Many Americans have pre-diabetes and should be considered for metformin therapy

Mary K Rhee, Kirsten Herrick, David C Ziemer, Viola Vaccarino, William S Weintraub, K M Venkat Narayan, Paul Kolm, Jennifer G Twombly, Lawrence S Phillips, Mary K Rhee, Kirsten Herrick, David C Ziemer, Viola Vaccarino, William S Weintraub, K M Venkat Narayan, Paul Kolm, Jennifer G Twombly, Lawrence S Phillips

Abstract

Objective: To determine the proportion of the American population who would merit metformin treatment, according to recent American Diabetes Association (ADA) consensus panel recommendations to prevent or delay the development of diabetes.

Research design and methods: Risk factors were evaluated in 1,581 Screening for Impaired Glucose Tolerance (SIGT), 2,014 Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), and 1,111 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2006 (NHANES 2005-2006) subjects, who were non-Hispanic white and black, without known diabetes. Criteria for consideration of metformin included the presence of both impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), with > or =1 additional diabetes risk factor: age <60 years, BMI > or =35 kg/m(2), family history of diabetes, elevated triglycerides, reduced HDL cholesterol, hypertension, or A1C >6.0%.

Results: Isolated IFG, isolated IGT, and IFG and IGT were found in 18.0, 7.2, and 8.2% of SIGT; 22.3, 6.4, and 9.4% of NHANES III; and 21.8, 5.0, and 9.0% of NHANES 2005-2006 subjects, respectively. In SIGT, NHANES III, and NHANES 2005-2006, criteria for metformin consideration were met in 99, 96, and 96% of those with IFG and IGT; 31, 29, and 28% of all those with IFG; and 53, 57, and 62% of all those with IGT (8.1, 9.1, and 8.7% of all subjects), respectively.

Conclusions: More than 96% of individuals with both IFG and IGT are likely to meet ADA consensus criteria for consideration of metformin. Because >28% of all those with IFG met the criteria, providers should perform oral glucose tolerance tests to find concomitant IGT in all patients with IFG. To the extent that our findings are representative of the U.S. population, approximately 1 in 12 adults has a combination of pre-diabetes and risk factors that may justify consideration of metformin treatment for diabetes prevention.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence of metformin indication, stratified by glucose tolerance category. Metformin is indicated per the ADA consensus statement criteria of the presence of both IFG and IGT and one of the following diabetes risk factors: age 2, family history of diabetes, elevated triglycerides, reduced HDL cholesterol, and A1C >6.0% (8). Risk factors for diabetes that were not specifically defined by the ADA were categorized according to the AHA/NHLBI diagnostic criteria for metabolic syndrome (12): presence of hypertension by history, systolic blood pressure >130 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >85 mmHg, triglyceride level ≥150 mg/dl, and HDL cholesterol <40 mg/dl in men and <50 mg/dl in women. Glucose tolerance categories are as follows: IFG 100–109, FPG levels 100–109 mg/dl and 2-h postchallenge plasma glucose <140 mg/dl; IFG 110–125, FPG 110–125 mg/dl and 2-h postchallenge plasma glucose <140 mg/dl; all IFG, isolated IFG (FPG 100–125 mg/dl and 2-h postchallenge plasma glucose <140 mg/dl); IGT, isolated IGT; and IFG 100–125 + IGT, all IFG and IGT.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: General Information and National Estimates on Diabetes in the United States, 2007. Atlanta, GA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2008
    1. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2007. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 596– 615
    1. Cowie CC, Rust KF, Ford ES, Eberhardt MS, Byrd-Holt DD, Li C, Williams DE, Gregg EW, Bainbridge KE, Saydah SH, Geiss LS: Full accounting of diabetes and pre-diabetes in the U.S. population in 1988–1994 and 2005–2006. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 287– 294
    1. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, Nathan DM: the Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 393– 403
    1. Chiasson JL, Josse RG, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Karasik A, Laakso M: the STOP-NIDDM Trial Research Group. Acarbose for prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus: the STOP-NIDDM randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 2072– 2077
    1. Gerstein HC, Yusuf S, Bosch J, Pogue J, Sheridan P, Dinccag N, Hanefeld M, Hoogwerf B, Laakso M, Mohan V, Shaw J, Zinman B, Holman RR: DREAM (Diabetes REduction Assessment with ramipril and rosiglitazone Medication) trial. Effect of rosiglitazone on the frequency of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006; 368: 1096– 1105
    1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). VIII. Study design, progress and performance. Diabetologia 1991; 34: 877– 890
    1. Nathan DM, Davidson MB, DeFronzo RA, Heine RJ, Henry RR, Pratley R, Zinman B: Impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance: implications for care. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 753– 759
    1. Phillips LS, Ziemer DC, Kolm P, Weintraub WS, Vaccarino V, Rhee MK, Chatterjee R, Narayan KM, Koch DD: Glucose challenge test screening for prediabetes and undiagnosed diabetes. Diabetologia 2009; 52: 1798– 1807
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994, NHANES III. Hyattsville, MD, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009. Available from Accessed 4 August 2009
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. Continuous National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, NHANES 2005–2006. Hyattsville, MD, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Available from Accessed 4 August 2009
    1. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, Gordon DJ, Krauss RM, Savage PJ, Smith SC, Jr, Spertus JA, Costa F: Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation 2005; 112: 2735– 2752
    1. Pinhas-Hamiel O, Zeitler P: The global spread of type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents. J Pediatr 2005; 146: 693– 700
    1. Warram JH, Sigal RJ, Martin BC, Krolewski AS, Soeldner JS: Natural history of impaired glucose tolerance: follow-up at Joslin Clinic. Diabet Med 1996; 13: S40– S45
    1. Meigs JB, Muller DC, Nathan DM, Blake DR, Andres R: The natural history of progression from normal glucose tolerance to type 2 diabetes in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Diabetes 2003; 52: 1475– 1484
    1. Norhammar A, Tenerz A, Nilsson G, Hamsten A, Efendíc S, Rydén L, Malmberg K: Glucose metabolism in patients with acute myocardial infarction and no previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: a prospective study. Lancet 2002; 359: 2140– 2144
    1. The DECODE Study Group on behalf of the European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Glucose tolerance and mortality: comparison of WHO and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria: collaborative analysis of diagnostic criteria in Europe. Lancet 1999; 354: 617– 621
    1. Barr EL, Wong TY, Tapp RJ, Harper CA, Zimmet PZ, Atkins R, Shaw JE: Is peripheral neuropathy associated with retinopathy and albuminuria in individuals with impaired glucose metabolism? The 1999–2000 AusDiab. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1114– 1116
    1. Torgerson JS, Hauptman J, Boldrin MN, Sjöström L: XENical in the prevention of diabetes in obese subjects (XENDOS) study: a randomized study of orlistat as an adjunct to lifestyle changes for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in obese patients. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 155– 161
    1. Grey A: Skeletal consequences of thiazolidinedione therapy. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19: 129– 137
    1. Hollenberg NK: Considerations for management of fluid dynamic issues associated with thiazolidinediones. Am J Med 2003; 115( Suppl. 8A): 111S– 115S
    1. Lago RM, Singh PP, Nesto RW: Congestive heart failure and cardiovascular death in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes given thiazolidinediones: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Lancet 2007; 370: 1129– 1136
    1. American College of Endocrinology Task Force on Pre-Diabetes. American College of Endocrinology Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Management of Pre-Diabetes in the Continuum of Hyperglycemia—When Do the Risks of Diabetes Begin? Washington, DC, American College of Endocrinology Task Force on Pre-Diabetes, 2008
    1. Herman WH, Hoerger TJ, Brandle M, Hicks K, Sorensen S, Zhang P, Hamman RF, Ackermann RT, Engelgau MM, Ratner RE: the Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The cost-effectiveness of lifestyle modification or metformin in preventing type 2 diabetes in adults with impaired glucose tolerance. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 323– 332

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe