Effects of 60 Min Electrostimulation With the EXOPULSE Mollii Suit on Objective Signs of Spasticity

Gaia Valentina Pennati, Hanna Bergling, Loïc Carment, Jörgen Borg, Påvel G Lindberg, Susanne Palmcrantz, Gaia Valentina Pennati, Hanna Bergling, Loïc Carment, Jörgen Borg, Påvel G Lindberg, Susanne Palmcrantz

Abstract

Background: The EXOPULSE Mollii method is an innovative full-body suit approach for non-invasive electrical stimulation, primarily designed to reduce disabling spasticity and improve motor function through the mechanism of reciprocal inhibition. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of one session of stimulation with the EXOPULSE Mollii suit at different stimulation frequencies on objective signs of spasticity and clinical measures, and the subjective perceptions of the intervention. Methods: Twenty patients in the chronic phase after stroke were enrolled in a cross-over, double-blind controlled study. Electrical stimulation delivered through EXOPULSE Mollii was applied for 60 min at two active frequencies (20 and 30 Hz) and in OFF-settings (placebo) in a randomized order, every second day. Spasticity was assessed with controlled-velocity passive muscle stretches using the NeuroFlexor hand and foot modules. Surface electromyography (EMG) for characterizing flexor carpi radialis, medial gastrocnemius, and soleus muscles activation, Modified Ashworth Scale and range of motion were used as complementary tests. Finally, a questionnaire was used to assess the participants' perceptions of using the EXOPULSE Mollii suit. Results: At group level, analyses showed no significant effect of stimulation at any frequency on NeuroFlexor neural component (NC) and EMG amplitude in the upper or lower extremities (p > 0.35). Nevertheless, the effect was highly variable at the individual level, with eight patients exhibiting reduced NC (>1 N) in the upper extremity after stimulation at 30 Hz, 5 at 20 Hz and 3 in OFF settings. All these patients presented severe spasticity at baseline, i.e., NC > 8 N. Modified Ashworth ratings of spasticity and range of motion did not change significantly after stimulation at any frequency. Finally, 75% of participants reported an overall feeling of well-being during stimulation, with 25% patients describing a muscle-relaxing effect on the affected hand and/or foot at both 20 and 30 Hz. Conclusions: The 60 min of electrical stimulation with EXOPULSE Mollii suit did not reduce spasticity consistently in the upper and lower extremities in the chronic phase after stroke. Findings suggest a need for further studies in patients with severe spasticity after stroke including repeated stimulation sessions. Clinical Trial Registration: https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04076878, identifier: NCT04076878.

Keywords: electrical stimulation; medical instrument; muscle spasticity; outcome assessment; stroke.

Conflict of interest statement

The NeuroFlexor instrument has been patented (WO/2008/121067), and the PL is a shareholder in the manufacturing company Aggero MedTech AB. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Pennati, Bergling, Carment, Borg, Lindberg and Palmcrantz.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The EXOPULSE Mollii suit. This figure has been reproduced with permission from EXONEURAL NETWORK AB.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Semi-structured questions asked to the patients during each of the three sessions of stimulation with EXOPULSE Mollii.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of NeuroFlexor force trace and electromyography signal before and after stimulation with EXOPULSE Mollii. (A) NeuroFlexor hand module resistance profile during the fast velocity movement, before and after 60 min of electrical stimulation with EXOPULSE Mollii at 30 Hz. Blue trace shows the angle of wrist movement, from 20° of palmar flexion to 30° of extension. Bright red trace shows resisting force to the passive stretch and the ticker dark red line shows resistance profile when the device ran without hand. Arrow shows the late resistance toward the end of the movement (P2 time point). Values of neural component (NC) are reported in Newton, N. (B) Electromyography (EMG) signal of the flexor carpi radialis recorded synchronized with the NeuroFlexor assessment from onset (i.e., 20° of flexion) until full extension of wrist (offset, i.e., 30°). The amplitude of EMG signal is reported in mV. After stimulation, a decreased NC was accompanied by a reduced EMG amplitude (i.e., smaller burst in EMG signal in green).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Changes in spasticity of the upper extremity during and after stimulation with EXOPULSE Mollii. A slight increase (p > 0.05) in (A) the NeuroFlexor neural component (in Newton, N) and in (B) the electromyography (EMG) amplitude of the flexor carpi radialis (in mV) was observed during and after stimulation with the EXOPULSE Mollii suit at different frequencies: OFF-settings = circles, 20 Hz = solid triangle and 30 Hz = square.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Individual changes in NeuroFlexor neural component in the upper extremity during and after stimulation with EXOPULSE Mollii, graphically presented by type of response (DeltaA−B NC). A high variability of the EXOPULSE Mollii effect on NeuroFlexor neural component (NC, in Newton, N) was observed at individual level. Three patients out of 20 presented a negative DeltaA−B NC (i.e., the difference in NC between after stimulation value and before stimulation value) in OFF-settings, six patients at 20 Hz and eight at 30 Hz. To notice, NC before electrical stimulation was >14 N for OFF-settings, >13 N for 20 Hz and >8 N for 30 Hz among these patients. Nine patients presented a positive DeltaA−B NC in OFF-settings, 11 patients at 20 Hz and seven patients at 30 Hz. DeltaA−B NC within the margin of measurement error of 1 N was considered stable.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Individual changes in spasticity in the upper and lower extremities after stimulation with EXOPULSE Mollii. Correlation between values of NeuroFlexor neural component (NC, in Newton, N) before electrical stimulation with the EXOPULSE Mollii suit, and DeltaA−B NC (i.e., the difference in NC between after stimulation value and before stimulation value) in (A) the upper extremity (N = 20) and (B) lower extremity (n = 10). Solid circles represent the reduction in NC beyond the margin of measurement error (i.e., 1 N).

References

    1. Lin S, Sun Q, Wang H, Xie G. Influence of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on spasticity, balance, and walking speed in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med. (2018) 50:3–7. 10.2340/16501977-2303
    1. Sommerfeld DK, Eek EU, Svensson AK, Holmqvist LW, von Arbin MH. Spasticity after stroke: its occurrence and association with motor impairments and activity limitations. Stroke. (2004) 35:134–9. 10.1161/01.STR.0000105386.05173.5E
    1. Lundstrom E, Terent A, Borg J. Prevalence of disabling spasticity 1 year after first-ever stroke. Eur J Neurol. (2008) 15:533–9. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02114.x
    1. Thibaut A, Chatelle C, Ziegler E, Bruno MA, Laureys S, Gosseries O. Spasticity after stroke: physiology, assessment and treatment. Brain Injury. (2013) 27:1093–105. 10.3109/02699052.2013.804202
    1. Plantin J, Pennati GV, Roca P, Baron J-C, Laurencikas E, Weber K, et al. . Quantitative assessment of hand spasticity after stroke: imaging correlates and impact on motor recovery. Front Neurol. (2019) 10:836. 10.3389/fneur.2019.00836
    1. Lance JW. Symposium synopsis. In: Feldman RG, Young RR, Koella WP. editors. Spasticity, Disordered Motor Control. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; (1980). p. 485–94.
    1. Schuhfried O, Crevenna R, Fialka-Moser V, Paternostro-Sluga T. Non-invasive neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with central nervous system lesions: an educational review. J Rehabil Med. (2012) 44:99–105. 10.2340/16501977-0941
    1. Stein C, Fritsch CG, Robinson C, Sbruzzi G, Plentz RD. Effects of electrical stimulation in spastic muscles after stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Stroke. (2015) 46:2197–205. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009633
    1. Mills PB, Dossa F. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for management of limb spasticity: a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. (2016) 95:309–18. 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000437
    1. Mahmood A, Veluswamy SK, Hombali A, Mullick A, N M, Solomon JM. Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on spasticity in adults with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2019) 100:751–68. 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.10.016
    1. Rosenbaum P, Stewart D. The World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: a model to guide clinical thinking, practice and research in the field of cerebral palsy. Semin Pediatr Neurol. (2004) 11:5–10. 10.1016/j.spen.2004.01.002
    1. Garcia MAC, Vargas CD. Is somatosensory electrical stimulation effective in relieving spasticity? A systematic review. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. (2019) 19:317–25
    1. Fernández-Tenorio E, Serrano-Muñoz D, Avendaño-Coy J, Gómez-Soriano J. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for spasticity: A systematic review. Neurología (English Edition). (2019) 34:451–60. 10.1016/j.nrleng.2018.08.001
    1. Marcolino MAZ, Hauck M, Stein C, Schardong J, Pagnussat AdS, Plentz RDM. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation alone or as additional therapy on chronic post-stroke spasticity: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Disabil Rehabil. (2020) 42:623–35. 10.1080/09638288.2018.1503736
    1. Perez MA, Field-Fote EC, Floeter MK. Patterned sensory stimulation induces plasticity in reciprocal ia inhibition in humans. J Neurosci. (2003) 23:2014–8. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-06-02014.2003
    1. Karakoyun A, Boyraz I, Gunduz R, Karamercan A, Ozgirgin N. Electrophysiological and clinical evaluation of the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the spasticity in the hemiplegic stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. (2015) 27:3407–11. 10.1589/jpts.27.3407
    1. Westerlund MO, Sjöberg E, Sandell J, Sandström C, Lauritsen HK, Lundqvist F. The Inerventions Method-follow up and long term use of a new possible therapy for patients with spasticity. Available online at: (accessed September 1, 2020).
    1. Wong C, Torabi TP, Mortensen K, Michelsen J. The Mollii-suit®-A novel method using reciprocal inhibition in children with cerebral palsy, gross motor function classification system IV-V: a 6-month prospective study. Toxicon. (2018) 156:S116. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.11.279
    1. Palmcrantz S, Pennati GV, Bergling H, Borg J. Feasibility and potential effects of using the electro-dress Mollii on spasticity and functioning in chronic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. (2020) 17:109. 10.1186/s12984-020-00740-z
    1. Pennati GV, Plantin J, Borg J, Lindberg PG. Normative NeuroFlexor data for detection of spasticity after stroke: a cross-sectional study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. (2016) 13:30. 10.1186/s12984-016-0133-x
    1. Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther. (1984) 64:35–40. 10.1093/ptj/64.1.35
    1. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. (1965) 14:61–5. 10.1037/t02366-000
    1. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. (1975). 7:13–31.
    1. Lindberg PG, Gaverth J, Islam M, Fagergren A, Borg J, Forssberg H. Validation of a new biomechanical model to measure muscle tone in spastic muscles. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2011) 25:617–25. 10.1177/1545968311403494
    1. Gaverth J, Sandgren M, Lindberg PG, Forssberg H, Eliasson AC. TEST-RETEST AND INTER-RATER RELIABILITY OF A METHOD TO MEASURE WRIST AND FINGER SPASTICITY. J Rehabil Med. (2013) 45:630–6. 10.2340/16501977-1160
    1. Gaverth J, Eliasson AC, Kullander K, Borg J, Lindberg PG, Forssberg H. Sensitivity of the NeuroFlexor method to measure change in spasticity after treatment with botulinum toxin A in wrist and finger muscles. J Rehabil Med. (2014) 46:629–34. 10.2340/16501977-1824
    1. Hermens HJ, Freriks B. Recommendations for Sensor Locations on Individual Muscles: The SENIAM Project (Surface ElectroMyoGraphy for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles). Available online at: . (accessed August 1, 2017).
    1. Boone DC, Azen SP, Lin CM, Spence C, Baron C, Lee L. Reliability of goniometric measurements. Phys Ther. (1978) 58:1355–60. 10.1093/ptj/58.11.1355
    1. Potisk KP, Gregoric M, Vodovnik L. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on spasticity in patients with hemiplegia. Scand J Rehabil Med. (1995) 27:169–74.
    1. Ping Ho Chung B, Kam Kwan Cheng B. Immediate effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury. Clin Rehabil. (2010) 24:202–10. 10.1177/0269215509343235
    1. Cho HY, In TS, Cho KH, Song CH. A single trial of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) improves spasticity and balance in patients with chronic stroke. Tohoku J Exp Med. (2013) 229:187–93. 10.1620/tjem.229.187
    1. Aydin G, Tomruk S, Keles I, Demir S, Orkun S. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus baclofen in spasticity: clinical and electrophysiologic comparison. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. (2005) 84:584–92. 10.1097/01.phm.0000171173.86312.69
    1. Crone C, Nielsen J, Petersen N, Ballegaard M, Hultborn H. Disynaptic reciprocal inhibition of ankle extensors in spastic patients. Brain. (1994) 117 (Pt 5):1161–8. 10.1093/brain/117.5.1161
    1. Koyama S, Tanabe S, Takeda K, Sakurai H, Kanada Y. Modulation of spinal inhibitory reflexes depends on the frequency of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in spastic stroke survivors. Somatosens Mot Res. (2016) 33:8–15. 10.3109/08990220.2016.1142436
    1. Joodaki MR, Olyaei GR, Bagheri H. The effects of electrical nerve stimulation of the lower extremity on H-reflex and F-wave parameters. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. (2001) 41:23–8.
    1. Levin MF, Hui-Chan CW. Relief of hemiparetic spasticity by TENS is associated with improvement in reflex and voluntary motor functions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. (1992) 85:131–42. 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90079-Q
    1. Tinazzi M, Zarattini S, Valeriani M, Romito S, Farina S, Moretto G, et al. . Long-lasting modulation of human motor cortex following prolonged transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of forearm muscles: evidence of reciprocal inhibition and facilitation. Exp Brain Res. (2005) 161:457–64. 10.1007/s00221-004-2091-y
    1. Gracies JM, Marosszeky JE, Renton R, Sandanam J, Gandevia SC, Burke D. Short-term effects of dynamic lycra splints on upper limb in hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2000) 81:1547–55. 10.1053/apmr.2000.16346
    1. Karadag-Saygi E, Giray E. The clinical aspects and effectiveness of suit therapies for cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. (2019) 65:93–110. 10.5606/tftrd.2019.3431
    1. Ertzgaard P, Alwin J, Sorbo A, Lindgren M, Sandsjo L. Evaluation of a self-administered transcutaneous electrical stimulation concept for the treatment of spasticity: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. (2018) 54:507–17. 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04791-8

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnieren