Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Pre-Hospital Advanced Airway Management in the Nordic Countries (PHAST)

21 de agosto de 2017 actualizado por: Mikael Gellerfors, Karolinska Institutet

Pre-Hospital Advanced Airway Management in the Nordic Countries - A Prospective Multicentre Observational Study

Pre-Hospital Advanced Airway Management (PHAAM) is a potentially lifesaving intervention. A recent Danish multicentre single country study demonstrated a 99,7% incidence of successful anaesthesiologist pre-hospital endotracheal intubation, with a PHAAM-related complication rate of 7.9%. A London study revealed a significantly higher intubation failure rate among non-anaesthesiologist physicians. In Scandinavia different types of emergency medical services (EMS) and professions provide PHAAM. The success rate of prehospital endotracheal intubation (PHETI), incidence of difficult intubation and complications in the Nordic countries is not known. The aim of this study is to define PHAAM success rate and complications in different types of Nordic EMS organisations and physician critical care teams. The study is a prospective observational study with collection of PHAAM data according to the template by Sollid et al. in the 12 participating Nordic Countries EMS/HEMS centres and physician critical care teams. The primary endpoint is PHETI success on ≤2 attempts and no complications.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Pre-Hospital Advanced Airway Management (PHAAM) is a potentially lifesaving intervention. A recent meta-analysis of >15.000 patients reported a variation in the prehospital endotracheal intubation (PHETI) success rate with different methods used and provider background. A recent prehospital study from London revealed a significantly higher intubation failure rate among non-anaesthesiologist physicians. In Scandinavia different types of emergency medical services (EMS) and professionals provide PHAAM. The success rate of PHETI, incidence of difficult intubation and complications in the Nordic countries is not known. Although the EMS structure in Scandinavia is reasonably similar, there are some inter- and intra-national differences regarding mission profile, staffing, systems for dispatch and on-scene management. A Danish PHAAM study demonstrated a 99,7% anaesthesiologist PHETI success rate with a 7,9% complication rate. The authors concluded the study was from a homogenous Danish system limiting the ability to generalise the findings to other systems with different staffing, caseload or case mix.

The PHAST investigators aim to provide prospective multicentre data on the pre-hospital intubation success rate and complications in the Nordic countries. Additionally the investigators will compare the PHAAM procedure for different subgroups of patients, regions and EMS organisations.

In the PHAST observational study twelve Nordic (Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland) Helicopter and Rapid Response Emergency Medical Services will include patients during 18 months. The decision to perform PHAAM is based on the discretion of prehospital provider. The PHAAM core data will be prospectively collected according the template by Sollid et al.

The primary endpoint is PHETI success on ≤2 attempts and no complications. Secondary endpoints include overall PHETI success rate, PHETI success on 1st, 2nd, 3rd and >3rd attempt, difficult PHETI, success rate of laryngeal mask and surgical airway, PHAAM complications and prehospital mortality.

Through predefined analysis of the data, the PHAST investigators hope to

  1. Describe the characteristics and outcome of advanced prehospital airway management.
  2. Identify which groups of critically injured or ill patients will benefit most from competent advanced prehospital airway management, and identify specific areas for future research.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Actual)

2028

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • VästraGötaland
      • Gothenburg, VästraGötaland, Suecia
        • HEMS VGR

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Método de muestreo

Muestra de probabilidad

Población de estudio

All patients requiring prehospital advanced airway management (PHAAM) by the Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and Ground EMS (GEMS) units in the study. PHAAM includes endotracheal intubation, supraglottic airway and percutaneous/surgical airway.

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

All patients requiring prehospital advanced airway management (PHAAM) by the Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and Ground EMS (GEMS) units in the study. PHAAM includes endotracheal intubation, supraglottic airway and percutaneous/surgical airway. The indications for performing PHAAM as categorised by Sollid et al. are

  • Decreased level of consciousness
  • Hypoxemia
  • Ineffective ventilation
  • Existing airway obstruction
  • Impending airway obstruction
  • Combative or uncooperative patient
  • Relief of pain or distress
  • Cardiopulmonary arrest
  • Other

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving advanced airway management during so-called secondary missions (or inter-hospital transfer)

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Modelos observacionales: Grupo
  • Perspectivas temporales: Futuro

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
PHETI ≤ 2attempts and no complications
Periodo de tiempo: At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
Prehospital Endotracheal Intubation success and complications as defined by Sollid et al (Sollid SJ, Lockey D, Lossius HM: A consensus-based template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:58.)
At hospital admission (</= 1 day)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
PHETI overall success rate
Periodo de tiempo: At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
PHETI= Prehospital Endotracheal Intubation as defined by Sollid et al (Sollid SJ, Lockey D, Lossius HM: A consensus-based template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:58.)
At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
PHETI success on 1st attempt and no complications
Periodo de tiempo: At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
Endpoint as defined by Sollid et al (Sollid SJ, Lockey D, Lossius HM: A consensus-based template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:58.)
At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
PHETI success rate on 1st, 2nd, 3rd and >3rd attempt
Periodo de tiempo: At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
PHETI success as defined by Sollid et al (Sollid SJ, Lockey D, Lossius HM: A consensus-based template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:58.)
At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
PHAAM Complications
Periodo de tiempo: At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
PHAAM Complications as defined by Sollid et al (Sollid SJ, Lockey D, Lossius HM: A consensus-based template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:58.)
At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
Success rate of airway back-up devices
Periodo de tiempo: At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
Endpoint as defined by Sollid et al (Sollid SJ, Lockey D, Lossius HM: A consensus-based template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:58.)
At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
Pre-hospital mortality
Periodo de tiempo: At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
Endpoint as defined by Sollid et al (Sollid SJ, Lockey D, Lossius HM: A consensus-based template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:58.)
At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
Other pre-specified endpoints and analysis as defined by the ERB-submitted protocol
Periodo de tiempo: At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
Endpoints as defined by Sollid et al (Sollid SJ, Lockey D, Lossius HM: A consensus-based template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:58.)
At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
Mortality
Periodo de tiempo: At hospital discharge (estimated average 7 days)
At hospital discharge (estimated average 7 days)
Mortalidad
Periodo de tiempo: A los 30 días
A los 30 días
PHETI ≤ 2attempts and no complications among patients with TBI
Periodo de tiempo: At hospital discharge (estimated average 7 days)
PHETI ≤ 2attempts and no complications among subgroup of patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. Prehospital Advanced Airway Management (PHAAM) success and complications as defined by Sollid et al (Sollid SJ, Lockey D, Lossius HM: A consensus-based template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:58.)
At hospital discharge (estimated average 7 days)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Silla de estudio: Hans Morten Lossius, MD, PhD, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de mayo de 2015

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de noviembre de 2016

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de marzo de 2017

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

7 de mayo de 2015

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

18 de mayo de 2015

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

21 de mayo de 2015

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

22 de agosto de 2017

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

21 de agosto de 2017

Última verificación

1 de agosto de 2017

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

Indeciso

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir