Influence of time of day of blood pressure-lowering treatment on cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes

Ramón C Hermida, Diana E Ayala, Artemio Mojón, José R Fernández, Ramón C Hermida, Diana E Ayala, Artemio Mojón, José R Fernández

Abstract

Objective: We prospectively investigated in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes if bedtime treatment with ≥1 hypertension medications exerts better blood pressure control and cardiovascular risk reduction than conventional therapy, in which all medications are ingested in the morning.

Research design and methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point trial on 448 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes, 255 men/193 women, mean ± SD age 62.5 ± 10.8 years, randomized to ingest all their prescribed hypertension medications upon awakening or ≥1 of them at bedtime. Ambulatory blood pressure was measured for 48 h at baseline and again annually or even more frequently (quarterly) after adjustments in treatment.

Results: After a median follow-up of 5.4 years, patients ingesting ≥1 hypertension medications at bedtime showed a significantly lower cardiovascular risk (adjusted by age and sex) than subjects ingesting all medications upon awakening (hazard ratio 0.33 [95% CI 0.21-0.54]; P < 0.001). The difference between groups in the adjusted risk of major events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) was also statistically significant (0.25 [0.10-0.61]; P = 0.003). Patients treated at bedtime showed significantly lower sleep time blood pressure mean and higher prevalence of controlled ambulatory blood pressure (62.5 vs. 50.9%; P = 0.013). There was a significant 12% cardiovascular risk reduction per each 5 mmHg decrease in asleep systolic blood pressure during follow-up (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Among patients with diabetes, treatment with ≥1 hypertension medications at bedtime, compared with all medications upon waking, resulted in improved ambulatory blood pressure control and significantly reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00295542.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Top: Kaplan-Meier survival curves as a function of time of day of hypertension treatment, i.e., for patients with type 2 diabetes ingesting either all their blood pressure–lowering medications upon awakening or ≥1 medications at bedtime. Bottom: Hazard ratios (95% CIs) of CVD events (adjusted by age and sex) as a function of time of day of hypertension treatment, i.e., for patients with type 2 diabetes ingesting either all their blood pressure–lowering medications upon awakening or ≥1 medications at bedtime. Total events include death (from all causes), cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, and coronary revascularization), cerebrovascular events (stroke and transient ischemic attack), heart failure, and other events (acute arterial occlusion of lower extremities and thrombotic occlusion of the retinal artery). Major events include cardiovascular deaths, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hazard ratio of CVD events (adjusted by age, sex, and number of hypertension medications used for treatment) as a function of achieved asleep SBP mean (top) and daytime clinic SBP (bottom) at the time of the last ABPM evaluation. Studied population was divided into five classes of equal size (quintiles).

References

    1. Smolensky MH, Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Tiseo R, Portaluppi F. Administration-time-dependent effects of blood pressure–lowering medications: basis for the chronotherapy of hypertension. Blood Press Monit 2010;15:173–180
    1. Ohkubo T, Hozawa A, Yamaguchi J, et al. Prognostic significance of the nocturnal decline in blood pressure in individuals with and without high 24-h blood pressure: the Ohasama study. J Hypertens 2002;20:2183–2189
    1. Dolan E, Stanton A, Thijs L, et al. Superiority of ambulatory over clinic blood pressure measurement in predicting mortality: the Dublin outcome study. Hypertension 2005;46:156–161
    1. Boggia J, Li Y, Thijs L, et al. ; International Database on Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes (IDACO) investigators Prognostic accuracy of day versus night ambulatory blood pressure: a cohort study. Lancet 2007;370:1219–1229
    1. Nakano S, Fukuda M, Hotta F, et al. Reversed circadian blood pressure rhythm is associated with occurrences of both fatal and nonfatal vascular events in NIDDM subjects. Diabetes 1998;47:1501–1506
    1. Sturrock ND, George E, Pound N, Stevenson J, Peck GM, Sowter H. Non-dipping circadian blood pressure and renal impairment are associated with increased mortality in diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 2000;17:360–364
    1. Eguchi K, Pickering TG, Hoshide S, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure is a better marker than clinic blood pressure in predicting cardiovascular events in patients with/without type 2 diabetes. Am J Hypertens 2008;21:443–450
    1. Kikuya M, Ohkubo T, Asayama K, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure and 10-year risk of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality: the Ohasama study. Hypertension 2005;45:240–245
    1. Ben-Dov IZ, Kark JD, Ben-Ishay D, Mekler J, Ben-Arie L, Bursztyn M. Predictors of all-cause mortality in clinical ambulatory monitoring: unique aspects of blood pressure during sleep. Hypertension 2007;49:1235–1241
    1. Fagard RH, Celis H, Thijs L, et al. Daytime and nighttime blood pressure as predictors of death and cause-specific cardiovascular events in hypertension. Hypertension 2008;51:55–61
    1. Fan HQ, Li Y, Thijs L, et al. ; International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure In Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes Investigators Prognostic value of isolated nocturnal hypertension on ambulatory measurement in 8711 individuals from 10 populations. J Hypertens 2010;28:2036–2045
    1. Hansen TW, Li Y, Boggia J, Thijs L, Richart T, Staessen JA. Predictive role of the nighttime blood pressure. Hypertension 2011;57:3–10
    1. Nakano S, Ito T, Furuya K, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure level rather than dipper/nondipper status predicts vascular events in type 2 diabetic subjects. Hypertens Res 2004;27:647–656
    1. Astrup AS, Nielsen FS, Rossing P, et al. Predictors of mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes with or without diabetic nephropathy: a follow-up study. J Hypertens 2007;25:2479–2485
    1. Bouhanick B, Bongard V, Amar J, Bousquel S, Chamontin B. Prognostic value of nocturnal blood pressure and reverse-dipping status on the occurrence of cardiovascular events in hypertensive diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab 2008;34:560–567
    1. Hermida RC. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the prediction of cardiovascular events and effects of chronotherapy: rationale and design of the MAPEC study. Chronobiol Int 2007;24:749–775
    1. Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Mojón A, Fernández JR. Influence of circadian time of hypertension treatment on cardiovascular risk: results of the MAPEC study. Chronobiol Int 2010;27:1629–1651
    1. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2007;25:1105–1187
    1. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, et al. ; American Heart Association; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation 2005;112:2735–2752
    1. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. ; CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:604–612
    1. Vokó Z, Bots ML, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Witteman JCM, Breteler MMB. J-shaped relation between blood pressure and stroke in treated hypertensives. Hypertension 1999;34:1181–1185
    1. Cushman WC, Evans GW, Byington RP, et al. ; ACCORD Study Group Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1575–1585

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren