- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT01991743
A Trial Comparing Combined Spinal- Epidural Dosing Strategies for External Cephalic Version
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Combined Spinal- Epidural Dosing Strategies for External Cephalic Version
We plan to conduct a prospective, single blinded, randomized clinical trial to assess the impact of combined spinal-epidural dosing on the success rate of, and patient satisfaction during, external version for breech fetal position and the incidence of vaginal vs. Cesarean delivery.
The research aim of this project is to determine the ideal neuraxial dosing strategy to maximize success of external cephalic version (ECV).
The research questions, does a combined spinal-epidural (CSE) of a higher dose result in greater success in converting a breech presentation to vertex during external cephalic version (ECV).
The hypotheses of this project is that CSE at higher dose will result in greater ECV success than analgesic dosing.
The research significance:Increasing the success and comfort of ECV for fetal malpresentation may help decrease the cesarean section rate.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
At term 2 to 3% of singleton pregnancies are in breech presentation. Many of these deliveries are managed by cesarean delivery due to higher neonatal morbidity associated with vaginal breech delivery. However, cesarean delivery, the safer option for the baby, is associated with a higher incidence of maternal complications for both the current and subsequent pregnancies. External cephalic version (ECV) is a procedure commonly used to attempt to manually rotate the fetus into vertex position. This facilitates vaginal delivery and thus avoids higher maternal and/or neonatal complications. (Hofmeyr Cochrane Review) Obstetricians generally perform versions after 36 weeks gestational age with a reportable success rate of 50-80%, depending on several factors, including patient characteristics. (Fortunato, Zhang, ACOG 1997 ECV) The most common technique involves external manipulation of the fetal position preceded by pharmacologic uterine relaxation. Until recently, pain relief was generally provided in the form of intravenous opioids such as fentanyl. A more efficacious form of analgesia is the use of neuraxial opioids and local anesthetics (neuraxial analgesia), a technique commonly used for labor and delivery analgesia.
Two non-randomized studies of neuraxial analgesia compared to systemic analgesia found improved success of external cephalic version in the neuraxial analgesia groups.(Carlan, Birnbach) Three randomized trials have conflicting results: 2 demonstrate an increase in success, one shows no difference. (Dugoff, Schorr, Mancuso) None of these studies have blinded the obstetrician performing the version. In 2010, Lavoie and colleagues completed a meta-analysis looking at ECV performed under analgesic and anesthetic neuraxial doses. The analgesic dose included spinal bupivacaine and epidural dosing. The anesthestic groups gave higher doses of spinal or epidural bupivacaine. This meta-analysis suggested that those patients who had received an anesthetic dose of had more successful ECV. All published studies examining pain outcomes have demonstrated that neuraxial analgesia results in greater patient comfort during this procedure.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has stated, "Currently there is not enough evidence to make a recommendation favoring or opposing anesthesia during ECV (external cephalic version) attempts."
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, Estados Unidos, 60611
- Prentice Women's Hospital
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy patients age 18 and older
- Breech presentation
- Singleton gestation .scheduled for ECV desiring CSE.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal
- Contraindication to neuraxial (coagulopathy, anticoagulant use, local infection, sepsis etc) .Rupture of membranes.
- Drop-out: Patients may choose to drop-out of the study at any time. The physicians involved in this study may choose to end a patient's involvement in the study at their discretion.
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Tratamiento
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Doble
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador activo: Drug:Group 2.5
Administration of 2.5 mg bupivacaine
|
Administration of bupivacaine 2.5 mg.
Otros nombres:
|
|
Comparador activo: Group 5
Administration of 5 mg bupivacaine.
|
Administration of 5 mg bupivacaine
Otros nombres:
|
|
Comparador activo: Group 7.5
Administration of 7.5mg bupivacaine.
|
Administration of 7.5 mg bupivacaine
Otros nombres:
|
|
Comparador activo: Group 10
Administration of 10 mg bupivacaine.
|
Administration of 10mg bupivacaine.
Otros nombres:
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Success Rate of External Cephalic Version
Periodo de tiempo: Completion of the procedure
|
Rates of successful version evaluated among the 4 dose groups.
|
Completion of the procedure
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Mode of Delivery
Periodo de tiempo: To time of delivery
|
To time of delivery
|
|
|
Indication of Cesarean Delivery
Periodo de tiempo: To time of delivery
|
To time of delivery
|
|
|
Pain Score During the Procedure
Periodo de tiempo: < 20 minutes
|
pain score during the procedure (Visual Analog Score: VAS=0 no pain -100 worst pain imaginable, scale)
|
< 20 minutes
|
|
Abdominal Relaxation
Periodo de tiempo: <20 minutes
|
Obstetrician rating of participants abdominal relaxation (Visual analog score: VAS score= 0 no relaxation- complete relaxation 100)
|
<20 minutes
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Director de estudio: David Walega, MD, Northwestern University
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Publicaciones Generales
- Lavoie A, Guay J. Anesthetic dose neuraxial blockade increases the success rate of external fetal version: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2010 May;57(5):408-14. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9278-4. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
- Fortunato SJ, Mercer LJ, Guzick DS. External cephalic version with tocolysis: factors associated with success. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jul;72(1):59-62.
- Zhang J, Bowes WA Jr, Fortney JA. Efficacy of external cephalic version: a review. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Aug;82(2):306-12.
- Carlan SJ, Dent JM, Huckaby T, Whittington EC, Shaefer D. The effect of epidural anesthesia on safety and success of external cephalic version at term. Anesth Analg. 1994 Sep;79(3):525-8. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199409000-00021.
- Birnbach DJ, Matut J, Stein DJ, Campagnuolo J, Drimbarean C, Grunebaum A, Kuroda MM, Thys DM. The effect of intrathecal analgesia on the success of external cephalic version. Anesth Analg. 2001 Aug;93(2):410-3, 4th contents page. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200108000-00035.
- Hofmeyr GJ. Interventions to help external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(2):CD000184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000184.
- ACOG practice patterns. External cephalic version. Number 4, July 1997. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997 Oct;59(1):73-80. No abstract available.
- Dugoff L, Stamm CA, Jones OW 3rd, Mohling SI, Hawkins JL. The effect of spinal anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Mar;93(3):345-9. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00456-6.
- Schorr SJ, Speights SE, Ross EL, Bofill JA, Rust OA, Norman PF, Morrison JC. A randomized trial of epidural anesthesia to improve external cephalic version success. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;177(5):1133-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70029-2.
- Mancuso KM, Yancey MK, Murphy JA, Markenson GR. Epidural analgesia for cephalic version: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 May;95(5):648-51. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00611-0.
- Sullivan JT, Grobman WA, Bauchat JR, Scavone BM, Grouper S, McCarthy RJ, Wong CA. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of combined spinal-epidural analgesia on the success of external cephalic version for breech presentation. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009 Oct;18(4):328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.02.006. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- STU00050371
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .