Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review

Hugh Gemmell, Peter Miller, Hugh Gemmell, Peter Miller

Abstract

Background: Neck pain is a common problem and different forms of manual therapy are used in its treatment. The purpose of this systematic review was to critically appraise the literature that directly compared manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument for non-specific neck pain.

Methods: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, MANTIS and CINAHL) were searched from their inception to October 2005 for all English language randomised clinical trials that directly compared manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select the studies and these studies were then evaluated using validated criteria.

Results: Five such studies were identified. The methodological quality was mostly poor. Findings from the studies were mixed and no one therapy was shown to be more effective than the others.

Conclusion: Further high quality research has to be done before a recommendation can be made as to the most effective manual method for non-specific neck pain.

References

    1. Jordan A, Bendix T, Nielsen H, Hansen FR, Host D, Winkel A. Intensive training, physiotherapy, or manipulation for patients with chronic neck pain. Spine. 1998;23:311–319. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199802010-00005.
    1. Sarigiovannis P, Hollis B. Effectiveness of manual therapy in the treatment of non-specific neck pain: a review. Physical Therapy Review. 2005;10:35–50. doi: 10.1179/108331905X43436.
    1. McGregor AH, Wragg P, Gedroyc WMW. Can interventional MRI provide an insight into the mechanics of a posterior-anterior mobilisation? Clinical Biomechanics. 2001;16:926–929. doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00091-2.
    1. Lee RYW, McGregor AH, Bull AMJ, Wragg P. Dynamic response of the cervical spine to posteroanterior mobilisation. Clinical Biomechanics. 2005;20:228–231. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.09.013.
    1. Refshauge KM, Parry S, Shirley D, Larsen D, Rivett DA, Boland R. Professional responsibility in relation to cervical spine manipulation. Australian journal of Physiotherapy. 2002;48:171–179.
    1. Sterling M, Jull G, Wright A. Cervical mobilisation: concurrent effects on pain, sympathetic nervous system activity and motor activity. Manual Therapy. 2001;6:72–81. doi: 10.1054/math.2000.0378.
    1. Jull G. Use of high and low velocity cervical manipulative therapy procedures by Australian manipulative physiotherapists. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2002;48:189–193.
    1. National Board of Chiropractic Examiners . Job Analysis of Chiropractic: A Project Report, Survey Analysis and Summary of the Practice of Chiropractic within the United States. Greeley, Colorado, USA: National Board of Chiropractic Examiners; 1993.
    1. National Board of Chiropractic Examiners . Job Analysis of Chiropractic: A Project Report, Survey Analysis and Summary of the Practice of Chiropractic within the United States. Greeley, Colorado, USA: National Board of Chiropractic Examiners; 2000.
    1. National Board of Chiropractic Examiners . Job Analysis of Chiropractic: A Project Report, Survey Analysis, and Summary of the Practice of Chiropractic within the United States. Greeley, Colorado, USA: National Board of Chiropractic Examiners; 2005.
    1. National Board of Chiropractic Examiners . Job Analysis of Chiropractic in Canada: A Project Report, Survey Analysis and Summary of the Practice of Chiropractic within Canada. Greeley, Colorado, USA: National Board of Chiropractic Examiners, International Division; 1993.
    1. National Board of Chiropractic Examiners . Job Analysis of Chiropractic in Australia and New Zealand: A Project Report, Survey Analysis, and Summary of the Practice of Chiropractic within Australia and New Zealand. Greeley, Colorado, USA: National Board of Chiropractic Examiners, International Division; 1994.
    1. Gross AR, Kay TM, Kennedy C, Gasner D, Hurley L, Yardley K, Hendry L, McLaughlin L. Clinical practice guideline on the use of manipulation and mobilization in the treatment of adults with mechanical neck disorders. Manual Therapy. 2002;7:193–205. doi: 10.1054/math.2002.0477.
    1. Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Vassilaki M, Chiang L-M. Adverse reactions to chiropractic treatment and their effects on satisfaction and clinical outcomes among patients enrolled in the UCLA neck pain study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;27:16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2003.11.002.
    1. Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Vassilaki M, Chiang L-M. Frequency and clinical predictors of adverse reactions to chiropractic care in the UCLA neck pain study. Spine. 2005;30:1477–1484. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000167821.39373.c1.
    1. Di Fabio RP. Manipulation of the cervical spine: risks and benefits. Phys Ther. 1999;79:50–65.
    1. Gross AR, Hoving JL, Haines TA, Goldsmith CH, Kay T, Aker P, Bronfort G. A Cochrane review of manipulation and mobilization for mechanical neck disorders. Spine. 2004;29:1541–1548. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000131218.35875.ED.
    1. Hurwitz EL, Aker PD, Adams AH, Meeker WC, Shekelle PG. Manipulation and mobilization the cervical spine. A systematic review of the literature. Spine. 1996;21:1746–1760. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199608010-00007.
    1. Koes BW, Assendelft WJJ, Van der Heijden GJMG, Bouter LM, Knipschild PG. Spinal manipulation and mobilisation for back and neck pain: a blinded review. BMJ. 1991;303:1298–1303.
    1. Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans RL, Bouter LM. Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. The Spine Journal. 2004;4:335–356. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.06.002.
    1. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds JM, Gavaghan DJ, McQuy HJ. Assessing the quality of reports of randomised clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Controlled Clin Trials. 1996;17:1–12. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4.
    1. Vernon HT, Aker P, Burns S, Viljakaanen S, Short L. Pressure pain threshold evaluation of the effect of spinal manipulation in the treatment of chronic neck pain: A pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990;13:13–16.
    1. Cassidy JD, Lopes AA, Yong-Hing K. The immediate effect of manipulation versus mobilization on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine: A randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992;15:570–575.
    1. Yurkiw D, Mior S. Comparison of two chiropractic techniques on pain and lateral flexion in neck pain patients: a pilot study. Chiropractic Technique. 1996;8:155–162.
    1. Wood TG, Colloca CJ, Mathews R. A pilot randomized clinical trial on the relative effect of instrumental (MFMA) versus manual (HVLA) manipulation in the treatment of cervical spine dysfunction. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001;24:260–271. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2001.114365.
    1. Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Harber P, Kominski GF, Yu F, Adams AH. A randomized trial of chiropractic manipulation and mobilization for patients with neck pain: Clinical outcomes from the UCLA neck-pain study. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:1634–1641.
    1. Ernst E, Harkness E. Spinal manipulation: a systematic review of sham-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trials. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;22:879–889. doi: 10.1016/S0885-3924(01)00337-2.
    1. Downing DS, Weinstein A. Ultrasound therapy for subacromial bursitis. A double blind trial. Phys Ther. 1986;66:194–199.
    1. Nykanen M. Pulsed ultrasound treatment of the painful shoulder. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Scan J Rehabil Med. 1995;27:105–108.
    1. Van der Windt DAWM, Van der Heijden GJMG, Van den Berg SGM, Ter Riet G, De Winter AF, Bouter LM. Therapeutic ultrasound for acute ankle sprains. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2002 Art. No.: CD001250. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001250.
    1. Hashish I, Harvey W, Harris M. Anti-inflammatory effects of ultrasound therapy: evidence for a major placebo effect. Rheumatology. 1986;25:77–81.
    1. Bogduk N. Spinal manipulation for neck pain does not work. The Journal of Pain. 2003;4:427–428. doi: 10.1067/S1526-5900(03)00733-8.
    1. Greenhalgh T, Peacock R. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primarysources. BMJ. 2005.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe