- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT03984435
Patients' and Radiographers' Experiences and Views of Comfort Management in Radiotherapy (COMFORT)
A Qualitative Study Exploring Patient Experiences of Comfort During Radiotherapy and Radiographer Views of Managing Patient Comfort During the Delivery of Radiotherapy
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Descripción detallada
Patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment for cancer frequently express their feelings of discomfort during the procedure, especially those who require radiotherapy with extended treatment times. This problem was explored by informal questioning of patients who revealed that this is a problem and causes distress and discomfort but that it was being accepted as being part of the treatment. In healthcare, several interventions have been used to improve the comfort of patients. In radiotherapy, there have been examples where positioning or relaxation has improved the patient's comfort. Literature searches have revealed some comfort interventions that can be used during radiotherapy treatment which may be possible interventions.
With the consent of the patient, it is intended to establish the patients' experience and views of comfort and comfort management during radiotherapy. Radiographers' experiences and views of managing patient comfort during radiotherapy will also be explored. It will also be essential to explore what would be the most ideal solution to comfort management, or how comfort could be improved, from the perspective of both patients and radiographers.
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Anticipado)
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Somerset
-
Taunton, Somerset, Reino Unido, TA15DA
- Reclutamiento
- Musgrove Park Hospital
-
Contacto:
- Simon D Goldsworthy, MSc
- Número de teléfono: 01823 344250
- Correo electrónico: Simon.goldsworthy@tst.nhs.uk
-
Contacto:
- Susan J Mahoney
- Número de teléfono: 01823 343369
- Correo electrónico: Susan.mahoney@tst.nhs.uk
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Método de muestreo
Población de estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients:
- diagnosed with a malignancy;
- aged over 18 years owing to different treatment options for children and young adults;
- recently referred for radiotherapy, currently receiving treatment or had had radiotherapy within the previous 3 months;
- treatment delivery time exceeding 10 minutes (the time the patient is immobilised on the radiotherapy couch).
Therapeutic radiographers:
- practicing Therapeutic radiographers;
- administering radiotherapy with treatment delivery times exceeding 10 minutes per radiotherapy treatment session (the time the patient is immobilised on the radiotherapy couch).
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients:
- patients with treatment delivery time below 10 minutes;
- unable to communicate in English.
Therapeutic Radiographers:
- student Therapeutic radiographers,
- no more than two radiographers from the same radiotherapy department.
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
Cohortes e Intervenciones
Grupo / Cohorte |
|---|
|
Patients
Patients with a diagnosed malignancy who have been referred for radiotherapy with extended treatment time (>10 minutes)
|
|
Radiographers
Radiographers from radiotherapy departments in the UK who deliver radiotherapy
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Experiences of comfort during radiotherapy - qualitative (non-standard outcome measure)
Periodo de tiempo: Duration of radiotherapy and up to three months after
|
This is qualitative research and the outcomes are derived from transcribed interviews analysed thematically generating codes, themes and sub-themes of patient and radiographers lived experiences of comfort during radiotherapy.
|
Duration of radiotherapy and up to three months after
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Simon D Goldsworthy, MSc, Principal Research Radiographer
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Publicaciones Generales
- Kolcaba K, Tilton C, Drouin C. Comfort Theory: a unifying framework to enhance the practice environment. J Nurs Adm. 2006 Nov;36(11):538-44. doi: 10.1097/00005110-200611000-00010.
- Schnur JB, Ouellette SC, Bovbjerg DH, Montgomery GH. Breast cancer patients' experience of external-beam radiotherapy. Qual Health Res. 2009 May;19(5):668-76. doi: 10.1177/1049732309334097.
- Arcangeli S, Scorsetti M, Alongi F. Will SBRT replace conventional radiotherapy in patients with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer? A review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012 Oct;84(1):101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.11.009. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
- Gestaut MM, Thawani N, Kim S, Gutti VR, Jhavar S, Deb N, Morrow A, Ward RA, Huang JH, Patel M. Single fraction spine stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy. J Neurooncol. 2017 May;133(1):165-172. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2428-6. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
- Chang JH, Gandhidasan S, Finnigan R, Whalley D, Nair R, Herschtal A, Eade T, Kneebone A, Ruben J, Foote M, Siva S. Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Spinal Oligometastases. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017 Jul;29(7):e119-e125. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
- Dawson LA, Balter JM. Interventions to reduce organ motion effects in radiation delivery. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004 Jan;14(1):76-80. doi: 10.1053/j.semradonc.2003.10.010.
- Cheng. F, Wang.W. Factors influencing comfort level in head and neck neoplasm patients receiving radiotherapy. Int J Nur Scie. 2014; 1 (4): 394-399
- Cox.J. Davison.A. Comfort as a determiner of treatment position in radiotherapy of the male pelvis. Radiog. 2005; 11 (2): 109-115
- Goldsworthy.SD, Tuke.K, Latour.J.M. A focus group consultation round exploring patient experiences of comfort during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer; Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice; 2016; 15 (2)143-149
- Pineau,C. The psychological meaning of comfort. International Review of Applied Psychology. 1982. Vol 31, 271-283
- Kolcaba K, Steiner R. Empirical evidence for the nature of holistic comfort. J Holist Nurs. 2000 Mar;18(1):46-62. doi: 10.1177/089801010001800106.
- Braun V. Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology; 2006 July 3: 77-101
- Carter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, Blythe J, Neville AJ. The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Sep;41(5):545-7. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547.
Enlaces Útiles
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Anticipado)
Finalización del estudio (Anticipado)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- HAS.19.02.126
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Descripción del plan IPD
Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD
Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD
Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
- RSC
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .