Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Web-based Validation Pelvic Floor Questionnaires

28. marts 2019 opdateret af: Columbia University

Validation of Electronic (Web-based and Smartphone) Administration of Measures of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

Patient-reported outcomes are commonly used in healthcare. Examples include validated symptom-based questionnaires and health diaries. In the field of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery there are many questionnaires and diaries that have been validated for a paper-based administration. As technology is incorporated into delivery of medical care and research, investigators need to consider how to collect data electronically while ensuring that this new format is equivalent to the paper questionnaires they rely on. In this study, the investigators aim to validate a series of validated questionnaires and symptom diaries administered via the web and smartphone for a more streamlined care for the patients.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Health questionnaires and health diaries are two forms of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) commonly used in healthcare. Health questionnaires are often used as intake logs, discerning and recording the symptoms and severity of a problem at the time of presentation. Health diaries, in contrast, are ongoing logs which allow for mindful attention to symptoms and monitoring of response to therapy. Unfortunately, both types of PRO forms are often under-utilized or uninterpretable because they are collected on paper. Within urogynecology, PRO scales such as the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), Bristol Stool Chart, Bladder Diaries and others are used ubiquitously. Their impact, however, is diminished by poor compliance and recall bias. The move towards electronic PRO measures would be endorsed by patients (who can track and interact with their data), physicians (who can track progress and study group outcomes) and by regulators (who want to ensure accurate and reproducible data collection). Electronic PRO tools, particularly on the patient's own device, would allow for increased rate of reporting through mobile availability, time stamping of data to prevent recall bias and reduction in data entry mistakes and costs.

Study Procedures After informed consent is obtained, demographic data will be collected. Subjects will be administered the questionnaires either in paper or web-based or smartphone form based on a random number block scheme. At least two weeks later but prior to treatment they will complete the other form of the questionnaire. This can occur at their next office visit or can be completed at home. Subjects will be emailed and/or called by research staff to remind them to complete the second set of questionnaires.

Undersøgelsestype

Observationel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

90

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 1N4
        • University of Calgary
    • Arkansas
      • Fayetteville, Arkansas, Forenede Stater, 72701
        • University of Arkansas
    • New York
      • New York, New York, Forenede Stater, 10032
        • Columbia University Irving Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, Forenede Stater, 77030
        • Houston Methodist Hospital
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, Forenede Stater, 53726
        • University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Kvinde

Prøveudtagningsmetode

Sandsynlighedsprøve

Studiebefolkning

This is a prospective validation study. Subjects will be recruited at their visit to the Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery offices and clinics at Columbia and Cornell. Demographic information will be collected at the initial visit/enrollment including age, race, parity, and presenting complaint.

Questionnaires will be administered based on a randomization scheme. These include:

  • Pelvic Floor Disorders Inventory short form (PFDI-20)
  • Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7)
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12)
  • Bristol Stool Scale (BSS)

Questionnaires will be administered via paper-based form, web-based, or smartphone app based on randomization scheme.

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women at least 18 years of age presenting with pelvic floor dysfunction

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to repeat questionnaires or return to the office in 2 weeks
  • No access to computer/web or smartphone
  • Pregnancy (as gestational age will advance during 2 week time interval and symptoms may change)

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Observationsmodeller: Case-Crossover
  • Tidsperspektiver: Fremadrettet

Kohorter og interventioner

Gruppe / kohorte
Intervention / Behandling
Arm 1 paper form first
paper questionnaires first then web/smart phone questionnaires after a 2-week washout period
questionnaires in paper form
questionnaires in web/smartphone
Arm 2 web/smartphone form first
web/smart phone questionnaires first then paper questionnaires after a 2-week washout period
questionnaires in paper form
questionnaires in web/smartphone

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Test-retest reliability of PFDI-20 in the electronic format
Tidsramme: minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Subjects will complete the paper and either web-based or smartphone versions of the PFDI-20 with at least a 2 week interval between administration of the 2 versions.
minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Test-retest reliability of PFIQ-7 in the electronic format
Tidsramme: minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Subjects will complete the paper and either web-based or smartphone versions of the PFIQ-7 with at least a 2 week interval between administration of the 2 versions.
minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Test-retest reliability of PISQ-12 in the electronic format
Tidsramme: minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Subjects will complete the paper and either web-based or smartphone versions of the PISQ-12 with at least a 2 week interval between administration of the 2 versions.
minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Test-retest reliability of BSS in the electronic format
Tidsramme: minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Subjects will complete the paper and either web-based or smartphone versions of the BSS with at least a 2 week interval between administration of the 2 versions.
minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Cara Grimes, MD, Columbia University

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. februar 2015

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. oktober 2018

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. oktober 2018

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

4. februar 2016

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

25. marts 2016

Først opslået (Skøn)

31. marts 2016

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

1. april 2019

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

28. marts 2019

Sidst verificeret

1. marts 2019

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • AAAO8451

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

Ingen

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

produkt fremstillet i og eksporteret fra U.S.A.

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Bækkenbundsdysfunktion

Kliniske forsøg med paper form

3
Abonner