Oral rehydration versus intravenous therapy for treating dehydration due to gastroenteritis in children: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Steven Bellemare, Lisa Hartling, Natasha Wiebe, Kelly Russell, William R Craig, Don McConnell, Terry P Klassen, Steven Bellemare, Lisa Hartling, Natasha Wiebe, Kelly Russell, William R Craig, Don McConnell, Terry P Klassen

Abstract

Background: Despite treatment recommendations from various organizations, oral rehydration therapy (ORT) continues to be underused, particularly by physicians in high-income countries. We conducted a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to compare ORT and intravenous therapy (IVT) for the treatment of dehydration secondary to acute gastroenteritis in children.

Methods: RCTs were identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, authors and references of included trials, pharmaceutical companies, and relevant organizations. Screening and inclusion were performed independently by two reviewers in order to identify randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing ORT and IVT in children with acute diarrhea and dehydration. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality using the Jadad scale and allocation concealment. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second. The primary outcome measure was failure of rehydration. We analyzed data using standard meta-analytic techniques.

Results: The quality of the 14 included trials ranged from 0 to 3 (Jadad score); allocation concealment was unclear in all but one study. Using a random effects model, there was no significant difference in treatment failures (risk difference [RD] 3%; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0, 6). The Mantel-Haenzsel fixed effects model gave a significant difference between treatment groups (RD 4%; 95% CI: 2, 5) favoring IVT. Based on the four studies that reported deaths, there were six in the IVT groups and two in ORT. There were no significant differences in total fluid intake at six and 24 hours, weight gain, duration of diarrhea, or hypo/hypernatremia. Length of stay was significantly shorter for the ORT group (weighted mean difference [WMD] -1.2 days; 95% CI: -2.4,-0.02). Phlebitis occurred significantly more often with IVT (number needed to treat [NNT] 33; 95% CI: 25,100); paralytic ileus occurred more often with ORT (NNT 33; 95% CI: 20,100). These results may not be generalizable to children with persistent vomiting.

Conclusion: There were no clinically important differences between ORT and IVT in terms of efficacy and safety. For every 25 children (95% CI: 20, 50) treated with ORT, one would fail and require IVT. The results support existing practice guidelines recommending ORT as the first course of treatment in appropriate children with dehydration secondary to gastroenteritis.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of studies considered for inclusion in the review. RCT, randomised controlled trial; IVT, intravenous therapy; ORT, oral rehydration therapy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Metagraph for primary outcome (failure to rehydrate). Studies are arranged in order of increasing sample size. ORT-NG, oral rehydration therapy-nasogastric; IVT, intravenous therapy; RD, risk difference; CI, confidence intervals.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plot based on primary outcome (failure to rehydrate). SE, standard error; RD, risk difference.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cumulative meta-graph of studies comparing ORT versus IVT from 1982–2002. RD, risk difference; CI, confidence intervals; ORT-NG, oral rehydration therapy-nasogastric.

References

    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Provisional committee on quality improvement, subcommittee on acute gastroenteritis, Practice parameter: the management of acute gastroenteritis in young children. Pediatrics. 1996;97:424–35.
    1. Armon K, Elliott EJ. Acute gastroenteritis. In: Moyer VA, editor. In Evidence based pediatrics and child health. London: BMJ Books; 2000. pp. 273–86.
    1. World Health Organization (Child and Adolescent Health and Development) Child Health Epidemiology [Cited 2002 May 6]
    1. World Health Organization The challenge of diarrhoeal and acute respiratory disease control. In Point of Fact No 77 Geneva: World Health Organization. 1996. pp. 1–4.
    1. Duggan C, Santosham M, Glass RI. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention: The management of acute diarrhea in children: oral rehydration, maintenance, and nutritional therapy. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 1992;41:1–20.
    1. Gavin N, Merrick N, Davidson B. Efficacy of glucose-based oral rehydration therapy. Pediatrics. 1996;98:52–4.
    1. Jones G, Steketee RW, Black RE, Bhutta ZA, Morris SS, the Bellagio Child Survival Study Group How many child deaths can we prevent this year? Lancet. 2003;362:65–71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13811-1.
    1. Ozuah P, Avner J, Stein R. Oral rehydration, emergency physicians, and practice parameters: a national survey. Pediatrics. 2002;109:259–61.
    1. Conners GP, Barker WH, Mushlin AI, Goepp JGK. Oral versus intravenous: rehydration preferences of pediatric emergency medicine fellowship directors. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2000;16:335–8. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200010000-00007.
    1. Reis EC, Goepp JG, Katz S, Santosham M. Barriers to use of oral rehydration therapy. Pediatrics. 1994;93:708–11.
    1. Snyder JD. Use and misuse of oral therapy for diarrhea: Comparison of US practices with American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations. Pediatrics. 1991;87:28–33.
    1. Santosham M. Oral rehydration therapy – Reverse transfer of technology (editorial) Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:1177–9.
    1. World Health Organization . The treatment of diarrhea – a manual for physicians and other senior health workers. third. World Health Organization; 1995. Division of diarrheal and acute respiratory disease control.
    1. Garland JS, Dunne WM, Jr, Havens P, Hintermeyer M, Bozzette MA, Wincek J, Bromberger T, Seavers M. Peripheral intravenous catheter complications in critically ill children: a prospective study. Pediatrics. 1992;89:1145–50.
    1. Mackenzie A, Barnes G. Oral rehydration in infantile diarrhoea in the developed world. Drugs. 1988;36:48–60.
    1. Gremse D. Effectiveness of nasogastric rehydration in hospitalized children with acute diarrhea. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1995;21:145–8.
    1. Listernick R, Zieserl E, Davis AT. Outpatient oral rehydration in the United States. Am J Dis Child. 1986;140:211–15.
    1. Cochrane Library, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness Efficacy of glucose-based oral rehydration therapy. The Cochrane Library. 2002.
    1. Oxman A, Guyatt GH. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:1271–8. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90160-B.
    1. Klassen TP, Hartling L. In children with moderate dehydration, oral rehydration reduced ED stay and staff time compared with intravenous rehydration (see commentary) Evid Based Med. 2003;8:116. doi: 10.1136/ebm.8.4.116.
    1. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary. Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1–12. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4.
    1. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trial. JAMA. 1995;273:408–12. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.5.408.
    1. Santosham M, Daum RS, Dillman L, Rodriguez JL, Luque S, Russell R, Kourany M, Ryder RW, Bartlett AV, Rosenberg A, Benenson AS, Sack RB. Oral rehydration therapy of infantile diarrhea- a controlled study of well-nourished children hospitalized in the United States and Panama. NEJM. 1982;306:1070–6.
    1. Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Toronto: Academic Press; 1985.
    1. Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In: Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG, editor. Systematic reviews in health care. 2. London, UK: BMJ Books; 2001. p. 300.
    1. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088–1101.
    1. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple graphical test. British Medical Journal. 1997;315:629–634.
    1. Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56:455–463.
    1. De Pumarejo MartinM, Lugo CE, Alvarez-Ruiz JR, Colon-Santinl JL. [Oral rehydration: experience in the mangerment of patients with acute gastroenterltis in the emergency room at the Dr. Antonio Ortiz pediatric hospital] Bol Asoc Med PR. 1990;82:227–33. Spanish.
    1. el-Mougi M, el-Akkad N, Hendawi A, Hassan M, Amer A, Fontaine O, Pierce NF. Is a low-osmolarity ors solution more efficacious than standard WHO ors solution? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1994;19:83–6.
    1. Gonzalez-Adriano SR, Valdes-Garza HE, Garcia-Valdes LC. Hidratacion oral versus hidratacion endovenosa en pacientes con diarrea aguda. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 1988;45:165–72.
    1. Issenman RM, Leung AK. Oral and intravenous rehydration of children. Can Fam Physician. 1993;39:2129–36.
    1. Mackenzie A, Barnes G. Randomised controlled trial comparing oral and intravenous rehydration therapy in children with diarrhoea. BMJ. 1991;303:393–96.
    1. Sharifi J, Ghavami F, Nowrouzi Z, Fouladvand B, Malek M, Rezaeian M, Emami M. Oral versus intravenous rehydration therapy in severe gastroenteritis. Arch Dis Child. 1985;60:856–60.
    1. Singh M, Mahmoodi A, Arya LJ, Azamy S. Controlled trial of oral versus intravenous rehydration in the management of acute gastroenteritis. Indian J Med Res. 1982;75:691–3.
    1. Tamer AM, Friedman LB, Maxwell SRW, Cynamon HA, Perez HN, Cleveland WW. Oral rehydration of infants in a large urban U.S. medical center. J Pediatr. 1985;107:14–19.
    1. Vesikari T, Isolauri E, Baer M. A comparative trial of rapid oral and intravenous rehydration in acute diarrhoea. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1987;76:300–5.
    1. Nager AL, Wang VJ. Comparison of nasogastric and intravenous methods of rehydration in pediatric patients with acute dehydration. Pediatrics. 2002;109:566–572.
    1. Atherly-John YC, Cunningham SJ, Crain EF. A randomized trial of oral vs intravenous rehydration in a pediatric emergency department. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:1240–3.
    1. United Nations Statistics Division Economic Trade and Other Groupings of Countries or Areas New York, NY: United Nations Statistics Division [WWW Document] Accessed November 14, 2001.
    1. Hahn S, Kim S, Garner P. Reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution for treating dehydration due to diarrhoea in children: systematic review. BMJ. 2001;323:81–5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7304.81.
    1. Colditz GA, Miller JN, Mosteller F. How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy, I: medical. Stat Med. 1989;8:411–54.
    1. Fontaine O, Gore SM, Pierce NF. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: 2000; Vol. 2. Oxford: Update Software; 2003. Rice-based oral rehydration solution for treating diarrhoea. CD001264 Review.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe