Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Web-based Validation Pelvic Floor Questionnaires

28. mars 2019 oppdatert av: Columbia University

Validation of Electronic (Web-based and Smartphone) Administration of Measures of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

Patient-reported outcomes are commonly used in healthcare. Examples include validated symptom-based questionnaires and health diaries. In the field of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery there are many questionnaires and diaries that have been validated for a paper-based administration. As technology is incorporated into delivery of medical care and research, investigators need to consider how to collect data electronically while ensuring that this new format is equivalent to the paper questionnaires they rely on. In this study, the investigators aim to validate a series of validated questionnaires and symptom diaries administered via the web and smartphone for a more streamlined care for the patients.

Studieoversikt

Status

Fullført

Detaljert beskrivelse

Health questionnaires and health diaries are two forms of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) commonly used in healthcare. Health questionnaires are often used as intake logs, discerning and recording the symptoms and severity of a problem at the time of presentation. Health diaries, in contrast, are ongoing logs which allow for mindful attention to symptoms and monitoring of response to therapy. Unfortunately, both types of PRO forms are often under-utilized or uninterpretable because they are collected on paper. Within urogynecology, PRO scales such as the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), Bristol Stool Chart, Bladder Diaries and others are used ubiquitously. Their impact, however, is diminished by poor compliance and recall bias. The move towards electronic PRO measures would be endorsed by patients (who can track and interact with their data), physicians (who can track progress and study group outcomes) and by regulators (who want to ensure accurate and reproducible data collection). Electronic PRO tools, particularly on the patient's own device, would allow for increased rate of reporting through mobile availability, time stamping of data to prevent recall bias and reduction in data entry mistakes and costs.

Study Procedures After informed consent is obtained, demographic data will be collected. Subjects will be administered the questionnaires either in paper or web-based or smartphone form based on a random number block scheme. At least two weeks later but prior to treatment they will complete the other form of the questionnaire. This can occur at their next office visit or can be completed at home. Subjects will be emailed and/or called by research staff to remind them to complete the second set of questionnaires.

Studietype

Observasjonsmessig

Registrering (Faktiske)

90

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 1N4
        • University of Calgary
    • Arkansas
      • Fayetteville, Arkansas, Forente stater, 72701
        • University of Arkansas
    • New York
      • New York, New York, Forente stater, 10032
        • Columbia University Irving Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, Forente stater, 77030
        • Houston Methodist Hospital
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, Forente stater, 53726
        • University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

18 år og eldre (Voksen, Eldre voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Hunn

Prøvetakingsmetode

Sannsynlighetsprøve

Studiepopulasjon

This is a prospective validation study. Subjects will be recruited at their visit to the Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery offices and clinics at Columbia and Cornell. Demographic information will be collected at the initial visit/enrollment including age, race, parity, and presenting complaint.

Questionnaires will be administered based on a randomization scheme. These include:

  • Pelvic Floor Disorders Inventory short form (PFDI-20)
  • Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7)
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12)
  • Bristol Stool Scale (BSS)

Questionnaires will be administered via paper-based form, web-based, or smartphone app based on randomization scheme.

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women at least 18 years of age presenting with pelvic floor dysfunction

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to repeat questionnaires or return to the office in 2 weeks
  • No access to computer/web or smartphone
  • Pregnancy (as gestational age will advance during 2 week time interval and symptoms may change)

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Observasjonsmodeller: Case-Crossover
  • Tidsperspektiver: Potensielle

Kohorter og intervensjoner

Gruppe / Kohort
Intervensjon / Behandling
Arm 1 paper form first
paper questionnaires first then web/smart phone questionnaires after a 2-week washout period
questionnaires in paper form
questionnaires in web/smartphone
Arm 2 web/smartphone form first
web/smart phone questionnaires first then paper questionnaires after a 2-week washout period
questionnaires in paper form
questionnaires in web/smartphone

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Test-retest reliability of PFDI-20 in the electronic format
Tidsramme: minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Subjects will complete the paper and either web-based or smartphone versions of the PFDI-20 with at least a 2 week interval between administration of the 2 versions.
minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Test-retest reliability of PFIQ-7 in the electronic format
Tidsramme: minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Subjects will complete the paper and either web-based or smartphone versions of the PFIQ-7 with at least a 2 week interval between administration of the 2 versions.
minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Test-retest reliability of PISQ-12 in the electronic format
Tidsramme: minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Subjects will complete the paper and either web-based or smartphone versions of the PISQ-12 with at least a 2 week interval between administration of the 2 versions.
minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Test-retest reliability of BSS in the electronic format
Tidsramme: minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year
Subjects will complete the paper and either web-based or smartphone versions of the BSS with at least a 2 week interval between administration of the 2 versions.
minimum 2 week interval until subject receives treatment for the condition or up to one year

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Cara Grimes, MD, Columbia University

Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker

Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart

1. februar 2015

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

1. oktober 2018

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

1. oktober 2018

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

4. februar 2016

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

25. mars 2016

Først lagt ut (Anslag)

31. mars 2016

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

1. april 2019

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

28. mars 2019

Sist bekreftet

1. mars 2019

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • AAAO8451

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

Nei

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

produkt produsert i og eksportert fra USA

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Kliniske studier på Dysfunksjon i bekkenbunnen

Kliniske studier på paper form

3
Abonnere