Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Pre-Hospital Advanced Airway Management in the Nordic Countries (PHAST)

21 agosto 2017 aggiornato da: Mikael Gellerfors, Karolinska Institutet

Pre-Hospital Advanced Airway Management in the Nordic Countries - A Prospective Multicentre Observational Study

Pre-Hospital Advanced Airway Management (PHAAM) is a potentially lifesaving intervention. A recent Danish multicentre single country study demonstrated a 99,7% incidence of successful anaesthesiologist pre-hospital endotracheal intubation, with a PHAAM-related complication rate of 7.9%. A London study revealed a significantly higher intubation failure rate among non-anaesthesiologist physicians. In Scandinavia different types of emergency medical services (EMS) and professions provide PHAAM. The success rate of prehospital endotracheal intubation (PHETI), incidence of difficult intubation and complications in the Nordic countries is not known. The aim of this study is to define PHAAM success rate and complications in different types of Nordic EMS organisations and physician critical care teams. The study is a prospective observational study with collection of PHAAM data according to the template by Sollid et al. in the 12 participating Nordic Countries EMS/HEMS centres and physician critical care teams. The primary endpoint is PHETI success on ≤2 attempts and no complications.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Pre-Hospital Advanced Airway Management (PHAAM) is a potentially lifesaving intervention. A recent meta-analysis of >15.000 patients reported a variation in the prehospital endotracheal intubation (PHETI) success rate with different methods used and provider background. A recent prehospital study from London revealed a significantly higher intubation failure rate among non-anaesthesiologist physicians. In Scandinavia different types of emergency medical services (EMS) and professionals provide PHAAM. The success rate of PHETI, incidence of difficult intubation and complications in the Nordic countries is not known. Although the EMS structure in Scandinavia is reasonably similar, there are some inter- and intra-national differences regarding mission profile, staffing, systems for dispatch and on-scene management. A Danish PHAAM study demonstrated a 99,7% anaesthesiologist PHETI success rate with a 7,9% complication rate. The authors concluded the study was from a homogenous Danish system limiting the ability to generalise the findings to other systems with different staffing, caseload or case mix.

The PHAST investigators aim to provide prospective multicentre data on the pre-hospital intubation success rate and complications in the Nordic countries. Additionally the investigators will compare the PHAAM procedure for different subgroups of patients, regions and EMS organisations.

In the PHAST observational study twelve Nordic (Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland) Helicopter and Rapid Response Emergency Medical Services will include patients during 18 months. The decision to perform PHAAM is based on the discretion of prehospital provider. The PHAAM core data will be prospectively collected according the template by Sollid et al.

The primary endpoint is PHETI success on ≤2 attempts and no complications. Secondary endpoints include overall PHETI success rate, PHETI success on 1st, 2nd, 3rd and >3rd attempt, difficult PHETI, success rate of laryngeal mask and surgical airway, PHAAM complications and prehospital mortality.

Through predefined analysis of the data, the PHAST investigators hope to

  1. Describe the characteristics and outcome of advanced prehospital airway management.
  2. Identify which groups of critically injured or ill patients will benefit most from competent advanced prehospital airway management, and identify specific areas for future research.

Tipo di studio

Osservativo

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

2028

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • VästraGötaland
      • Gothenburg, VästraGötaland, Svezia
        • HEMS VGR

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Bambino
  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Metodo di campionamento

Campione di probabilità

Popolazione di studio

All patients requiring prehospital advanced airway management (PHAAM) by the Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and Ground EMS (GEMS) units in the study. PHAAM includes endotracheal intubation, supraglottic airway and percutaneous/surgical airway.

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

All patients requiring prehospital advanced airway management (PHAAM) by the Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and Ground EMS (GEMS) units in the study. PHAAM includes endotracheal intubation, supraglottic airway and percutaneous/surgical airway. The indications for performing PHAAM as categorised by Sollid et al. are

  • Decreased level of consciousness
  • Hypoxemia
  • Ineffective ventilation
  • Existing airway obstruction
  • Impending airway obstruction
  • Combative or uncooperative patient
  • Relief of pain or distress
  • Cardiopulmonary arrest
  • Other

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving advanced airway management during so-called secondary missions (or inter-hospital transfer)

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Modelli osservazionali: Coorte
  • Prospettive temporali: Prospettiva

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
PHETI ≤ 2attempts and no complications
Lasso di tempo: At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
Prehospital Endotracheal Intubation success and complications as defined by Sollid et al (Sollid SJ, Lockey D, Lossius HM: A consensus-based template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:58.)
At hospital admission (</= 1 day)

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
PHETI overall success rate
Lasso di tempo: At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
PHETI= Prehospital Endotracheal Intubation as defined by Sollid et al (Sollid SJ, Lockey D, Lossius HM: A consensus-based template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:58.)
At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
PHETI success on 1st attempt and no complications
Lasso di tempo: At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
Endpoint as defined by Sollid et al (Sollid SJ, Lockey D, Lossius HM: A consensus-based template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:58.)
At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
PHETI success rate on 1st, 2nd, 3rd and >3rd attempt
Lasso di tempo: At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
PHETI success as defined by Sollid et al (Sollid SJ, Lockey D, Lossius HM: A consensus-based template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:58.)
At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
PHAAM Complications
Lasso di tempo: At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
PHAAM Complications as defined by Sollid et al (Sollid SJ, Lockey D, Lossius HM: A consensus-based template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:58.)
At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
Success rate of airway back-up devices
Lasso di tempo: At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
Endpoint as defined by Sollid et al (Sollid SJ, Lockey D, Lossius HM: A consensus-based template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:58.)
At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
Pre-hospital mortality
Lasso di tempo: At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
Endpoint as defined by Sollid et al (Sollid SJ, Lockey D, Lossius HM: A consensus-based template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:58.)
At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
Other pre-specified endpoints and analysis as defined by the ERB-submitted protocol
Lasso di tempo: At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
Endpoints as defined by Sollid et al (Sollid SJ, Lockey D, Lossius HM: A consensus-based template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:58.)
At hospital admission (</= 1 day)
Mortality
Lasso di tempo: At hospital discharge (estimated average 7 days)
At hospital discharge (estimated average 7 days)
Mortalità
Lasso di tempo: A 30 giorni
A 30 giorni
PHETI ≤ 2attempts and no complications among patients with TBI
Lasso di tempo: At hospital discharge (estimated average 7 days)
PHETI ≤ 2attempts and no complications among subgroup of patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. Prehospital Advanced Airway Management (PHAAM) success and complications as defined by Sollid et al (Sollid SJ, Lockey D, Lossius HM: A consensus-based template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009, 17:58.)
At hospital discharge (estimated average 7 days)

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Cattedra di studio: Hans Morten Lossius, MD, PhD, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

1 maggio 2015

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

1 novembre 2016

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

1 marzo 2017

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

7 maggio 2015

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

18 maggio 2015

Primo Inserito (Stima)

21 maggio 2015

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

22 agosto 2017

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

21 agosto 2017

Ultimo verificato

1 agosto 2017

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

Indeciso

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

prodotto fabbricato ed esportato dagli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi