- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04076878
Effects of Using the Electrodress Mollii on Spasticity
Effects of Using the Electrodress Mollii to Reduce Spasticity and Enhance Functioning After Stroke.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Stockholm
-
Danderyd, Stockholm, Sweden, SE18288
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Eligible participants had
- suffered a stroke > 12 months earlier
- were living with hemiplegia affecting the right or the left side of the body including both upper and lower extremity function
- were able to walk with assistance or independently according to the Functional Ambulatory Categories (Holden 1984) with a score of 2-5
- activity in upper extremity was limited according to the Action Research Arm test (ARAT) (Nordin 2014) but could perform a grasp and grip movement
- were > 17 years old, able to understand instructions as well as written and oral study information and could express informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- no detected neural component exceeding the cut off for spasticity according to the Neuroflexor (> 3. 4 Newton) in the wrist flexors
- contractures not compatible with performing the Neurofexor test or walking
- any other disorder with an impact on sensorimotor function
- any other severe concomitant disease (such as cancer, cardiovascular, inflammatory or psychiatric disease), uncontrolled epilepsy or blood pressure, major surgery during the last year, any implanted medical devices
- pregnancy
- BMI>35
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Intervention in a Mechanism and a Clinical substudy
Mechanism substudy: 3 trial sessions ( electrodes set to 1) 20 Hz, 2) 30 Hz, 3) 0 Hz (placebo). Patients and datacollectors were blinded in terms of the randomised order of the treatment at each of the 3 trial sessions ( electrodes set to 1) 20 Hz, 2) 30 Hz, 3) 0 Hz (placebo). Clinical substudy: Use of the fitted and individually set body suit, Mollii, in the home setting for 6 weeks |
The Mollii method is provided in a tight fitting, whole body suit with multiple electrodes that can be set individually.
The Mollii method uses low frequencies and low intensities that evokes sensory input but does not directly elicit muscle contractions.
The theoretical background of this treatment method primarily refers to the concept of reciprocal inhibition, i.e. that sensory input from a muscle may inhibit the activation of an antagonistic muscle through the activation of the disynaptic reciprocal Ia inhibitory pathway.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mechanism substudy and Clinical substudy: NeuroFlexor
Time Frame: Mechanism study: To assess change, NeuroFlexor data is recorded before, during and 10 minutes after treatment at each session. Clinical study: To assess change Neuroflexor data is collected before and after the 6 week intervention.
|
Measure related to spasticity: The Neuroflexor device comprises a portable computer-controlled step motor system with a lever arm that generates constant velocity movements of the wrist or ankle.
The passive resistive force of the wrist or ankle is recorded by a force transducer.
The force is then analyzed off-line and the total resistance is separated into mechanical and a neural components using a neuro-biomechanical computerized model.
NeuroFlexor neural component reflecting stretch reflex mediated resistance, represents the main outcome.
The NeuroFlexor hand (used in mechanism and clinical substudy) and foot module (used in mechansim substudy only) is a valid method that quantifies and distinguishes the genuine spasticity and the mechanical contributions (viscoelastic and soft tissue components) of the resistance opposing a passive stretch.
|
Mechanism study: To assess change, NeuroFlexor data is recorded before, during and 10 minutes after treatment at each session. Clinical study: To assess change Neuroflexor data is collected before and after the 6 week intervention.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mechanism substudy: Surface electromyography
Time Frame: To assess change sEMG are assessed before and after 60 min of treatment at each session.
|
Measure related to spasticity: Surface electromyography (sEMG) signal of spastic muscles in the upper and lower limb (flexor carpi radialis, medial gastrocnemius and soleus muscles).
|
To assess change sEMG are assessed before and after 60 min of treatment at each session.
|
Mechanism substudy: Modified Ashworth scale:
Time Frame: Before and after 60 min of treatment at each session to assess change
|
Clinical assessment of spasticity on a 5 point scale ranging from 0= no spasticity to 5= rigidity
|
Before and after 60 min of treatment at each session to assess change
|
Mechanism substudy: Semi structured interview
Time Frame: During the 60 min of treatment at each session
|
To assess perceived effects of each intervention
|
During the 60 min of treatment at each session
|
Clinical substudy: the Fugl-Meyer scale
Time Frame: Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Clinical assessment of motor sensory function of the upper (min 0 p and max 126p) and lower extremity (min 0 p and max 86p).
Max point indicates no detected impairment.
|
Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Clinical substudy: Modified Ashworth scale
Time Frame: Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Clinical assessment of spasticity on a 5 point scale ranging from 0= no spasticity to 5= rigidity
|
Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Clinical substudy: Barthel Index
Time Frame: Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Assessment of self-care and mobility (min 0 p and max 100p).
Max point indicates independence
|
Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Clinical substudy: Berg balance scale
Time Frame: Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Clinical assessment of balance (max 56p).
Max point indicate no limitations in balance.
|
Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Clinical substudy: Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Assessment of cognitive function (min 0 p and max 30p).
Max point indicate no impairment.
|
Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Clinical substudy: Action Research Arm Test
Time Frame: Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Clinical assessment of activity in upper extremity (max 57 p).
Max point indicate no limitation.
|
Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Clinical substudy: A digital hand dynamometer
Time Frame: Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Clinical assessment of grip strength in kilograms.
|
Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Clinical substudy: 10 meter walk test
Time Frame: Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Clinical assessment of walking speed (m/s)
|
Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Clinical substudy: 6 min walk test
Time Frame: Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Clinical assessment of walking endurance (meters)
|
Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Clinical substudy: Functional Ambulation Category
Time Frame: Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Assessment of indedence in walking (min 0 p and max 5p) Max point indicate independence
|
Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Clinical substudy: Stroke Impact Scale
Time Frame: Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Self-perceived functioning and disability (min 0 p and max 100p/item).
Max point indicate no perceived disability.
|
Before and after the 6 week intervention to assess change
|
Clinical substudy: Weekly semistructured telephone interview
Time Frame: Weekly during the 6 week intervention
|
To assess compliance, perceived effects and adverse events.
|
Weekly during the 6 week intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Susanne Palmcrantz, PhD, Danderyd Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Gaverth J, Eliasson AC, Kullander K, Borg J, Lindberg PG, Forssberg H. Sensitivity of the NeuroFlexor method to measure change in spasticity after treatment with botulinum toxin A in wrist and finger muscles. J Rehabil Med. 2014 Jul;46(7):629-34. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1824.
- Gaverth J, Sandgren M, Lindberg PG, Forssberg H, Eliasson AC. Test-retest and inter-rater reliability of a method to measure wrist and finger spasticity. J Rehabil Med. 2013 Jul;45(7):630-6. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1160.
- Lindberg PG, Gaverth J, Islam M, Fagergren A, Borg J, Forssberg H. Validation of a new biomechanical model to measure muscle tone in spastic muscles. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Sep;25(7):617-25. doi: 10.1177/1545968311403494. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
- Pennati GV, Bergling H, Carment L, Borg J, Lindberg PG, Palmcrantz S. Effects of 60 Min Electrostimulation With the EXOPULSE Mollii Suit on Objective Signs of Spasticity. Front Neurol. 2021 Oct 15;12:706610. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.706610. eCollection 2021.
- Palmcrantz S, Pennati GV, Bergling H, Borg J. Feasibility and potential effects of using the electro-dress Mollii on spasticity and functioning in chronic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Aug 10;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00740-z.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Mollii for spasticity
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, CryptogenicSingapore, Philippines
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; University of Alabama at BirminghamEnrolling by invitationStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Engagement, Patient | Stroke HemorrhagicUnited States
-
University of MinnesotaAmerican Occupational Therapy FoundationRecruitingStroke | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke IschemicUnited States
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Michael Smith Foundation for...RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Chronic StrokeCanada
-
University of CincinnatiMedical University of South Carolina; University of California, Los Angeles; University...RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke HemorrhagicUnited States
-
University of LiegeCompletedStroke, Acute | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, ComplicationBelgium
-
Turkish Stroke Research and Clinical Trials NetworkElectroCore INC; Turkish Neurological SocietyCompletedStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke, HemorrhagicTurkey
Clinical Trials on Mollii
-
Institut De La Colonne Vertebrale Et Des NeurosciencesCompleted
-
Exoneural Network ABHannover Medical School; Ottobock SE & Co. KGaA; Pohlig GmbHRecruitingCerebral Palsy | Hemiplegia | Tetraplegia | Pain Syndrome | Spasticity | Balance | Muscle | DiplegiaGermany
-
Danderyd HospitalRecruitingStroke | Pain, Shoulder | Technology | TherapeuticsSweden
-
Exoneural Network ABNot yet recruitingStroke | Multiple Sclerosis | Cerebral Palsy | Spinal Cord Injuries | Neurologic DisorderSweden
-
Sheikh Shakhbout Medical CityRecruitingNervous System Diseases | Rheumatic Diseases | Muscular Diseases | Neuromuscular Diseases | FibromyalgiaUnited Arab Emirates
-
Sheikh Shakhbout Medical CityRecruitingStroke | Spasticity, Muscle | SpasticUnited Arab Emirates
-
KK Women's and Children's HospitalInerventions ABRecruitingCerebral Palsy | Spasticity, MuscleSingapore
-
Sormland County Council, SwedenCompletedSpastic Cerebral PalsySweden
-
Linkoeping UniversityUniversity Hospital, Linkoeping; Sodra Alvsborgs Hospital; University of BorasCompletedStroke | Cerebral Palsy | Spasticity
-
Institut De La Colonne Vertebrale Et Des NeurosciencesRecruiting