Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

A Trial Comparing Combined Spinal- Epidural Dosing Strategies for External Cephalic Version

15. december 2019 opdateret af: David Walega, Northwestern University

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Combined Spinal- Epidural Dosing Strategies for External Cephalic Version

We plan to conduct a prospective, single blinded, randomized clinical trial to assess the impact of combined spinal-epidural dosing on the success rate of, and patient satisfaction during, external version for breech fetal position and the incidence of vaginal vs. Cesarean delivery.

The research aim of this project is to determine the ideal neuraxial dosing strategy to maximize success of external cephalic version (ECV).

The research questions, does a combined spinal-epidural (CSE) of a higher dose result in greater success in converting a breech presentation to vertex during external cephalic version (ECV).

The hypotheses of this project is that CSE at higher dose will result in greater ECV success than analgesic dosing.

The research significance:Increasing the success and comfort of ECV for fetal malpresentation may help decrease the cesarean section rate.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

At term 2 to 3% of singleton pregnancies are in breech presentation. Many of these deliveries are managed by cesarean delivery due to higher neonatal morbidity associated with vaginal breech delivery. However, cesarean delivery, the safer option for the baby, is associated with a higher incidence of maternal complications for both the current and subsequent pregnancies. External cephalic version (ECV) is a procedure commonly used to attempt to manually rotate the fetus into vertex position. This facilitates vaginal delivery and thus avoids higher maternal and/or neonatal complications. (Hofmeyr Cochrane Review) Obstetricians generally perform versions after 36 weeks gestational age with a reportable success rate of 50-80%, depending on several factors, including patient characteristics. (Fortunato, Zhang, ACOG 1997 ECV) The most common technique involves external manipulation of the fetal position preceded by pharmacologic uterine relaxation. Until recently, pain relief was generally provided in the form of intravenous opioids such as fentanyl. A more efficacious form of analgesia is the use of neuraxial opioids and local anesthetics (neuraxial analgesia), a technique commonly used for labor and delivery analgesia.

Two non-randomized studies of neuraxial analgesia compared to systemic analgesia found improved success of external cephalic version in the neuraxial analgesia groups.(Carlan, Birnbach) Three randomized trials have conflicting results: 2 demonstrate an increase in success, one shows no difference. (Dugoff, Schorr, Mancuso) None of these studies have blinded the obstetrician performing the version. In 2010, Lavoie and colleagues completed a meta-analysis looking at ECV performed under analgesic and anesthetic neuraxial doses. The analgesic dose included spinal bupivacaine and epidural dosing. The anesthestic groups gave higher doses of spinal or epidural bupivacaine. This meta-analysis suggested that those patients who had received an anesthetic dose of had more successful ECV. All published studies examining pain outcomes have demonstrated that neuraxial analgesia results in greater patient comfort during this procedure.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has stated, "Currently there is not enough evidence to make a recommendation favoring or opposing anesthesia during ECV (external cephalic version) attempts."

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

240

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, Forenede Stater, 60611
        • Prentice Women's Hospital

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Kvinde

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy patients age 18 and older
  • Breech presentation
  • Singleton gestation .scheduled for ECV desiring CSE.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal
  • Contraindication to neuraxial (coagulopathy, anticoagulant use, local infection, sepsis etc) .Rupture of membranes.
  • Drop-out: Patients may choose to drop-out of the study at any time. The physicians involved in this study may choose to end a patient's involvement in the study at their discretion.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Dobbelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Drug:Group 2.5
Administration of 2.5 mg bupivacaine
Administration of bupivacaine 2.5 mg.
Andre navne:
  • 2.5 mg bupivacaine
Aktiv komparator: Group 5
Administration of 5 mg bupivacaine.
Administration of 5 mg bupivacaine
Andre navne:
  • 5 mg bupivacaine
Aktiv komparator: Group 7.5
Administration of 7.5mg bupivacaine.
Administration of 7.5 mg bupivacaine
Andre navne:
  • Administration of 7.5 mg bupivacaine.
Aktiv komparator: Group 10
Administration of 10 mg bupivacaine.
Administration of 10mg bupivacaine.
Andre navne:
  • Administration of 10mg bupivacaine.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Success Rate of External Cephalic Version
Tidsramme: Completion of the procedure
Rates of successful version evaluated among the 4 dose groups.
Completion of the procedure

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Mode of Delivery
Tidsramme: To time of delivery
To time of delivery
Indication of Cesarean Delivery
Tidsramme: To time of delivery
To time of delivery
Pain Score During the Procedure
Tidsramme: < 20 minutes
pain score during the procedure (Visual Analog Score: VAS=0 no pain -100 worst pain imaginable, scale)
< 20 minutes
Abdominal Relaxation
Tidsramme: <20 minutes
Obstetrician rating of participants abdominal relaxation (Visual analog score: VAS score= 0 no relaxation- complete relaxation 100)
<20 minutes

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Studieleder: David Walega, MD, Northwestern University

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Generelle publikationer

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. maj 2011

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. oktober 2016

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. januar 2017

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

29. oktober 2013

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

18. november 2013

Først opslået (Skøn)

25. november 2013

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

6. januar 2020

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

15. december 2019

Sidst verificeret

1. december 2019

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Smerte

Kliniske forsøg med Group 2.5

Abonner