Activity-based training with the Myosuit: a safety and feasibility study across diverse gait disorders

Florian Leander Haufe, Kai Schmidt, Jaime Enrique Duarte, Peter Wolf, Robert Riener, Michele Xiloyannis, Florian Leander Haufe, Kai Schmidt, Jaime Enrique Duarte, Peter Wolf, Robert Riener, Michele Xiloyannis

Abstract

Background: Physical activity is a recommended part of treatment for numerous neurological and neuromuscular disorders. Yet, many individuals with limited mobility are not able to meet the recommended activity levels. Lightweight, wearable robots like the Myosuit promise to facilitate functional ambulation and thereby physical activity. However, there is limited evidence of the safety and feasibility of training with such devices.

Methods: Twelve participants with diverse motor disorders and the ability to walk for at least 10 m were enrolled in this uncontrolled case series study. The study protocol included five training sessions with a net training time of 45 min each. Primary outcomes were the feasibility of engaging in training with the Myosuit, the occurrence of adverse events, and participant retention. As secondary outcomes, we analyzed the walking speed using the 10-m Walk Test (10MWT) and for three participants, walking endurance using the 2-min Walk Tests.

Results: Eight out of 12 participants completed the entire study protocol. Three participants withdrew from the study or were excluded for reasons unrelated to the study. One participant withdrew because of an unsafe feeling when walking with the Myosuit. No adverse events occurred during the study period for any of the participants and all scheduled trainings were completed. For five out of the eight participants that completed the full study, the walking speed when using the Myosuit was higher than to their baseline walking speed.

Conclusions: Activity-based training with the Myosuit appears to be safe, feasible, and well-tolerated by individuals with diverse motor disorders.

Keywords: Exomuscle; Exoskeleton; Exosuit; Muscle dystrophy; Rehabilitation; Robot-assisted; Spinal cord injury; Stroke; Training.

Conflict of interest statement

FLH, PW and MX have no competing interests to declare. KS, JED and RR are authors of the European patent application 16207252.4 filed by ETH Zurich and licensed by MyoSwiss AG. KS is co-founder and CTO of MyoSwiss AG. JED is co-founder and CEO of MyoSwiss AG.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Schematic drawing of the Myosuit. On each leg, an actuated cable is routed across the hip and knee joints and driven by electric motors contained in a backpack unit. b The motors tension the cables to apply forces assisting hip and knee extension against gravity during parts of the stance phase of walking. From terminal stance into swing, the springs assist hip flexion. c Exemplary picture of training with the Myosuit
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
10MWT walking speed measured in trainings 1 to 4 with Myosuit assistance, relative to baseline 10MWT speed measured without the Myosuit in training 0. During the training blocks, the participants completed an individualized program comprising walking, balance and strength exercises. 10MWTs were performed at the beginning and end of training session, except for P6, P7 and P8, where only one 10MWT was performed at the beginning of the session and a 2minWT in place of the second 10MWT towards the end of the session (see also Fig. 3). Data points and baseline are calculated as the mean of the two 10MWTs during the respective session, and as the result from only the first 10MWT for P6, P7 and P8
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Distance covered in 2minWT during trainings 1 to 4 with Myosuit assistance, relative to baseline 2minWT distance measured without the Myosuit in training 0. Instead of the second 10MWT in training sessions 1 to 4, the last three participants performed a 2minWT during each training session
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a Mean daily step count was moderately positively correlated with the observed change in 10MWT walking speed. The number of daily steps was recorded with a wrist-worn step counter during daily activities between training sessions. b The participants’ age was moderately negatively correlated with the observed change in 10MWT walking speed. P3 (green triangle) showed the largest increase in 10MWT speed, was the most active during daily life, and the youngest of all participants

References

    1. World Health Organisation . Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010.
    1. Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, Dauphinee SW, Richards C, Ashburn A, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke—a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004;35(11):2529–2536. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000143153.76460.7d.
    1. Leech KA, Kinnaird CR, Holleran CL, Kahn J, Hornby TG. Effects of locomotor exercise intensity on gait performance in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2016;96(12):1919–1929. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150646.
    1. McCorquodale D, Pucillo EM, Johnson NE. Management of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: improving long-term care with a multidisciplinary approach. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9:7–19.
    1. Wisloff U, Stoylen A, Loennechen JP, Bruvold M, Rognmo O, Haram PM, et al. Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients—a randomized study. Circulation. 2007;115(24):3086–3094. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675041.
    1. McCarthy B, Casey D, Devane D, Murphy K, Murphy E, Lacasse Y. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003793.pub3.
    1. Anokye NK, Trueman P, Green C, Pavey TG, Taylor RS. Physical activity and health related quality of life. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):624. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-624.
    1. Chen M-D, Rimmer JH. Effects of exercise on quality of life in stroke survivors. Stroke. 2011;42(3):832–837. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.607747.
    1. Halaweh H, Willen C, Grimby-Ekman A, Svantesson U. Physical activity and health-related quality of life among community dwelling elderly. J Clin Med Res. 2015;7(11):845–852. doi: 10.14740/jocmr2307w.
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Aoyagi Y, Bell RC, Croteau KA, De Bourdeaudhuij I, et al. How many steps/day are enough? For older adults and special populations. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:80. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-80.
    1. Evaluation of automatic class III designation (de novo) for Argo ReWalk K131798/DEN130034. 2014.
    1. Response to section 510(k) premarket notification K152416. 2016.
    1. Response to section 510(k) premarket notification K143690. 2016.
    1. Response to section 510(k) premarket notification K171909. 2017.
    1. Kozlowski AJ, Bryce TN, Dijkers MP. Time and effort required by persons with spinal cord injury to learn to use a powered exoskeleton for assisted walking. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015;21(2):110–121. doi: 10.1310/sci2102-110.
    1. Hartigan C, Kandilakis C, Dalley S, Clausen M, Wilson E, Morrison S, et al. Mobility outcomes following five training sessions with a powered exoskeleton. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015;21(2):93–99. doi: 10.1310/sci2102-93.
    1. Benson I, Hart K, Tussler D, van Middendorp JJ. Lower-limb exoskeletons for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: findings from a feasibility study. Clin Rehabil. 2015;30(1):73–84. doi: 10.1177/0269215515575166.
    1. Nilsson A, Vreede KS, Häglund V, Kawamoto H, Sankai Y, Borg J. Gait training early after stroke with a new exoskeleton—the hybrid assistive limb: a study of safety and feasibility. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11(1):92. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-92.
    1. Molteni F, Gasperini G, Gaffuri M, Colombo M, Giovanzana C, Lorenzon C, et al. Wearable robotic exoskeleton for over-ground gait training in sub-acute and chronic hemiparetic stroke patients: preliminary results. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53:676–684.
    1. Awad LN, Bae J, O’Donnell K, De Rossi SMM, Hendron K, Sloot LH, et al. A soft robotic exosuit improves walking in patients after stroke. Sci Transl Med. 2017 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aai9084.
    1. Schmidt K, Duarte JE, Grimmer M, Sancho-Puchades A, Wei H, Easthope CS, et al. The Myosuit: Bi-articular anti-gravity exosuit that reduces hip extensor activity in sitting transfers. Front Neurorobot. 2017;11:57. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2017.00057.
    1. McLeod JC, Ward SJM, Hicks AL. Evaluation of the Keeogo™ dermoskeleton. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;14(5):503–512.
    1. Martini E, Crea S, Parri A, Bastiani L, Faraguna U, McKinney Z, et al. Gait training using a robotic hip exoskeleton improves metabolic gait efficiency in the elderly. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):7157. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43628-2.
    1. Lee H-J, Lee S-H, Seo K, Lee M, Chang WH, Choi B-O, et al. Training for walking efficiency with a wearable hip-assist robot in patients with stroke. Stroke. 2019;50(12):3545–3552. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025950.
    1. Haufe FL, Kober AM, Schmidt K, Sancho-Puchades A, Duarte JE, Wolf P, et al. editors. User-driven walking assistance: first experimental results using the MyoSuit*. In: International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). 2019.
    1. Haufe FL, Wolf P, Duarte JE, Riener R, Xiloyannis M. Increasing exercise intensity during outside walking training with a wearable robot. In: IEEE RAS/EMBS international conference for biomedical robotics and biomechatronics (BioRob). 2020.
    1. McGibbon CA, Sexton A, Jayaraman A, Deems-Dluhy S, Gryfe P, Novak A, et al. Evaluation of the Keeogo exoskeleton for assisting ambulatory activities in people with multiple sclerosis: an open-label, randomized, cross-over trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0468-6.
    1. Stein J, Bishop L, Stein DJ, Wong CK. Gait training with a robotic leg brace after stroke a randomized controlled pilot study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93(11):987–994. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000119.
    1. Jayaraman A, O'Brien MK, Madhavan S, Mummidisetty CK, Roth HR, Hohl K, et al. Stride management assist exoskeleton vs functional gait training in stroke: a randomized trial. Neurology. 2019;92(3):e263–e273. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006782.
    1. Pirker W, Katzenschlager R. Gait disorders in adults and the elderly: a clinical guide. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017;129(3–4):81–95. doi: 10.1007/s00508-016-1096-4.
    1. Kuo AD, Donelan JM. Dynamic principles of gait and their clinical implications. Phys Ther. 2010;90(2):157–174. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090125.
    1. Winter DA. Kinematic and kinetic patterns in human gait: variability and compensating effects. Hum Mov Sci. 1984;3(1):51–76. doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(84)90005-8.
    1. Anderson FC, Pandy MG. Individual muscle contributions to support in normal walking. Gait Posture. 2003;17(2):159–169. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00073-5.
    1. Winter DA. Anthropometry. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 2009. p. 82–106.
    1. Schweizer Bundesamt für Gesundheit. Tarifstruktur für physiotherapeutische Leistungen. 2018.
    1. Bohannon RW, Bubela D, Magasi S, McCreath H, Wang Y-C, Reuben D, et al. Comparison of walking performance over the first 2 minutes and the full 6 minutes of the Six-Minute Walk Test. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:269. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-269.
    1. Borg G. Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1990;16(Suppl 1):55–58. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1815.
    1. Emken JL, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005;13(1):33–39. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2004.843173.
    1. Takahashi CD, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Hemiparetic stroke impairs anticipatory control of arm movement. Exp Brain Res. 2003;149(2):131–140. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1340-1.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe