Dermoscopy is a new diagnostic tool in diagnosis of common hypopigmented macular disease: A descriptive study

Khitam Al-Refu, Khitam Al-Refu

Abstract

One of the most frequent complaints in dermatology clinics is the eruption of hypopigmented patchy skin lesions. The aim of the study was to investigate the utility of dermoscopy in common hypopigmented macular diseases. Patients with the followings diseases were examined by dermoscopy: vitiligo, pityriasis alba, nevus depigmentosus, achromic pityriasis versicolor, idiopathic guttate hypomelanosis, and extragenital guttate lichen sclerosus. This study showed that these hypopigmented macular diseases might display specific dermoscopic features. In vitiligo, the mean dermoscopic features were the presence of a diffuse white glow with perifollicular pigment, perilesional hyperpigmentation, leukotrichia and the pigmentary network. In idiopathic guttate hypomelanosis, the characteristic features were the presence of multiple, shiny, scaly macules with welland ill-defined edges borders that coalesced into polycyclic macules. For nevus depigmentosus, the mean features were hypopigmented patches with irregular border with a faint reticular network. For pityriasis alba, the fairly ill-demarcated hypopigmented macules with fine scales were the mean feature. In lichen sclerosus, there were white structureless areas, perilesional erythematous halo, follicular plugging and white chrysalis like structures. Dermoscopy of achromic pityriasis versicolor showed a fairly demarcated white area with fine scales localized in the skin creases.

Keywords: Dermoscopy; Diagnosis; Hypopigmented macules; Vitiligo.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: the author declares no potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A) Dermoscopic view for vitiligo show depigmented patch, perilesional hyperpigmentation (blue arrows) and depigmented hair (leukotrichia) (red arrow). It is prominent in the same view that the lower margin of the depigmented patch with ill-defined margins that merge indistinctly into the surrounding (Nebulous pattern) (blue stars). (B) Dermoscopic view for vitiligo show Polka dot appearance with several depigmented macules within a hyperpigmented background. Few macules show perifollicular repigmentation and leukotrichia as well.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) Dermoscopy of a lesion of idiopathic guttate hypomelanosis shows multiple, roundish, homogenous, white-porcelain macules, and two were well defined (amoeboid pattern) (red arrows) and with irregular cloudy whitish pattern (nebuloid) (blue arrow). Several white shades present within the field represents the scales. In addition, these whitish areas were surrounded by a patchy hyperpigmented network (cloudy- sky pattern) (blue stars). (B) The hypopigmented patches of nevus depigmentosus with irregular border (serrated) and with a faint reticular network within the patch.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(A) Dermoscopic feature for a child with pityriasis alba. The hypopigmented macules were fairly ill-demarcated white area with fine scales that are commonly distributed within and outside the macules. The hair inside the patches was of normal color. There is no sharp margin to differentiate the hypopigmented patch from the surrounding skin. (B) Dermoscopic view for achromic pityriasis versicolor showed a fairly demarcated white area with fine scales that are commonly localized in the skin creases.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Histopathology of a lesion of extragenital lichen sclerosus showed hyperkeratosis, epidermal atrophy, squamatization of the basal cell layer and homogenization and hyalinization of the upper dermis.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
The dermoscopic features of new lichen sclerosus et atrophicus (A) and an old LSE lesions (B). Dermoscopy showing white structureless areas (blue stars) and comedolike openings (yellow arrows) with telangiectasia of different lengths and calibers (red arrows).

References

    1. Errichetti E, Stinco G. The practical usefulness of dermoscopy in general dermatology. J Ital Dermatol Venereol 2015;150:533-46.
    1. Lallas A, Giacomel J, Argenziano G, et al. Dermoscopy in general dermatology: practical tips for the clinician. Br J Dermatol 2014;170:514-26.
    1. Lallas A, Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, et al. Dermoscopy in general dermatology. Dermatol Clin 2013;31:679-94.
    1. Errichetti E, Stinco G. Dermoscopy in general dermatology: a practical overview. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2016;6:471-507.
    1. Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Di Stefani A, Ferrara G, et al. Dermoscopy in general dermatology. Dermatology 2006;212:7-18.
    1. Micali G, Lacarrubba F, Massimino D, Schwartz RA. Dermatoscopy: alternative uses in daily clinical practice. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;64:1135-46.
    1. Zalaudek I, Lallas A, Moscarella E, et al. The dermatologist’s stethoscope-traditional and new applications of dermoscopy. Dermatol Pract Concept 2013;3:67-71.
    1. Miteva M, Tosti A. Hair and scalp dermatoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012;67:1040-8.
    1. Lencastre A, Lamas A, Sa D, Tosti A. Onychoscopy. Clin Dermatol 2013;31: 587-93.
    1. Gandhi S, Shamanur M, Shashikiran AR, et al. Study of clinico-epidemiological and dermoscopic patterns of vitiligo in pediatric age group. Ind J Paediatr Dermatol 2017;18:292-8.
    1. Alghamdi KM, Kumar A, Taïeb A, Ezzedine K. Assessment methods for the evaluation of vitiligo. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2012;26:1463-71.
    1. Sosa JJ, Currimbhoy SD, Ukoha U, et al. Confetti-like depigmentation: A potential sign of rapidly progressing vitiligo. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015;73:272-5.
    1. Benzekri L, Gauthier Y. Clinical markers of vitiligo activity. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017;76:856-62.
    1. Thatte SS, Khopkar US. The utility of dermoscopy in the diagnosis of evolving lesions of vitiligo. Ind J Der VL 2014;80:505-8.
    1. Chuh AA, Zawar V. Demonstration of residual perifollicular pigmentation in localized vitiligo-a reverse and novel application of digital epiluminescence dermoscopy. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2004;28:213-7.
    1. Meng R, Zhao G, Cai RK, et al. Application of polarized light dermoscopy in the early diagnosis of vitiligo and its differential diagnosis from other depigmented diseases. Chin J Dermatol 2009;42:810-3.
    1. Chandrashekhar L. Dermoscopy: A tool to assess stability in Vitiligo. Khopkar U, ed. Dermoscopy and trichoscopy in diseases of the brown skin: atlas and short text. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2012. pp 112-113.
    1. Kumar Jha A, Sonthalia S, Lallas A, Chaudhary RKP. Dermoscopy in vitiligo: diagnosis and beyond. Int J Dermatol 2017;26.
    1. Jackson SM, Nesbitt LT. The diagnosis. Jackson SM, Nesbitt LT, eds. Differential diagnosis for the dermatologist, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2012. pp 767-768.
    1. Ankad BS, Beergouder SL. Dermoscopic evaluation of idiopathic guttate hypomelanosis: a preliminary observation. Indian Dermatol Online J 2015;6:164-7.
    1. Errichetti E, Stinco G. Dermoscopy of idiopathic guttate hypomelanosis. J Dermatol 2015;42:1118-9.
    1. Coupe RL. Unilateral systematized achromic naevus. Dermatologica 1967;134:19-35.
    1. Ankad BS, Shah S. Dermoscopy of nevus depigmentosus. Pigment Int 2017;4:121-3.
    1. Sarma N, Akkad BS. Dermoscopy in nevoid disorders: dermoscopy in darker skins. New Delhi, India: Japee Brothers; 2017. pp 127-128.
    1. Nayak SS, Mehta HH, Gajjar PC, Nimbark VN. Dermoscopy of general dermatological conditions in Indian population: A descriptive study. Clin Derm Rev 2017;1:41-51.
    1. Ankad BS, Beergouder BL. Dermoscopic patterns in lichen sclerosus: A report of three cases. Ind D J 2015;6:237-40.
    1. Errichetti E, Lallas A, Apalla Z, et al. Dermoscopy of morphea and cutaneous lichen sclerosus: clinicopathological correlation study and comparative analysis. Dermatology 2017;233:462-70.
    1. Marghoob AA, Cowell L, Kopf AW, Scope A. Observation of chrysalis structures with polarized dermoscopy. Arch Dermatol 2009;145:618.
    1. Carlson JA, Lamb P, Malfetano J, et al. Clinicopathologic comparison of vulvar and extragenital lichen sclerosus: Histologic variants, evolving lesions, and etiology of 141 cases. Mod Pathol 1998;11:844-54.
    1. Edmonds EV, Oyama N, Chan I, et al. Extracellular matrix protein 1 autoantibodies in male genital lichen sclerosus. Br J Dermatol 2011;165:218-9.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe