Efficacy of Rituximab in Refractory Inflammatory Myopathies Associated with Anti- Synthetase Auto-Antibodies: An Open-Label, Phase II Trial

Yves Allenbach, Marguerite Guiguet, Aude Rigolet, Isabelle Marie, Eric Hachulla, Laurent Drouot, Fabienne Jouen, Serge Jacquot, Kuberaka Mariampillai, Lucile Musset, Philippe Grenier, Herve Devilliers, Adrian Hij, Olivier Boyer, Serge Herson, Olivier Benveniste, Yves Allenbach, Marguerite Guiguet, Aude Rigolet, Isabelle Marie, Eric Hachulla, Laurent Drouot, Fabienne Jouen, Serge Jacquot, Kuberaka Mariampillai, Lucile Musset, Philippe Grenier, Herve Devilliers, Adrian Hij, Olivier Boyer, Serge Herson, Olivier Benveniste

Abstract

Objective: Anti-synthetase syndrome (anti-SS) is frequently associated with myositis and interstitial lung disease (ILD). We evaluated prospectively, in a multicenter, open-label, phase II study, the efficacy of rituximab on muscle and lung outcomes.

Methods: Patients were enrolled if they were refractory to conventional treatments (prednisone and at least 2 immunosuppressants). They received 1 g of rituximab at D0, D15, and M6. The primary endpoint was muscular improvement based on manual muscular testing (MMT10, Kendall score in 10 muscles) at M12. Secondary endpoints were normalization of creatine kinase (CK) level, ILD improvement based on forced vital capacity and/or diffuse capacity for carbon monoxide, and number and/or doses of associated immunosuppressants.

Results: Twelve patients were enrolled, and 10 completed the study. Only 2 patients presented an improvement of at least 4 points on at least two muscle groups (primary end-point). Overall, seven patients had an increase of at least 4 points on MMT10. CK level decreased from 399 IU/L (range, 48-11,718) to 74.5 IU/L (range, 40-47,857). Corticosteroid doses decreased from 52.5 mg/d (range, 10-70) to 9 mg/d (range, 7-65) and six patients had a decrease in the burden of their associated immunosuppressants. At baseline, all 10 patients presented with ILD. At M12, improvement of ILD was observed in 5 out of the 10 patients, stabilization in 4, and worsening in 1.

Conclusions: This pilot study of rituximab treatment in patients with refractory anti-SS provided data on evolution of muscular and pulmonary parameters. Rituximab should now be evaluated in a larger, controlled study for this homogenous group of patients.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00774462.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Rituximab was kindly provided by Roche. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1. Flowchart.
Fig 1. Flowchart.
Fig 2. Evolution of strength and CK…
Fig 2. Evolution of strength and CK levels from baseline to months 18.
(A) MMT10 using Kendall score. (B) CK level. The continuous line and the dotted line represent the median Kendall score and the median CK level, respectively.
Fig 3. Interstitial lung disease evolution.
Fig 3. Interstitial lung disease evolution.
Lung CT scans, before enrolment (M0) and 1 year later (M12), of the only patient with and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia improving after rituximab infusions.
Fig 4. Forced vital capacity evolution.
Fig 4. Forced vital capacity evolution.
Forced vital capacity (FVC) is represented for each patient who terminated the study and had interstitial lung disease (ILD). FVC is represented 6 months before enrolment (M−6), when available, and 6 and 12 months (M6 and M12) after the first rituximab infusion (arrow, M0). The grey area represents a decrease of ≥ 10% in absolute FVC at baseline compared with M−6. (*) Represents an increase or a decrease of ≥ 10% of absolute FVC or ≥ 15% of DLCOcor at M12 compared with M0.
Fig 5. SF-36 scores measuring parameters of…
Fig 5. SF-36 scores measuring parameters of mobility.
For each score (ranging from 0 to 100) the mean values (± SD) are represented at different time points: baseline (M0); months 6, 12 and 18 after rituximab infusion (M6, M12 and M18). The asterisk represents a significant increase (more than 10 points) compared with baseline.
Fig 6. Anti-Jo-1 titer variation and B-lymphocyte…
Fig 6. Anti-Jo-1 titer variation and B-lymphocyte depletion.
Anti-Jo-1 titer was monitored for the 9 patients who terminated the study (the tenth had anti-PL-7). On the right side, 4 boxes represent the status at M12 (vs M0) concerning manual muscular testing (MM10), creatine kinase level (CK), treatment modification (treatment), and forced vital capacity (FVC). Black represents worsening, grey area represent no change, and white represents an improvement. Concerning CK, black shows an increased level at M12 and white a normal level.

References

    1. Koenig M, Fritzler MJ, Targoff IN, Troyanov Y, Senécal J-L. Heterogeneity of autoantibodies in 100 patients with autoimmune myositis: insights into clinical features and outcomes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9(4):R78
    1. Stanciu R, Guiguet M, Musset L, Touitou D, Beigelman C, Rigolet A, et al. Antisynthetase syndrome with anti-Jo1 antibodies in 48 patients: pulmonary involvement predicts disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use. J Rheumatol. 2012. September;39(9):1835–9. 10.3899/jrheum.111604
    1. Love LA, Leff RL, Fraser DD, Targoff IN, Dalakas M, Plotz PH, et al. A new approach to the classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: myositis-specific autoantibodies define useful homogeneous patient groups. Medicine (Baltimore). 1991. November;70(6):360–74.
    1. Ascherman DP. The role of Jo-1 in the immunopathogenesis of polymyositis: current hypotheses. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2003. December;5(6):425–30.
    1. Katsumata Y, Ridgway WM, Oriss T, Gu X, Chin D, Wu Y, et al. Species-specific immune responses generated by histidyl-tRNA synthetase immunization are associated with muscle and lung inflammation. J Autoimmun. 2007. November;29(2–3):174–86.
    1. Soejima M, Kang EH, Gu X, Katsumata Y, Clemens PR, Ascherman DP. Role of innate immunity in a murine model of histidyl-transfer RNA synthetase (Jo-1)-mediated myositis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011. February;63(2):479–87. 10.1002/art.30113
    1. Stone JH, Merkel PA, Spiera R, Seo P, Langford CA, Hoffman GS, et al. Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis. N Engl J Med. 2010. July 15;363(3):221–32. 10.1056/NEJMoa0909905
    1. Edwards JCW, Szczepanski L, Szechinski J, Filipowicz-Sosnowska A, Emery P, Close DR, et al. Efficacy of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2004. June 17;350(25):2572–81.
    1. Lambotte O, Kotb R, Maigne G, Blanc F-X, Goujard C, Delfraissy JF. Efficacy of rituximab in refractory polymyositis. J Rheumatol. 2005. July;32(7):1369–70.
    1. Vandenbroucke E, Grutters JC, Altenburg J, Boersma WG, ter Borg EJ, van den Bosch JMM. Rituximab in life threatening antisynthetase syndrome. Rheumatol Int. 2009. October;29(12):1499–502. 10.1007/s00296-009-0859-x
    1. Sem M, Molberg O, Lund MB, Gran JT. Rituximab treatment of the anti-synthetase syndrome: a retrospective case series. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009. August;48(8):968–71.
    1. Oddis CV, Reed AM, Aggarwal R, Rider LG, Ascherman DP, Levesque MC, et al. Rituximab in the treatment of refractory adult and juvenile dermatomyositis and adult polymyositis: A randomized, placebo-phase trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2012. November 2;
    1. Hoogendijk JE, Amato AA, Lecky BR, Choy EH, Lundberg IE, Rose MR, et al. 119th ENMC international workshop: Trial design in adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, with the exception of inclusion body myositis, 10–12 October 2003, Naarden, The Netherlands. Neuromuscular Disorders. 2004. May;14(5):337–45.
    1. Provance PG. K FP. Muscles: Testing and function 4 ed. Muscles: Testing and function 4 ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
    1. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek BG. The SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide Boston: The Health Institute. New England Medical Center; 1993.
    1. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, McHorney CA, Rogers WH, Raczek A. Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care. 1995. April;33(4 Suppl):AS264–79.
    1. Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum. 2001. August;45(4):384–91.
    1. Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ, Martinez FJ, Behr J, Brown KK, et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011. March 15;183(6):788–824. 10.1164/rccm.2009-040GL
    1. Mok CC, Ho LY, To CH. Rituximab for refractory polymyositis: an open-label prospective study. J Rheumatol. 2007. September;34(9):1864–8.
    1. Mahler EAM, Blom M, Voermans NC, van Engelen BGM, van Riel PLCM, Vonk MC. Rituximab treatment in patients with refractory inflammatory myopathies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011. December;50(12):2206–13.
    1. Hervier B, Devilliers H, Stanciu R, Meyer A, Uzunhan Y, Masseau A, et al. Hierarchical cluster and survival analyses of antisynthetase syndrome: phenotype and outcome are correlated with anti-tRNA synthetase antibody specificity. Autoimmunity reviews. 2012;12(2):210–7 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.06.006
    1. Isenberg DA, Allen E, Farewell V, Ehrenstein MR, Hanna MG, Lundberg IE, et al. International consensus outcome measures for patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Development and initial validation of myositis activity and damage indices in patients with adult onset disease. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004. January;43(1):49–54.
    1. Rider L, Koziol D, Giannini E, Jain M, Smith M, Whitney-Mahoney k, et al. Validation of manual muscle testing and a subset of eight muscles for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2010. April;62(4):465–72.
    1. Vanhoutte EK, Faber CG, van Nes SI, Jacobs BC, van Doorn PA, van Koningsveld R, Cornblath DR et al. Modifying the Medical Research Council grading system through Rasch analyses.Brain. 2012. May;135(Pt 5):1639–49. 10.1093/brain/awr318
    1. Aggarwal R, Bandos A, Reed AM, Ascherman DP, Barohn RJ, Feldman BM, et al. Predictors of Clinical Improvement in Rituximab-Treated Refractory Adult and Juvenile Dermatomyositis and Adult Polymyositis: Clinical and Serologic Predictors of Improvement in Myositis. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2014. March;66(3):740–9. 10.1002/art.38270
    1. Stone KB, Oddis CV, Fertig N, Katsumata Y, Lucas M, Vogt M, et al. Anti-Jo-1 antibody levels correlate with disease activity in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. Arthritis Rheum. 2007. September;56(9):3125–31.
    1. Vital EM, Dass S, Rawstron AC, Buch MH, Goëb V, Henshaw K, et al. Management of nonresponse to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: predictors and outcome of re-treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 2010. May;62(5):1273–9. 10.1002/art.27359
    1. Cartin-Ceba R, Golbin JM, Keogh KA, Peikert T, Sánchez-Menéndez M, Ytterberg SR, et al. Rituximab for remission induction and maintenance in refractory granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s): ten-year experience at a single center. Arthritis Rheum. 2012. November;64(11):3770–8. 10.1002/art.34584
    1. Jones RB, Ferraro AJ, Chaudhry AN, Brogan P, Salama AD, Smith KGC, et al. A multicenter survey of rituximab therapy for refractory antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009. July;60(7):2156–68. 10.1002/art.24637

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren