The Flipped Classroom Approach in Ophthalmology Residency
5 de mayo de 2020 actualizado por: Michelle T. Cabrera, University of Washington
The Flipped Classroom Approach to Teaching Horizontal Strabismus in Ophthalmology Residency: A Multi-Centered Randomized Controlled Study
This study aims to evaluate the flipped classroom approach compared to the traditional classroom approach in teaching horizontal strabismus in ophthalmology residency didactics.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Terminado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Ophthalmology residents (post-graduate years 2-4) from 11 institutions were invited to participate.
Participating residents were taught esotropia and exotropia topics sequentially, randomized by order and classroom style (flipped classroom vs. traditional lecture) one to three weeks apart.
Participants were assigned a pre-class video lecture prior to the flipped classroom in-class case-based activity.
The traditional classroom included a preparatory reading assignment and an in-person lecture delivered by the same instructor.
Participants completed three identical 5-question content assessments (pre-test, post-test, and 3-month retention) and opinion surveys following each classroom.
Tipo de estudio
De observación
Inscripción (Actual)
110
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, Estados Unidos, 98195
- Department of Ophthalmology - University of Washington
-
-
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Niño
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Sí
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Todos
Método de muestreo
Muestra no probabilística
Población de estudio
Ophthalmology residents from all levels (PGY2-PGY4) in the United States.
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ophthalmology residents of all levels (PGY2-PGY4) from 11 residency programs were invited to participate in this study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Those who did not complete both classroom styles were excluded from the survey data
- Those who lost their study-IDs were excluded from the results analysis
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
Cohortes e Intervenciones
Grupo / Cohorte |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Flipped Classroom
Residents in the flipped classroom were assigned a pre-class video lecture prior to completing the flipped classroom in-class case-based activity in groups of 2-3 each.
|
In the Flipped Classroom, participants form groups of 2-3 and are instructed to work together through clinical cases of the in-class case based activity, committing to group answers to the clinical questions before advancing to the next case.
At the end of class, the faculty instructor facilitated a short interactive group discussion.
|
|
Traditional Classroom
Residents in the traditional classroom were assigned a pre-class reading assignment followed by a 44-minute lecture that was delivered in-person using PowerPoint.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Resident Preference
Periodo de tiempo: Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
|
Participants were asked to complete both a written (Likert-scale) survey in the classroom and an additional online survey (Catalyst WebQ, University of Washington, Seattle, WA) following the classroom session.
These surveys asked residents to rate their preference for traditional vs. flipped classroom format, the effectiveness of preparation and classroom material, and the advantages and disadvantages of the flipped classroom format
|
Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge Acquisition
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (Before class), immediately after completing the class, 3 months after class
|
Participants were assessed a total of three times for each course (esotropia and exotropia): once prior to starting the class (pre-test), once immediately after completing the class (post-test), and once three months later.
All assessments consisted of 5 OKAP style questions created by fellowship trained ophthalmologists.
These test questions were previously piloted.
Residents were allotted 5 minutes to complete each test.
|
Baseline (Before class), immediately after completing the class, 3 months after class
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Michelle T Cabrera, MD, University of Washington
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.
Publicaciones Generales
- Wolff M, Wagner MJ, Poznanski S, Schiller J, Santen S. Not another boring lecture: engaging learners with active learning techniques. J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;48(1):85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
- Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: an overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218.
- Cabrera MT, Yanovitch TL, Gandhi NG, Ding L, Enyedi LB. The flipped-classroom approach to teaching horizontal strabismus in ophthalmology residency: a pilot study. J AAPOS. 2019 Aug;23(4):200.e1-200.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
- Casasola T SK, Nguyen T, Warschauer M. Can flipping the classroom work? Evidence from undergraduate chemistry. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 2017;29(3):421-435.
- Baepler PM WJ, Driessen M. It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education. 2014;78:227-236.
- O'Flaherty J PC. The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education. 2015;25:85-95.
- Nouri, J. The flipped classroom: for active, effective and increased learning - especially for low achievers. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 13, 33 (2016).
- Soriano RP, Blatt B, Coplit L, CichoskiKelly E, Kosowicz L, Newman L, Pasquale SJ, Pretorius R, Rosen JM, Saks NS, Greenberg L. Teaching medical students how to teach: a national survey of students-as-teachers programs in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 2010 Nov;85(11):1725-31. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f53273.
- Yu TC, Wilson NC, Singh PP, Lemanu DP, Hawken SJ, Hill AG. Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011 Jun 23;2:157-72. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S14383. Print 2011.
- Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt H, Wenderoth MP. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 10;111(23):8410-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111. Epub 2014 May 12.
- Young TP, Bailey CJ, Guptill M, Thorp AW, Thomas TL. The flipped classroom: a modality for mixed asynchronous and synchronous learning in a residency program. West J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;15(7):938-44. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.10.23515. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
- Riddell J, Jhun P, Fung CC, Comes J, Sawtelle S, Tabatabai R, Joseph D, Shoenberger J, Chen E, Fee C, Swadron SP. Does the Flipped Classroom Improve Learning in Graduate Medical Education? J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Aug;9(4):491-496. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00817.1.
- Martinelli SM, Chen F, DiLorenzo AN, Mayer DC, Fairbanks S, Moran K, Ku C, Mitchell JD, Bowe EA, Royal KD, Hendrickse A, VanDyke K, Trawicki MC, Rankin D, Guldan GJ, Hand W, Gallagher C, Jacob Z, Zvara DA, McEvoy MD, Schell RM. Results of a Flipped Classroom Teaching Approach in Anesthesiology Residents. J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Aug;9(4):485-490. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00128.1.
- Marchalot A, Dureuil B, Veber B, Fellahi JL, Hanouz JL, Dupont H, Lorne E, Gerard JL, Compere V. Effectiveness of a blended learning course and flipped classroom in first year anaesthesia training. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018 Oct;37(5):411-415. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
- Allenbaugh J, Spagnoletti C, Berlacher K. Effects of a Flipped Classroom Curriculum on Inpatient Cardiology Resident Education. J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Apr;11(2):196-201. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00543.1.
- Bachorik A, Nemer MK, Chen GL, Alexander CB, Pelletier SR, Pace LE, Shields HM. Case-Based Curriculum With Integrated Smartphone Applications Improves Internal Medicine Resident Knowledge Of Contraceptive Care. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Nov 19;10:971-977. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S221256. eCollection 2019.
- Moulton ST, Turkay S, Kosslyn SM. Does a presentation's medium affect its message? PowerPoint, Prezi, and oral presentations. PLoS One. 2017 Jul 5;12(7):e0178774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178774. eCollection 2017. Erratum In: PLoS One. 2017 Oct 12;12 (10 ):e0186673.
- Låg, T., & Sæle, R. G. (2019). Does the Flipped Classroom Improve Student Learning and Satisfaction? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AERA Open.
- Hew KF, Lo CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2018 Mar 15;18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
1 de octubre de 2017
Finalización primaria (Actual)
1 de julio de 2018
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
1 de agosto de 2018
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
28 de abril de 2020
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
5 de mayo de 2020
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
11 de mayo de 2020
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
11 de mayo de 2020
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
5 de mayo de 2020
Última verificación
1 de mayo de 2020
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- STUDY00001185
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
NO
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .