Subjective Assessment of Spatial Orientation Abilities in Alzheimer's Disease (ESCAPE-AD)
Evaluation Subjective Des CApacités d'Orientation sPatialE Dans la mAladie D'Alzheimer
Difficulty orienting oneself and finding one's way around the environment, also known as "topographical disorientation" (TD) or "spatial disorientation" (SD), is a common and often early symptom of Alzheimer's disease (AD) that affects people's independence and well-being. Being able to identify it is therefore crucial in order to provide appropriate support.
It cannot be assessed using conventional psychometric tests due to its low ecological validity. Several subjective assessment scales have been created to screen for SD "spatial disorientation" and assess its functional and psychological impact. However, none of these scales have been translated and validated in French. As a result, DS is not assessed in routine clinical practice.
Among these scales, the Wayfinding Questionnaire (WQ) explores three dimensions: spatial orientation, distance estimation, and spatial anxiety. This questionnaire has undergone psychometric validation studies in its original Dutch version for a population with mild post-stroke , and norms for the general population have been published.
Our team translated this questionnaire into French (i.e., "Questionnaire d'Orientation Spatiale" (QOS)) and adapted it cross-culturally to preserve the qualities of the measurement. A "Caregiver" version was also created, taking into account the anosognosia known to occur in AD. Primary Objective : Evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spatial Orientation Questionnaire (SOSQ) (i.e., the French translation and adaptation of the Wayfinding Questionnaire) in assessing spatial orientation disorders in patients with Alzheimer's disease, in both its "patient" and "caregiver" versions. Secondary objective : Evaluate the acceptability of the Spatial Orientation Questionnaire (SOC) in its "patient" and "caregiver" versions.
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienkontakt
- Name: EL AKHDAR Hajar, Master Science
- Telefonnummer: 0383153596
- E-Mail: h.elakhdar@chru-nancy.fr
Studienorte
-
-
-
Nancy, Frankreich, 54500
- CHRU (Centre Hospitalier Régionale Universitaire) Nancy
-
Kontakt:
- Hajar EL AKHDAR
- Telefonnummer: +33 3 83 15 35 96
- E-Mail: h.elakhdar@chru-nancy.fr
-
Hauptermittler:
- Thérèse JONVEAUX, Dr
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Erwachsene
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Probenahmeverfahren
Studienpopulation
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
For all subjects :
- Native French speakers
- Independent mobility: (minimum mobility range of 3 (i.e., neighborhood) on the LSA-F assessment of the mobility zone scale)
- Person affiliated with a social security system or beneficiary of such a system
Patients (Subgroup A1) and healthy control subjects (Group C):
- Individuals who have received complete information about the clinical research organization and have signed their written informed consent
- Patients (Subgroups A2 and A3) and Companions (Group B) Individuals who have received complete information about the clinical research and have agreed to participate
Patients (group A):
- Aged 55 to 85
- Diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease (NINCDR-ADRDA diagnostic criteria)
- Score of 4 or less on the Hachinski Ischemic Scale
- Score of 20 or higher on the Folstein MMSE (Mini Mental State Examination)
- In the case of specific treatment for Alzheimer's disease (anticholinesterase and memantine treatments), treatment stability for > 15 days
- Able to walk independently, i.e., without assistance, whether human or technical, except for a simple cane
Caregivers (group B):
- Caregivers of a person with dementia included in group A, with regular contact (at least 10 hours per week, spread over a minimum of 3 times per week)
- Healthy control subjects (group C):
- Aged 55 to 85
- Able to walk independently, i.e., without assistance, whether human or technical, except for a single cane
- Normal performance on the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), according to GRECO (Cognitive Assessment Task Force) standards
Exclusion Criteria:
For all subjects:
- Adults subject to legal protection measures (guardianship, curatorship, judicial protection)
- Adults unable to give their consent
- Persons deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision, persons receiving psychiatric care pursuant to Articles L. 3212-1 and L. 3213-1.
- Persons capable of giving consent but unable to read French
- Persons capable of giving consent but unable to write
- One of the members of the patient/caregiver dyad refusing to participate in the study.
Patients (subgroup A1) and healthy control subjects (group C):
- Sensory or phasic deficit interfering with the task.
- History of moderate or severe head trauma (with loss of consciousness).
- Change in psychotropic treatment less than 48 hours before the tests
- Chronic alcoholism
- Severe depression (score greater than or equal to 10 on the GDS-15 Geriatric Depression Scale)
- Presence of other clinically significant psychiatric or neurological conditions (except Alzheimer disease for case subjects)
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
Kohorten und Interventionen
Gruppe / Kohorte |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Patients Group
Patients with Alzheimer disease
|
French version of the wayfinding questionnaire
|
|
Accompanying persons
Relatives (friends or family) of patients with alzheimer disease
|
French version of the wayfinding questionnaire
|
|
Control arm
Healthy participants
|
French version of the wayfinding questionnaire
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
French version of the QOS Score
Zeitfenster: Baseline and between 30 and 90 days after baseline for groups A1, A2, A3, B1 and B2
|
There are three sub-scores in total :
For these three sub-scores, a high score indicates a good level of spatial orientation. |
Baseline and between 30 and 90 days after baseline for groups A1, A2, A3, B1 and B2
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen
- Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. No abstract available.
- Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Dec;46(12):1417-32. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n.
- de Rooij NK, Claessen MHG, van der Ham IJM, Post MWM, Visser-Meily JMA. The Wayfinding Questionnaire: A clinically useful self-report instrument to identify navigation complaints in stroke patients. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019 Aug;29(7):1042-1061. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2017.1347098. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
- Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;68(4):435-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.021. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
- van der Ham IJM, Claessen MHG. A clinical guide to assessment of navigation impairment: Standardized subjective and objective instruments and normative data. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2022 Sep;44(7):487-498. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2022.2123895. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
- van der Ham IJ, Kant N, Postma A, Visser-Meily JM. Is navigation ability a problem in mild stroke patients? Insights from self-reported navigation measures. J Rehabil Med. 2013 May;45(5):429-33. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1139.
- Claessen MHG, Visser-Meily JMA, de Rooij NK, Postma A, van der Ham IJM. The Wayfinding Questionnaire as a Self-report Screening Instrument for Navigation-related Complaints After Stroke: Internal Validity in Healthy Respondents and Chronic Mild Stroke Patients. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016 Dec 1;31(8):839-854. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acw044.
- Hegarty, M., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., Ishikawa, T., & Lovelace, K. (2006). Spatial abilities at different scales : Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning. Intelligence, 34(2), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.09.005
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- 2019PI271
- N°ID-RCB : 2025-A00441-48 (Andere Kennung: ANSM (The National Agency for Drug and Health Product Safety))
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .