Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Web-based Validation Pelvic Floor Questionnaires

28 de marzo de 2019 actualizado por: Columbia University

Validation of Electronic (Web-based and Smartphone) Administration of Measures of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

Patient-reported outcomes are commonly used in healthcare. Examples include validated symptom-based questionnaires and health diaries. In the field of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery there are many questionnaires and diaries that have been validated for a paper-based administration. As technology is incorporated into delivery of medical care and research, investigators need to consider how to collect data electronically while ensuring that this new format is equivalent to the paper questionnaires they rely on. In this study, the investigators aim to validate a series of validated questionnaires and symptom diaries administered via the web and smartphone for a more streamlined care for the patients.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Descripción detallada

Health questionnaires and health diaries are two forms of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) commonly used in healthcare. Health questionnaires are often used as intake logs, discerning and recording the symptoms and severity of a problem at the time of presentation. Health diaries, in contrast, are ongoing logs which allow for mindful attention to symptoms and monitoring of response to therapy. Unfortunately, both types of PRO forms are often under-utilized or uninterpretable because they are collected on paper. Within urogynecology, PRO scales such as the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), Bristol Stool Chart, Bladder Diaries and others are used ubiquitously. Their impact, however, is diminished by poor compliance and recall bias. The move towards electronic PRO measures would be endorsed by patients (who can track and interact with their data), physicians (who can track progress and study group outcomes) and by regulators (who want to ensure accurate and reproducible data collection). Electronic PRO tools, particularly on the patient's own device, would allow for increased rate of reporting through mobile availability, time stamping of data to prevent recall bias and reduction in data entry mistakes and costs.

Study Procedures After informed consent is obtained, demographic data will be collected. Subjects will be administered the questionnaires either in paper or web-based or smartphone form based on a random number block scheme. At least two weeks later but prior to treatment they will complete the other form of the questionnaire. This can occur at their next office visit or can be completed at home. Subjects will be emailed and/or called by research staff to remind them to complete the second set of questionnaires.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Actual)

90

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canadá, T2N 1N4
        • University Of Calgary
    • Arkansas
      • Fayetteville, Arkansas, Estados Unidos, 72701
        • University of Arkansas
    • New York
      • New York, New York, Estados Unidos, 10032
        • Columbia University Irving Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, Estados Unidos, 77030
        • Houston Methodist Hospital
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, Estados Unidos, 53726
        • University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Femenino

Método de muestreo

Muestra de probabilidad

Población de estudio

This is a prospective validation study. Subjects will be recruited at their visit to the Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery offices and clinics at Columbia and Cornell. Demographic information will be collected at the initial visit/enrollment including age, race, parity, and presenting complaint.

Questionnaires will be administered based on a randomization scheme. These include:

  • Pelvic Floor Disorders Inventory short form (PFDI-20)
  • Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7)
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12)
  • Bristol Stool Scale (BSS)

Questionnaires will be administered via paper-based form, web-based, or smartphone app based on randomization scheme.

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women at least 18 years of age presenting with pelvic floor dysfunction

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to repeat questionnaires or return to the office in 2 weeks
  • No access to computer/web or smartphone
  • Pregnancy (as gestational age will advance during 2 week time interval and symptoms may change)

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Modelos observacionales: Caso cruzado
  • Perspectivas temporales: Futuro

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
Arm 1 paper form first
paper questionnaires first then web/smart phone questionnaires after a 2-week washout period
questionnaires in paper form
questionnaires in web/smartphone
Arm 2 web/smartphone form first
web/smart phone questionnaires first then paper questionnaires after a 2-week washout period
questionnaires in paper form
questionnaires in web/smartphone

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Test-retest reliability of PFDI-20 in the electronic format
Periodo de tiempo: minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Subjects will complete the paper and either web-based or smartphone versions of the PFDI-20 with at least a 2 week interval between administration of the 2 versions.
minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Test-retest reliability of PFIQ-7 in the electronic format
Periodo de tiempo: minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Subjects will complete the paper and either web-based or smartphone versions of the PFIQ-7 with at least a 2 week interval between administration of the 2 versions.
minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Test-retest reliability of PISQ-12 in the electronic format
Periodo de tiempo: minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Subjects will complete the paper and either web-based or smartphone versions of the PISQ-12 with at least a 2 week interval between administration of the 2 versions.
minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Test-retest reliability of BSS in the electronic format
Periodo de tiempo: minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Subjects will complete the paper and either web-based or smartphone versions of the BSS with at least a 2 week interval between administration of the 2 versions.
minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Cara Grimes, MD, Columbia University

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de febrero de 2015

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de octubre de 2018

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de octubre de 2018

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

4 de febrero de 2016

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

25 de marzo de 2016

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

31 de marzo de 2016

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

1 de abril de 2019

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

28 de marzo de 2019

Última verificación

1 de marzo de 2019

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • AAAO8451

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

No

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir