    1. Ordnance Survey . Points of Interest Database: User Guide and Technical Specification. Ordnance Survey; Southampton, UK; 2011.
    1. Communities and Local Government . Generalised Land Use Database Statistics for England 2005. Department for Communities and Local Government; London, UK; 2007.
    1. Rubin DB.Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys John Wiley and Sons, USA, 1987
    1. Sterne JAC, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009;29:b2393.
    1. Raftery AE. Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociol Methodol. 1995;25:111–163.
    1. Carpenter JR, Goldstein H, Kenwood MG. REALCOM-IMPUTE software for multilevel multiple imputation with mixed response types. J Stat Softw. 2011;45:1–14.
    1. Stata Statistical Software Stata Statistical Software: Release 12 StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA, 2011
    1. Rasbash J, Charlton C, Browne WJ, Healy M, Cameron B.MLwiN Version 2.1 Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol, UK, 2009
    1. Leckie G, Charlton C.runmlwin: Stata Module for Fitting Multilevel Models in the MLwiN Software Package Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol, UK, 2011
    1. Griffiths LJ, Parsons TJ, Hill AJ. Self-esteem and quality of life in obese children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2010;5:282–304.
    1. Edwards KL, Clarke GP, Ransley JK, Cade J. The neighbourhood matters: studying exposures relevant to childhood obesity and the policy implications in Leeds, UK. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64:194–201.
    1. Edwards N. Scaling-up health innovations and interventions in public health: a brief review of the current state-of-the-science. In:Inaugural Conference to Advance the State of the Science and Practice on Scale-up and Spread of Effective Health Programs; 6–8 July; Washington, DC, USA, 2010
    1. Kolsgaard M, Joner G, Brunborg C, Anderssen S, Tonstad S, Andersen L. Reduction in BMI z-score and improvement in cardiometabolic risk factors in obese children and adolescents. The Oslo Adiposity Intervention Study - a hospital/public health nurse combined treatment. BMC Pediatr. 2011;11:47.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe