Extracorporeal Ultrafiltration for Fluid Overload in Heart Failure: Current Status and Prospects for Further Research

Maria Rosa Costanzo, Claudio Ronco, William T Abraham, Piergiuseppe Agostoni, Jonathan Barasch, Gregg C Fonarow, Stephen S Gottlieb, Brian E Jaski, Amir Kazory, Allison P Levin, Howard R Levin, Giancarlo Marenzi, Wilfried Mullens, Dan Negoianu, Margaret M Redfield, W H Wilson Tang, Jeffrey M Testani, Adriaan A Voors, Maria Rosa Costanzo, Claudio Ronco, William T Abraham, Piergiuseppe Agostoni, Jonathan Barasch, Gregg C Fonarow, Stephen S Gottlieb, Brian E Jaski, Amir Kazory, Allison P Levin, Howard R Levin, Giancarlo Marenzi, Wilfried Mullens, Dan Negoianu, Margaret M Redfield, W H Wilson Tang, Jeffrey M Testani, Adriaan A Voors

Abstract

More than 1 million heart failure hospitalizations occur annually, and congestion is the predominant cause. Rehospitalizations for recurrent congestion portend poor outcomes independently of age and renal function. Persistent congestion trumps serum creatinine increases in predicting adverse heart failure outcomes. No decongestive pharmacological therapy has reduced these harmful consequences. Simplified ultrafiltration devices permit fluid removal in lower-acuity hospital settings, but with conflicting results regarding safety and efficacy. Ultrafiltration performed at fixed rates after onset of therapy-induced increased serum creatinine was not superior to standard care and resulted in more complications. In contrast, compared with diuretic agents, some data suggest that adjustment of ultrafiltration rates to patients' vital signs and renal function may be associated with more effective decongestion and fewer heart failure events. Essential aspects of ultrafiltration remain poorly defined. Further research is urgently needed, given the burden of congestion and data suggesting sustained benefits of early and adjustable ultrafiltration.

Keywords: biomarkers; creatinine; diuretics; glomerular filtration rate; venous congestion.

Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

FIGURE 1. UF Circuit
FIGURE 1. UF Circuit
(A) The console controls blood removal rates and extracts ultrafiltrate at a maximum rate set by the clinician. Blood is withdrawn from a vein through the withdrawal catheter (red) connected by tubing to the blood pump. Blood passes through the withdrawal pressure sensor before entering the blood pump tubing loop. After exiting the blood pump, blood passes through the air detector and enters the hemofilter (made of a bundle of hollow fibers) through a port on the bottom, exits through the port at the top of the filter, and passes through the infusion pressure sensor before returning to the patient (blue). The ultrafiltrate passes sequentially through the ultrafiltrate’s pressure sensor, the pump, and the collecting bag suspended from the weight scale. A hematocrit sensor is located on the withdrawal line. (B) This UF system requires only a single-lumen, multihole, small (18-gauge) cannula inserted in a peripheral vein of the arm. A syringe pump drives the blood inside the extracorporeal circuit, which includes 2 check valves that allow the blood to move from the vein to the filter, and then returns it to the same vein through alternate flows that can be independent. The priming volume of 50 ml and the reduced contact surface between blood and tubing set ensure minimal blood loss if circuit clots and for reduced heparin requirements. BD = blood detector; BLD = blood leak detector; HTC = hematocrit sensor; UF = ultrafiltration.
FIGURE 2. Adjustable UF Guidelines Used by…
FIGURE 2. Adjustable UF Guidelines Used by the AVOID-HF Investigators
(A) Guidelines for the adjustment of UF therapy. (B) Guidelines for the completion of ultrafiltration therapy: 40 mg of furosemide = 1 mg bumetanide or 10 mg of torsemide (52,53). b.i.d. = twice daily; GDMT = guideline-directed medical therapy; IV = intravenous; JVP = jugular venous pressure; LV = left ventricular; QD = once daily; RV = right ventricular; SBP = systolic blood pressure; sCr = serum creatinine; UO = urine output; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.
FIGURE 3. Adjustable Loop Diuretic Agent Guidelines…
FIGURE 3. Adjustable Loop Diuretic Agent Guidelines Used by the AVOID-HF Investigators
(A) Initiation of loop diuretic agents. *Evaluation of blood pressure, heart rate, urine output, and net intake/output was performed every 6 h; evaluation of serum chemistries was performed every 12 h. Decreasing or holding the diuretic agent dose may be considered if: 1) serum creatinine rises by 30% or ≥0.4 mg/dl (whichever is less) versus previous measurement; 2) resting systolic blood pressure decreases >20 mm Hg compared to previous 6 h or drops <80 mm Hg; or 3) resting heart rate is >30 beats/min compared to previous 6 h or >120 beats/min. LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; NTG = nitroglycerin; other abbreviations as in Figure 2. (B) Guidelines for the completion of adjustable loop diuretic agents. (C) Guidelines for management after completion of adjustable loop diuretic agents (see also references and 53).
FIGURE 3. Adjustable Loop Diuretic Agent Guidelines…
FIGURE 3. Adjustable Loop Diuretic Agent Guidelines Used by the AVOID-HF Investigators
(A) Initiation of loop diuretic agents. *Evaluation of blood pressure, heart rate, urine output, and net intake/output was performed every 6 h; evaluation of serum chemistries was performed every 12 h. Decreasing or holding the diuretic agent dose may be considered if: 1) serum creatinine rises by 30% or ≥0.4 mg/dl (whichever is less) versus previous measurement; 2) resting systolic blood pressure decreases >20 mm Hg compared to previous 6 h or drops <80 mm Hg; or 3) resting heart rate is >30 beats/min compared to previous 6 h or >120 beats/min. LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; NTG = nitroglycerin; other abbreviations as in Figure 2. (B) Guidelines for the completion of adjustable loop diuretic agents. (C) Guidelines for management after completion of adjustable loop diuretic agents (see also references and 53).
CENTRAL ILLUSTRATION. Ultrafiltration for Fluid Overload in…
CENTRAL ILLUSTRATION. Ultrafiltration for Fluid Overload in Heart Failure
Of the >1 million heart failure hospitalizations in the United States and Europe, 90% are due to signs and symptoms of fluid overload. This enormous worldwide health care burden is aggravated by the fact that recurrent congestion worsens patients’ outcomes, regardless of age and renal function. Abnormal hemodynamics, neurohormonal activation, excessive tubular sodium reabsorption, inflammation, oxidative stress, and nephrotoxic medications drive the complex interactions between heart and kidney (cardiorenal syndrome). Loop diuretic agents are used in most congested patients. Due to their mechanism and site of action, loop diuretic agents lead to the production of hypotonic urine and may contribute to diuretic agent resistance (“braking phenomenon,” distal tubular adaptation, and increased renin secretion in the macula densa). Increased uremic anions and proteinuria also impair achievement of therapeutic concentrations at their tubular site of action. Ultrafiltration is the production of plasma water from whole blood across a hemofilter in response to a transmembrane pressure. Therefore, ultrafiltration removes isotonic fluid without direct activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, provided that fluid removal rates do not exceed capillary refill. Any method of fluid removal may cause an increase in serum creatinine. However, in the absence of evidence of renal tubular injury (e.g., augmented urinary concentration of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin), this increase represents a physiological decrease in glomerular filtration rate due to decreased intravascular volume from fluid removal. AVP = arginine vasopressin; GFR = glomerular filtration rate; K = potassium; KIM = kidney injury molecule; Mg = magnesium; NGAL = neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; RAAS = renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; SNS = sympathetic nervous system.

References

    1. Ambrosy AP, Fonarow GC, Butler J, et al. The global health and economic burden of hospitalizations for heart failure: lessons learned from hospitalized heart failure registries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1123–33.
    1. Crespo-Leiro MG, Anker SD, Maggioni AP, et al. Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Long-Term Registry (ESC-HF-LT): 1-year follow-up outcomes and differences across regions. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18:613–25.
    1. Setoguchi S, Stevenson LW, Schneeweiss S. Repeated hospitalizations predict mortality in the community population with heart failure. Am Heart J. 2007;154:260–6.
    1. McKie PM, Schirger JA, Costello-Boerrigter LC, et al. Impaired natriuretic and renal endocrine response to acute volume expansion in pre-clinical systolic and diastolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2095–103.
    1. Peacock WFIV, De Marco T, Fonarow GC, et al. for the ADHERE investigators. Cardiac troponin and outcome in acute heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2117–26.
    1. Rubboli A, Sobotka PA, Euler DE. Effect of acute edema on left ventricular function and coronary vascular resistance in the isolated rat heart. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:H1054–61.
    1. Verbrugge FH, Bertrand PB, Willems E, et al. Global myocardial oedema in advanced decompensated heart failure. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jul 4; [E-pub ahead of print]
    1. Verbrugge FH, Dupont M, Steels P, et al. The kidney in congestive heart failure: “are natriuresis, sodium, and diuretics really the good, the bad and the ugly?”. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16:133–42.
    1. Braam B, Cupples WA, Joles JA, Gaillard C. Systemic arterial and venous determinants of renal hemodynamics in congestive heart failure. Heart Fail Rev. 2012;17:161–75.
    1. Ronco C, Haapio M, House AA, Anvekar N, Bellomo R. Cardiorenal syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1527–39.
    1. Firth JD, Raine AE, Ledingham JG. Raised venous pressure: a direct cause of renal sodium retention in oedema? Lancet. 1988;1:1033–5.
    1. Winton FR. The influence of venous pressure on the isolated mammalian kidney. J Physiol. 1931;72:49–61.
    1. Damman K, van Deursen VM, Navis G, Voors AA, van Veldhuisen DJ, Hillege HL. Increased central venous pressure is associated with impaired renal function and mortality in a broad spectrum of patients with cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:582–8.
    1. Mullens W, Abrahams Z, Francis GS, et al. Importance of venous congestion for worsening of renal function in advanced decompensated heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:589–96.
    1. Colombo PC, Onat D, Harxhi A, et al. Peripheral venous congestion causes inflammation, neurohormonal, and endothelial cell activation. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:448–54.
    1. Metra M, Davison B, Bettari L, et al. Is worsening renal function an ominous prognostic sign in patients with acute heart failure? The role of congestion and its interaction with renal function. Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5:54–62.
    1. Testani JM, Chen J, McCauley BD, Kimmel SE, Shannon RP. Potential effects of aggressive decongestion during the treatment of decompensated heart failure on renal function and survival. Circulation. 2010;122:265–72.
    1. Damman K, Ng Kam Chuen MJ, MacFadyen RJ, et al. Volume status and diuretic therapy in systolic heart failure and the detection of early abnormalities in renal and tubular function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:2233–41.
    1. Thomas ME, Blaine C, Dawnay A, et al. The definition of acute kidney injury and its use in practice. Kidney Int. 2015;87:62–73.
    1. Singh D, Shrestha K, Testani JM, et al. Insufficient natriuretic response to continuous intravenous furosemide is associated with poor long-term outcomes in acute decompensated heart failure. J Card Fail. 2014;20:392–9.
    1. ter Maaten JM, Valente MA, Damman K, Hillege HL, Navis F, Voors AA. Diuretic response in acute heart failure—pathophysiology, evaluation, and therapy. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12:184–92.
    1. Voors AA, Davison BA, Teerlink JR, et al. for the RELAX-AHF investigators. Diuretic response in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: characteristics and clinical outcome—an analysis from RELAX-AHF. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16:1230–40.
    1. Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G. Reassessing treatment of acute heart failure syndromes: the ADHERE registry. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2005;7:B13–9.
    1. Felker GM, Lee KL, Bull DA, et al. for the NHLBI Heart Failure Clinical Research Network. Diuretic strategies in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:797–805.
    1. Konstam MA, Gheorghiade M, Burnett JC, Jr, et al. for the Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure Outcome Study With Tolvaptan (EVEREST) investigators. Effects of oral tolvaptan in patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure: the EVEREST outcome trial. JAMA. 2007;297:1319–31.
    1. Massie BM, O’Connor CM, Metra M, et al. for the PROTECT investigators and committees. Rolofylline, an adenosine A1-receptor antagonist, in acute heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1419–28.
    1. O’Connor CM, Starling RC, Hernandez AF, et al. Effect of nesiritide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure [published correction appears in N Engl J Med 2011;365:773] N Engl J Med. 2011;365:32–43.
    1. Costanzo MR, Jessup M. Treatment of congestion in heart failure with diuretics and extracorporeal therapies: effects on symptoms, renal function, and prognosis. Heart Fail Rev. 2012;17:313–24.
    1. Ronco C, Ricci Z, Bellomo R, Bedogni F. Extracorporeal ultrafiltration for the treatment of overhydration and congestive heart failure. Cardiology. 2001;96:155–68.
    1. Jaski BE, Ha J, Denys BG, Lamba S, Trupp RJ, Abraham WT. Peripherally inserted veno-venous ultrafiltration for rapid treatment of volume overloaded patients. J Card Fail. 2003;9:227–31.
    1. Agostoni P, Marenzi G, Lauri G, et al. Sustained improvement in functional capacity after removal of body fluid with isolated ultrafiltration in chronic cardiac insufficiency: failure of furosemide to provide the same result. Am J Med. 1994;96:191–9.
    1. Bart BA, Goldsmith SR, Lee KL, et al. for the Heart Failure Clinical Research Network. Ultrafiltration in decompensated heart failure with cardiorenal syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2296–304.
    1. Costanzo MR, Guglin ME, Saltzberg MT, et al. for the UNLOAD trial investigators. Ultrafiltration versus intravenous diuretics for patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:675–83.
    1. Marenzi G, Grazi S, Giraldi F, et al. Interrelation of humoral factors, hemodynamics, and fluid and salt metabolism in congestive heart failure: effects of extracorporeal ultrafiltration. Am J Med. 1993;94:49–56.
    1. Marenzi G, Lauri G, Grazi M, Assanelli E, Campodonico J, Agostoni P. Circulatory response to fluid overload removal by extracorporeal ultrafiltration in refractory congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:963–8.
    1. Agostoni PG, Marenzi GC, Pepi M, et al. Isolated ultrafiltration in moderate congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:424–31.
    1. Donato L, Biagini A, Contini C, et al. Treatment of end-stage congestive heart failure by extracorporeal ultrafiltration. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:379–80.
    1. Akiba T, Taniguchi K, Marumo F, Matsuda O. Clinical significance of renal hemodynamics in severe congestive heart failure: responsiveness to ultrafiltration therapies. Jpn Circ J. 1989;53:191–6.
    1. Costanzo MR, Saltzberg M, O’Sullivan J, Sobotka P. Early ultrafiltration in patients with decompensated heart failure and diuretic resistance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:2047–51.
    1. Bart BA, Boyle A, Bank AJ, et al. Ultrafiltration versus usual care for hospitalized patients with heart failure: the Relief for Acutely Fluid-Overloaded Patients With Decompensated Congestive Heart Failure (RAPID-CHF) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:2043–6.
    1. Rogers HL, Marshall J, Bock J, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of the renal effects of ultrafiltration as compared to furosemide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. J Card Fail. 2008;14:1–5.
    1. Elkayam U, Hatamizadeh P, Janmohamed M. The challenge of correcting volume overload in hospitalized patients with decompensated heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:684–6.
    1. Costanzo MR, Saltzberg MT, Jessup M, Teerlink JR, Sobotka PA for the Ultrafiltration Versus Intravenous Diuretics for Patients Hospitalized for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (UNLOAD) investigators. Ultrafiltration is associated with fewer rehospitalizations than continuous diuretic infusion in patients with decompensated heart failure: results from UNLOAD. J Cardiac Fail. 2010;16:277–84.
    1. Ali SS, Olinger CC, Sobotka PA, et al. Loop diuretics can cause clinical natriuretic failure: a prescription for volume expansion. Congest Heart Fail. 2009;15:1–4.
    1. Giglioli C, Landi D, Cecchi E, et al. Effects of ULTRAfiltration vs. DIureticS on clinical, biohumoral and haemodynamic variables in patients with deCOmpensated heart failure: the ULTRADISCO study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011;13:337–46.
    1. Agostoni PG, Marenzi GC, Sganzerla P, et al. Lung-heart interaction as a substrate for the improvement in exercise capacity after body fluid volume depletion in moderate congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:793–8.
    1. Pepi M, Marenzi GC, Agostoni PG, et al. Sustained cardiac diastolic changes elicited by ultrafiltration in patients with moderate congestive heart failure: pathophysiological correlates. Br Heart J. 1993;70:135–40.
    1. Bart BA, Goldsmith SR, Lee KL, et al. Cardiorenal rescue study in acute decompensated heart failure: rationale and design of CARRESS-HF, for the Heart Failure Clinical Research Network. J Card Fail. 2012;18:176–82.
    1. Mentz RJ, Stevens SR, DeVore AD, et al. Decongestion strategies and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation in acute heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol HF. 2015;3:97–107.
    1. Dev S, Shirolkar SC, Stevens SR, et al. Reduction in body weight but worsening renal function with late ultrafiltration for treatment of acute decompensated heart failure. Cardiology. 2012;123:145–53.
    1. Patarroyo M, Wehbe E, Hanna M, et al. Cardiorenal outcomes after slow continuous ultrafiltration therapy in refractory patients with advanced decompensated heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1906–12.
    1. Tang WH. Reconsidering ultrafiltration in the acute cardiorenal syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2351–2.
    1. Marenzi G, Muratori M, Cosentino ER, et al. Continuous ultrafiltration for congestive heart failure: the CUORE trial. J Card Fail. 2014;20:9–17.
    1. Lorenz JN, Weihprecht H, Schnermann J, Skøtt O, Briggs JP. Renin release from isolated juxtaglomerular apparatus depends on macula densa chloride transport. Am J Physiol. 1991;260:F486–93.
    1. Schlatter E, Salomonsson M, Persson AE, Greger R. Macula densa cells sense luminal NaCl concentration via furosemide sensitive Na+2Cl-K+ cotransport. Pflugers Arch. 1989;414:286–90.
    1. Costanzo MR, Negoianu D, Jaski BE, et al. Aquapheresis versus intravenous diuretics and hospitalizations for heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol HF. 2016;4:95–105.
    1. Costanzo MR, Negoianu D, Fonarow GC, et al. Rationale and design of the Aquapheresis Versus Intravenous Diuretics and Hospitalization for Heart Failure (AVOID-HF) trial. Am Heart J. 2015;170:471–82.
    1. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2129–200.
    1. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:e147–239.
    1. Stevenson LW, Perloff JK. The limited reliability of physical signs for estimating hemodynamics in chronic heart failure. JAMA. 1989;261:884–8.
    1. Gheorghiade M, Follath F, Ponikowski P, et al. Assessing and grading congestion in acute heart failure: a scientific statement from the acute heart failure committee of the heart failure association of the European Society of Cardiology and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12:423–33.
    1. Jefferies JL, Bartone C, Menon S, Egnaczyk GF, O’Brien TM, Chung ES. Ultrafiltration in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: comparison with systolic heart failure patients. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6:733–9.
    1. Schrier RW, Bansal S. Pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular failure, and kidney: different from left ventricular failure? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:1232–7.
    1. Ross EA. Congestive renal failure: the pathophysiology and treatment of renal venous hypertension. J Card Fail. 2012;18:930–8.
    1. Stawicki SP, Braslow BM, Panebianco NL, et al. Intensivist use of hand-carried ultrasonography to measure IVC collapsibility in estimating intravascular volume status: correlations with CVP. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:55–61.
    1. Abraham WT, Adamson PB, Bourge RC, et al. for the CHAMPION trial study group. Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial [published correction appears in Lancet 2012;379: 412] Lancet. 2011;377:658–66.
    1. Costanzo MR, Stevenson LW, Adamson PB, et al. Interventions linked to decreased heart failure hospitalizations during ambulatory pulmonary artery pressure monitoring. J Am Coll Cardiol HF. 2016;4:333–44.
    1. Ronco C, Brendolan A, Bellomo R. Online monitoring in continuous renal replacement therapies. Kidney Int Suppl. 1999;72:S8–14.
    1. Piccoli A. Whole body-single frequency bioimpedance. Contrib Nephrol. 2005;149:150–61.
    1. Ribas N, Nescolarde L, Domingo M, Gastelurrutia P, Bayés-Genis A, Rosell-Ferrer J. Longitudinal and transversal bioimpedance measurements in addition to diagnosis of heart failure. J Phys Conf Ser. 2010;224:012099.
    1. Abraham WT, Amir O, Weinstein JM, Abbo A, Ben Gal T. Remote dielectric sensing (ReDS)-guided patient management of ambulatory heart failure patients reduces rehospitalization rates [abstr] J Card Fail. 2015;21:S77.
    1. Margouleff D. Blood volume determination, a nuclear medicine test in evolution. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:534–7.
    1. Bayes-Genis A, Lupón J, Jaffe AS. Can natriuretic peptides be used to guide therapy? EJIFCC. 2016;27:208–16.
    1. Sise ME, Forster C, Singer E, et al. Urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin identifies unilateral and bilateral urinary tract obstruction. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:4132–5.
    1. Brown JR, Kramer RS, Coca SG, Parikh CR. Duration of acute kidney injury impacts long-term survival after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1142–8.
    1. Parikh CR, Coca SG. Acute kidney injury: defining prerenal azotemia in clinical practice and research. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010;6:641–2.
    1. Nickolas TL, O’Rourke MJ, Yang J, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of a single emergency department measurement of urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin for diagnosing acute kidney injury. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:810–9.
    1. Brisco MA, Zile MR, Hanberg JS, et al. Relevance of changes in serum creatinine during a heart failure trial of decongestive strategies: insights from the DOSE trial. J Card Fail. 2016;22:753–60.
    1. Mishra J, Ma Q, Prada A, et al. Identification of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a novel early urinary biomarker for ischemic renal injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14:2534–43.
    1. Xu K, Rosenstiel P, Paragas N, et al. Unique transcriptional programs identify subtypes of AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Dec 27; [E-pub ahead of print]

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe