Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Comparison of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring With Transcartilaginous Needle Electrodes Versus Endotracheal Tube Electrodes in Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

5 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: Evangelia Bellou, Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki

Injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is among the most important complications in thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) of the RLN using electrodes placed on the endotracheal tube is now a standard procedure to facilitate nerve detection and visual identification, to maintain its anatomical and functional integrity and to reduce the rate of nerve injuries. The most common neuromonitoring technique involves the use of electrodes located on the surface of the endotracheal tube, which are in contact with the vocal cords and record the electromyographic signals caused by the electrical stimulation of the RLN by a probe manipulated by the surgeon.

However, this technique has certain disadvantages:

(i) Correct placement of the endotracheal tube is technically demanding and requires an experienced anesthesiologist.

(ii) Improper placement of the tube by the anesthesiologist, its displacement during patient hyperextended neck positioning, intraoperative rotation, or saliva interference between the tube electrodes and the vocal cords may all lead to inability to receive adequate signals and limit the sensitivity of the method.

(iii) Intraoperative readjustment of the tube position can be time-consuming and difficult.

The above neuromonitoring method is associated with a high negative predictive value (92-100%) according to the literature. However, its positive predictive value ranges between 10% and 90% which means that in the case of a decrease or loss of the initial neurostimulation signal, the true injury of the RLN is 10-90%.

Neuromonitoring with intraoperative placement of electrodes in the thyroid cartilage is an alternative method, in which the electrodes are placed by the surgeon in the perichondrium of the thyroid cartilage at the beginning of the operation. Their placement is simple, with almost no learning curve and does not require further preparation of the surrounding structures. Similarly to the endotracheal tube electrode, these also record the electromyografic signal from the electrical stimulation of the laryngeal muscles and RLN, however they are more sensitive in detecting the movement of the vocal cords and can potentially record a higher and more stable neurostimulation signal. In this way, the rate of false positive signal loss could be reduced compared to the technique of neuromonitoring with the electrodes on the endotracheal tube.

This PhD thesis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of neuromonitoring with transcartilaginous needle electrodes versus endotracheal tube electrodes in thyroid and parathyroid surgeries. It is a prospective multicenter study of diagnostic accuracy, with paired design, of the neuromonitoring signals (amplitude - latency), which will be obtained based on the standard algorithm V1, R1, EBSLN1, EBSLN2, R2, V2, before and after the end of the manipulations in each thyroid lobe, using both aforementioned techniques. Their positive and negative predictive value will be compared and evaluated with regard to the injury of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. To achieve the above, at least 300 patients who will undergo thyroid or parathyroid gland surgery will be evaluated and intraoperatively will undergo neuromonitoring with both methods. After the surgery, on the 1st postoperative day, all patients will undergo laryngoscopy to exclude or confirm injury of the RLN.

Descripción general del estudio

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

300

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Thessaloniki, Grecia
        • 2nd Surgical Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patients undergoing thyroidectomy or parathyroidectomy via cervical incision
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years
  • Remote access thyroidectomy or parathyroidectomy
  • Presence of thyroglossal duct cyst

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Diagnóstico
  • Asignación: N / A
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: Endocrine surgery patients
All the patients submited to thyroid and/or parathyroid surgey will undergo intraoperative neuromonitoring with transcartilaginous needle electrodes and endotracheal tube electrodes at the same time

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of neuromonitoring with transcartilaginous needle electrodes versus endotracheal tube electrodes in thyroid and parathyroid surgeries. It is a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy, with paired design, of the neuromonitoring signals (amplitude - latency), which will be obtained based on the standard algorithm V1, R1, EBSLN1, EBSLN2, R2, V2, before and after the end of the manipulations in each thyroid lobe, using both aforementioned techniques. Their positive and negative predictive value will be compared and evaluated with regard to the injury of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. After the surgery, on the 1st postoperative day, all patients will undergo laryngoscopy to exclude or confirm injury of the RLN.

It is the first study that evaluates simultaneously both intraoperative neuromonitoring methods in the same patient and at such large group of patients.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Periodo de tiempo
positive predictive value
Periodo de tiempo: during surgery
during surgery

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Silla de estudio: Stefanos Atmatzidis, Assistant Professor of Surgery, 2nd Surgical Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de febrero de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

31 de diciembre de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de junio de 2028

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

5 de junio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

5 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

10 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

10 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

5 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

Descripción del plan IPD

Any Individual Participant's Data could be shared upon request (not including personal data)

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

The start date is from enrollment date and end date until study completion

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
  • CIF
  • RSC

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir