Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Ultrasound Guided Central Venous Vascular Access - Novel Needle Navigation Technology Compared With Conventional Method

10 de julio de 2017 actualizado por: Dr Mohd Shahnaz, MBBS, M Anes, University of Malaya

Ultrasound Guided Central Venous Vascular Access - Novel Needle Navigation Technology Compared With Conventional Method: A Prospective Randomized Study

Background: Central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is a very common procedure in the intensive care setting. A recent international guidelines advocated the use of ultrasound for routine internal jugular CVC insertion. The needle navigation technology is a new innovation, also known as guided positioning system (GPS) which allows clinician to visualize the needle position and trajectory in real time as it approaches the target. We hypothesised that the use of GPS would increase success rate and decrease performance time in vascular access procedures.

Objectives: To compare the success, efficacy and safety of the procedure using the ultrasound guidance (UG) with conventional versus GPS method.

Methods: This was a prospective randomized controlled study in a single centre - intensive care unit. 100 patients were randomized into two groups (50 each each). Subjects would receive CVC insertion via internal jugular vein using ultrasound guidance out of plane approach by conventional versus GPS method. Outcomes measured were the procedure efficacy, safety, level of operators' experience and their satisfaction.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Descripción detallada

Introduction Central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is a very common procedure in the intensive care setting. A recent international guideline advocates the use of ultrasound for routine internal jugular central venous catheter insertion1. The needle navigation technology is a new innovation, also known as guided positioning system (GPS) which allows clinician to visualize the needle position and trajectory in real time as it approaches the target. We hypothesised that the use of GPS would increase success rate and decrease performance time in vascular access procedures. The objectives of this study are to compare the success, efficacy and safety of central venous catheter insertion via internal jugular vein using the ultrasound guidance with conventional method versus needle navigation technology.

Methods:

This was a prospective randomized controlled study. It was conducted in a single centre - intensive care unit (ICU), University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia from February 2016 to October 2016. The ethic committee approval was obtained from the Malaysian medical research and ethics committee, MREC at the www.nih.gov.my (NMRR-16-334-29476).

The inclusion criterion was patients in the ICU who required central venous vascular access. The exclusion criteria were refusal to participate in this study by patient or their legal representative and patient with known history of difficult central venous access at internal jugular vein (IJV). The procedure operators were doctors in anaesthesia residency program with various level of experiences classified into 3 groups: 1 to < 2 years, 2 to < 3years, 3 years and above. Simply speaking all the operators have had previous training in ultrasound guided vascular access procedure. This would ensure that patient's safety is not compromised.

Study would be proceeded after obtaining consent from patient or the next of kin. The emergency verbal consent would be taken if the next of kin was not immediately available with subsequent written consent to follow. The available operator would perform CVC insertion via IJV using ultrasound guidance out of plane approach either with conventional method or needle guidance technology.

Study Protocol:

After obtaining consent, a computer generated randomisation would be assigned to either using the conventional or GPS method. Identified operators using GPS method would receive a standard 5 minute briefing on the needle guidance technology and got to practice with the new technology using the vascular phantom (Blue Phantom Inc., Bothell, WA, USA). The operators were allowed to practice until they were ready to perform on real patient.

All procedure would be performed using the ultrasound machine, eZono 4000 with eZGuide (eZono, Jena, Germany) and linear array transducer L3-12NGS (3-12 MHz). This ultrasound machine2 has a built-in adaptive needle recognition software called eZGuide. The navigation technology of the ultrasound device is based on an electromagnetic field that communicates with a transducer and an electromagnetic sensor sheathed by a vascular access needle. Needle movements and related magnetic field variation allow navigation system to compute the locations of the transducer and needle in the three dimensional space. The ultrasound screen would display colour coded alignment of the needle and the position of the tip relative to the imaging plane (Figure 1). Superimposed on the image is the real-time electronic needle guidance system. The dashed line represents the predicted needle trajectory. The red box represents the depth that the needle will cross the plane of the ultrasound. The solid lines on either side of the dashed line represent the actual depth of the needle. The top left corner shows a diagram of the transducer-needle relation. This allowed the user to identify the correct needle trajectory, prior to puncturing the patient's skin and maintain the chosen route to the target anatomy. Operators assigned to use GPS method would have activated the eZGuide software while those performing conventionally would have the software technology turned off when using the ultrasound machine.

The procedure time was measured in seconds using a stopwatch. The performance time was defined as time measured from placing the needle on the skin to successful vessel puncture as indicated by blood withdrawn into the syringe.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

100

Fase

  • No aplica

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in the ICU who required central venous vascular access.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate in this study by patient or their legal representative and patient with known history of difficult central venous access at internal jugular vein (IJV).

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: Conventional method
For the Conventional method of ultrasound guided central venous catheter insertion,we use the ultrasound machine, eZono 4000 and linear array transducer L3-12NGS (3-12 MHz)
Experimental: GPS method
For the GPS method, we use the ultrasound machine, eZono 4000 with built-in adaptive needle recognition software called eZGuide (eZono, Jena, Germany) and linear array transducer L3-12NGS (3-12 MHz).

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
The procedure efficacy justified by successful cannulation.
Periodo de tiempo: 0-120 seconds
The procedure efficacy justified by successful cannulation based on the performance time and number of attempts,
0-120 seconds

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Safety of procedure and complications.
Periodo de tiempo: During and within 24 hours after procedure.
The safety of the procedure by identifying any potential complications occur, i.e. secondary tissue injury, hematoma, bleeding, pneumothorax, haemothorax or arterial puncture.
During and within 24 hours after procedure.
Operators' satisfaction.
Periodo de tiempo: within 1 week
Level of operators' satisfaction.
within 1 week

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: MOHD SHAHNAZ HASAN, MBBS, University of Malaya

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de febrero de 2016

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de octubre de 2016

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

31 de octubre de 2016

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

4 de julio de 2017

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

10 de julio de 2017

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

11 de julio de 2017

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

11 de julio de 2017

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

10 de julio de 2017

Última verificación

1 de julio de 2017

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • NMRR-16-334-29476

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

INDECISO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Conventional method

Suscribir