- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk forsøg NCT01991743
A Trial Comparing Combined Spinal- Epidural Dosing Strategies for External Cephalic Version
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Combined Spinal- Epidural Dosing Strategies for External Cephalic Version
We plan to conduct a prospective, single blinded, randomized clinical trial to assess the impact of combined spinal-epidural dosing on the success rate of, and patient satisfaction during, external version for breech fetal position and the incidence of vaginal vs. Cesarean delivery.
The research aim of this project is to determine the ideal neuraxial dosing strategy to maximize success of external cephalic version (ECV).
The research questions, does a combined spinal-epidural (CSE) of a higher dose result in greater success in converting a breech presentation to vertex during external cephalic version (ECV).
The hypotheses of this project is that CSE at higher dose will result in greater ECV success than analgesic dosing.
The research significance:Increasing the success and comfort of ECV for fetal malpresentation may help decrease the cesarean section rate.
Studieoversigt
Status
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljeret beskrivelse
At term 2 to 3% of singleton pregnancies are in breech presentation. Many of these deliveries are managed by cesarean delivery due to higher neonatal morbidity associated with vaginal breech delivery. However, cesarean delivery, the safer option for the baby, is associated with a higher incidence of maternal complications for both the current and subsequent pregnancies. External cephalic version (ECV) is a procedure commonly used to attempt to manually rotate the fetus into vertex position. This facilitates vaginal delivery and thus avoids higher maternal and/or neonatal complications. (Hofmeyr Cochrane Review) Obstetricians generally perform versions after 36 weeks gestational age with a reportable success rate of 50-80%, depending on several factors, including patient characteristics. (Fortunato, Zhang, ACOG 1997 ECV) The most common technique involves external manipulation of the fetal position preceded by pharmacologic uterine relaxation. Until recently, pain relief was generally provided in the form of intravenous opioids such as fentanyl. A more efficacious form of analgesia is the use of neuraxial opioids and local anesthetics (neuraxial analgesia), a technique commonly used for labor and delivery analgesia.
Two non-randomized studies of neuraxial analgesia compared to systemic analgesia found improved success of external cephalic version in the neuraxial analgesia groups.(Carlan, Birnbach) Three randomized trials have conflicting results: 2 demonstrate an increase in success, one shows no difference. (Dugoff, Schorr, Mancuso) None of these studies have blinded the obstetrician performing the version. In 2010, Lavoie and colleagues completed a meta-analysis looking at ECV performed under analgesic and anesthetic neuraxial doses. The analgesic dose included spinal bupivacaine and epidural dosing. The anesthestic groups gave higher doses of spinal or epidural bupivacaine. This meta-analysis suggested that those patients who had received an anesthetic dose of had more successful ECV. All published studies examining pain outcomes have demonstrated that neuraxial analgesia results in greater patient comfort during this procedure.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has stated, "Currently there is not enough evidence to make a recommendation favoring or opposing anesthesia during ECV (external cephalic version) attempts."
Undersøgelsestype
Tilmelding (Faktiske)
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Studiesteder
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, Forenede Stater, 60611
- Prentice Women's Hospital
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Køn, der er berettiget til at studere
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy patients age 18 and older
- Breech presentation
- Singleton gestation .scheduled for ECV desiring CSE.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal
- Contraindication to neuraxial (coagulopathy, anticoagulant use, local infection, sepsis etc) .Rupture of membranes.
- Drop-out: Patients may choose to drop-out of the study at any time. The physicians involved in this study may choose to end a patient's involvement in the study at their discretion.
Studieplan
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Dobbelt
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Aktiv komparator: Drug:Group 2.5
Administration of 2.5 mg bupivacaine
|
Administration of bupivacaine 2.5 mg.
Andre navne:
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Group 5
Administration of 5 mg bupivacaine.
|
Administration of 5 mg bupivacaine
Andre navne:
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Group 7.5
Administration of 7.5mg bupivacaine.
|
Administration of 7.5 mg bupivacaine
Andre navne:
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Group 10
Administration of 10 mg bupivacaine.
|
Administration of 10mg bupivacaine.
Andre navne:
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Success Rate of External Cephalic Version
Tidsramme: Completion of the procedure
|
Rates of successful version evaluated among the 4 dose groups.
|
Completion of the procedure
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Mode of Delivery
Tidsramme: To time of delivery
|
To time of delivery
|
|
|
Indication of Cesarean Delivery
Tidsramme: To time of delivery
|
To time of delivery
|
|
|
Pain Score During the Procedure
Tidsramme: < 20 minutes
|
pain score during the procedure (Visual Analog Score: VAS=0 no pain -100 worst pain imaginable, scale)
|
< 20 minutes
|
|
Abdominal Relaxation
Tidsramme: <20 minutes
|
Obstetrician rating of participants abdominal relaxation (Visual analog score: VAS score= 0 no relaxation- complete relaxation 100)
|
<20 minutes
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Sponsor
Efterforskere
- Studieleder: David Walega, MD, Northwestern University
Publikationer og nyttige links
Generelle publikationer
- Lavoie A, Guay J. Anesthetic dose neuraxial blockade increases the success rate of external fetal version: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2010 May;57(5):408-14. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9278-4. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
- Fortunato SJ, Mercer LJ, Guzick DS. External cephalic version with tocolysis: factors associated with success. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jul;72(1):59-62.
- Zhang J, Bowes WA Jr, Fortney JA. Efficacy of external cephalic version: a review. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Aug;82(2):306-12.
- Carlan SJ, Dent JM, Huckaby T, Whittington EC, Shaefer D. The effect of epidural anesthesia on safety and success of external cephalic version at term. Anesth Analg. 1994 Sep;79(3):525-8. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199409000-00021.
- Birnbach DJ, Matut J, Stein DJ, Campagnuolo J, Drimbarean C, Grunebaum A, Kuroda MM, Thys DM. The effect of intrathecal analgesia on the success of external cephalic version. Anesth Analg. 2001 Aug;93(2):410-3, 4th contents page. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200108000-00035.
- Hofmeyr GJ. Interventions to help external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(2):CD000184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000184.
- ACOG practice patterns. External cephalic version. Number 4, July 1997. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997 Oct;59(1):73-80. No abstract available.
- Dugoff L, Stamm CA, Jones OW 3rd, Mohling SI, Hawkins JL. The effect of spinal anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Mar;93(3):345-9. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00456-6.
- Schorr SJ, Speights SE, Ross EL, Bofill JA, Rust OA, Norman PF, Morrison JC. A randomized trial of epidural anesthesia to improve external cephalic version success. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;177(5):1133-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70029-2.
- Mancuso KM, Yancey MK, Murphy JA, Markenson GR. Epidural analgesia for cephalic version: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 May;95(5):648-51. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00611-0.
- Sullivan JT, Grobman WA, Bauchat JR, Scavone BM, Grouper S, McCarthy RJ, Wong CA. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of combined spinal-epidural analgesia on the success of external cephalic version for breech presentation. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009 Oct;18(4):328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.02.006. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
Datoer for undersøgelser
Studer store datoer
Studiestart
Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)
Studieafslutning (Faktiske)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først opslået (Skøn)
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidst verificeret
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- STU00050371
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .
Kliniske forsøg med Smerte
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaRekrutteringPatellofemoral Pain, PfpTyrkiet (Türkiye)
-
Beijing Sport UniversityIkke rekrutterer endnuPatellofemoral Pain, Pfp
-
Beijing Sport UniversityIkke rekrutterer endnu
-
Pamukkale UniversityIkke rekrutterer endnuPatellofemoral Pain, PfpTyrkiet (Türkiye)
-
Beijing Sport UniversityAfsluttetPatellofemoral Pain, PfpKina
-
Future University in EgyptAfsluttet
-
Camilo Jose Cela UniversityAfsluttetMyofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS)Spanien
-
Sahmyook UniversityAfsluttetMyofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS)Sydkorea
-
Izmir Tinaztepe UniversityEge UniversityIkke rekrutterer endnuRygliggende stilling | FLACC Skala | Behavioral Pain Scale
-
University of California, DavisNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Center for Complementary...RekrutteringKronisk lænderygsmerter (cLBP) | Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS)Forenede Stater
Kliniske forsøg med Group 2.5
-
Abiomed Inc.McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University...Afsluttet
-
Abiomed Inc.AfsluttetST-elevation Myokardieinfarkt
-
University Hospital, CaenAfsluttetMyokardieinfarkt | Chok, kardiogentFrankrig
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.AfsluttetRheumatoid arthritis | Traumatisk gigt | Slidgigt SkuldreForenede Stater
-
Abiomed Inc.AfsluttetAkut myokardieinfarktForenede Stater
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalRekrutteringKunstig intelligensTyrkiet (Türkiye)
-
Abiomed Inc.AfsluttetKoronararteriesygdomForenede Stater, Holland, Canada
-
Centro de Atenção ao Assoalho PélvicoIndústria Brasileira Equipamentos Médicos - IBRAMEDRekrutteringErektil dysfunktionBrasilien
-
Cappagh National Orthopaedic HospitalConturaRekrutteringSlidgigt | Slidgigt i knæet | Intraartikulær injektionIrland
-
Vivek ReddyAbiomed Inc.AfsluttetVentrikulær takykardiForenede Stater