Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Prediction of Cardiovascular Events and Effects of Chronotherapy (MAPEC)

April 27, 2009 updated by: University of Vigo

Prognostic Value of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Prediction of Cardiovascular Events and Effects of Chronotherapy in Relation to Risk (the MAPEC Study).

The MAPEC study was designed to investigate whether normalizing the circadian blood pressure profile towards a more dipper pattern (increasing the diurnal/nocturnal ratio of blood pressure) by the use of Chronotherapy (that is, taking into account the time of day of administration of antihypertensive medications) reduces cardiovascular risk.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Target organ damage is more closely associated with ambulatory (ABPM) than with clinic blood pressure (BP). In particular, the reduction of the normal 10 to 20% sleep-time BP decline (non-dipper pattern) is associated with elevated risk of end-organ injury, particularly to the heart, brain and kidney. These results suggest that cardiovascular risk could be influenced not by BP elevation alone, but also by the magnitude of the circadian BP variability. Moreover, at least two independent prospective studies have suggested that nighttime BP is a better predictor of risk than daytime BP. Common to all previous trials is that prognostic significance of ABPM has relied on a single baseline profile from each participant, without accounting for possible changes in the BP pattern, mainly associated to antihypertensive therapy and aging during follow-up. The MAPEC study investigates, first, the comparative prognostic value of several BP parameters (including, among many others, BP variability, the diurnal/nocturnal ratio, diurnal and nocturnal means, slope of morning rise, etc) in the prediction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; and, second, whether potential changes in the circadian BP pattern after Chronotherapy with antihypertensive drugs are associated to changes in cardiovascular risk.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3344

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 15706
        • Hospital Clinico Universitario

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Essential hypertension

Exclusion Criteria:

  • AIDS
  • shift workers
  • secondary hypertension
  • intolerant to ABPM

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 1
Treatment on awakening
Sampling at 20-min intervals from 07:00 to 23:00 hours and at 30-min intervals at night for 48 consecutive hours
Comparison of effects of awakening versus bedtime dosing
Treatment at awakening versus bedtime
Treatment at awakening versus bedtime
Treatment at awakening versus bedtime
Treatment at awakening versus bedtime
Treatment at awakening versus bedtime
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 2
Treatment at bedtime
Sampling at 20-min intervals from 07:00 to 23:00 hours and at 30-min intervals at night for 48 consecutive hours
Comparison of effects of awakening versus bedtime dosing
Treatment at awakening versus bedtime
Treatment at awakening versus bedtime
Treatment at awakening versus bedtime
Treatment at awakening versus bedtime
Treatment at awakening versus bedtime

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Prognostic value of ABPM, impact of changes in ambulatory BP and impact of circadian time of antihypertensive treatment in cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and renal risk assessment.
Time Frame: Five years
Five years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Influence of circadian time of antihypertensive treatment in BP control and the remodeling of the circadian BP pattern of hypertensive patients.
Time Frame: Five years
Five years
Prevalence of an altered BP profile as a function of the circadian time of treatment.
Time Frame: Five years
Five years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2000

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2006

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 23, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 28, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2009

Last Verified

April 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe